Gençlerbirliği S.K. 2-2 Amed – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates Gençlerbirliği S.K. at 54%, yet other data sources diverge — this Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Eryaman Stadyumu plays host to Gençlerbirliği S.K. versus Amed in Süper Lig, Regular Season - 7. Kick-off: Saturday 10 October 2026 at 10:30 UTC.
Form
Gençlerbirliği S.K. (all games): 5W 1D 4L across 10 Süper Lig fixtures this term — 1.60 PPG. Last five: W D L L L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Gençlerbirliği S.K. have played only a handful of Süper Lig games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.
In front of their own supporters this season, Gençlerbirliği S.K. have posted 3W 3D 4L at Eryaman Stadyumu — 1.20 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
Amed's overall Süper Lig record this term: 4W 1D 1L from 6 games (2.17 PPG). Last five: L W D W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.50 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 6 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Amed have played only a handful of Süper Lig games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.
On a straight form reading, Amed are the stronger side — 0.57 PPG clear of the hosts (2.17 vs 1.60). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.
Trading
Gençlerbirliği S.K. half-time and goal-timing data (6 games): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games; they fail to score in 33% of games.
Amed half-time and goal-timing data (6 games): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 83% of games; Over 3.5 in 50%.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Gençlerbirliği S.K. 50% versus Amed 50%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Gençlerbirliği S.K. 67% | Amed 83%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Gençlerbirliği S.K. 1.87 xG and Amed 1.15 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Gençlerbirliği S.K. attack 0.910 / defence 1.107 | Amed attack 0.906 / defence 1.220. League average goals — home 1.688 / away 1.151. Amed bring a strong defensive rating of 1.220 — this is suppressing Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 40 Gençlerbirliği S.K. games / 6 Amed games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Gençlerbirliği S.K. 54% | Draw 23% | Amed 23%. Fair-value odds: Gençlerbirliği S.K. 1.85 | Draw 4.35 | Amed 4.35. Gençlerbirliği S.K. hold a narrow Poisson edge at 54% — the draw (23%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 58% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 3.03. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 58% — the 3.03 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Gençlerbirliği S.K. at 54% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Amed (2.17 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 23% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Gençlerbirliği S.K. if the outright odds are short.
On the goals line, Poisson's 3.03 combined xG gives a 58% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 58%. Form rates corroborate: Gençlerbirliği S.K. 60% | Amed 50% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed | Competition: Süper Lig, Regular Season - 7 | Venue: Eryaman Stadyumu • Kick-off: Saturday 10 Oct 2026, 10:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Gençlerbirliği S.K. 54% | Draw 23% | Amed 23% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 58% | BTTS 58% | xG Gençlerbirliği S.K. 1.87 / Amed 1.15 • Poisson strength factors: Gençlerbirliği S.K. attack 0.910 / def 1.107 | Amed attack 0.906 / def 1.220 | league avg home 1.688 / away 1.151 • Poisson stance: Gençlerbirliği S.K. (54%) — moderate lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.87
Gençlerbirliği S.K. xG
Expected Goals
1.15
Amed xG
58%
BTTS
80%
Over 1.5
58%
Over 2.5
36%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed kick off?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed kicked off at 10:30 on Saturday 10 October 2026 at Eryaman Stadyumu.
What was the final score in Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. 2 - 2 Amed.
Where is Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed being played?
The match is being played at Eryaman Stadyumu.
What competition is Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed part of?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed is a Regular Season - 7 fixture in the Süper Lig (Turkey).
Who is favourite to win Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed?
Our statistical model gives Gençlerbirliği S.K. a 54% chance of winning, Amed a 23% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making Gençlerbirliği S.K. the favourite.
Will both teams score in Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed?
Our model estimates a 58% probability that both Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed will score (BTTS).
Will Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 58%.
What is the head-to-head record between Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed in?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. (all comps): 5W-1D-4L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 1.60 | L5 W-D-L-L-L. Amed (all comps): 4W-1D-1L in 6 | 2.17 PPG | GF 2.50 / GA 1.17 | L5 L-W-D-W-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Where the Numbers Come From
Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s attacking strength (0.91x league average) is weighed against Amed's defensive record (1.22x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.87. Flip it around — Amed's attack (0.91x) against Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s defence (1.11x) — and the away total comes out at 1.15.
These ratings are built from 40/6 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Most Likely Scorelines
The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.8%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.8%), 2-0 (8.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Gençlerbirliği S.K. Win
54%
1.85
23%
4.44
23%
4.30
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
10.5%
Draw
Most likely
2 – 1
9.8%
Home win
1 – 0
9.1%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.87
Gençlerbirliği S.K. xG
Total xG
3.03
1.15
Amed xG
1.85
54%
Home win
4.44
23%
Draw
4.30
23%
Away win
Goals Markets
80%
Over 1.5
1.25
20%
Under 1.5
5.00
58%
Over 2.5
1.72
42%
Under 2.5
2.38
36%
Over 3.5
2.78
64%
Under 3.5
1.56
19%
Over 4.5
5.26
81%
Under 4.5
1.23
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
58%
BTTS Yes
1.73
42%
BTTS No
2.38
Clean Sheet
32%
3.17
15%
6.51
Win to Nil
17%
5.85
4%
27.99
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 8.5 | 9.8 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | – |
| 5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.8%.
How many goals are Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed expected to score?
The model projects 1.87 expected goals for Gençlerbirliği S.K. and 1.15 for Amed, a combined total of 3.03.
How confident is the prediction model for Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 54%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Recent Form Overview
Gençlerbirliği S.K. come into this having played 6 games, going 2W 1D 3L for 1.17 points per game. Their last five reads W-D-L-L-L. It's still early in the season for Gençlerbirliği S.K., so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.
On the other side, Amed sit at 2.17 PPG from 6 outings (4W 1D 1L), a run that reads L-W-D-W-W across their last five. It's still early in the season for Amed, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.
Amed carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.00 PPG clear of Gençlerbirliği S.K. — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.
Attack vs Defence
Gençlerbirliği S.K. are averaging 0.83 goals scored and 2.17 conceded per game recently; Amed are on 2.50 scored and 1.17 conceded.
Last 6 Results — Süper Lig
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Gençlerbirliği S.K.
Early Season
Amed
Early Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed in coming into this match?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. have gone 2W 1D 3L in their last 6 games (1.17 PPG), while Amed have gone 4W 1D 1L in their last 6 (2.17 PPG).
Have Gençlerbirliği S.K. or Amed been keeping clean sheets recently?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. have kept a clean sheet in 17% of their recent games, Amed in 33%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
The Rivalry So Far
These sides have met 1 times that we have on record, stretching back to October 2026 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Süper Lig. The two were last together as recently as 10 October 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.
Last 1 Meetings
0
Gençlerbirliği S.K.
1
Draws
0
Amed
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed?
From 1 meetings on record, Gençlerbirliği S.K. have won 0, Amed have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.
When did Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed last play each other?
They last met on 10 October 2026, when Gençlerbirliği S.K. 2-2 Amed.
📈 Trading Insight
Early Goal Trends
Gençlerbirliği S.K. are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches.
Amed are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.
Full-Time Markets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Gençlerbirliği S.K. 50%, Amed 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 67% for Gençlerbirliği S.K. and 83% for Amed. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 33% and 50% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Amed in 33%; Gençlerbirliği S.K. have failed to score in 33% of games.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Gençlerbirliği S.K. home games / Amed away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Gençlerbirliği S.K. play Amed?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s recent matches and 50% of Amed's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is Gençlerbirliği S.K. vs Amed usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 67% of Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s matches and 83% of Amed's.
Do Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed tend to score early?
Gençlerbirliği S.K. have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, Amed in 83% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
The points were shared at Eryaman Stadyumu, Regular Season - 7, as Gençlerbirliği S.K. and Amed drew 2-2 in the Süper Lig. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Gençlerbirliği S.K. 1.87 xG and Amed 1.15 xG, a combined 3.03. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Amed outscored their 1.15 projection by 0.8. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gençlerbirliği S.K. attack 0.91 / defence 1.11 against Amed attack 0.91 / defence 1.22, drawn from 40/6 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Gençlerbirliği S.K. 54% | Draw 23% | Amed 23%, with Gençlerbirliği S.K. to win its most likely call at 54%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 23% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 58%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 80% and landed. Over 3.5 was 36% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 75% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gençlerbirliği S.K. 67%, Amed 83%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Gençlerbirliği S.K.'s trading profile (6 games) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did.
Amed's trading profile (6 games) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
On form, Amed arrived the stronger side — 2.17 PPG against 1.17. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Gençlerbirliği S.K. scored 2 against a 0.83 average — above their attacking norm. Amed shipped 2 against a 1.17 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.