Sign in Register

Patro Eisden 1-0 KRC Genk II – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Sat 8 Feb 2025

19:00

Venue

Patrostadion

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours Patro Eisden (74%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Patro Eisden face KRC Genk II.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Challenger Pro League encounter, Regular Season - 21 sees KRC Genk II travel to Patrostadion to take on Patro Eisden. The game is scheduled for Saturday 8 February 2025, 19:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Challenger Pro League games this season, Patro Eisden have gone 6W 2D 2L from 10 outings — a 2.00 PPG return. Last five: L L W D W. They are averaging 2.50 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Patro Eisden, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Patro Eisden at Patrostadion this season: 6W 2D 2L from 10 home games — 2.00 PPG on home soil. They are averaging 2.70 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

KRC Genk II — All Games: 0W 4D 6L from 10 Challenger Pro League fixtures this season — 0.40 PPG. Last five: D D L L D. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 2.40. Conceding 2.40 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for KRC Genk II, so this record blends games from this season and last.

KRC Genk II's form when playing away from home: 1W 2D 7L across 10 road games this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Patro Eisden carry the stronger recent momentum — 1.60 PPG ahead of their opponents on 2.00 vs 0.40. The form data is a point in their favour, and where the price allows, it is the cleaner directional bet.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Patro Eisden register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant matches, KRC Genk II in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 2 wins for Patro Eisden, 0 for KRC Genk II and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 3 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 15 Dec 2024, ended 3–1 with Patro Eisden winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Patro Eisden trading profile (50 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 84% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 43% of the time; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 76% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%; they fail to score in 30% of games.

KRC Genk II trading profile (50 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 72% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 72% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 52%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Patro Eisden 48% versus KRC Genk II 70%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Patro Eisden 58% | KRC Genk II 72%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Patro Eisden 2.96 xG and KRC Genk II 1.15 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Patro Eisden attack 1.505 / defence 0.997 | KRC Genk II attack 0.839 / defence 1.431. League average goals — home 1.376 / away 1.374. Patro Eisden carry an above-average attack strength of 1.505 — their λ of 2.96 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. KRC Genk II bring a strong defensive rating of 1.431 — this is suppressing Patro Eisden's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 50 Patro Eisden games / 50 KRC Genk II games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Patro Eisden 74% | Draw 15% | KRC Genk II 12%. Fair-value odds: Patro Eisden 1.35 | Draw 6.67 | KRC Genk II 8.33. The model has a clear lean to Patro Eisden (74%) — a 62pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 78% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 4.11. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 78% — a total xG of 4.11 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (2.96 / 1.15) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Patro Eisden are the pick at 74% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support.

Poisson projects 4.11 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 78% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.6 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 65%. Form rates corroborate: Patro Eisden 70% | KRC Genk II 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Patro Eisden — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 74%.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (4.11) both back Over 2.5 goals (78% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 65% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Patro Eisden lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 0.40 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Patro Eisden Poisson xG (2.96) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (2.70) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Patro Eisden 7/10, KRC Genk II 6/10) and Poisson model (65%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Patro Eisden — Patro Eisden at 74% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Patro Eisden at 74% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 78% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Patrostadion • Kick-off: Saturday 8 Feb 2025, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Patro Eisden 74% | Draw 15% | KRC Genk II 12% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 78% | BTTS 65% | xG Patro Eisden 2.96 / KRC Genk II 1.15 • Poisson strength factors: Patro Eisden attack 1.505 / def 0.997 | KRC Genk II attack 0.839 / def 1.431 | league avg home 1.376 / away 1.374 • Poisson stance: Patro Eisden (74%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.96

Patro Eisden xG

Expected Goals

1.15

KRC Genk II xG

74%
15%
Patro Eisden Draw KRC Genk II

65%

BTTS

92%

Over 1.5

78%

Over 2.5

59%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II kick off?

Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II kicked off at 19:00 on Saturday 8 February 2025 at Patrostadion.

What was the final score in Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Patro Eisden 1 - 0 KRC Genk II.

Where is Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II being played?

The match is being played at Patrostadion.

What competition is Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II part of?

Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Our statistical model gives Patro Eisden a 74% chance of winning, KRC Genk II a 12% chance, and a 15% chance of a draw — making Patro Eisden the favourite.

Will both teams score in Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II will score (BTTS).

Will Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 78%.

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II?

Record (3 meetings): Patro Eisden 2W | Draws 1 | KRC Genk II 0W.

What form are Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II in?

Patro Eisden (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.50 / GA 1.00 | L5 L-L-W-D-W. KRC Genk II (all comps): 0W-4D-6L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 2.40 | L5 D-D-L-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Patro Eisden's attacking strength (1.50x league average) is weighed against KRC Genk II's defensive record (1.43x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.96. The same calculation in reverse, KRC Genk II's attack versus Patro Eisden's defence, projects 1.15 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 50/50 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-1, at 8.3%. Close behind: 3-1 (8.2%), 2-0 (7.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 24% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Patro Eisden Win

74%

Patro Eisden

1.35

15%

Draw

6.89

12%

KRC Genk II

8.70

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

8.3%

Home win

Most likely

3 – 1

8.2%

Home win

2 – 0

7.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.96

Patro Eisden xG

Total xG

4.11

1.15

KRC Genk II xG

74%
15%
12%
Patro EisdenDrawKRC Genk II

1.35

74%

Home win

6.89

15%

Draw

8.70

12%

Away win

Goals Markets

92%

Over 1.5

1.09

8%

Under 1.5

12.50

78%

Over 2.5

1.28

22%

Under 2.5

4.55

59%

Over 3.5

1.69

41%

Under 3.5

2.44

39%

Over 4.5

2.56

61%

Under 4.5

1.64

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.54

35%

BTTS No

2.85

Clean Sheet

32%

Patro Eisden

3.16

5%

KRC Genk II

19.38

Win to Nil

23%

Patro Eisden

4.26

1%

KRC Genk II

168.48

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1.6 1.9 1.1 0.4 0.1
1 4.8 5.6 3.2 1.2 0.4 0.1
2 7.2 8.3 4.7 1.8 0.5 0.1
3 7.1 8.2 4.7 1.8 0.5 0.1
4 5.3 6.0 3.5 1.3 0.4 0.1
5 3.1 3.6 2.1 0.8 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.964
λ Away (xG) 1.149
Total xG 4.113
League avg home goals 1.376
League avg away goals 1.374
Patro Eisden attack strength 1.505
Patro Eisden defence strength 0.997
KRC Genk II attack strength 0.839
KRC Genk II defence strength 1.431
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 50 / 50

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 8.3%.

How many goals are Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II expected to score?

The model projects 2.96 expected goals for Patro Eisden and 1.15 for KRC Genk II, a combined total of 4.11.

How confident is the prediction model for Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 74%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Across their last 50 outings, Patro Eisden have picked up 1.70 PPG on a 23W 16D 11L record — L-L-W-D-W across the most recent five. The sample for Patro Eisden is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

KRC Genk II's form line: 13W 11D 26L from 50 games, 1.00 PPG, last five D-D-L-L-D. The sample for KRC Genk II is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Patro Eisden are the form team by 0.70 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against KRC Genk II.

Venue Form

On home soil, Patro Eisden have posted 1.76 PPG from 25 outings (13W 5D 7L).

On the road, KRC Genk II have gone 5W 6D 14L from 25 away games — 0.84 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Patro Eisden come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Patro Eisden are averaging 1.64 goals scored and 1.06 conceded per game recently; KRC Genk II are on 1.44 scored and 1.94 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: KRC Genk II in 70%.

Defensively: Patro Eisden have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 50 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

Blended
L L W D W
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

Blended
D D L L D
50 Played 50
23/16/11 W / D / L 13/11/26
1.70 Points Per Game 1.00
1.64 Avg Goals Scored 1.44
1.06 Avg Goals Conceded 1.94
2.70 Avg Goals / Game 3.38
19 Clean Sheets 6
24 BTTS 35
29 Over 2.5 Games 36
Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

W
A Francs Borains
3–1 HT 2–1
02 Feb
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Jan
W
H Lokeren-Temse
4–1 HT 3–1
17 Jan
L
A Zulte Waregem
2–3 HT 1–0
11 Jan
L
H Seraing United
2–3 HT 1–1
22 Dec
W
A KRC Genk II
3–1 HT 1–1
15 Dec
W
H Lommel United
4–0 HT 1–0
08 Dec
D
A SK Beveren
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Nov
W
H Liège
2–0 HT 1–0
24 Nov
W
A AS Eupen
4–0 HT 1–0
10 Nov
D
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
D
A Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Oct
L
H Zulte Waregem
0–1 HT 0–1
20 Oct
W
H Deinze
3–1 HT 2–0
04 Oct
W
A RAAL La Louvière
2–0 HT 2–0
29 Sep
W
H Francs Borains
4–1 HT 2–0
21 Sep
D
A Lokeren-Temse
2–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
D
H Club Brugge II
2–2 HT 1–1
31 Aug
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
3–1 HT 1–0
24 Aug
D
A RWDM
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Aug
L
A Deinze
1–2 HT 1–0
01 May
L
H Deinze
0–4 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
A Beerschot VA
1–0 HT 0–0
19 Apr
L
H Oostende
2–3 HT 1–2
14 Apr
D
A Zulte Waregem
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
W
H Lommel United
3–0 HT 0–0
31 Mar
W
A SK Beveren
1–0 HT 1–0
15 Mar
D
H KRC Genk II
2–2 HT 1–0
08 Mar
L
A Seraing United
0–3 HT 0–2
03 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 1–0
23 Feb
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Feb
D
A Deinze
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Feb
W
H Francs Borains
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Feb
D
A Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Jan
W
H Standard Liège II
3–1 HT 0–1
21 Jan
L
A Liège
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Jan
W
H Club Brugge II
4–0 HT 3–0
16 Dec
W
A KRC Genk II
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Dec
L
H Beerschot VA
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Dec
W
A Lommel United
2–1 HT 1–0
24 Nov
L
H Zulte Waregem
0–3 HT 0–1
12 Nov
W
H Seraing United
2–1 HT 2–0
05 Nov
D
A Oostende
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
D
A Francs Borains
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
L
H Liège
0–2 HT 0–0
07 Oct
W
A Standard Liège II
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
H Dender
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Sep
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
3–1 HT 1–1
16 Sep
D
A Club Brugge II
2–2 HT 1–0
03 Sep
W
H SK Beveren
2–1 HT 0–0
26 Aug
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

D
H SK Beveren
3–3 HT 2–1
02 Feb
L
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–4 HT 0–1
28 Jan
L
A RWDM
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Jan
D
H Seraing United
2–2 HT 1–0
19 Jan
D
A Francs Borains
2–2 HT 2–1
20 Dec
L
H Patro Eisden
1–3 HT 1–1
15 Dec
L
A RAAL La Louvière
1–2 HT 0–0
07 Dec
L
H Zulte Waregem
2–3 HT 1–3
29 Nov
D
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–2 HT 1–0
22 Nov
L
H Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Nov
L
A Lokeren-Temse
0–4 HT 0–3
03 Nov
L
H Lommel United
0–4 HT 0–1
25 Oct
L
A Deinze
0–1 HT 0–1
19 Oct
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Oct
L
A AS Eupen
1–3 HT 0–0
27 Sep
L
H RWDM
0–3 HT 0–1
21 Sep
L
A SK Beveren
2–3 HT 1–1
15 Sep
L
H Francs Borains
1–2 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
H Liège
4–1 HT 0–1
25 Aug
W
A Seraing United
2–0 HT 1–0
16 Aug
L
A Liège
0–5 HT 0–2
19 Apr
D
H Francs Borains
1–1 HT 0–1
12 Apr
W
H Standard Liège II
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Apr
L
A Beerschot VA
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
W
H Oostende
3–1 HT 1–0
16 Mar
D
A Patro Eisden
2–2 HT 0–1
08 Mar
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 1–1
01 Mar
D
H Lommel United
1–1 HT 0–0
25 Feb
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
1–3 HT 1–1
16 Feb
W
H Dender
2–1 HT 1–0
11 Feb
W
A Seraing United
3–1 HT 3–0
04 Feb
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
3–0 HT 2–0
27 Jan
D
A Zulte Waregem
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Jan
W
H Deinze
3–2 HT 1–0
14 Jan
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 0–0
16 Dec
L
H Patro Eisden
0–1 HT 0–1
08 Dec
W
A Lommel United
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Dec
D
H Seraing United
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Nov
L
A Standard Liège II
1–3 HT 1–2
10 Nov
L
H Liège
2–3 HT 0–2
03 Nov
L
H K. Lierse S.K.
1–3 HT 1–1
28 Oct
L
A Deinze
2–3 HT 0–2
20 Oct
L
H Beerschot VA
1–2 HT 0–0
07 Oct
W
A Dender
3–1 HT 1–0
01 Oct
D
A Oostende
2–2 HT 1–1
23 Sep
L
H Zulte Waregem
2–4 HT 2–1
15 Sep
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Sep
L
H Club Brugge II
0–3 HT 0–2
25 Aug
W
A Francs Borains
5–2 HT 2–0
20 Aug
W
H SK Beveren
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II in coming into this match?

Patro Eisden have gone 23W 16D 11L in their last 50 games (1.70 PPG), while KRC Genk II have gone 13W 11D 26L in their last 50 (1.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Patro Eisden at home or KRC Genk II away?

Patro Eisden's home record (1.76 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Patro Eisden at home: 1.76 PPG; KRC Genk II away: 0.84 PPG.

Have Patro Eisden or KRC Genk II been keeping clean sheets recently?

Patro Eisden have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their recent games, KRC Genk II in 12%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to December 2023. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 6 February 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Streaks & Records

The biggest gap between the sides came on 26 Sep 2025, when Patro Eisden won 1-4 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Patro Eisden's record when hosting KRC Genk II specifically: 1W 2D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Patro Eisden

4

Patro Eisden

2

Draws

KRC Genk II

0

KRC Genk II

Recent Meetings

Patro Eisden
4–4
06 Feb 26
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
1–4
26 Sep 25
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
1–0
08 Feb 25
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
1–3
15 Dec 24
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
2–2
08 Mar 24
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
0–1
08 Dec 23
Patro Eisden

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II?

From 6 meetings on record, Patro Eisden have won 4, KRC Genk II have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II last play each other?

They last met on 6 February 2026, when Patro Eisden 4-4 KRC Genk II.

Who has won more matches between Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II?

Patro Eisden have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Patro Eisden are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 84% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 52% of the time.

KRC Genk II are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 88% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 28% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Patro Eisden 56%, KRC Genk II 72% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 76% for Patro Eisden and 72% for KRC Genk II. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 56% and 60% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Patro Eisden home games / KRC Genk II away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Patro Eisden Patro Eisden Blended
Metric All
(50 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/50
(72%)
21/25
(84%)
2+ Goals Before HT 15/50
(30%)
9/25
(36%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/14
(42.9%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/14
(21.4%)
3/4
(75%)
Winning at HT 23/50
(46%)
13/25
(52%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/50
(14%)
3/25
(12%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/50
(4%)
1/25
(4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/50
(48%)
14/25
(56%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/50
(58%)
19/25
(76%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/50
(42%)
14/25
(56%)
Clean Sheet 19/50
(38%)
6/25
(24%)
Failed to Score 15/50
(30%)
6/25
(24%)
KRC Genk II KRC Genk II Blended
Metric All
(50 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/50
(86%)
22/25
(88%)
2+ Goals Before HT 19/50
(38%)
11/25
(44%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/7
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/7
(71.4%)
3/3
(100%)
Winning at HT 17/50
(34%)
7/25
(28%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/50
(14%)
2/25
(8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/50
(10%)
3/25
(12%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/50
(70%)
18/25
(72%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/50
(72%)
18/25
(72%)
Over 3.5 Goals 26/50
(52%)
15/25
(60%)
Clean Sheet 6/50
(12%)
2/25
(8%)
Failed to Score 9/50
(18%)
5/25
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Patro Eisden play KRC Genk II?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of Patro Eisden's games and 72% of KRC Genk II's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Patro Eisden vs KRC Genk II usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 76% of Patro Eisden's matches and 72% of KRC Genk II's.

Do Patro Eisden and KRC Genk II tend to score early?

Patro Eisden have had a goal before half-time in 84% of their recent matches, KRC Genk II in 88% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Patro Eisden edge out KRC Genk II 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat KRC Genk II 1-0 at Patrostadion, Regular Season - 21, in the Challenger Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Patro Eisden 2.96 xG and KRC Genk II 1.15 xG, a combined 4.11. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Patro Eisden fell 2.0 short of their projected output. KRC Genk II landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Patro Eisden attack 1.50 / defence 1.00 against KRC Genk II attack 0.84 / defence 1.43, drawn from 50/50 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Patro Eisden 74% | Draw 15% | KRC Genk II 12%, with Patro Eisden to win its most likely call at 74%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 78%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 92% and missed. Over 3.5 was 59% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 65% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Patro Eisden 58%, KRC Genk II 72%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Patro Eisden's trading profile (50 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and duly kept one.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (50 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 70% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Patro Eisden arrived the stronger side — 1.70 PPG against 1.00. That form edge translated into the three points. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.08 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.36 average — tighter than their form line. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.40 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.04 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 78% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 65% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 65% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.