Sign in Register

VPS 2-3 EIF – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Veikkausliiga · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Sat 6 Jul 2024

15:00

Venue

Lemonsoft Stadion

Competition

Veikkausliiga

Finland

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates VPS at 58% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this VPS vs EIF encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Lemonsoft Stadion plays host to VPS versus EIF in Veikkausliiga, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off: Saturday 6 July 2024 at 15:00 UTC.

Form

VPS (all games): 4W 3D 3L across 10 Veikkausliiga fixtures this term — 1.50 PPG. Last five: W D D D L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.30 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for VPS, so this record blends games from this season and last.

VPS at Lemonsoft Stadion this season: 5W 4D 1L from 10 home games — 1.90 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

EIF's overall Veikkausliiga record this term: 2W 2D 6L from 10 games (0.80 PPG). Last five: L W L L W. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for EIF, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, EIF have gone 1W 1D 5L from 7 away fixtures this term (0.57 PPG). Away from home they average 1.14 goals scored and 2.14 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 86% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form ledger tips toward VPS. A 0.70 PPG lead over EIF (1.50 vs 0.80) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — VPS register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant games, EIF in 86%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: VPS 1W, EIF 0W, 0D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 2 Jun 2024, ended 2–1 with VPS winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

VPS — key trading statistics (13 games, 7 at home): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 83% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 86% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games).

EIF — key trading statistics (13 games, 7 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 86% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 86% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — VPS 85% and EIF 77% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (VPS 69% | EIF 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects VPS 2.11 xG and EIF 1.13 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: VPS attack 1.057 / defence 1.005 | EIF attack 0.881 / defence 1.274. League average goals — home 1.569 / away 1.274. EIF bring a strong defensive rating of 1.274 — this is suppressing VPS's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 36 VPS games / 13 EIF games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: VPS 58% | Draw 23% | EIF 18%. Fair-value odds: VPS 1.72 | Draw 4.35 | EIF 5.56. The model has a clear lean to VPS (58%) — a 40pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.24. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.24 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (2.11 / 1.13) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates VPS as the most likely outcome at 58% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.24 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 63% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: VPS 80% | EIF 86% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.24) both back Over 2.5 goals (63% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 61% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form VPS lead on PPG: 1.50 vs 0.80 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form VPS Poisson xG (2.11) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.80) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (VPS 8/10, EIF 6/7) and Poisson model (61%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour VPS — VPS at 58% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours VPS at 58% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 61% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: VPS vs EIF | Competition: Veikkausliiga, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Lemonsoft Stadion • Kick-off: Saturday 6 Jul 2024, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: VPS 58% | Draw 23% | EIF 18% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 61% | xG VPS 2.11 / EIF 1.13 • Poisson strength factors: VPS attack 1.057 / def 1.005 | EIF attack 0.881 / def 1.274 | league avg home 1.569 / away 1.274 • Poisson stance: VPS (58%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.11

VPS xG

Expected Goals

1.13

EIF xG

58%
23%
18%
VPS Draw EIF

61%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

41%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does VPS vs EIF kick off?

VPS vs EIF kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 6 July 2024 at Lemonsoft Stadion.

What was the final score in VPS vs EIF?

VPS 2 - 3 EIF.

Where is VPS vs EIF being played?

The match is being played at Lemonsoft Stadion.

What competition is VPS vs EIF part of?

VPS vs EIF is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Veikkausliiga (Finland).

Who is favourite to win VPS vs EIF?

Our statistical model gives VPS a 58% chance of winning, EIF a 18% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making VPS the favourite.

Will both teams score in VPS vs EIF?

Our model estimates a 61% probability that both VPS and EIF will score (BTTS).

Will VPS vs EIF have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between VPS and EIF?

Record (1 meetings): VPS 1W | Draws 0 | EIF 0W.

What form are VPS and EIF in?

VPS (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.30 | L5 W-D-D-D-L. EIF (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.70 | L5 L-W-L-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

VPS's attacking strength (1.06x league average) is weighed against EIF's defensive record (1.27x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.11. Flip it around — EIF's attack (0.88x) against VPS's defence (1.00x) — and the away total comes out at 1.13.

These ratings are built from 36/13 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 10.5%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.9%), 2-0 (8.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

VPS Win

58%

VPS

1.71

23%

Draw

4.27

18%

EIF

5.52

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.9%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

9.3%

Draw

2 – 0

8.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.11

VPS xG

Total xG

3.24

1.13

EIF xG

58%
23%
18%
VPSDrawEIF

1.71

58%

Home win

4.27

23%

Draw

5.52

18%

Away win

Goals Markets

83%

Over 1.5

1.20

17%

Under 1.5

5.88

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

61%

BTTS Yes

1.64

39%

BTTS No

2.56

Clean Sheet

32%

VPS

3.09

12%

EIF

8.26

Win to Nil

19%

VPS

5.28

2%

EIF

45.64

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 4.4 2.5 0.9 0.3 0.1
1 8.3 9.3 5.3 2.0 0.6 0.1
2 8.7 9.9 5.6 2.1 0.6 0.1
3 6.2 6.9 3.9 1.5 0.4 0.1
4 3.3 3.7 2.1 0.8 0.2
5 1.4 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.112
λ Away (xG) 1.127
Total xG 3.239
League avg home goals 1.569
League avg away goals 1.274
VPS attack strength 1.057
VPS defence strength 1.005
EIF attack strength 0.881
EIF defence strength 1.274
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 36 / 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for VPS vs EIF?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.5%.

How many goals are VPS and EIF expected to score?

The model projects 2.11 expected goals for VPS and 1.13 for EIF, a combined total of 3.24.

How confident is the prediction model for VPS vs EIF?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 58%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 13 outings, VPS have picked up 1.69 PPG on a 6W 4D 3L record — W-D-D-D-L across the most recent five. The sample for VPS is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

EIF's form line: 2W 3D 8L from 13 games, 0.69 PPG, last five L-W-L-L-W. The sample for EIF is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, VPS are the form team by 1.00 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against EIF.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, VPS have posted 1.71 PPG from 7 outings (3W 3D 1L).

On the road, EIF have gone 1W 1D 5L from 7 away games — 0.57 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, VPS come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

VPS are averaging 1.62 goals scored and 1.31 conceded per game recently; EIF are on 1.00 scored and 1.77 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: VPS have seen both teams score in 85% of their recent games; EIF in 77%.

Last 13 Results — Veikkausliiga

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

VPS

VPS

Blended
W D D D L
EIF

EIF

Blended
L W L L W
13 Played 13
6/4/3 W / D / L 2/3/8
1.69 Points Per Game 0.69
1.62 Avg Goals Scored 1.00
1.31 Avg Goals Conceded 1.77
2.92 Avg Goals / Game 2.77
2 Clean Sheets 2
11 BTTS 10
9 Over 2.5 Games 8
VPS

VPS

L
A Inter Turku
1–3 HT 0–2
28 Jun
D
H AC Oulu
1–1 HT 1–1
19 Jun
D
A Mariehamn
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
D
H Ilves
1–1 HT 1–0
07 Jun
W
A EIF
2–1 HT 0–0
02 Jun
W
H Inter Turku
3–1 HT 2–0
27 May
L
H KuPS
1–3 HT 0–1
22 May
W
A HJK Helsinki
2–1 HT 1–0
17 May
L
A KuPS
1–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Lahti
3–0 HT 0–0
03 May
W
A AC Oulu
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Gnistan
3–2 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H SJK
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Apr
EIF

EIF

W
A Gnistan
2–1 HT 1–0
30 Jun
L
H Mariehamn
1–2 HT 1–1
19 Jun
L
A SJK
1–3 HT 1–1
12 Jun
W
H Gnistan
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
L
H VPS
1–2 HT 0–0
02 Jun
L
A KuPS
1–4 HT 1–2
26 May
D
H Lahti
1–1 HT 1–0
19 May
L
H Ilves
0–2 HT 0–1
12 May
D
A HJK Helsinki
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
L
A Inter Turku
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Apr
D
H AC Oulu
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Apr
L
A Haka
1–2 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Mariehamn
2–3 HT 2–2
06 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are VPS and EIF in coming into this match?

VPS have gone 6W 4D 3L in their last 13 games (1.69 PPG), while EIF have gone 2W 3D 8L in their last 13 (0.69 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — VPS at home or EIF away?

VPS's home record (1.71 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — VPS at home: 1.71 PPG; EIF away: 0.57 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 2 times that we have on record, stretching back to June 2024 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Veikkausliiga. It has been a while since the last meeting — 6 July 2024, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

VPS

1

VPS

0

Draws

EIF

1

EIF

Recent Meetings

VPS
2–3
06 Jul 24
EIF
EIF
1–2
02 Jun 24
VPS

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between VPS and EIF?

From 2 meetings on record, VPS have won 1, EIF have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did VPS and EIF last play each other?

They last met on 6 July 2024, when VPS 2-3 EIF.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

VPS are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 43% of the time.

EIF are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 86% for VPS, 86% for EIF — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 57% for VPS and 86% for EIF. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 43% and 43% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = VPS home games / EIF away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

VPS VPS Blended
Metric All
(13 games)
Venue
(7 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 7/13
(53.8%)
5/7
(71.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/13
(30.8%)
3/7
(42.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/6
(83.3%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/6
(83.3%)
2/2
(100%)
Winning at HT 4/13
(30.8%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/13
(7.7%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/13
(0%)
0/7
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 11/13
(84.6%)
6/7
(85.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 9/13
(69.2%)
4/7
(57.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/13
(30.8%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Clean Sheet 2/13
(15.4%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Failed to Score 1/13
(7.7%)
0/7
(0%)
EIF EIF Blended
Metric All
(13 games)
Venue
(7 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 10/13
(76.9%)
6/7
(85.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/13
(30.8%)
3/7
(42.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
0/1
(0%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/3
(33.3%)
0/1
(0%)
Winning at HT 3/13
(23.1%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/13
(15.4%)
0/7
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/13
(0%)
0/7
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 10/13
(76.9%)
6/7
(85.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 8/13
(61.5%)
6/7
(85.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 3/13
(23.1%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Clean Sheet 2/13
(15.4%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Failed to Score 2/13
(15.4%)
1/7
(14.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when VPS play EIF?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 86% of VPS's games and 86% of EIF's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is VPS vs EIF usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 57% of VPS's matches and 86% of EIF's.

Do VPS and EIF tend to score early?

VPS have had a goal before half-time in 71% of their recent matches, EIF in 86% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as EIF defy the odds to beat VPS 2-3.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

EIF beat VPS 2-3 at Lemonsoft Stadion, Regular Season - 14, in the Veikkausliiga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting VPS 2.11 xG and EIF 1.13 xG, a combined 3.24. The scoreboard read 2-3 for 5 actual goals. EIF outscored their 1.13 projection by 1.9. Those figures were built on strength ratings of VPS attack 1.06 / defence 1.00 against EIF attack 0.88 / defence 1.27, drawn from 36/13 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it VPS 58% | Draw 23% | EIF 18%, with VPS to win its most likely call at 58%. Instead the game produced a EIF win, an outcome the model had rated at just 18% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 41% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 61% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 65% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (VPS 69%, EIF 62%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 81%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

VPS's trading profile (13 games, 7 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 85% of their matches — today it did.

EIF's trading profile (13 games, 7 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 77% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, VPS arrived the stronger side — 1.69 PPG against 0.69. Form was overturned, with EIF winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. VPS (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.29 concession average — a leakier day than usual. EIF (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.14 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 63% Over 2.5 probability, 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 61% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 65% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.