Sign in Register

Coquimbo Unido 0-0 Palestino – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Primera División · Regular Season - 12

Kick-off

Sun 25 May 2025

01:00

Venue

Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso

Competition

Primera División

Chile

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Coquimbo Unido at 38%, yet in-form Palestino provide a compelling counter-argument — this Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Palestino make the trip to Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso to face Coquimbo Unido in Primera División, Regular Season - 12. The match kicks off on Sunday 25 May 2025 at 01:00 UTC.

Current Form

Coquimbo Unido's overall Primera División record this term: 2W 4D 4L from 10 games (1.00 PPG). Last five: L L W D W. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Coquimbo Unido's home record at Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso: 3W 5D 2L from 10 Primera División appearances (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso.

Palestino have collected 1.70 PPG across 10 Primera División outings this season: 5W 2D 3L. Last five: L W L W W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.10. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

When travelling in Primera División this season, Palestino have posted 2W 3D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.90 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.90 is notably below their overall 1.70 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Palestino arrive in superior form — a 0.70 PPG advantage (1.70 vs 1.00) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Coquimbo Unido lead 0W to 2W over the last 6 encounters, with 4 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.7 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 6 Oct 2024, ended 0–2 with Palestino winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Coquimbo Unido half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games).

Palestino half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 84% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 53% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Coquimbo Unido 60% versus Palestino 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Coquimbo Unido 52% | Palestino 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Coquimbo Unido 1.04 xG and Palestino 0.91 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Coquimbo Unido attack 0.915 / defence 0.801 | Palestino attack 1.202 / defence 0.714. League average goals — home 1.591 / away 0.943. Palestino's defence strength of 0.714 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Palestino have an above-average attack strength of 1.202 — the away xG of 0.91 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 41 Coquimbo Unido games / 41 Palestino games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Coquimbo Unido 38% | Draw 31% | Palestino 31%. Fair-value odds: Coquimbo Unido 2.63 | Draw 3.23 | Palestino 3.23. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 31% | BTTS probability 39% | Total xG 1.95. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 69% probability — total xG of 1.95 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 39% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Coquimbo Unido are the pick at 38% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Palestino (1.70 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 31% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Coquimbo Unido if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 1.95 combined xG gives a 31% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 39%. Form rates are neutral: Coquimbo Unido 40% | Palestino 70%.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–4D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Palestino but Poisson model leans Coquimbo Unido — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
BTTS H2H BTTS history (67%) is contradicted by Poisson (39%) — recent defensive form has changed the dynamic.
Form Palestino lead on PPG: 1.70 vs 1.00 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Goals Form averages (~1.7 goals/game) and Poisson xG (1.95) both support Under 2.5 goals (69% probability).
Form Form (PPG) favours Palestino but Poisson leans Coquimbo Unido (38%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 31% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 31% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino | Competition: Primera División, Regular Season - 12 | Venue: Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso • Kick-off: Sunday 25 May 2025, 01:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Coquimbo Unido 38% | Draw 31% | Palestino 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 31% | BTTS 39% | xG Coquimbo Unido 1.04 / Palestino 0.91 • Poisson strength factors: Coquimbo Unido attack 0.915 / def 0.801 | Palestino attack 1.202 / def 0.714 | league avg home 1.591 / away 0.943 • Poisson stance: Coquimbo Unido (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.04

Coquimbo Unido xG

Expected Goals

0.91

Palestino xG

38%
31%
31%
Coquimbo Unido Draw Palestino

39%

BTTS

58%

Over 1.5

31%

Over 2.5

13%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino kick off?

Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino kicked off at 01:00 on Sunday 25 May 2025 at Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso.

What was the final score in Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino?

Coquimbo Unido 0 - 0 Palestino.

Where is Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino being played?

The match is being played at Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso.

What competition is Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino part of?

Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino is a Regular Season - 12 fixture in the Primera División (Chile).

Who is favourite to win Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino?

Our statistical model gives Coquimbo Unido a 38% chance of winning, Palestino a 31% chance, and a 31% chance of a draw — making Coquimbo Unido the favourite.

Will both teams score in Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino?

Our model estimates a 39% probability that both Coquimbo Unido and Palestino will score (BTTS).

Will Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 31%.

What is the head-to-head record between Coquimbo Unido and Palestino?

Record (6 meetings): Coquimbo Unido 0W | Draws 4 | Palestino 2W.

What form are Coquimbo Unido and Palestino in?

Coquimbo Unido (all comps): 2W-4D-4L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.20 | L5 L-L-W-D-W. Palestino (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 1.10 | L5 L-W-L-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Working from Coquimbo Unido's attack rating (0.92) and Palestino's defence rating (0.71), the model arrives at 1.04 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Palestino's attack (1.20x) against Coquimbo Unido's defence (0.80x) — and the away total comes out at 0.91.

These ratings are built from 41/41 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 0-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 16.0%. Close behind: 1-1 (15.2%), 1-0 (13.1%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 44% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Coquimbo Unido Win

38%

Coquimbo Unido

2.64

31%

Draw

3.20

31%

Palestino

3.24

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

14.8%

Home win

Most likely

0 – 0

14.3%

Draw

1 – 1

13.5%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.04

Coquimbo Unido xG

Total xG

1.95

0.91

Palestino xG

38%
31%
31%
Coquimbo UnidoDrawPalestino

2.64

38%

Home win

3.20

31%

Draw

3.24

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

58%

Over 1.5

1.72

42%

Under 1.5

2.38

31%

Over 2.5

3.23

69%

Under 2.5

1.45

13%

Over 3.5

7.69

87%

Under 3.5

1.15

5%

Over 4.5

20.00

95%

Under 4.5

1.05

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

39%

BTTS Yes

2.59

61%

BTTS No

1.63

Clean Sheet

40%

Coquimbo Unido

2.48

35%

Palestino

2.83

Win to Nil

15%

Coquimbo Unido

6.54

11%

Palestino

9.15

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 14.3 13.0 5.9 1.8 0.4 0.1
1 14.8 13.5 6.1 1.8 0.4 0.1
2 7.7 7.0 3.2 1.0 0.2
3 2.7 2.4 1.1 0.3 0.1
4 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.039
λ Away (xG) 0.907
Total xG 1.946
League avg home goals 1.591
League avg away goals 0.943
Coquimbo Unido attack strength 0.915
Coquimbo Unido defence strength 0.801
Palestino attack strength 1.202
Palestino defence strength 0.714
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 41 / 41

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 16.0%.

How many goals are Coquimbo Unido and Palestino expected to score?

The model projects 1.04 expected goals for Coquimbo Unido and 0.91 for Palestino, a combined total of 1.95.

How confident is the prediction model for Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Coquimbo Unido's recent record stands at 27W 14D 19L from 60 games, a 1.58 PPG return, with L-L-W-D-W in the last five.

Palestino, meanwhile, have gone 27W 14D 19L across 60 games — 1.58 PPG, with L-W-L-W-W in their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.58 PPG for Coquimbo Unido against 1.58 for Palestino. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, Coquimbo Unido have managed 16W 8D 6L from 30 games — 1.87 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Palestino's away record stands at 11W 8D 11L across 30 trips, a 1.37 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Coquimbo Unido come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Coquimbo Unido are averaging 1.37 goals scored and 1.23 conceded per game recently; Palestino are on 1.53 scored and 1.22 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Coquimbo Unido have seen both teams score in 60% of their recent games.

Defensively: Palestino in 35% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 60 Results — Primera División

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Coquimbo Unido

Coquimbo Unido

Current Season
L L W D W
Palestino

Palestino

Current Season
L W L W W
60 Played 60
27/14/19 W / D / L 27/14/19
1.58 Points Per Game 1.58
1.37 Avg Goals Scored 1.53
1.23 Avg Goals Conceded 1.22
2.60 Avg Goals / Game 2.75
13 Clean Sheets 21
36 BTTS 31
31 Over 2.5 Games 29
Coquimbo Unido

Coquimbo Unido

W
A U. Catolica
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Nov
D
H Union La Calera
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Nov
W
H Cobresal
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Oct
L
A Palestino
0–2 HT 0–0
06 Oct
L
A Huachipato
2–3 HT 0–1
30 Sep
D
H Everton de Vina
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Sep
D
A O'Higgins
1–1 HT 1–1
14 Sep
L
H Universidad de Chile
0–1 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
A Cobreloa
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Aug
D
H A. Italiano
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Aug
L
A Colo Colo
0–2 HT 0–0
17 Aug
L
H Deportes Iquique
1–2 HT 0–1
11 Aug
D
H Union Espanola
2–2 HT 2–1
03 Aug
L
A Deportes Copiapo
0–3 HT 0–0
27 Jul
W
H Nublense
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Jul
D
H Palestino
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Jun
W
H U. Catolica
2–0 HT 2–0
03 Jun
W
A Union La Calera
2–1 HT 1–1
25 May
W
A Cobresal
3–2 HT 2–1
20 May
W
H Huachipato
3–1 HT 2–0
04 May
W
A Everton de Vina
2–1 HT 0–0
28 Apr
W
H O'Higgins
2–0 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Universidad de Chile
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
W
H Cobreloa
2–1 HT 1–1
07 Apr
W
A A. Italiano
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Mar
D
H Colo Colo
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Mar
L
A Deportes Iquique
2–4 HT 1–2
10 Mar
L
A Union Espanola
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Mar
W
H Deportes Copiapo
3–1 HT 1–1
24 Feb
D
A Nublense
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Feb
W
A Magallanes
3–2 HT 1–1
09 Dec
L
H Union La Calera
1–2 HT 1–2
01 Dec
W
A Universidad de Chile
2–1 HT 2–0
24 Nov
W
H Deportes Copiapo
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Union Espanola
3–1 HT 2–1
08 Oct
L
H Nublense
1–3 HT 0–0
30 Sep
W
H O'Higgins
2–1 HT 0–1
23 Sep
L
A Cobresal
2–3 HT 0–1
03 Sep
D
A A. Italiano
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Aug
D
H Colo Colo
2–2 HT 1–1
12 Aug
D
A Huachipato
2–2 HT 1–2
05 Aug
L
H Everton de Vina
0–2 HT 0–1
31 Jul
L
A U. Catolica
1–2 HT 0–1
23 Jul
D
A Palestino
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Jul
W
H Curico Unido
1–0 HT 0–0
13 Jul
W
H Magallanes
1–0 HT 0–0
20 May
W
A Union La Calera
2–1 HT 0–0
14 May
W
H Universidad de Chile
2–1 HT 1–1
10 May
L
A Deportes Copiapo
0–1 HT 0–0
01 May
L
A Union Espanola
0–2 HT 0–0
24 Apr
W
A Nublense
3–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
A O'Higgins
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Mar
W
H Cobresal
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Mar
W
H A. Italiano
3–1 HT 1–1
03 Mar
W
A Colo Colo
3–2 HT 3–1
26 Feb
L
H Huachipato
1–2 HT 0–1
18 Feb
L
A Everton de Vina
0–2 HT 0–2
11 Feb
W
H U. Catolica
2–1 HT 1–1
03 Feb
D
H Palestino
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Jan
L
A Curico Unido
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Jan
Palestino

Palestino

W
H A. Italiano
2–0 HT 0–0
10 Nov
W
A Union Espanola
3–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
L
H Colo Colo
2–3 HT 2–1
20 Oct
W
H Coquimbo Unido
2–0 HT 0–0
06 Oct
L
A Deportes Copiapo
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Sep
W
H Deportes Iquique
2–0 HT 2–0
24 Sep
L
A Universidad de Chile
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Sep
D
H Nublense
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Sep
D
A Huachipato
2–2 HT 1–1
30 Aug
W
H Cobresal
3–0 HT 1–0
25 Aug
L
A Union La Calera
1–2 HT 0–1
18 Aug
W
H O'Higgins
4–1 HT 0–1
09 Aug
D
A U. Catolica
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Aug
L
A Cobreloa
1–3 HT 1–0
30 Jul
L
H Everton de Vina
1–4 HT 1–2
21 Jul
D
A Coquimbo Unido
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Jun
W
A A. Italiano
2–1 HT 0–1
02 Jun
L
H Union Espanola
0–1 HT 0–0
24 May
L
A Colo Colo
0–2 HT 0–1
19 May
W
H Deportes Copiapo
3–1 HT 3–1
03 May
L
A Deportes Iquique
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Apr
D
H Universidad de Chile
2–2 HT 1–1
21 Apr
W
H Huachipato
2–0 HT 2–0
17 Apr
W
A Nublense
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
W
A Cobresal
2–0 HT 0–0
29 Mar
D
A Everton de Vina
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Mar
D
H Union La Calera
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Mar
W
A O'Higgins
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
L
H U. Catolica
0–2 HT 0–1
02 Mar
W
H Cobreloa
5–0 HT 3–0
24 Feb
W
A O'Higgins
1–0 HT 1–0
09 Dec
W
H Curico Unido
4–0 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
H Everton de Vina
0–2 HT 0–1
23 Nov
D
A Nublense
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Colo Colo
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Cobresal
1–2 HT 0–1
01 Oct
W
H Union Espanola
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
D
A Huachipato
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
A Magallanes
0–2 HT 0–2
03 Sep
W
H U. Catolica
3–0 HT 2–0
13 Aug
W
A Union La Calera
3–2 HT 1–0
07 Aug
W
H Deportes Copiapo
2–0 HT 0–0
30 Jul
W
A Universidad de Chile
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Jul
D
H Coquimbo Unido
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Jul
W
A A. Italiano
3–0 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
H O'Higgins
0–1 HT 0–0
19 May
W
A Curico Unido
1–0 HT 1–0
15 May
D
A Everton de Vina
2–2 HT 1–0
12 May
L
H Nublense
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Apr
L
A Colo Colo
1–3 HT 0–1
23 Apr
L
H Cobresal
1–5 HT 1–2
14 Apr
W
H Magallanes
3–2 HT 2–1
01 Apr
L
A Union Espanola
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Mar
W
H Huachipato
2–1 HT 1–0
03 Mar
L
A U. Catolica
2–5 HT 1–3
25 Feb
D
H Union La Calera
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Feb
W
A Deportes Copiapo
3–1 HT 1–1
11 Feb
W
H Universidad de Chile
2–0 HT 0–0
05 Feb
D
A Coquimbo Unido
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Jan
D
H A. Italiano
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Jan

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Coquimbo Unido and Palestino in coming into this match?

Coquimbo Unido have gone 27W 14D 19L in their last 60 games (1.58 PPG), while Palestino have gone 27W 14D 19L in their last 60 (1.58 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Coquimbo Unido at home or Palestino away?

Coquimbo Unido's home record (1.87 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Coquimbo Unido at home: 1.87 PPG; Palestino away: 1.37 PPG.

Have Coquimbo Unido or Palestino been keeping clean sheets recently?

Coquimbo Unido have kept a clean sheet in 22% of their recent games, Palestino in 35%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 10 times that we have on record, stretching back to February 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 4 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Primera División. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Palestino won 5-1 on 16 Jul 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Coquimbo Unido have gone 1W 4D 0L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Palestino — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Coquimbo Unido

2

Coquimbo Unido

5

Draws

Palestino

3

Palestino

Recent Meetings

Palestino
2–1
01 Aug 26
Coquimbo Unido
Coquimbo Unido
3–1
07 Feb 26
Palestino
Palestino
1–2
08 Nov 25
Coquimbo Unido
Coquimbo Unido
0–0
25 May 25
Palestino
Palestino
2–0
06 Oct 24
Coquimbo Unido
Coquimbo Unido
0–0
06 Jun 24
Palestino
Palestino
1–1
17 Jul 23
Coquimbo Unido
Coquimbo Unido
1–1
28 Jan 23
Palestino
Palestino
5–1
16 Jul 22
Coquimbo Unido
Coquimbo Unido
2–2
20 Feb 22
Palestino

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Coquimbo Unido and Palestino?

From 10 meetings on record, Coquimbo Unido have won 2, Palestino have won 3, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Coquimbo Unido and Palestino last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Palestino 2-1 Coquimbo Unido.

Who has won more matches between Coquimbo Unido and Palestino?

Palestino have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Coquimbo Unido are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches.

Palestino are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 73% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 27% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Coquimbo Unido 60%, Palestino 57% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 53% (Coquimbo Unido) and 50% (Palestino).

On the defensive side: Coquimbo Unido keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Coquimbo Unido home games / Palestino away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Coquimbo Unido Coquimbo Unido Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/60
(61.7%)
20/30
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/60
(35%)
12/30
(40%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 19/23
(82.6%)
7/10
(70%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/23
(47.8%)
2/10
(20%)
Winning at HT 12/60
(20%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/60
(3.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/60
(10%)
3/30
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/60
(51.7%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/60
(26.7%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Clean Sheet 13/60
(21.7%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 15/60
(25%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Palestino Palestino Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 41/60
(68.3%)
22/30
(73.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/60
(26.7%)
5/30
(16.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 16/19
(84.2%)
6/8
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/19
(52.6%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Winning at HT 19/60
(31.7%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/60
(8.3%)
3/30
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/60
(51.7%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/60
(30%)
9/30
(30%)
Clean Sheet 21/60
(35%)
9/30
(30%)
Failed to Score 11/60
(18.3%)
6/30
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Coquimbo Unido play Palestino?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 60% of Coquimbo Unido's games and 57% of Palestino's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Coquimbo Unido vs Palestino usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 53% of Coquimbo Unido's recent games and 50% of Palestino's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Coquimbo Unido and Palestino tend to score early?

Coquimbo Unido have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, Palestino in 73% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Coquimbo Unido's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Coquimbo Unido and Palestino finished level at 0-0 at Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso, Regular Season - 12, in the Primera División. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Coquimbo Unido 1.04 xG and Palestino 0.91 xG, a combined 1.95. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Coquimbo Unido fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Palestino landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Coquimbo Unido attack 0.92 / defence 0.80 against Palestino attack 1.20 / defence 0.71, drawn from 41/41 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Coquimbo Unido 38% | Draw 31% | Palestino 31%, with Coquimbo Unido to win its most likely call at 38%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 31%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 58% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 39% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Coquimbo Unido 52%, Palestino 48%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Coquimbo Unido's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Palestino's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Coquimbo Unido 1.58 PPG, Palestino 1.58 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Coquimbo Unido (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.97 average — tighter than their form line. Palestino (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.30 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.37 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 31% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 39% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 50% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.