Como 5-0 Pisa – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Como at 72% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Como vs Pisa encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia plays host to Como versus Pisa in Serie A, Regular Season - 30. Kick-off: Sunday 22 March 2026 at 11:30 UTC.
Form
Como (all games): 6W 2D 2L across 10 Serie A fixtures this term — 2.00 PPG. Last five: D W W W W. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
Como's home record at Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia: 5W 3D 2L from 10 Serie A appearances (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia.
Pisa's overall Serie A record this term: 1W 3D 6L from 10 games (0.60 PPG). Last five: L L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
Pisa's form when playing away from home: 0W 6D 4L across 10 road games this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
The points-per-game gap of 1.40 in Como's favour (2.00 vs 0.60) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.
Head-to-Head
Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 7 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Como, 2 for Pisa and 3 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.
These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.1 per game across 7 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 6 Jan 2026, ended 3–0 with Como winning.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.1 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.
Trading
Como half-time and goal-timing data (67 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 79% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games).
Pisa half-time and goal-timing data (67 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 76% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); they fail to score in 36% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Como 54% versus Pisa 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Como 45% | Pisa 51%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Como 2.36 xG and Pisa 0.81 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Como attack 1.254 / defence 0.845 | Pisa attack 0.800 / defence 1.487. League average goals — home 1.266 / away 1.199. Como carry an above-average attack strength of 1.254 — their λ of 2.36 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Pisa bring a strong defensive rating of 1.487 — this is suppressing Como's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 67 Como games / 29 Pisa games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Como 72% | Draw 17% | Pisa 11%. Fair-value odds: Como 1.39 | Draw 5.88 | Pisa 9.09. The model has a clear lean to Como (72%) — a 61pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 50% | Total xG 3.17. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.17 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 50% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Como at 72% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support.
On the goals line, Poisson's 3.17 combined xG gives a 61% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.1 goals per meeting.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 50%. Form rates corroborate: Como 50% | Pisa 60% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Como vs Pisa | Competition: Serie A, Regular Season - 30 | Venue: Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia • Kick-off: Sunday 22 Mar 2026, 11:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Como 72% | Draw 17% | Pisa 11% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 61% | BTTS 50% | xG Como 2.36 / Pisa 0.81 • Poisson strength factors: Como attack 1.254 / def 0.845 | Pisa attack 0.800 / def 1.487 | league avg home 1.266 / away 1.199 • Poisson stance: Como (72%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
2.36
Como xG
Expected Goals
0.81
Pisa xG
50%
BTTS
82%
Over 1.5
61%
Over 2.5
39%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Como vs Pisa kick off?
Como vs Pisa kicked off at 11:30 on Sunday 22 March 2026 at Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia.
What was the final score in Como vs Pisa?
Como 5 - 0 Pisa.
Where is Como vs Pisa being played?
The match is being played at Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia.
What competition is Como vs Pisa part of?
Como vs Pisa is a Regular Season - 30 fixture in the Serie A (Italy).
Who is favourite to win Como vs Pisa?
Our statistical model gives Como a 72% chance of winning, Pisa a 11% chance, and a 17% chance of a draw — making Como the favourite.
Will both teams score in Como vs Pisa?
Our model estimates a 50% probability that both Como and Pisa will score (BTTS).
Will Como vs Pisa have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 61%.
What is the head-to-head record between Como and Pisa?
Record (7 meetings): Como 2W | Draws 3 | Pisa 2W.
What form are Como and Pisa in?
Como (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-W-W-W-W. Pisa (all comps): 1W-3D-6L in 10 | 0.60 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 2.10 | L5 L-L-L-L-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Where the Numbers Come From
Working from Como's attack rating (1.25) and Pisa's defence rating (1.49), the model arrives at 2.36 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Pisa's attack (0.80x) against Como's defence (0.84x) — and the away total comes out at 0.81.
These ratings are built from 67/29 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.7%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.5%), 3-0 (9.2%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Como Win
72%
1.39
17%
5.89
11%
9.02
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
2 – 0
11.7%
Home win
Most likely
1 – 0
9.9%
Home win
2 – 1
9.5%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
2.36
Como xG
Total xG
3.17
0.81
Pisa xG
1.39
72%
Home win
5.89
17%
Draw
9.02
11%
Away win
Goals Markets
83%
Over 1.5
1.20
17%
Under 1.5
5.88
61%
Over 2.5
1.64
39%
Under 2.5
2.56
39%
Over 3.5
2.56
61%
Under 3.5
1.64
21%
Over 4.5
4.76
79%
Under 4.5
1.27
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
50%
BTTS Yes
1.99
50%
BTTS No
2.01
Clean Sheet
44%
2.25
9%
10.60
Win to Nil
32%
3.13
1%
95.60
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 1 | 9.9 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | – |
| 2 | 11.7 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | – |
| 3 | 9.2 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | – |
| 4 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Como vs Pisa?
Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.7%.
How many goals are Como and Pisa expected to score?
The model projects 2.36 expected goals for Como and 0.81 for Pisa, a combined total of 3.17.
How confident is the prediction model for Como vs Pisa?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 72%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
Recent Form Overview
Across their last 67 outings, Como have picked up 1.54 PPG on a 28W 19D 20L record — D-W-W-W-W across the most recent five.
Pisa's form line: 24W 20D 23L from 67 games, 1.37 PPG, last five L-L-L-L-W.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.54 PPG for Como against 1.37 for Pisa. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
How They Fare by Venue
On home soil, Como have posted 1.73 PPG from 33 outings (16W 9D 8L).
On the road, Pisa have gone 9W 12D 12L from 33 away games — 1.18 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Como come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Attack vs Defence
Como are averaging 1.45 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game recently; Pisa are on 1.27 scored and 1.28 conceded.
Last 67 Results — Serie A
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Como
Current Season
Pisa
Current Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Como and Pisa in coming into this match?
Como have gone 28W 19D 20L in their last 67 games (1.54 PPG), while Pisa have gone 24W 20D 23L in their last 67 (1.37 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Como at home or Pisa away?
Como's home record (1.73 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Como at home: 1.73 PPG; Pisa away: 1.18 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
The Rivalry So Far
These sides have met 8 times that we have on record, stretching back to December 2021 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 4 years. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Serie B, Serie A all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 22 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.
Notable Numbers
Como go into this on the back of 3 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Como won 5-0 on 22 Mar 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Como have gone 2W 1D 1L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Pisa — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 8 Meetings
3
Como
3
Draws
2
Pisa
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Como and Pisa?
From 8 meetings on record, Como have won 3, Pisa have won 2, and 3 have been drawn.
When did Como and Pisa last play each other?
They last met on 22 March 2026, when Como 5-0 Pisa.
Who has won more matches between Como and Pisa?
Como have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 8 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
Early Goal Trends
Como are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 39% of the time.
Pisa are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 76% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.
Full-Time Markets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Como 61%, Pisa 54% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 42% (Como) and 52% (Pisa).
On the defensive side: Como keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches; Pisa in 36%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Como home games / Pisa away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Como play Pisa?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 61% of Como's games and 54% of Pisa's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Como vs Pisa usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 42% of Como's recent games and 52% of Pisa's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Como and Pisa tend to score early?
Como have had a goal before half-time in 70% of their recent matches, Pisa in 76% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Como run riot with a 5-0 hammering of Pisa.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Como beat Pisa 5-0 at Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Regular Season - 30, in the Serie A. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Como 2.36 xG and Pisa 0.81 xG, a combined 3.17. The scoreboard read 5-0 for 5 actual goals. Como beat their projection by 2.6 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Pisa landed 0.8 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Como attack 1.25 / defence 0.84 against Pisa attack 0.80 / defence 1.49, drawn from 67/29 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Como 72% | Draw 17% | Pisa 11%, with Como to win its most likely call at 72%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. Over 3.5 was 39% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 50% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Como 45%, Pisa 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Como's trading profile (67 games, 33 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not.
Pisa's trading profile (67 games, 33 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 36% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Como 1.54 PPG, Pisa 1.37 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Como win broke the near-deadlock. Como (home/away splits) scored 5 against a 1.58 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.06 average — tighter than their form line. Pisa (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.24 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 5 against a 1.52 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.