Sign in Register

RWDM 4-0 Beerschot VA – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Promotion Round - 6

Kick-off

Sun 9 Apr 2023

18:15

Venue

Edmond Machtensstadion

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours RWDM (59%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as RWDM face Beerschot VA.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Challenger Pro League encounter, Promotion Round - 6 sees Beerschot VA travel to Edmond Machtensstadion to take on RWDM. The game is scheduled for Sunday 9 April 2023, 18:15 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Challenger Pro League games this season, RWDM have gone 8W 1D 1L from 10 outings — a 2.50 PPG return. Last five: W L W W D. They are averaging 2.20 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, RWDM have posted 9W 0D 1L at Edmond Machtensstadion — 2.70 PPG. They are averaging 2.70 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Beerschot VA — All Games: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Challenger Pro League fixtures this season — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D W L L D. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Beerschot VA, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Beerschot VA's away record: 5W 0D 5L from 10 road trips in Challenger Pro League this season (1.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.50 exceeds their overall 0.80 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

RWDM carry the stronger recent momentum — 1.70 PPG ahead of their opponents on 2.50 vs 0.80. The form data is a point in their favour, and where the price allows, it is the cleaner directional bet.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. RWDM register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Beerschot VA in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 2 wins for RWDM, 0 for Beerschot VA and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.7 per contest from 3 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 2 Apr 2023, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

RWDM in-play tendencies (57 games, 28 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 53% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (home games).

Beerschot VA in-play tendencies (57 games, 28 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 56% versus Beerschot VA 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 56% | Beerschot VA 54%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 2.01 xG and Beerschot VA 1.09 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 1.263 / defence 0.868 | Beerschot VA attack 0.861 / defence 1.115. League average goals — home 1.430 / away 1.453. RWDM carry an above-average attack strength of 1.263 — their λ of 2.01 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 50 RWDM games / 22 Beerschot VA games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RWDM 59% | Draw 21% | Beerschot VA 20%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 1.69 | Draw 4.76 | Beerschot VA 5.00. The model has a clear lean to RWDM (59%) — a 39pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 57% | Total xG 3.10. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.10 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 57% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, RWDM are the pick at 59% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.10 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 60% probability — marginal — conflicting signals conviction, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.7 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 57%. Form rates corroborate: RWDM 60% | Beerschot VA 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to RWDM — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 59%.
Goals H2H only shows 1.67 goals/game but Poisson xG is 3.10 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form RWDM lead on PPG: 2.50 vs 0.80 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form RWDM Poisson xG (2.01) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Beerschot VA Poisson xG (1.09) is below their form scoring rate (1.40) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (RWDM 6/10, Beerschot VA 6/10) and Poisson model (57%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour RWDM — RWDM at 59% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours RWDM at 59% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 60% — the model favours goals in this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RWDM vs Beerschot VA | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Promotion Round - 6 | Venue: Edmond Machtensstadion • Kick-off: Sunday 9 Apr 2023, 18:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 59% | Draw 21% | Beerschot VA 20% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 60% | BTTS 57% | xG RWDM 2.01 / Beerschot VA 1.09 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 1.263 / def 0.868 | Beerschot VA attack 0.861 / def 1.115 | league avg home 1.430 / away 1.453 • Poisson stance: RWDM (59%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.01

RWDM xG

Expected Goals

1.09

Beerschot VA xG

59%
21%
20%
RWDM Draw Beerschot VA

57%

BTTS

82%

Over 1.5

60%

Over 2.5

38%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RWDM vs Beerschot VA kick off?

RWDM vs Beerschot VA kicked off at 18:15 on Sunday 9 April 2023 at Edmond Machtensstadion.

What was the final score in RWDM vs Beerschot VA?

RWDM 4 - 0 Beerschot VA.

Where is RWDM vs Beerschot VA being played?

The match is being played at Edmond Machtensstadion.

What competition is RWDM vs Beerschot VA part of?

RWDM vs Beerschot VA is a Promotion Round - 6 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Beerschot VA?

Our statistical model gives RWDM a 59% chance of winning, Beerschot VA a 20% chance, and a 21% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.

Will both teams score in RWDM vs Beerschot VA?

Our model estimates a 57% probability that both RWDM and Beerschot VA will score (BTTS).

Will RWDM vs Beerschot VA have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 60%.

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Beerschot VA?

Record (3 meetings): RWDM 2W | Draws 1 | Beerschot VA 0W.

What form are RWDM and Beerschot VA in?

RWDM (all comps): 8W-1D-1L in 10 | 2.50 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 1.00 | L5 W-L-W-W-D. Beerschot VA (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

The model rates RWDM's attack at 1.26x the league average against Beerschot VA's defence at 1.11x — combine the two and it projects 2.01 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Beerschot VA's attack versus RWDM's defence, projects 1.09 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 50/22 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 11.1% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.9%), 2-0 (9.1%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

RWDM Win

59%

RWDM

1.70

21%

Draw

4.71

20%

Beerschot VA

5.03

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.9%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.9%

Home win

1 – 0

9.1%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.01

RWDM xG

Total xG

3.10

1.09

Beerschot VA xG

59%
21%
20%
RWDMDrawBeerschot VA

1.70

59%

Home win

4.71

21%

Draw

5.03

20%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

60%

Over 2.5

1.67

40%

Under 2.5

2.50

38%

Over 3.5

2.63

62%

Under 3.5

1.61

20%

Over 4.5

5.00

80%

Under 4.5

1.25

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

57%

BTTS Yes

1.74

43%

BTTS No

2.35

Clean Sheet

34%

RWDM

2.96

13%

Beerschot VA

7.49

Win to Nil

20%

RWDM

5.03

3%

Beerschot VA

37.65

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.5 4.9 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.1
1 9.1 9.9 5.4 1.9 0.5 0.1
2 9.1 9.9 5.4 2.0 0.5 0.1
3 6.1 6.7 3.6 1.3 0.4 0.1
4 3.1 3.4 1.8 0.7 0.2
5 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.014
λ Away (xG) 1.086
Total xG 3.100
League avg home goals 1.430
League avg away goals 1.453
RWDM attack strength 1.263
RWDM defence strength 0.868
Beerschot VA attack strength 0.861
Beerschot VA defence strength 1.115
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 50 / 22

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs Beerschot VA?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.1%.

How many goals are RWDM and Beerschot VA expected to score?

The model projects 2.01 expected goals for RWDM and 1.09 for Beerschot VA, a combined total of 3.10.

How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs Beerschot VA?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 59%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

RWDM's recent record stands at 31W 13D 13L from 57 games, a 1.86 PPG return, with W-L-W-W-D in the last five. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Beerschot VA, meanwhile, have gone 17W 7D 33L across 57 games — 1.02 PPG, with D-W-L-L-D in their last five. The sample for Beerschot VA is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours RWDM by 0.84 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Beerschot VA heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, RWDM have managed 17W 5D 6L from 28 games — 2.00 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Beerschot VA's away record stands at 7W 3D 18L across 28 trips, a 0.86 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

RWDM are averaging 1.65 goals scored and 1.07 conceded per game recently; Beerschot VA are on 1.18 scored and 1.77 conceded.

Last 57 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

RWDM

RWDM

Blended
W L W W D
Beerschot VA

Beerschot VA

Blended
D W L L D
57 Played 57
31/13/13 W / D / L 17/7/33
1.86 Points Per Game 1.02
1.65 Avg Goals Scored 1.18
1.07 Avg Goals Conceded 1.77
2.72 Avg Goals / Game 2.95
19 Clean Sheets 10
32 BTTS 29
32 Over 2.5 Games 31
RWDM

RWDM

D
A Beerschot VA
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
4–0 HT 1–0
18 Mar
W
H Club Brugge II
3–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Feb
W
A Beerschot VA
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Standard Liège II
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Feb
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Jan
W
H Deinze
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Jan
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–1 HT 2–1
11 Dec
L
H Club Brugge II
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Dec
L
A KRC Genk II
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Nov
D
A SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Nov
W
H Lommel United
5–0 HT 2–0
13 Nov
W
A Dender
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Oct
W
H SK Beveren
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Oct
W
A Standard Liège II
4–1 HT 1–0
14 Oct
W
H Beerschot VA
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
L
A Lommel United
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Oct
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Sep
W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Sep
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Aug
W
H Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
A Excelsior Virton
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug
D
A Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Apr
L
H Seraing United
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Apr
D
A KVC Westerlo
2–2 HT 0–1
16 Apr
W
H SK Beveren
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Apr
L
A Deinze
0–3 HT 0–1
03 Apr
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–0 HT 1–0
20 Mar
D
A Lommel United
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Mar
W
A Royal Excel Mouscron
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–1 HT 0–0
27 Feb
L
A SK Beveren
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Feb
W
H Deinze
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Feb
W
A Excelsior Virton
1–0 HT 1–0
06 Feb
W
H Royal Excel Mouscron
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Jan
L
H KVC Westerlo
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
H Lommel United
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Jan
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Dec
W
A SK Beveren
3–2 HT 2–1
04 Dec
D
H Deinze
2–2 HT 2–0
28 Nov
W
A Excelsior Virton
2–0 HT 0–0
21 Nov
D
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–3 HT 2–1
07 Nov
W
A Lommel United
3–2 HT 0–1
31 Oct
D
A Royal Excel Mouscron
1–1 HT 0–1
22 Oct
L
H KVC Westerlo
1–2 HT 0–2
17 Oct
W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
03 Oct
L
H Lommel United
1–2 HT 0–2
25 Sep
L
H SK Beveren
1–3 HT 1–1
17 Sep
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
1–4 HT 0–3
12 Sep
D
H Excelsior Virton
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Aug
D
A KVC Westerlo
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Aug
W
H Royal Excel Mouscron
3–1 HT 2–0
14 Aug
Beerschot VA

Beerschot VA

D
H RWDM
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–2
19 Mar
L
H SK Beveren
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Feb
L
H RWDM
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Feb
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Feb
W
H KRC Genk II
3–2 HT 1–2
27 Jan
L
A SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Jan
L
A Deinze
2–3 HT 0–2
15 Jan
W
H Standard Liège II
1–0 HT 1–0
11 Dec
W
A Dender
3–2 HT 2–0
04 Dec
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–1 HT 1–1
26 Nov
W
H Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Nov
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
A Lommel United
3–1 HT 1–1
06 Nov
L
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
A KRC Genk II
2–1 HT 1–0
22 Oct
D
H Dender
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Oct
L
A RWDM
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Oct
W
H Deinze
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
A Excelsior Virton
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Sep
L
H Lommel United
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Sep
W
A Club Brugge II
2–1 HT 1–0
03 Sep
L
H K. Lierse S.K.
2–3 HT 1–1
28 Aug
D
A Standard Liège II
2–2 HT 0–1
19 Aug
W
H SK Beveren
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
L
A Union St. Gilloise
0–5 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–3 HT 0–1
01 Apr
L
A St. Truiden
2–3 HT 1–2
20 Mar
L
H Gent
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Mar
L
A Antwerp
1–2 HT 1–0
06 Mar
L
A Standard Liege
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Mar
L
H Charleroi
2–3 HT 1–1
25 Feb
L
A Cercle Brugge
0–2 HT 0–2
19 Feb
W
H Kortrijk
2–1 HT 2–1
13 Feb
L
A KV Mechelen
2–3 HT 0–3
06 Feb
D
H Zulte Waregem
3–3 HT 1–3
29 Jan
L
A Seraing United
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Jan
W
H OH Leuven
3–1 HT 2–1
22 Jan
L
A Genk
1–4 HT 0–2
16 Jan
L
H Anderlecht
0–7 HT 0–3
27 Dec
L
H Oostende
0–2 HT 0–2
18 Dec
L
A AS Eupen
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Dec
L
H Antwerp
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Dec
L
A Zulte Waregem
0–2 HT 0–2
28 Nov
W
H Genk
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Nov
D
A Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Nov
W
H Seraing United
3–0 HT 1–0
30 Oct
L
A Anderlecht
2–4 HT 0–1
24 Oct
L
H KV Mechelen
0–1 HT 0–1
17 Oct
D
A OH Leuven
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Oct
L
H AS Eupen
0–3 HT 0–1
25 Sep
L
A Oostende
1–3 HT 0–2
18 Sep
L
H St. Truiden
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Sep
L
A Charleroi
2–5 HT 0–1
28 Aug
L
A Club Brugge KV
2–3 HT 1–2
22 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are RWDM and Beerschot VA in coming into this match?

RWDM have gone 31W 13D 13L in their last 57 games (1.86 PPG), while Beerschot VA have gone 17W 7D 33L in their last 57 (1.02 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or Beerschot VA away?

RWDM's home record (2.00 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 2.00 PPG; Beerschot VA away: 0.86 PPG.

Have RWDM or Beerschot VA been keeping clean sheets recently?

RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, Beerschot VA in 18%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 22 February 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Streaks & Records

The biggest gap between the sides came on 9 Apr 2023, when RWDM won 4-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

RWDM's record when hosting Beerschot VA specifically: 2W 0D 1L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

RWDM

3

RWDM

2

Draws

Beerschot VA

1

Beerschot VA

Recent Meetings

Beerschot VA
1–1
22 Feb 26
RWDM
RWDM
0–1
09 Nov 25
Beerschot VA
RWDM
4–0
09 Apr 23
Beerschot VA
Beerschot VA
1–1
02 Apr 23
RWDM
Beerschot VA
0–1
12 Feb 23
RWDM
RWDM
2–0
08 Oct 22
Beerschot VA

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Beerschot VA?

From 6 meetings on record, RWDM have won 3, Beerschot VA have won 1, and 2 have been drawn.

When did RWDM and Beerschot VA last play each other?

They last met on 22 February 2026, when Beerschot VA 1-1 RWDM.

Who has won more matches between RWDM and Beerschot VA?

RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 57% of the time.

Beerschot VA are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 57%, Beerschot VA 64% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 64% for RWDM and 64% for Beerschot VA. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 43% and 39% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: RWDM keep a clean sheet in 32% of their matches; Beerschot VA in 32%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = RWDM home games / Beerschot VA away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

RWDM RWDM Blended
Metric All
(57 games)
Venue
(28 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 40/57
(70.2%)
23/28
(82.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 12/57
(21.1%)
9/28
(32.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/17
(76.5%)
4/5
(80%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 9/17
(52.9%)
4/5
(80%)
Winning at HT 23/57
(40.4%)
16/28
(57.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/57
(5.3%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/57
(14%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/57
(56.1%)
16/28
(57.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/57
(56.1%)
18/28
(64.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/57
(31.6%)
12/28
(42.9%)
Clean Sheet 19/57
(33.3%)
9/28
(32.1%)
Failed to Score 10/57
(17.5%)
4/28
(14.3%)
Beerschot VA Beerschot VA Blended
Metric All
(57 games)
Venue
(28 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/57
(80.7%)
24/28
(85.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/57
(35.1%)
11/28
(39.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/11
(81.8%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
2/4
(50%)
Winning at HT 12/57
(21.1%)
4/28
(14.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/57
(1.8%)
1/28
(3.6%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/57
(7%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/57
(50.9%)
18/28
(64.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/57
(54.4%)
18/28
(64.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/57
(33.3%)
11/28
(39.3%)
Clean Sheet 10/57
(17.5%)
2/28
(7.1%)
Failed to Score 20/57
(35.1%)
9/28
(32.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when RWDM play Beerschot VA?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of RWDM's games and 64% of Beerschot VA's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is RWDM vs Beerschot VA usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 64% of RWDM's matches and 64% of Beerschot VA's.

Do RWDM and Beerschot VA tend to score early?

RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 82% of their recent matches, Beerschot VA in 86% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant RWDM run riot with a 4-0 hammering of Beerschot VA.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RWDM beat Beerschot VA 4-0 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Promotion Round - 6, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 2.01 xG and Beerschot VA 1.09 xG, a combined 3.10. The scoreboard read 4-0 for 4 actual goals. RWDM beat their projection by 2.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Beerschot VA landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 1.26 / defence 0.87 against Beerschot VA attack 0.86 / defence 1.11, drawn from 50/22 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RWDM 59% | Draw 21% | Beerschot VA 20%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 59%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. Over 3.5 was 38% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 55% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 56%, Beerschot VA 54%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RWDM's trading profile (57 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Beerschot VA's trading profile (57 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.86 PPG against 1.02. The form guide was vindicated by the result. RWDM (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.96 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.07 average — tighter than their form line. Beerschot VA (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.18 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 2.04 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 60% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 57% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 55% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.