Sign in Register

Meizhou Kejia 3-1 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 15

Kick-off

Fri 7 Jul 2023

12:35

Venue

Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 52% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Meizhou Kejia host Chengdu Better City at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 15. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 7 July 2023 at 12:35 UTC.

Form Guide

Meizhou Kejia — All Games: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 0.80 points per game. Last five: L L L L D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Meizhou Kejia at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium this season: 3W 1D 6L from 10 home games — 1.00 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.80 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 5W 4D 1L from 10 outings — 1.90 PPG. Last five: W W D W L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.10. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chengdu Better City's away record: 5W 4D 1L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (1.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 6 away clean sheets from 10 games (60%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Chengdu Better City are 1.10 PPG ahead (1.90 vs 0.80), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 2 previous encounters have yielded 0 wins for Meizhou Kejia, 1 for Chengdu Better City and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The last 2 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.5 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 11 Jul 2022, ended 1–2 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.5 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Meizhou Kejia in-play tendencies (48 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

Chengdu Better City in-play tendencies (48 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 53% of the time; BTTS occurs in 35% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 30% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 46% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Meizhou Kejia 50% versus Chengdu Better City 46%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Meizhou Kejia 52% | Chengdu Better City 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 0.95 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.62 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.963 / defence 1.076 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.160 / defence 0.717. League average goals — home 1.384 / away 1.295. Chengdu Better City's defence strength of 0.717 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 48 Meizhou Kejia games / 48 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 27% | Chengdu Better City 52%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 4.76 | Draw 3.70 | Chengdu Better City 1.92. Chengdu Better City hold a narrow Poisson edge at 52% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.57. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.57 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Chengdu Better City are the pick at 52% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Chengdu Better City offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.57 combined xG gives a 47% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 51% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Meizhou Kejia 40% | Chengdu Better City 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.50 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.57 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 1.90 vs 0.80 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.62) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.30) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 52% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 15 | Venue: Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 7 Jul 2023, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 27% | Chengdu Better City 52% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 47% | BTTS 51% | xG Meizhou Kejia 0.95 / Chengdu Better City 1.62 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.963 / def 1.076 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.160 / def 0.717 | league avg home 1.384 / away 1.295 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (52%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

0.95

Meizhou Kejia xG

Expected Goals

1.62

Chengdu Better City xG

21%
27%
52%
Meizhou Kejia Draw Chengdu Better City

51%

BTTS

74%

Over 1.5

47%

Over 2.5

26%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 12:35 on Friday 7 July 2023 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.

What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City?

Meizhou Kejia 3 - 1 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.

What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 15 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 21% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 52% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 51% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 47%.

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City?

Record (2 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 0W | Draws 1 | Chengdu Better City 1W.

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City in?

Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 2.10 | L5 L-L-L-L-D. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 5W-4D-1L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-W-D-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Meizhou Kejia's attacking strength (0.96x league average) is weighed against Chengdu Better City's defensive record (0.72x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 0.95. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Meizhou Kejia's defence, projects 1.62 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 48/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 13.3%. Close behind: 0-1 (10.8%), 0-2 (10.0%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 34% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

21%

Meizhou Kejia

4.75

27%

Draw

3.66

52%

Chengdu Better City

1.94

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

12.4%

Away win

Most likely

1 – 1

11.8%

Draw

0 – 2

10.0%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.95

Meizhou Kejia xG

Total xG

2.57

1.62

Chengdu Better City xG

21%
27%
52%
Meizhou KejiaDrawChengdu Better City

4.75

21%

Home win

3.66

27%

Draw

1.94

52%

Away win

Goals Markets

73%

Over 1.5

1.37

27%

Under 1.5

3.70

47%

Over 2.5

2.13

53%

Under 2.5

1.89

26%

Over 3.5

3.85

74%

Under 3.5

1.35

12%

Over 4.5

8.33

88%

Under 4.5

1.14

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

51%

BTTS Yes

1.98

49%

BTTS No

2.02

Clean Sheet

20%

Meizhou Kejia

5.03

38%

Chengdu Better City

2.60

Win to Nil

4%

Meizhou Kejia

23.89

20%

Chengdu Better City

5.04

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.6 12.4 10.0 5.4 2.2 0.7
1 7.3 11.8 9.5 5.1 2.1 0.7
2 3.5 5.6 4.6 2.5 1.0 0.3
3 1.1 1.8 1.4 0.8 0.3 0.1
4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.955
λ Away (xG) 1.616
Total xG 2.571
League avg home goals 1.384
League avg away goals 1.295
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.963
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.076
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.160
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.717
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 48 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.3%.

How many goals are Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 0.95 expected goals for Meizhou Kejia and 1.62 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 2.57.

How confident is the prediction model for Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 52%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 48 outings, Meizhou Kejia have picked up 1.23 PPG on a 16W 11D 21L record — L-L-L-L-D across the most recent five. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City's form line: 25W 17D 6L from 48 games, 1.92 PPG, last five W-W-D-W-L. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Chengdu Better City are the form team by 0.69 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Meizhou Kejia.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Meizhou Kejia have posted 1.48 PPG from 23 outings (10W 4D 9L).

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 12W 7D 4L from 23 away games — 1.87 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Meizhou Kejia are averaging 1.25 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.48 scored and 0.85 conceded.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City in 46% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 48 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Blended
L L L L D
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W W D W L
48 Played 48
16/11/21 W / D / L 25/17/6
1.23 Points Per Game 1.92
1.25 Avg Goals Scored 1.48
1.40 Avg Goals Conceded 0.85
2.65 Avg Goals / Game 2.33
11 Clean Sheets 22
24 BTTS 22
25 Over 2.5 Games 22
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

D
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 1–0
02 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–1
28 Jun
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 1–1
09 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
03 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–3 HT 2–0
28 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
24 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–1
20 May
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–0
14 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 1–2
10 May
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Apr
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Apr
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Dec
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3
27 Dec
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
10 Dec
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Dec
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Dalian Aerbin
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Nov
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–3 HT 0–2
21 Nov
W
A Guangzhou R&F
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–0
08 Nov
D
A Wuhan Zall
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–7 HT 0–3
24 Oct
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–1 HT 2–0
09 Oct
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 1–0
10 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–2 HT 1–1
28 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–2
22 Aug
W
H Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
W
H Wuhan Zall
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–2
17 Jun
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
27 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–1
23 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
14 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Dec
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 0–1
27 Dec
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Nov
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–2
07 Nov
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Meizhou Kejia have gone 16W 11D 21L in their last 48 games (1.23 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 25W 17D 6L in their last 48 (1.92 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Meizhou Kejia at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.87 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Meizhou Kejia at home: 1.48 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.87 PPG.

Have Meizhou Kejia or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Meizhou Kejia have kept a clean sheet in 23% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 46%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to June 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 17 October 2025, roughly 10 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

Chengdu Better City go into this on the back of 5 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 10 May 2025, when Chengdu Better City won 0-4 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Meizhou Kejia's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 1W 0D 3L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Meizhou Kejia

1

Meizhou Kejia

1

Draws

Chengdu Better City

6

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
3–1
17 Oct 25
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
0–4
10 May 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–0
29 Sep 24
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–4
17 May 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–0
04 Nov 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
3–1
07 Jul 23
Chengdu Better City
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
11 Jul 22
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–0
20 Jun 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City?

From 8 meetings on record, Meizhou Kejia have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 6, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 17 October 2025, when Chengdu Better City 3-1 Meizhou Kejia.

Who has won more matches between Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 74% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 35% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Meizhou Kejia 61%, Chengdu Better City 35% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 56% (Meizhou Kejia) and 30% (Chengdu Better City).

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City in 52%; Chengdu Better City in 26%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Meizhou Kejia home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 34/47
(72.3%)
17/23
(73.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/47
(29.8%)
7/23
(30.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/13
(69.2%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/13
(30.8%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 14/47
(29.8%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/47
(12.8%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/47
(8.5%)
3/23
(13%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/48
(50%)
14/23
(60.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 25/48
(52.1%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 12/48
(25%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Clean Sheet 11/48
(22.9%)
5/23
(21.7%)
Failed to Score 17/48
(35.4%)
5/23
(21.7%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 33/48
(68.8%)
16/23
(69.6%)
2+ Goals Before HT 13/48
(27.1%)
2/23
(8.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/15
(53.3%)
4/7
(57.1%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/15
(13.3%)
0/7
(0%)
Winning at HT 18/48
(37.5%)
8/23
(34.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/48
(12.5%)
3/23
(13%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/48
(45.8%)
8/23
(34.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 22/48
(45.8%)
7/23
(30.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/48
(20.8%)
1/23
(4.3%)
Clean Sheet 22/48
(45.8%)
12/23
(52.2%)
Failed to Score 11/48
(22.9%)
6/23
(26.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Meizhou Kejia play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 61% of Meizhou Kejia's recent matches and 35% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Meizhou Kejia vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 56% of Meizhou Kejia's recent games and 30% of Chengdu Better City's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Meizhou Kejia and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Meizhou Kejia have had a goal before half-time in 74% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 70% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Meizhou Kejia cruise to a comfortable 3-1 victory over Chengdu Better City.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Meizhou Kejia beat Chengdu Better City 3-1 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium, Regular Season - 15, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Meizhou Kejia 0.95 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.62 xG, a combined 2.57. The scoreboard read 3-1 for 4 actual goals. Meizhou Kejia beat their projection by 2.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Meizhou Kejia attack 0.96 / defence 1.08 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.16 / defence 0.72, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 27% | Chengdu Better City 52%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 52%. Instead the game produced a Meizhou Kejia win, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 47%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 74% and landed. Over 3.5 was 26% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 49% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Meizhou Kejia 52%, Chengdu Better City 46%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (48 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (48 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 46% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.92 PPG against 1.23. Form was overturned, with Meizhou Kejia winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.57 average — above their attacking norm. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 0.78 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 47% Over 2.5 probability, but 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 51% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 49% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.