Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 3-1 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 27

Kick-off

Fri 17 Oct 2025

12:35

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours Chengdu Better City (73%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Chengdu Better City face Meizhou Kejia.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 27 sees Meizhou Kejia travel to Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park to take on Chengdu Better City. The game is scheduled for Friday 17 October 2025, 12:35 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Chengdu Better City stand at 6W 3D 1L from 10 Super League matches — 2.10 PPG. Last five: W W W D D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chengdu Better City's home record at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park: 7W 3D 0L from 10 Super League appearances (2.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 0.50 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

Across all Super League games this season, Meizhou Kejia have recorded 2W 2D 6L from 10 outings — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 2.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Meizhou Kejia away from home this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 away games — 0.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game.

On current form, Chengdu Better City have the edge — a 1.30 PPG advantage (2.10 vs 0.80) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H Record

Chengdu Better City hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 5 wins from 7 previous encounters compared to 1 for Meizhou Kejia, with 1 draws in between.

The 7 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 10 May 2025, ended 4–0 with Chengdu Better City winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Chengdu Better City and goals. The home side's 5 wins from 7 meetings, combined with an average of 3.0 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

In-Play Data

Chengdu Better City trading profile (56 games, 28 at home): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; they lead at the break 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

Meizhou Kejia trading profile (56 games, 28 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%; they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 55% versus Meizhou Kejia 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 59% | Meizhou Kejia 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 2.20 xG and Meizhou Kejia 0.62 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.016 / defence 0.631 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.703 / defence 1.175. League average goals — home 1.846 / away 1.397. Chengdu Better City's defence rating of 0.631 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 56 Chengdu Better City games / 56 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 19% | Meizhou Kejia 8%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.37 | Draw 5.26 | Meizhou Kejia 12.50. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (73%) — a 65pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 42% | Total xG 2.82. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.82 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 42% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City as the most likely outcome at 73% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 2.82 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 42%. Form rates are neutral: Chengdu Better City 50% | Meizhou Kejia 50%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Chengdu Better City hold a strong historical advantage, winning 5 of 7 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 71% vs Poisson 73%.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.82) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.10 vs 0.80 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (2.20) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.82 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 73% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 73% home win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 27 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park • Kick-off: Friday 17 Oct 2025, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 19% | Meizhou Kejia 8% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 42% | xG Chengdu Better City 2.20 / Meizhou Kejia 0.62 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.016 / def 0.631 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.703 / def 1.175 | league avg home 1.846 / away 1.397 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (73%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.20

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

0.62

Meizhou Kejia xG

73%
19%
Chengdu Better City Draw Meizhou Kejia

42%

BTTS

78%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

31%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 12:35 on Friday 17 October 2025 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia?

Chengdu Better City 3 - 1 Meizhou Kejia.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 27 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 73% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 8% chance, and a 19% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our model estimates a 42% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia?

Record (7 meetings): Chengdu Better City 5W | Draws 1 | Meizhou Kejia 1W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 6W-3D-1L in 10 | 2.10 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 0.90 | L5 W-W-W-D-D. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 2.20 | L5 D-L-L-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Chengdu Better City's attacking strength (1.02x league average) is weighed against Meizhou Kejia's defensive record (1.18x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.20. The same calculation in reverse, Meizhou Kejia's attack versus Chengdu Better City's defence, projects 0.62 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 56/56 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-0, at 14.4%. Close behind: 1-0 (12.0%), 3-0 (10.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 37% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

73%

Chengdu Better City

1.37

19%

Draw

5.38

8%

Meizhou Kejia

11.99

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 0

14.4%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 0

13.1%

Home win

3 – 0

10.6%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.20

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

2.82

0.62

Meizhou Kejia xG

73%
19%
Chengdu Better CityDrawMeizhou Kejia

1.37

73%

Home win

5.38

19%

Draw

11.99

8%

Away win

Goals Markets

77%

Over 1.5

1.30

23%

Under 1.5

4.35

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

31%

Over 3.5

3.23

69%

Under 3.5

1.45

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

42%

BTTS Yes

2.39

58%

BTTS No

1.72

Clean Sheet

54%

Chengdu Better City

1.86

11%

Meizhou Kejia

9.06

Win to Nil

39%

Chengdu Better City

2.54

1%

Meizhou Kejia

108.65

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.9 3.7 1.1 0.2
1 13.1 8.1 2.5 0.5 0.1
2 14.4 8.9 2.8 0.6 0.1
3 10.6 6.6 2.0 0.4 0.1
4 5.8 3.6 1.1 0.2
5 2.6 1.6 0.5 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.204
λ Away (xG) 0.620
Total xG 2.824
League avg home goals 1.846
League avg away goals 1.397
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.016
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.631
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.703
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.175
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 56 / 56

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.4%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?

The model projects 2.20 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 0.62 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 2.82.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 73%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Across their last 56 outings, Chengdu Better City have picked up 2.04 PPG on a 34W 12D 10L record — W-W-W-D-D across the most recent five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Meizhou Kejia's form line: 11W 14D 31L from 56 games, 0.84 PPG, last five D-L-L-L-W. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Chengdu Better City are the form team by 1.20 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Meizhou Kejia.

Venue Form

On home soil, Chengdu Better City have posted 2.32 PPG from 28 outings (20W 5D 3L).

On the road, Meizhou Kejia have gone 3W 8D 17L from 28 away games — 0.61 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Chengdu Better City are averaging 2.11 goals scored and 0.95 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.07 scored and 2.00 conceded.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 56 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W W W D D
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Blended
D L L L W
56 Played 56
34/12/10 W / D / L 11/14/31
2.04 Points Per Game 0.84
2.11 Avg Goals Scored 1.07
0.95 Avg Goals Conceded 2.00
3.05 Avg Goals / Game 3.07
20 Clean Sheets 10
31 BTTS 33
33 Over 2.5 Games 36
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Sep
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 3–0
09 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 3–0
03 Aug
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
04 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–6 HT 0–2
26 Sep
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–2 HT 1–1
20 Sep
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–2 HT 0–1
31 Aug
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–2
24 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
16 Aug
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–1 HT 1–0
10 Aug
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–4 HT 0–4
02 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–0
27 Jul
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Jul
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–2
29 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–4 HT 0–2
25 Jun
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–0
13 Jun
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–2 HT 0–1
16 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–4 HT 0–3
10 May
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 0–0
06 May
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–1
02 May
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 0–2
16 Apr
L
H Changchun Yatai
1–3 HT 0–2
11 Apr
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 0–1
06 Apr
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–2
02 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
3–4 HT 3–1
29 Mar
W
H Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–0
23 Feb
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Sep
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–3 HT 0–1
20 Sep
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 2–0
17 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–7 HT 1–4
09 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–4 HT 1–2
28 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
21 Jul
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
13 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–3
07 Jul
L
H Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–0
30 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
21 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 0–1
17 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–0
11 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
05 May
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 1–1
09 Mar
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
03 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 34W 12D 10L in their last 56 games (2.04 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 11W 14D 31L in their last 56 (0.84 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Meizhou Kejia away?

Chengdu Better City's home record (2.32 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.32 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 0.61 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Meizhou Kejia been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their recent games, Meizhou Kejia in 18%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

8 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to June 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 17 October 2025, roughly 10 months ago.

Streaks & Records

Chengdu Better City have won the last 5 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 10 May 2025, when Chengdu Better City won 0-4 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Chengdu Better City's record when hosting Meizhou Kejia specifically: 3W 1D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

6

Chengdu Better City

1

Draws

Meizhou Kejia

1

Meizhou Kejia

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
3–1
17 Oct 25
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
0–4
10 May 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–0
29 Sep 24
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–4
17 May 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–0
04 Nov 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
3–1
07 Jul 23
Chengdu Better City
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
11 Jul 22
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–0
20 Jun 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia?

From 8 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 6, Meizhou Kejia have won 1, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?

They last met on 17 October 2025, when Chengdu Better City 3-1 Meizhou Kejia.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 93% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 64% of the time.

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 46%, Meizhou Kejia 54% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 57% (Chengdu Better City) and 57% (Meizhou Kejia). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 36% and 36% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches; Meizhou Kejia in 39%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(56 games)
Venue
(28 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 47/56
(83.9%)
26/28
(92.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 27/56
(48.2%)
15/28
(53.6%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
0/2
(0%)
Winning at HT 28/56
(50%)
18/28
(64.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/56
(5.4%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/56
(5.4%)
0/28
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/56
(55.4%)
13/28
(46.4%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/56
(58.9%)
16/28
(57.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/56
(35.7%)
10/28
(35.7%)
Clean Sheet 20/56
(35.7%)
14/28
(50%)
Failed to Score 6/56
(10.7%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Blended
Metric All
(56 games)
Venue
(28 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 39/56
(69.6%)
20/28
(71.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/56
(35.7%)
11/28
(39.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/17
(70.6%)
6/8
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/17
(47.1%)
2/8
(25%)
Winning at HT 10/56
(17.9%)
4/28
(14.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/56
(7.1%)
3/28
(10.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/56
(12.5%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/56
(58.9%)
15/28
(53.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/56
(64.3%)
16/28
(57.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/56
(37.5%)
10/28
(35.7%)
Clean Sheet 10/56
(17.9%)
4/28
(14.3%)
Failed to Score 18/56
(32.1%)
11/28
(39.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Meizhou Kejia?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 46% of Chengdu Better City's recent matches and 54% of Meizhou Kejia's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 57% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 57% of Meizhou Kejia's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 93% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 71% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Chengdu Better City cruise to a comfortable 3-1 victory over Meizhou Kejia.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Meizhou Kejia 3-1 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park, Regular Season - 27, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 2.20 xG and Meizhou Kejia 0.62 xG, a combined 2.82. The scoreboard read 3-1 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.02 / defence 0.63 against Meizhou Kejia attack 0.70 / defence 1.18, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 73% | Draw 19% | Meizhou Kejia 8%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 73%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. Over 3.5 was 31% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 42% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 59%, Meizhou Kejia 64%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (56 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and conceded here.

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (56 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 2.04 PPG against 0.84. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 2.14 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 54% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 42% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.