Sign in Register

Meizhou Kejia 1-0 Shenzhen Ruby FC – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 8

Kick-off

Sun 3 Jul 2022

09:30

Venue

Wuhua Hengpi Football Town

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Meizhou Kejia at 54%, yet other data sources diverge — this Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Shenzhen Ruby FC make the trip to Wuhua Hengpi Football Town to face Meizhou Kejia in Super League, Regular Season - 8. The match kicks off on Sunday 3 July 2022 at 09:30 UTC.

Form

Meizhou Kejia (all games): 2W 4D 1L across 7 Super League fixtures this term — 1.43 PPG. Last five: W D D L W. They are averaging 1.43 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 7 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 71% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Meizhou Kejia have played only a handful of Super League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Meizhou Kejia's home record at Wuhua Hengpi Football Town: 1W 2D 0L from 3 Super League appearances (1.67 PPG). They are averaging 2.33 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 100% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's overall Super League record this term: 4W 1D 5L from 10 games (1.30 PPG). Last five: L W L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Shenzhen Ruby FC have played only a handful of Super League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

When travelling in Super League this season, Shenzhen Ruby FC have posted 3W 3D 4L from 10 away outings — 1.20 PPG. Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 90% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.43 PPG for Meizhou Kejia against 1.30 for Shenzhen Ruby FC. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — Meizhou Kejia register both teams scoring in 100% of relevant games, Shenzhen Ruby FC in 90%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Meizhou Kejia lead 1W to 0W over the last 1 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 13 Jun 2022, ended 2–1 with Meizhou Kejia winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

Meizhou Kejia goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (7 games, 3 at home): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games.

Shenzhen Ruby FC goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (7 games, 3 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games; Over 3.5 in 43%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Meizhou Kejia 71% and Shenzhen Ruby FC 71% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Meizhou Kejia 43% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 71%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 2.28 xG and Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.49 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.202 / defence 1.123 | Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.164 / defence 1.335. League average goals — home 1.421 / away 1.142. Shenzhen Ruby FC bring a strong defensive rating of 1.335 — this is suppressing Meizhou Kejia's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 7 Meizhou Kejia games / 21 Shenzhen Ruby FC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 54% | Draw 23% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 23%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 1.85 | Draw 4.35 | Shenzhen Ruby FC 4.35. Meizhou Kejia hold a narrow Poisson edge at 54% — the draw (23%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 73% | BTTS probability 71% | Total xG 3.77. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 73% — a total xG of 3.77 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 71% reflects that both xG figures (2.28 / 1.49) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Meizhou Kejia as the most likely outcome at 54% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 23% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Meizhou Kejia if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 3.77 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 73% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.7 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 71% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Meizhou Kejia 100% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 90% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.77) both back Over 2.5 goals (73% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 71% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Goals Form averages (~2.9 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.77) both support Over 2.5 goals at 73%.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Meizhou Kejia 3/3, Shenzhen Ruby FC 9/10) and Poisson model (71%).
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 73% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 71% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 8 | Venue: Wuhua Hengpi Football Town • Kick-off: Sunday 3 Jul 2022, 09:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 54% | Draw 23% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 23% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 73% | BTTS 71% | xG Meizhou Kejia 2.28 / Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.49 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.202 / def 1.123 | Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.164 / def 1.335 | league avg home 1.421 / away 1.142 • Poisson stance: Meizhou Kejia (54%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.28

Meizhou Kejia xG

Expected Goals

1.49

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

54%
23%
23%
Meizhou Kejia Draw Shenzhen Ruby FC

71%

BTTS

91%

Over 1.5

73%

Over 2.5

52%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC kick off?

Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC kicked off at 09:30 on Sunday 3 July 2022 at Wuhua Hengpi Football Town.

What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Meizhou Kejia 1 - 0 Shenzhen Ruby FC.

Where is Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC being played?

The match is being played at Wuhua Hengpi Football Town.

What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC part of?

Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC is a Regular Season - 8 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 54% chance of winning, Shenzhen Ruby FC a 23% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making Meizhou Kejia the favourite.

Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our model estimates a 71% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC will score (BTTS).

Will Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 73%.

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Record (1 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 1W | Draws 0 | Shenzhen Ruby FC 0W.

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC in?

Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 2W-4D-1L in 7 | 1.43 PPG | GF 1.43 / GA 1.00 | L5 W-D-D-L-W. Shenzhen Ruby FC (all comps): 4W-1D-5L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-W-L-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Meizhou Kejia's attacking strength (1.20x league average) is weighed against Shenzhen Ruby FC's defensive record (1.33x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.28. Flip it around — Shenzhen Ruby FC's attack (1.16x) against Meizhou Kejia's defence (1.12x) — and the away total comes out at 1.49.

These ratings are built from 7/21 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-1, at 8.9%. Close behind: 1-1 (8.8%), 3-1 (6.8%). Together the top three scorelines make up 25% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Meizhou Kejia Win

54%

Meizhou Kejia

1.86

23%

Draw

4.35

23%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

4.30

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

8.9%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

7.8%

Draw

3 – 1

6.8%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.28

Meizhou Kejia xG

Total xG

3.77

1.49

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

54%
23%
23%
Meizhou KejiaDrawShenzhen Ruby FC

1.86

54%

Home win

4.35

23%

Draw

4.30

23%

Away win

Goals Markets

89%

Over 1.5

1.12

11%

Under 1.5

9.09

73%

Over 2.5

1.37

27%

Under 2.5

3.70

52%

Over 3.5

1.92

48%

Under 3.5

2.08

33%

Over 4.5

3.03

67%

Under 4.5

1.49

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

71%

BTTS Yes

1.41

29%

BTTS No

3.46

Clean Sheet

22%

Meizhou Kejia

4.45

10%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

9.77

Win to Nil

12%

Meizhou Kejia

8.27

2%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

42.04

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 2.3 3.4 2.6 1.3 0.5 0.1
1 5.2 7.8 5.8 2.9 1.1 0.3
2 6.0 8.9 6.7 3.3 1.2 0.4
3 4.5 6.8 5.1 2.5 0.9 0.3
4 2.6 3.9 2.9 1.4 0.5 0.2
5 1.2 1.8 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.279
λ Away (xG) 1.492
Total xG 3.771
League avg home goals 1.421
League avg away goals 1.142
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 1.202
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.123
Shenzhen Ruby FC attack strength 1.164
Shenzhen Ruby FC defence strength 1.335
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 7 / 21

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 8.9%.

How many goals are Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC expected to score?

The model projects 2.28 expected goals for Meizhou Kejia and 1.49 for Shenzhen Ruby FC, a combined total of 3.77.

How confident is the prediction model for Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 54%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 7 outings, Meizhou Kejia have picked up 1.43 PPG on a 2W 4D 1L record — W-D-D-L-W across the most recent five. It's still early in the season for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's form line: 3W 1D 3L from 7 games, 1.43 PPG, last five L-W-L-D-L. It's still early in the season for Shenzhen Ruby FC, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.43 PPG for Meizhou Kejia against 1.43 for Shenzhen Ruby FC. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Meizhou Kejia have posted 1.67 PPG from 3 outings (1W 2D 0L).

On the road, Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 1W 1D 1L from 3 away games — 1.33 PPG when travelling.

Attack vs Defence

Meizhou Kejia are averaging 1.43 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game recently; Shenzhen Ruby FC are on 1.57 scored and 1.71 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Meizhou Kejia have seen both teams score in 71% of their recent games; Shenzhen Ruby FC in 71%.

Last 7 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Early Season
W D D L W
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Early Season
L W L D L
7 Played 7
2/4/1 W / D / L 3/1/3
1.43 Points Per Game 1.43
1.43 Avg Goals Scored 1.57
1.00 Avg Goals Conceded 1.71
2.43 Avg Goals / Game 3.29
1 Clean Sheets 2
5 BTTS 5
3 Over 2.5 Games 5
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–2
17 Jun
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

L
H Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 2–1
29 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–4 HT 0–1
21 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
13 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–0
09 Jun
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC in coming into this match?

Meizhou Kejia have gone 2W 4D 1L in their last 7 games (1.43 PPG), while Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 3W 1D 3L in their last 7 (1.43 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Meizhou Kejia at home or Shenzhen Ruby FC away?

Meizhou Kejia's home record (1.67 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Meizhou Kejia at home: 1.67 PPG; Shenzhen Ruby FC away: 1.33 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 4 times that we have on record, stretching back to June 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 16 September 2023, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Meizhou Kejia won 5-1 on 16 Sep 2023, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Meizhou Kejia have gone 2W 0D 0L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Shenzhen Ruby FC — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Meizhou Kejia

3

Meizhou Kejia

0

Draws

Shenzhen Ruby FC

1

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Recent Meetings

Meizhou Kejia
5–1
16 Sep 23
Shenzhen Ruby FC
Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–2
28 May 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–0
03 Jul 22
Shenzhen Ruby FC
Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–2
13 Jun 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

From 4 meetings on record, Meizhou Kejia have won 3, Shenzhen Ruby FC have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC last play each other?

They last met on 16 September 2023, when Meizhou Kejia 5-1 Shenzhen Ruby FC.

Who has won more matches between Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Meizhou Kejia have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.

Shenzhen Ruby FC are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 100% for Meizhou Kejia, 100% for Shenzhen Ruby FC — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 67% for Meizhou Kejia and 100% for Shenzhen Ruby FC. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 67% and 67% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Meizhou Kejia home games / Shenzhen Ruby FC away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Early Season
Metric All
(7 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 6/7
(85.7%)
3/3
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/7
(57.1%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Winning at HT 2/7
(28.6%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/7
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/7
(14.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 5/7
(71.4%)
3/3
(100%)
Over 2.5 Goals 3/7
(42.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 2/7
(28.6%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Clean Sheet 1/7
(14.3%)
0/3
(0%)
Failed to Score 2/7
(28.6%)
0/3
(0%)
Shenzhen Ruby FC Shenzhen Ruby FC Early Season
Metric All
(7 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 6/7
(85.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 2/7
(28.6%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 1/1
(100%)
1/1
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/1
(100%)
1/1
(100%)
Winning at HT 3/7
(42.9%)
0/3
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/7
(14.3%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/7
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 5/7
(71.4%)
3/3
(100%)
Over 2.5 Goals 5/7
(71.4%)
3/3
(100%)
Over 3.5 Goals 3/7
(42.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Clean Sheet 2/7
(28.6%)
0/3
(0%)
Failed to Score 0/7
(0%)
0/3
(0%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Meizhou Kejia play Shenzhen Ruby FC?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 100% of Meizhou Kejia's games and 100% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Meizhou Kejia vs Shenzhen Ruby FC usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 67% of Meizhou Kejia's matches and 100% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's.

Do Meizhou Kejia and Shenzhen Ruby FC tend to score early?

Meizhou Kejia have had a goal before half-time in 100% of their recent matches, Shenzhen Ruby FC in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Meizhou Kejia edge out Shenzhen Ruby FC 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Meizhou Kejia beat Shenzhen Ruby FC 1-0 at Wuhua Hengpi Football Town, Regular Season - 8, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Meizhou Kejia 2.28 xG and Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.49 xG, a combined 3.77. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Meizhou Kejia fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Shenzhen Ruby FC landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Meizhou Kejia attack 1.20 / defence 1.12 against Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 1.16 / defence 1.33, drawn from 7/21 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Meizhou Kejia 54% | Draw 23% | Shenzhen Ruby FC 23%, with Meizhou Kejia to win its most likely call at 54%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 73%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 91% and missed. Over 3.5 was 52% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 71% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Meizhou Kejia 43%, Shenzhen Ruby FC 71%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 71%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (7 games, 3 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 71% of their matches — today it did not.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's trading profile (7 games, 3 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 71% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Meizhou Kejia 1.43 PPG, Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.43 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Meizhou Kejia win broke the near-deadlock. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.33 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.33 average — tighter than their form line. Shenzhen Ruby FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.67 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.33 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 73% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 71% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 57% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.