Patro Eisden 1-1 RWDM – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates RWDM at 37% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Patro Eisden vs RWDM encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Pre-Match Analysis
Patro Eisden and RWDM meet at Patrostadion in Challenger Pro League (matchday 28). This fixture gets under way on Friday 4 April 2025 at 20:00 UK time.
Form & Momentum
Patro Eisden have collected 1.80 PPG across their last 10 games: 5W 3D 2L. Last five: D W L W D. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
Patro Eisden's home record over their last 10 home games: 5W 2D 3L (1.70 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
RWDM's record over their last 10 games: 9W 1D 0L (2.80 PPG). Last five: W W W W W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 0.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.10 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 9 clean sheets from 10 games (90%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No.
When travelling, RWDM have posted 5W 3D 2L from their last 10 away outings — 1.80 PPG. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from their last 10 away games (50%) — they are hard to break down on the road. Their away PPG of 1.80 is notably below their overall 2.80 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.
RWDM arrive in superior form — a 1.00 PPG advantage (2.80 vs 1.80) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.
Head-to-Head
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 1 H2H match in our data, the wins are level at 0 apiece, with 1 draw. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 1 H2H match to go on, treat this as a light input.
The 1 H2H match in our data averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that gives no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent of those, on 17 Aug 2024, ended Patro Eisden 1–1 RWDM — a draw.
The head-to-head data offers no strong steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the model and current market pricing should carry more weight for this fixture.
Trading Data
Patro Eisden goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (last 58 games, 28 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 75% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; of the 23 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 30%; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.
RWDM goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (last 58 games, 28 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 61% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Patro Eisden 50% versus RWDM 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Patro Eisden 57% | RWDM 57%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Patro Eisden 1.27 xG and RWDM 1.30 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Patro Eisden attack 1.212 / defence 0.991 | RWDM attack 1.015 / defence 0.771. League average goals — home 1.362 / away 1.294. RWDM bring a tight defence (rating 0.771, below 1 = concedes less than average) — this is pulling Patro Eisden's projected output down. Data: built from Patro Eisden's last 56 games and RWDM's last 26.
Result probabilities: Patro Eisden 36% | Draw 27% | RWDM 37%. Fair-value odds: Patro Eisden 2.77 | Draw 3.77 | RWDM 2.68. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS Yes probability 52% | Total xG 2.58. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.58 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 52% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates RWDM as the most likely outcome at 37% — marginal model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on RWDM if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
Poisson projects 2.58 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 52% probability — low conviction — though recent form (Patro Eisden's last 10 home games and RWDM's last 10 away games) averaging 3.0 goals per game points the other way.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 52% on Yes. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Patro Eisden 60% (last 10 home games) | RWDM 50% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Patro Eisden vs RWDM | Competition: Challenger Pro League, matchday 28 | Venue: Patrostadion • Kick-off: Friday 4 April 2025 at 20:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Patro Eisden 36% | Draw 27% | RWDM 37% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 48% (Under 52%) | BTTS Yes 52% (No 48%) | xG Patro Eisden 1.27 / RWDM 1.30 • Poisson strength factors: Patro Eisden attack 1.212 / def 0.991 | RWDM attack 1.015 / def 0.771 | league avg home 1.362 / away 1.294 • Poisson stance: RWDM (37%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.27
Patro Eisden xG
Expected Goals
1.30
RWDM xG
52%
BTTS
73%
Over 1.5
48%
Over 2.5
26%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Patro Eisden vs RWDM FAQs
What time does Patro Eisden vs RWDM kick off?
Patro Eisden vs RWDM kicked off at 20:00 UK time on Friday 4 April 2025 at Patrostadion.
What was the final score in Patro Eisden vs RWDM?
Patro Eisden 1 - 1 RWDM.
Where is Patro Eisden vs RWDM being played?
The match is being played at Patrostadion.
What competition is Patro Eisden vs RWDM part of?
Patro Eisden vs RWDM is a Challenger Pro League fixture (matchday 28) (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win Patro Eisden vs RWDM?
Our statistical model gives Patro Eisden a 36% chance of winning, RWDM a 37% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.
Will both teams score in Patro Eisden vs RWDM?
Our model estimates a 52% probability that both Patro Eisden and RWDM will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will Patro Eisden vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 48%, so it leans towards under 2.5 goals (52%).
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
The model rates Patro Eisden's attack at 1.21x the league average against RWDM's defence at 0.77x — combine the two and it projects 1.27 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — RWDM's attack (1.01x) against Patro Eisden's defence (0.99x) — and the away total comes out at 1.30.
These ratings are built from Patro Eisden's last 56 games and RWDM's last 26 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (9.3%), 0-1 (8.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
RWDM Win
36%
2.77
27%
3.77
37%
2.68
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 1
12.6%
Draw
Most likely
0 β 1
9.9%
Away win
1 β 0
9.7%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.27
Patro Eisden xG
Total xG
2.58
1.30
RWDM xG
2.77
36%
Home win
3.77
27%
Draw
2.68
37%
Away win
Goals Markets
73%
Over 1.5
1.37
27%
Under 1.5
3.70
48%
Over 2.5
2.08
52%
Under 2.5
1.92
26%
Over 3.5
3.85
74%
Under 3.5
1.35
12%
Over 4.5
8.33
88%
Under 4.5
1.14
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
52%
BTTS Yes
1.91
48%
BTTS No
2.10
Clean Sheet
27%
3.67
28%
3.58
Win to Nil
10%
10.18
10%
9.57
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7.6 | 9.9 | 6.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| 1 | 9.7 | 12.6 | 8.2 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| 2 | 6.2 | 8.0 | 5.2 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Patro Eisden vs RWDM Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Patro Eisden vs RWDM?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.3%.
How many goals are Patro Eisden and RWDM expected to score?
The model projects 1.27 expected goals for Patro Eisden and 1.30 for RWDM, a combined total of 2.58.
How confident is the prediction model for Patro Eisden vs RWDM?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Patro Eisden's recent record stands at 27W 18D 13L from 58 games, a 1.71 PPG return, with D-W-L-W-D in the last five.
RWDM, meanwhile, have gone 23W 14D 21L across 58 games — 1.43 PPG, with W-W-W-W-W in their last five.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.71 PPG for Patro Eisden against 1.43 for RWDM. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
Home & Away Splits
At home specifically, Patro Eisden have managed 14W 6D 8L from their last 28 home games — 1.71 PPG in front of their own supporters.
RWDM's away record stands at 9W 6D 13L across their last 28 away games, a 1.18 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Patro Eisden come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Patro Eisden are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.05 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.34 scored and 1.43 conceded.
Defensively: Patro Eisden have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 58 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Patro Eisden
Blended
RWDM
Blended
Patro Eisden (Home) vs RWDM (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Patro Eisden
Blended
RWDM
Blended
❓ Patro Eisden vs RWDM Form FAQs
What form are Patro Eisden and RWDM in coming into this match?
Patro Eisden have gone 27W 18D 13L in their last 58 games (1.71 PPG), while RWDM have gone 23W 14D 21L in their last 58 (1.43 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Patro Eisden at home or RWDM away?
Patro Eisden's home record (1.71 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Patro Eisden at home: 1.71 PPG; RWDM away: 1.18 PPG.
Have Patro Eisden or RWDM been keeping clean sheets recently?
Patro Eisden have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their recent games, RWDM in 31%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 4 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to August 2024 — a small sample, so read the trends with care. All of them came in Challenger Pro League. The most recent was on 24 January 2026, roughly 9 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
Patro Eisden have won each of the latest 2 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Patro Eisden have gone 1W 1D 0L from the 2 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against RWDM — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 4 Meetings
2
Patro Eisden
2
Draws
0
RWDM
Recent Meetings
❓ Patro Eisden vs RWDM H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and RWDM?
Across the 4 head-to-head matches in our data, Patro Eisden have won 2, RWDM have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.
When did Patro Eisden and RWDM last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 24 January 2026: RWDM 2-4 Patro Eisden.
Who has won more matches between Patro Eisden and RWDM?
Patro Eisden have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from the 4 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Patro Eisden are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 46% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 23% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 61% of their matches.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Patro Eisden 57%, RWDM 54% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 71% for Patro Eisden and 64% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 50% and 36% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: RWDM in 32%; RWDM in 29%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Patro Eisden home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Patro Eisden vs RWDM Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Patro Eisden and RWDM matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of Patro Eisden's games and 54% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Patro Eisden and RWDM matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 71% of Patro Eisden's matches and 64% of RWDM's.
Do Patro Eisden and RWDM matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 75% of Patro Eisden's recent matches and 61% of RWDM's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Patro Eisden and RWDM share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Patro Eisden and RWDM finished level at 1-1 at Patrostadion, Regular Season - 28, in the Challenger Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Patro Eisden 1.27 xG and RWDM 1.30 xG, a combined 2.58. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Patro Eisden attack 1.21 / defence 0.99 against RWDM attack 1.01 / defence 0.77, drawn from 56/26 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Patro Eisden 36% | Draw 27% | RWDM 37%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 48%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 73% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 52% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Patro Eisden 57%, RWDM 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Patro Eisden's trading profile (58 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.
RWDM's trading profile (58 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Patro Eisden 1.71 PPG, RWDM 1.43 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.96 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.