Sign in Register

Guangzhou R&F 1-2 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 15

Kick-off

Sat 27 Aug 2022

12:30

Venue

Yuexiushan Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 65% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City meet at Yuexiushan Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 15. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 27 August 2022 at 12:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Guangzhou R&F have collected 0.00 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 0W 0D 10L. Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 0.50 goals per game and conceding 2.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.70 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. This season is still relatively young for Guangzhou R&F, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Guangzhou R&F's form when playing at home: 2W 0D 8L across 10 games at Yuexiushan Stadium this term (0.60 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 0.60 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.00 — Guangzhou R&F are significantly better at Yuexiushan Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Chengdu Better City's overall Super League record this term: 5W 4D 1L from 10 games (1.90 PPG). Last five: W W W W L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 0.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chengdu Better City's form when playing away from home: 5W 3D 2L across 10 road games this term (1.80 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home.

On a straight form reading, Chengdu Better City are the stronger side — 1.90 PPG clear of the hosts (1.90 vs 0.00). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

Trading

Guangzhou R&F half-time and goal-timing data (16 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 88% of games (home games); they fail to score in 56% of games.

Chengdu Better City half-time and goal-timing data (16 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 40% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Guangzhou R&F 44% versus Chengdu Better City 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Guangzhou R&F 62% | Chengdu Better City 38%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Guangzhou R&F 0.71 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.92 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Guangzhou R&F attack 0.642 / defence 1.709 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.869 / defence 0.827. League average goals — home 1.343 / away 1.296. Guangzhou R&F's attack strength of 0.642 is below the league average — the 0.71 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 28 Guangzhou R&F games / 14 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Guangzhou R&F 12% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 65%. Fair-value odds: Guangzhou R&F 8.33 | Draw 4.55 | Chengdu Better City 1.54. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (65%) — a 53pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 44% | Total xG 2.64. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.64 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 44% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 65% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 2.64 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 49% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 44% on No. Form rates corroborate: Guangzhou R&F 40% | Chengdu Better City 40% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 1.90 vs 0.00 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Guangzhou R&F Poisson xG (0.71) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.10) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.92) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.00) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.64 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 65% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 65% away win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 15 | Venue: Yuexiushan Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 27 Aug 2022, 12:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Guangzhou R&F 12% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 65% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 49% | BTTS 44% | xG Guangzhou R&F 0.71 / Chengdu Better City 1.92 • Poisson strength factors: Guangzhou R&F attack 0.642 / def 1.709 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.869 / def 0.827 | league avg home 1.343 / away 1.296 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (65%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

0.71

Guangzhou R&F xG

Expected Goals

1.92

Chengdu Better City xG

22%
65%
Guangzhou R&F Draw Chengdu Better City

44%

BTTS

75%

Over 1.5

49%

Over 2.5

27%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 12:30 on Saturday 27 August 2022 at Yuexiushan Stadium.

What was the final score in Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City?

Guangzhou R&F 1 - 2 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Yuexiushan Stadium.

What competition is Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 15 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Guangzhou R&F a 12% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 65% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 44% probability that both Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 49%.

What is the head-to-head record between Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City in?

Guangzhou R&F (all comps): 0W-0D-10L in 10 | 0.00 PPG | GF 0.50 / GA 2.70 | L5 L-L-L-L-L. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 5W-4D-1L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 0.80 | L5 W-W-W-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Guangzhou R&F's attack at 0.64x the league average against Chengdu Better City's defence at 0.83x — combine the two and it projects 0.71 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Chengdu Better City's attack (0.87x) against Guangzhou R&F's defence (1.71x) — and the away total comes out at 1.92.

These ratings are built from 28/14 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 0-2 carries the highest individual probability at 13.2% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-1 (12.5%), 1-1 (11.1%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 37% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

12%

Guangzhou R&F

8.06

22%

Draw

4.51

65%

Chengdu Better City

1.53

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

13.8%

Away win

Most likely

0 – 2

13.2%

Away win

1 – 1

9.8%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.71

Guangzhou R&F xG

Total xG

2.64

1.92

Chengdu Better City xG

12%
22%
65%
Guangzhou R&FDrawChengdu Better City

8.06

12%

Home win

4.51

22%

Draw

1.53

65%

Away win

Goals Markets

74%

Over 1.5

1.35

26%

Under 1.5

3.85

49%

Over 2.5

2.04

51%

Under 2.5

1.96

27%

Over 3.5

3.70

73%

Under 3.5

1.37

13%

Over 4.5

7.69

87%

Under 4.5

1.15

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

44%

BTTS Yes

2.26

56%

BTTS No

1.79

Clean Sheet

15%

Guangzhou R&F

6.85

49%

Chengdu Better City

2.04

Win to Nil

2%

Guangzhou R&F

55.23

32%

Chengdu Better City

3.12

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.2 13.8 13.2 8.5 4.1 1.6
1 5.1 9.8 9.4 6.1 2.9 1.1
2 1.8 3.5 3.4 2.2 1.0 0.4
3 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1
4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
5

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.713
λ Away (xG) 1.924
Total xG 2.637
League avg home goals 1.343
League avg away goals 1.296
Guangzhou R&F attack strength 0.642
Guangzhou R&F defence strength 1.709
Chengdu Better City attack strength 0.869
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.827
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 28 / 14

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 0-2 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.2%.

How many goals are Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 0.71 expected goals for Guangzhou R&F and 1.92 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 2.64.

How confident is the prediction model for Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 65%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Guangzhou R&F come into this having played 16 games, going 1W 1D 14L for 0.25 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-L-L-L. The sample for Guangzhou R&F is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, Chengdu Better City sit at 1.56 PPG from 16 outings (6W 7D 3L), a run that reads W-W-W-W-L across their last five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.31 PPG clear of Guangzhou R&F — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home & Away Splits

Guangzhou R&F's home form reads 1W 0D 7L across 8 games on their own ground, a 0.38 PPG return.

Away from home, Chengdu Better City have taken 1.88 points per game from 8 outings (4W 3D 1L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Guangzhou R&F are averaging 0.56 goals scored and 2.44 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.12 scored and 0.94 conceded.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City in 38% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 16 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Guangzhou R&F

Guangzhou R&F

Blended
L L L L L
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W W W W L
16 Played 16
1/1/14 W / D / L 6/7/3
0.25 Points Per Game 1.56
0.56 Avg Goals Scored 1.12
2.44 Avg Goals Conceded 0.94
3.00 Avg Goals / Game 2.06
0 Clean Sheets 6
7 BTTS 9
10 Over 2.5 Games 6
Guangzhou R&F

Guangzhou R&F

L
A Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Aug
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
H Wuhan Zall
0–5 HT 0–4
13 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–3 HT 0–0
06 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Jul
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–2 HT 0–2
03 Jul
L
H Dalian Aerbin
0–3 HT 0–2
28 Jun
L
H Changchun Yatai
1–3 HT 1–2
24 Jun
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–4 HT 0–3
20 Jun
L
H Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–1
15 Jun
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–2
08 Jun
L
A Changchun Yatai
1–4 HT 0–2
04 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
2–1 HT 2–0
04 Jan
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Jan
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun
W
A Dalian Aerbin
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Jan
D
H Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 0–1
08 Jan

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Guangzhou R&F have gone 1W 1D 14L in their last 16 games (0.25 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 6W 7D 3L in their last 16 (1.56 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Guangzhou R&F at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.88 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Guangzhou R&F at home: 0.38 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.88 PPG.

Have Guangzhou R&F or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Guangzhou R&F have kept a clean sheet in 0% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 38%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 2 times since August 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 25 November 2022, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Guangzhou R&F

0

Guangzhou R&F

0

Draws

Chengdu Better City

2

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
3–0
25 Nov 22
Guangzhou R&F
Guangzhou R&F
1–2
27 Aug 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City?

From 2 meetings on record, Guangzhou R&F have won 0, Chengdu Better City have won 2, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 25 November 2022, when Chengdu Better City 3-0 Guangzhou R&F.

Who has won more matches between Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Guangzhou R&F are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 62% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 25% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Guangzhou R&F 38%, Chengdu Better City 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 88% for Guangzhou R&F and 38% for Chengdu Better City. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 38% and 0% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City in 50%; Guangzhou R&F have failed to score in 62% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Guangzhou R&F home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Guangzhou R&F Guangzhou R&F Blended
Metric All
(16 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 14/16
(87.5%)
6/8
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 9/16
(56.2%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/2
(100%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/2
(50%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 3/16
(18.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/16
(12.5%)
0/8
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/16
(6.2%)
0/8
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 7/16
(43.8%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 10/16
(62.5%)
7/8
(87.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/16
(25%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Clean Sheet 0/16
(0%)
0/8
(0%)
Failed to Score 9/16
(56.2%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(16 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 11/16
(68.8%)
5/8
(62.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 2/16
(12.5%)
0/8
(0%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/5
(40%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/5
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Winning at HT 4/16
(25%)
2/8
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/16
(12.5%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/16
(18.8%)
2/8
(25%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 9/16
(56.2%)
4/8
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 6/16
(37.5%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 2/16
(12.5%)
0/8
(0%)
Clean Sheet 6/16
(37.5%)
4/8
(50%)
Failed to Score 4/16
(25%)
2/8
(25%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Guangzhou R&F play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 38% of Guangzhou R&F's recent matches and 50% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Guangzhou R&F vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 88% of Guangzhou R&F's matches and 38% of Chengdu Better City's.

Do Guangzhou R&F and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Guangzhou R&F have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 62% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Chengdu Better City edge out Guangzhou R&F 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Guangzhou R&F 1-2 at Yuexiushan Stadium, Regular Season - 15, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Guangzhou R&F 0.71 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.92 xG, a combined 2.64. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Guangzhou R&F attack 0.64 / defence 1.71 against Chengdu Better City attack 0.87 / defence 0.83, drawn from 28/14 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Guangzhou R&F 12% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 65%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 65%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 75% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Guangzhou R&F 62%, Chengdu Better City 38%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Guangzhou R&F's trading profile (16 games, 8 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (16 games, 8 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.56 PPG against 0.25. That form edge translated into the three points. Guangzhou R&F (home/away splits) conceded 2 against a 2.88 average — tighter than their form line. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.12 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 49% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 44% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 50% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.