Sign in Register

Chongqing Tongliang Long 2-3 SHANGHAI SIPG – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 22

Kick-off

Sun 9 Aug 2026

11:35

Venue

Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Chongqing Tongliang Long at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG meet at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 22. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 9 August 2026 at 11:35 UTC.

Form

Chongqing Tongliang Long (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 0.90 PPG. Last five: L D D L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Chongqing Tongliang Long, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chongqing Tongliang Long's home record at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium: 4W 5D 1L from 10 Super League appearances (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.90 — Chongqing Tongliang Long are significantly better at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium than their overall form suggests.

SHANGHAI SIPG have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 3W 4D 3L. Last five: W L D W L. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.40. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for SHANGHAI SIPG, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 2W 3D 5L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.90 PPG for Chongqing Tongliang Long against 1.30 for SHANGHAI SIPG. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Chongqing Tongliang Long have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 70%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 1 head-to-head meetings have produced 1 wins for Chongqing Tongliang Long, 0 for SHANGHAI SIPG and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 21 Apr 2026, ended 2–1 with Chongqing Tongliang Long winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Chongqing Tongliang Long — key trading statistics (21 games, 10 at home): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 30% of games (home games).

SHANGHAI SIPG — key trading statistics (21 games, 10 at away): they score before half-time in 60% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 57% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chongqing Tongliang Long 52% versus SHANGHAI SIPG 67%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chongqing Tongliang Long 33% | SHANGHAI SIPG 57%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.32 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 1.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chongqing Tongliang Long attack 0.791 / defence 0.926 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.050 / defence 0.977. League average goals — home 1.702 / away 1.282. Chongqing Tongliang Long's attack strength of 0.791 is below the league average — the 1.32 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 21 Chongqing Tongliang Long games / 50 SHANGHAI SIPG games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chongqing Tongliang Long 38% | Draw 27% | SHANGHAI SIPG 35%. Fair-value odds: Chongqing Tongliang Long 2.63 | Draw 3.70 | SHANGHAI SIPG 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 2.56. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.56 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Chongqing Tongliang Long are the pick at 38% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Chongqing Tongliang Long if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.56 combined xG gives a 47% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 52%. Form rates corroborate: Chongqing Tongliang Long 60% | SHANGHAI SIPG 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.56) both back Over 2.5 goals (47% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 52% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Chongqing Tongliang Long 6/10, SHANGHAI SIPG 7/10) and Poisson model (52%).

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 22 | Venue: Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium • Kick-off: Sunday 9 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chongqing Tongliang Long 38% | Draw 27% | SHANGHAI SIPG 35% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 47% | BTTS 52% | xG Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.32 / SHANGHAI SIPG 1.25 • Poisson strength factors: Chongqing Tongliang Long attack 0.791 / def 0.926 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.050 / def 0.977 | league avg home 1.702 / away 1.282 • Poisson stance: Chongqing Tongliang Long (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.32

Chongqing Tongliang Long xG

Expected Goals

1.25

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

38%
27%
35%
Chongqing Tongliang Long Draw SHANGHAI SIPG

52%

BTTS

73%

Over 1.5

47%

Over 2.5

26%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG kick off?

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG kicked off at 11:35 on Sunday 9 August 2026 at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium.

What was the final score in Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Chongqing Tongliang Long 2 - 3 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Where is Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG being played?

The match is being played at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium.

What competition is Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG part of?

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG is a Regular Season - 22 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our statistical model gives Chongqing Tongliang Long a 38% chance of winning, SHANGHAI SIPG a 35% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Chongqing Tongliang Long the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our model estimates a 52% probability that both Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG will score (BTTS).

Will Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 47%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG?

Record (1 meetings): Chongqing Tongliang Long 1W | Draws 0 | SHANGHAI SIPG 0W.

What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG in?

Chongqing Tongliang Long (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-D-D-L-L. SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-L-D-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Chongqing Tongliang Long's attack at 0.79x the league average against SHANGHAI SIPG's defence at 0.98x — combine the two and it projects 1.32 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — SHANGHAI SIPG's attack (1.05x) against Chongqing Tongliang Long's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 1.25.

These ratings are built from 21/50 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (9.4%), 1-0 (8.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chongqing Tongliang Long Win

38%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

2.61

27%

Draw

3.76

35%

SHANGHAI SIPG

2.85

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.7%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

10.2%

Home win

0 – 1

9.6%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.32

Chongqing Tongliang Long xG

Total xG

2.56

1.25

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

38%
27%
35%
Chongqing Tongliang LongDrawSHANGHAI SIPG

2.61

38%

Home win

3.76

27%

Draw

2.85

35%

Away win

Goals Markets

72%

Over 1.5

1.39

28%

Under 1.5

3.57

47%

Over 2.5

2.13

53%

Under 2.5

1.89

26%

Over 3.5

3.85

74%

Under 3.5

1.35

12%

Over 4.5

8.33

88%

Under 4.5

1.14

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

52%

BTTS Yes

1.92

48%

BTTS No

2.09

Clean Sheet

29%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

3.47

27%

SHANGHAI SIPG

3.73

Win to Nil

11%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

9.05

9%

SHANGHAI SIPG

10.64

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.7 9.6 6.0 2.5 0.8 0.2
1 10.2 12.7 7.9 3.3 1.0 0.3
2 6.7 8.3 5.2 2.2 0.7 0.2
3 2.9 3.7 2.3 0.9 0.3 0.1
4 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1
5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.316
λ Away (xG) 1.245
Total xG 2.561
League avg home goals 1.702
League avg away goals 1.282
Chongqing Tongliang Long attack strength 0.791
Chongqing Tongliang Long defence strength 0.926
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 1.050
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 0.977
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 21 / 50

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.3%.

How many goals are Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG expected to score?

The model projects 1.32 expected goals for Chongqing Tongliang Long and 1.25 for SHANGHAI SIPG, a combined total of 2.56.

How confident is the prediction model for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 21 outings, Chongqing Tongliang Long have picked up 1.38 PPG on a 7W 8D 6L record — L-D-D-L-L across the most recent five. The sample for Chongqing Tongliang Long is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

SHANGHAI SIPG's form line: 7W 6D 8L from 21 games, 1.29 PPG, last five W-L-D-W-L. The sample for SHANGHAI SIPG is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.38 PPG for Chongqing Tongliang Long against 1.29 for SHANGHAI SIPG. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Chongqing Tongliang Long have posted 1.70 PPG from 10 outings (4W 5D 1L).

On the road, SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 2W 3D 5L from 10 away games — 0.90 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chongqing Tongliang Long come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chongqing Tongliang Long are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.14 conceded per game recently; SHANGHAI SIPG are on 1.48 scored and 1.29 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: SHANGHAI SIPG in 67%.

Last 21 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Blended
L D D L L
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Blended
W L D W L
21 Played 21
7/8/6 W / D / L 7/6/8
1.38 Points Per Game 1.29
1.10 Avg Goals Scored 1.48
1.14 Avg Goals Conceded 1.29
2.24 Avg Goals / Game 2.76
7 Clean Sheets 4
11 BTTS 14
7 Over 2.5 Games 12
Chongqing Tongliang Long

Chongqing Tongliang Long

L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–2 HT 0–0
02 Aug
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jul
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
D
A Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
L
A Shenyang Urban
1–3 HT 1–0
04 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 0–1
30 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
24 May
D
H Yunnan Yukun
0–0 HT 0–0
20 May
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–2
16 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–2 HT 2–0
09 May
D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
05 May
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–0
01 May
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–1 HT 2–0
11 Apr
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 0–2
21 Mar
W
H Shenyang Urban
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Mar
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Mar
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Aug
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jul
D
A Yunnan Yukun
2–2 HT 2–0
17 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–2 HT 0–0
04 Jul
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Jun
L
A Shenyang Urban
2–3 HT 1–1
29 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 0–0
23 May
W
A Chengdu Better City
1–0 HT 0–0
19 May
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–1
15 May
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–0
10 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 0–0
06 May
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 0–1
02 May
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
4–0 HT 1–0
25 Apr
L
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–2 HT 0–2
21 Apr
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
17 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
11 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Apr
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Mar
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
4–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–2
07 Mar
W
A Dalian Zhixing
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG in coming into this match?

Chongqing Tongliang Long have gone 7W 8D 6L in their last 21 games (1.38 PPG), while SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 7W 6D 8L in their last 21 (1.29 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chongqing Tongliang Long at home or SHANGHAI SIPG away?

Chongqing Tongliang Long's home record (1.70 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chongqing Tongliang Long at home: 1.70 PPG; SHANGHAI SIPG away: 0.90 PPG.

Have Chongqing Tongliang Long or SHANGHAI SIPG been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chongqing Tongliang Long have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 19%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 2 times since April 2026 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 9 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Last 2 Meetings

Chongqing Tongliang Long

1

Chongqing Tongliang Long

0

Draws

SHANGHAI SIPG

1

SHANGHAI SIPG

Recent Meetings

Chongqing Tongliang Long
2–3
09 Aug 26
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2
21 Apr 26
Chongqing Tongliang Long

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG?

From 2 meetings on record, Chongqing Tongliang Long have won 1, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG last play each other?

They last met on 9 August 2026, when Chongqing Tongliang Long 2-3 SHANGHAI SIPG.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Chongqing Tongliang Long see a goal before the break in 50% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 60% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 30% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 60% for Chongqing Tongliang Long, 70% for SHANGHAI SIPG — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 30% (Chongqing Tongliang Long) and 60% (SHANGHAI SIPG).

On the defensive side: Chongqing Tongliang Long keep a clean sheet in 40% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chongqing Tongliang Long home games / SHANGHAI SIPG away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chongqing Tongliang Long Chongqing Tongliang Long Blended
Metric All
(21 games)
Venue
(10 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 11/21
(52.4%)
5/10
(50%)
2+ Goals Before HT 6/21
(28.6%)
3/10
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/10
(80%)
4/5
(80%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/10
(30%)
2/5
(40%)
Winning at HT 4/21
(19%)
1/10
(10%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/21
(9.5%)
0/10
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/21
(14.3%)
2/10
(20%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 11/21
(52.4%)
6/10
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 7/21
(33.3%)
3/10
(30%)
Over 3.5 Goals 5/21
(23.8%)
2/10
(20%)
Clean Sheet 7/21
(33.3%)
4/10
(40%)
Failed to Score 5/21
(23.8%)
1/10
(10%)
SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Blended
Metric All
(21 games)
Venue
(10 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 14/21
(66.7%)
6/10
(60%)
2+ Goals Before HT 7/21
(33.3%)
3/10
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/7
(100%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/7
(57.1%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 7/21
(33.3%)
3/10
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/21
(14.3%)
3/10
(30%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/21
(0%)
0/10
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/21
(66.7%)
7/10
(70%)
Over 2.5 Goals 12/21
(57.1%)
6/10
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/21
(33.3%)
4/10
(40%)
Clean Sheet 4/21
(19%)
1/10
(10%)
Failed to Score 3/21
(14.3%)
2/10
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chongqing Tongliang Long play SHANGHAI SIPG?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 60% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's games and 70% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chongqing Tongliang Long vs SHANGHAI SIPG usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 30% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's recent games and 60% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Chongqing Tongliang Long and SHANGHAI SIPG tend to score early?

Chongqing Tongliang Long have had a goal before half-time in 50% of their recent matches, SHANGHAI SIPG in 60% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as SHANGHAI SIPG defy the odds to beat Chongqing Tongliang Long 2-3.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Chongqing Tongliang Long 2-3 at Chongqing Longxing Football Stadium, Regular Season - 22, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.32 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 1.25 xG, a combined 2.56. The scoreboard read 2-3 for 5 actual goals. SHANGHAI SIPG outscored their 1.25 projection by 1.8. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chongqing Tongliang Long attack 0.79 / defence 0.93 against SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.05 / defence 0.98, drawn from 21/50 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chongqing Tongliang Long 38% | Draw 27% | SHANGHAI SIPG 35%, with Chongqing Tongliang Long to win its most likely call at 38%. The actual SHANGHAI SIPG win had been the model's second-ranked read at 35%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 47%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 73% and landed. Over 3.5 was 26% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 52% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 45% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%, SHANGHAI SIPG 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 60%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chongqing Tongliang Long's trading profile (21 games, 10 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (21 games, 10 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.38 PPG, SHANGHAI SIPG 1.29 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the SHANGHAI SIPG win broke the near-deadlock. Chongqing Tongliang Long (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.00 concession average — a leakier day than usual. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.20 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 47% Over 2.5 probability, but 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 52% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 45% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.