Sign in Register

Meizhou Kejia 1-2 Wuhan Three Towns – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 3

Kick-off

Tue 25 Apr 2023

12:35

Venue

Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns at 41% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium plays host to Meizhou Kejia versus Wuhan Three Towns in Super League, Regular Season - 3. Kick-off: Tuesday 25 April 2023 at 12:35 UTC.

Current Form

Meizhou Kejia's overall Super League record this term: 4W 0D 6L from 10 games (1.20 PPG). Last five: L L W L W. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their games — a low BTTS rate that suggests clean sheets are a regular occurrence.

In front of their own supporters this season, Meizhou Kejia have posted 5W 1D 4L at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium — 1.60 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.

Wuhan Three Towns (all games): 6W 1D 3L across 10 Super League outings this term — 1.90 points per game. Last five: D W L W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not.

On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 7W 1D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (2.20 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

On a straight form reading, Wuhan Three Towns are the stronger side — 0.70 PPG clear of the hosts (1.90 vs 1.20). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Meizhou Kejia lead 0W to 2W over the last 2 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 2 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 21 Nov 2022, ended 0–3 with Wuhan Three Towns winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Meizhou Kejia half-time and goal-timing data (34 games, 17 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (home games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

Wuhan Three Towns half-time and goal-timing data (34 games, 17 at away): they score before half-time in 76% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 44%; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Meizhou Kejia 41% versus Wuhan Three Towns 50%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Meizhou Kejia 50% | Wuhan Three Towns 74%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 1.03 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.34 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.883 / defence 0.894 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.147 / defence 0.848. League average goals — home 1.374 / away 1.308. Data: 36 Meizhou Kejia games / 36 Wuhan Three Towns games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 25% | Draw 34% | Wuhan Three Towns 41%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 4.00 | Draw 2.94 | Wuhan Three Towns 2.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 34% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 42% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.37. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 58% — total xG of 2.37 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Three Towns at 41% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 34% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.37 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 42% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

Poisson assigns a 51% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Meizhou Kejia 40% | Wuhan Three Towns 50%.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (36 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Wuhan Three Towns — H2H win rate 100% vs Poisson 41%.
Form Wuhan Three Towns lead on PPG: 1.90 vs 1.20 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.03) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.34) is below their form scoring rate (1.90) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Wuhan Three Towns — Wuhan Three Towns at 41% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 34% — tight contest expected.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 3 | Venue: Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium • Kick-off: Tuesday 25 Apr 2023, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 25% | Draw 34% | Wuhan Three Towns 41% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 42% | BTTS 51% | xG Meizhou Kejia 1.03 / Wuhan Three Towns 1.34 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.883 / def 0.894 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.147 / def 0.848 | league avg home 1.374 / away 1.308 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.03

Meizhou Kejia xG

Expected Goals

1.34

Wuhan Three Towns xG

25%
34%
41%
Meizhou Kejia Draw Wuhan Three Towns

51%

BTTS

72%

Over 1.5

42%

Over 2.5

22%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kick off?

Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kicked off at 12:35 on Tuesday 25 April 2023 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.

What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Meizhou Kejia 1 - 2 Wuhan Three Towns.

Where is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns being played?

The match is being played at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.

What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns part of?

Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns is a Regular Season - 3 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 25% chance of winning, Wuhan Three Towns a 41% chance, and a 34% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.

Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our model estimates a 51% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns will score (BTTS).

Will Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 42%.

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns?

Record (2 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 0W | Draws 0 | Wuhan Three Towns 2W.

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns in?

Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 4W-0D-6L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.20 | L5 L-L-W-L-W. Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 6W-1D-3L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-W-L-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Meizhou Kejia's attack at 0.88x the league average against Wuhan Three Towns's defence at 0.85x — combine the two and it projects 1.03 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Wuhan Three Towns's attack (1.15x) against Meizhou Kejia's defence (0.89x) — and the away total comes out at 1.34.

The sample (36/36 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.6% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (11.0%), 0-1 (10.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 36% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

25%

Meizhou Kejia

3.93

34%

Draw

2.95

41%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.46

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.9%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

12.5%

Away win

1 – 0

9.6%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.03

Meizhou Kejia xG

Total xG

2.37

1.34

Wuhan Three Towns xG

25%
34%
41%
Meizhou KejiaDrawWuhan Three Towns

3.93

25%

Home win

2.95

34%

Draw

2.46

41%

Away win

Goals Markets

68%

Over 1.5

1.47

32%

Under 1.5

3.12

42%

Over 2.5

2.38

58%

Under 2.5

1.72

22%

Over 3.5

4.55

78%

Under 3.5

1.28

9%

Over 4.5

11.11

91%

Under 4.5

1.10

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

51%

BTTS Yes

1.97

49%

BTTS No

2.03

Clean Sheet

26%

Meizhou Kejia

3.82

36%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.80

Win to Nil

7%

Meizhou Kejia

15.01

15%

Wuhan Three Towns

6.89

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 9.3 12.5 8.4 3.8 1.3 0.3
1 9.6 12.9 8.6 3.9 1.3 0.3
2 4.9 6.6 4.4 2.0 0.7 0.2
3 1.7 2.3 1.5 0.7 0.2 0.1
4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.029
λ Away (xG) 1.341
Total xG 2.370
League avg home goals 1.374
League avg away goals 1.308
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.883
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 0.894
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.147
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 0.848
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 36 / 36

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.6%.

How many goals are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns expected to score?

The model projects 1.03 expected goals for Meizhou Kejia and 1.34 for Wuhan Three Towns, a combined total of 2.37.

How confident is the prediction model for Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 34 outings, Meizhou Kejia have picked up 1.44 PPG on a 14W 7D 13L record — L-L-W-L-W across the most recent five.

Wuhan Three Towns's form line: 25W 3D 6L from 34 games, 2.29 PPG, last five D-W-L-W-W.

Put side by side, Wuhan Three Towns are the form team by 0.85 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Meizhou Kejia.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Meizhou Kejia have posted 1.76 PPG from 17 outings (9W 3D 5L).

On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 13W 2D 2L from 17 away games — 2.41 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Meizhou Kejia are averaging 1.26 goals scored and 1.21 conceded per game recently; Wuhan Three Towns are on 2.68 scored and 0.82 conceded.

Defensively: Wuhan Three Towns in 44% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 34 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Current Season
L L W L W
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
D W L W W
34 Played 34
14/7/13 W / D / L 25/3/6
1.44 Points Per Game 2.29
1.26 Avg Goals Scored 2.68
1.21 Avg Goals Conceded 0.82
2.47 Avg Goals / Game 3.50
11 Clean Sheets 15
14 BTTS 17
17 Over 2.5 Games 25
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Dec
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3
27 Dec
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
10 Dec
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Dec
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Dalian Aerbin
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Nov
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–3 HT 0–2
21 Nov
W
A Guangzhou R&F
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–0
08 Nov
D
A Wuhan Zall
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–7 HT 0–3
24 Oct
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–1 HT 2–0
09 Oct
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 1–0
10 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–2 HT 1–1
28 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–2
22 Aug
W
H Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
W
H Wuhan Zall
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–2
17 Jun
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

W
H Tianjin Teda
3–0
31 Dec
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Dec
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Dec
W
A Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 0–0
14 Dec
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Dec
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
04 Dec
L
H Changchun Yatai
2–3 HT 0–1
30 Nov
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
21 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–0
13 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Nov
W
H Guangzhou R&F
4–1 HT 2–1
03 Nov
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–0 HT 2–0
25 Oct
W
A Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–4 HT 1–2
24 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
28 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–1
22 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
06 Aug
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jul
W
H Wuhan Zall
5–0 HT 2–0
08 Jul
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Jul
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
5–0 HT 3–0
26 Jun
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 2–0
19 Jun
W
A Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 2–0
15 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Jun
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
6–0 HT 2–0
07 Jun
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 2–0
03 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns in coming into this match?

Meizhou Kejia have gone 14W 7D 13L in their last 34 games (1.44 PPG), while Wuhan Three Towns have gone 25W 3D 6L in their last 34 (2.29 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Meizhou Kejia at home or Wuhan Three Towns away?

Wuhan Three Towns's away record (2.41 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Meizhou Kejia at home: 1.76 PPG; Wuhan Three Towns away: 2.41 PPG.

Have Meizhou Kejia or Wuhan Three Towns been keeping clean sheets recently?

Meizhou Kejia have kept a clean sheet in 32% of their recent games, Wuhan Three Towns in 44%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since August 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 10 August 2025, roughly 12 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

Meizhou Kejia go into this on the back of 4 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Wuhan Three Towns won 3-0 on 21 Nov 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Meizhou Kejia have gone 2W 0D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Wuhan Three Towns — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Meizhou Kejia

4

Meizhou Kejia

0

Draws

Wuhan Three Towns

4

Wuhan Three Towns

Recent Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns
1–2
10 Aug 25
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
3–1
06 Apr 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Meizhou Kejia
1–0
27 Oct 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
25 May 24
Meizhou Kejia
Wuhan Three Towns
2–1
23 Jul 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
25 Apr 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–0
21 Nov 22
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
22 Aug 22
Wuhan Three Towns

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns?

From 8 meetings on record, Meizhou Kejia have won 4, Wuhan Three Towns have won 4, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns last play each other?

They last met on 10 August 2025, when Wuhan Three Towns 1-2 Meizhou Kejia.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 29% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 76% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 65% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Meizhou Kejia 59%, Wuhan Three Towns 47% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 59% for Meizhou Kejia and 65% for Wuhan Three Towns. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 29% and 24% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns in 47%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Meizhou Kejia home games / Wuhan Three Towns away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 22/33
(66.7%)
11/17
(64.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/33
(30.3%)
5/17
(29.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/11
(63.6%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/11
(18.2%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 9/33
(27.3%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/33
(3%)
1/17
(5.9%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/33
(6.1%)
2/17
(11.8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/34
(41.2%)
10/17
(58.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/34
(50%)
10/17
(58.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/34
(23.5%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Clean Sheet 11/34
(32.4%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Failed to Score 13/34
(38.2%)
3/17
(17.6%)
Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/33
(87.9%)
13/17
(76.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/33
(51.5%)
6/17
(35.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/4
(100%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/4
(50%)
2/4
(50%)
Winning at HT 23/33
(69.7%)
11/17
(64.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/33
(9.1%)
2/17
(11.8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/33
(0%)
0/17
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/34
(50%)
8/17
(47.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 25/34
(73.5%)
11/17
(64.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/34
(44.1%)
4/17
(23.5%)
Clean Sheet 15/34
(44.1%)
8/17
(47.1%)
Failed to Score 2/34
(5.9%)
1/17
(5.9%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Meizhou Kejia play Wuhan Three Towns?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 59% of Meizhou Kejia's recent matches and 47% of Wuhan Three Towns's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 59% of Meizhou Kejia's matches and 65% of Wuhan Three Towns's.

Do Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns tend to score early?

Meizhou Kejia have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, Wuhan Three Towns in 76% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Wuhan Three Towns edge out Meizhou Kejia 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Wuhan Three Towns beat Meizhou Kejia 1-2 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium, Regular Season - 3, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Meizhou Kejia 1.03 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.34 xG, a combined 2.37. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Meizhou Kejia attack 0.88 / defence 0.89 against Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.15 / defence 0.85, drawn from 36/36 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Meizhou Kejia 25% | Draw 34% | Wuhan Three Towns 41%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 41%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 42%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 72% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Meizhou Kejia 50%, Wuhan Three Towns 74%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 46%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (34 games, 17 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and conceded here.

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (34 games, 17 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 2.29 PPG against 1.44. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 1.06 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 42% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 51% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.