Sign in Register

Patro Eisden 1-0 RWDM – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Sun 23 Nov 2025

15:00

Venue

Patrostadion

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates RWDM at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this Patro Eisden vs RWDM fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Patro Eisden and RWDM meet at Patrostadion in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 14. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 23 November 2025 at 15:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Patro Eisden have collected 1.50 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 4W 3D 3L. Last five: W D L D L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Patro Eisden, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Patro Eisden's home record at Patrostadion: 5W 3D 2L from 10 Challenger Pro League appearances (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

RWDM's overall Challenger Pro League record this term: 3W 2D 5L from 10 games (1.10 PPG). Last five: D W L D L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.50. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Challenger Pro League this season, RWDM have posted 4W 2D 4L from 10 away outings — 1.40 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 1.50 vs 1.10 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 2 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for Patro Eisden, 0 for RWDM and 2 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 4 Apr 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Patro Eisden goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (43 games, 20 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 55% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

RWDM goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (43 games, 20 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Patro Eisden 58% versus RWDM 49%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Patro Eisden 54% | RWDM 49%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Patro Eisden 1.44 xG and RWDM 1.53 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Patro Eisden attack 0.956 / defence 0.928 | RWDM attack 1.179 / defence 1.172. League average goals — home 1.284 / away 1.397. Data: 41 Patro Eisden games / 41 RWDM games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Patro Eisden 34% | Draw 29% | RWDM 38%. Fair-value odds: Patro Eisden 2.94 | Draw 3.45 | RWDM 2.63. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 29% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 2.97. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.97 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.44 / 1.53) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates RWDM as the most likely outcome at 38% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 29% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on RWDM if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.97 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 57% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Patro Eisden 70% | RWDM 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–2D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 62% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Patro Eisden vs RWDM | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Patrostadion • Kick-off: Sunday 23 Nov 2025, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Patro Eisden 34% | Draw 29% | RWDM 38% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 57% | BTTS 62% | xG Patro Eisden 1.44 / RWDM 1.53 • Poisson strength factors: Patro Eisden attack 0.956 / def 0.928 | RWDM attack 1.179 / def 1.172 | league avg home 1.284 / away 1.397 • Poisson stance: RWDM (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.44

Patro Eisden xG

Expected Goals

1.53

RWDM xG

34%
29%
38%
Patro Eisden Draw RWDM

62%

BTTS

82%

Over 1.5

57%

Over 2.5

35%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Patro Eisden vs RWDM kick off?

Patro Eisden vs RWDM kicked off at 15:00 on Sunday 23 November 2025 at Patrostadion.

What was the final score in Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Patro Eisden 1 - 0 RWDM.

Where is Patro Eisden vs RWDM being played?

The match is being played at Patrostadion.

What competition is Patro Eisden vs RWDM part of?

Patro Eisden vs RWDM is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Our statistical model gives Patro Eisden a 34% chance of winning, RWDM a 38% chance, and a 29% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.

Will both teams score in Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both Patro Eisden and RWDM will score (BTTS).

Will Patro Eisden vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 57%.

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and RWDM?

Record (2 meetings): Patro Eisden 0W | Draws 2 | RWDM 0W.

What form are Patro Eisden and RWDM in?

Patro Eisden (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-D-L-D-L. RWDM (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.50 | L5 D-W-L-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Patro Eisden's attack at 0.96x the league average against RWDM's defence at 1.17x — combine the two and it projects 1.44 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — RWDM's attack (1.18x) against Patro Eisden's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 1.53.

These ratings are built from 41/41 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.8% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (8.6%), 2-1 (8.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

RWDM Win

34%

Patro Eisden

2.97

29%

Draw

3.48

38%

RWDM

2.66

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.3%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

8.6%

Away win

2 – 1

8.1%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.44

Patro Eisden xG

Total xG

2.97

1.53

RWDM xG

34%
29%
38%
Patro EisdenDrawRWDM

2.97

34%

Home win

3.48

29%

Draw

2.66

38%

Away win

Goals Markets

80%

Over 1.5

1.25

20%

Under 1.5

5.00

57%

Over 2.5

1.75

43%

Under 2.5

2.33

35%

Over 3.5

2.86

65%

Under 3.5

1.54

18%

Over 4.5

5.56

82%

Under 4.5

1.22

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.62

38%

BTTS No

2.62

Clean Sheet

22%

Patro Eisden

4.61

24%

RWDM

4.22

Win to Nil

7%

Patro Eisden

13.69

9%

RWDM

11.21

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.1 7.9 6.0 3.1 1.2 0.4
1 7.4 11.3 8.6 4.4 1.7 0.5
2 5.3 8.1 6.2 3.2 1.2 0.4
3 2.6 3.9 3.0 1.5 0.6 0.2
4 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.439
λ Away (xG) 1.528
Total xG 2.967
League avg home goals 1.284
League avg away goals 1.397
Patro Eisden attack strength 0.956
Patro Eisden defence strength 0.928
RWDM attack strength 1.179
RWDM defence strength 1.172
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 41 / 41

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.8%.

How many goals are Patro Eisden and RWDM expected to score?

The model projects 1.44 expected goals for Patro Eisden and 1.53 for RWDM, a combined total of 2.97.

How confident is the prediction model for Patro Eisden vs RWDM?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Patro Eisden's recent record stands at 21W 11D 11L from 43 games, a 1.72 PPG return, with W-D-L-D-L in the last five. The sample for Patro Eisden is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

RWDM, meanwhile, have gone 23W 9D 11L across 43 games — 1.81 PPG, with D-W-L-D-L in their last five. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.72 PPG for Patro Eisden against 1.81 for RWDM. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Patro Eisden have managed 9W 6D 5L from 20 games — 1.65 PPG in front of their own supporters.

RWDM's away record stands at 9W 5D 6L across 20 trips, a 1.60 PPG haul.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Patro Eisden are averaging 1.65 goals scored and 1.16 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.65 scored and 1.07 conceded.

Defensively: RWDM in 37% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 43 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

Blended
W D L D L
RWDM

RWDM

Blended
D W L D L
43 Played 43
21/11/11 W / D / L 23/9/11
1.72 Points Per Game 1.81
1.65 Avg Goals Scored 1.65
1.16 Avg Goals Conceded 1.07
2.81 Avg Goals / Game 2.72
13 Clean Sheets 16
25 BTTS 21
23 Over 2.5 Games 21
Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

L
A Kortrijk
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Nov
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Nov
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Oct
D
H Seraing United
2–2 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 0–1
04 Oct
W
A KRC Genk II
4–1 HT 4–1
26 Sep
D
A AS Eupen
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Sep
L
H Lommel United
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
A Liège
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Aug
W
H Club Brugge II
2–1 HT 1–0
22 Aug
L
A Francs Borains
0–2 HT 0–1
15 Aug
W
H Lokeren-Temse
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Cercle Brugge
1–3 HT 0–2
23 May
L
H Cercle Brugge
1–5 HT 0–2
18 May
D
H Lokeren-Temse
1–1 HT 1–1
11 May
W
A Lokeren-Temse
2–1 HT 1–0
03 May
W
A SK Beveren
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
H SK Beveren
3–2 HT 2–1
24 Apr
W
H AS Eupen
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Apr
D
H RWDM
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
A Liège
2–2 HT 1–1
30 Mar
W
A Lommel United
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H SK Beveren
1–2 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
H RAAL La Louvière
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Feb
W
H KRC Genk II
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
A Francs Borains
3–1 HT 2–1
02 Feb
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Jan
W
H Lokeren-Temse
4–1 HT 3–1
17 Jan
L
A Zulte Waregem
2–3 HT 1–0
11 Jan
L
H Seraing United
2–3 HT 1–1
22 Dec
W
A KRC Genk II
3–1 HT 1–1
15 Dec
W
H Lommel United
4–0 HT 1–0
08 Dec
D
A SK Beveren
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Nov
W
H Liège
2–0 HT 1–0
24 Nov
W
A AS Eupen
4–0 HT 1–0
10 Nov
D
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
D
A Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Oct
L
H Zulte Waregem
0–1 HT 0–1
20 Oct
W
H Deinze
3–1 HT 2–0
04 Oct
W
A RAAL La Louvière
2–0 HT 2–0
29 Sep
W
H Francs Borains
4–1 HT 2–0
21 Sep
RWDM

RWDM

L
H Beerschot VA
0–1 HT 0–0
09 Nov
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Nov
L
A Liège
3–4 HT 2–3
25 Oct
W
H Club Brugge II
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Oct
D
A AS Eupen
2–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
W
A KAA Gent II
2–0 HT 2–0
28 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
1–2 HT 0–2
24 Sep
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–2 HT 0–0
19 Sep
W
H Seraing United
5–0 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
H SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–0
23 Aug
W
A Lokeren-Temse
3–1 HT 2–0
16 Aug
D
H Lommel United
3–3 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
H Lokeren-Temse
3–2 HT 1–0
27 Apr
L
A Lokeren-Temse
0–2 HT 0–2
24 Apr
L
A Zulte Waregem
1–2 HT 0–1
18 Apr
L
H Lommel United
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Apr
D
A Patro Eisden
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Apr
W
H Seraing United
3–0 HT 2–0
28 Mar
W
A SK Beveren
2–0 HT 2–0
14 Mar
W
H Lokeren-Temse
1–0 HT 1–0
09 Mar
W
H Francs Borains
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Feb
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Feb
D
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
W
H KRC Genk II
1–0 HT 1–0
24 Jan
W
A AS Eupen
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Jan
W
H Liège
2–1 HT 0–0
11 Jan
D
A RAAL La Louvière
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Dec
W
H Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 1–0
15 Dec
W
A Lokeren-Temse
4–1 HT 1–1
08 Dec
D
A Seraing United
4–4 HT 1–1
01 Dec
L
H SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–2
23 Nov
L
A Liège
1–2 HT 1–1
08 Nov
W
H Zulte Waregem
2–1 HT 1–1
01 Nov
W
H Deinze
3–2 HT 2–1
26 Oct
L
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–2 HT 1–0
20 Oct
D
H RAAL La Louvière
1–1 HT 1–0
05 Oct
W
A Francs Borains
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Sep
W
A KRC Genk II
3–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H AS Eupen
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Aug
W
A Lommel United
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
D
H Patro Eisden
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Patro Eisden and RWDM in coming into this match?

Patro Eisden have gone 21W 11D 11L in their last 43 games (1.72 PPG), while RWDM have gone 23W 9D 11L in their last 43 (1.81 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Patro Eisden at home or RWDM away?

Patro Eisden's home record (1.65 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Patro Eisden at home: 1.65 PPG; RWDM away: 1.60 PPG.

Have Patro Eisden or RWDM been keeping clean sheets recently?

Patro Eisden have kept a clean sheet in 30% of their recent games, RWDM in 37%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 4 times since August 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 24 January 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

Patro Eisden have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Patro Eisden have gone 1W 1D 0L from 2 meetings on their own ground against RWDM — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Patro Eisden

2

Patro Eisden

2

Draws

RWDM

0

RWDM

Recent Meetings

RWDM
2–4
24 Jan 26
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
1–0
23 Nov 25
RWDM
Patro Eisden
1–1
04 Apr 25
RWDM
RWDM
1–1
17 Aug 24
Patro Eisden

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and RWDM?

From 4 meetings on record, Patro Eisden have won 2, RWDM have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Patro Eisden and RWDM last play each other?

They last met on 24 January 2026, when RWDM 2-4 Patro Eisden.

Who has won more matches between Patro Eisden and RWDM?

Patro Eisden have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Patro Eisden are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 35% of the time.

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Patro Eisden 65%, RWDM 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 55% (Patro Eisden) and 50% (RWDM).

On the defensive side: RWDM in 40%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Patro Eisden home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Patro Eisden Patro Eisden Blended
Metric All
(43 games)
Venue
(20 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/43
(72.1%)
13/20
(65%)
2+ Goals Before HT 15/43
(34.9%)
6/20
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/12
(66.7%)
6/7
(85.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/12
(33.3%)
4/7
(57.1%)
Winning at HT 18/43
(41.9%)
7/20
(35%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/43
(7%)
1/20
(5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/43
(2.3%)
1/20
(5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 25/43
(58.1%)
13/20
(65%)
Over 2.5 Goals 23/43
(53.5%)
11/20
(55%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/43
(37.2%)
7/20
(35%)
Clean Sheet 13/43
(30.2%)
5/20
(25%)
Failed to Score 9/43
(20.9%)
3/20
(15%)
RWDM RWDM Blended
Metric All
(43 games)
Venue
(20 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/43
(72.1%)
13/20
(65%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/43
(41.9%)
10/20
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/12
(83.3%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/12
(50%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Winning at HT 17/43
(39.5%)
5/20
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/43
(9.3%)
1/20
(5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/43
(2.3%)
1/20
(5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 21/43
(48.8%)
10/20
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 21/43
(48.8%)
10/20
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/43
(23.3%)
5/20
(25%)
Clean Sheet 16/43
(37.2%)
8/20
(40%)
Failed to Score 8/43
(18.6%)
4/20
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Patro Eisden play RWDM?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 65% of Patro Eisden's games and 50% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Patro Eisden vs RWDM usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 55% of Patro Eisden's recent games and 50% of RWDM's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Patro Eisden and RWDM tend to score early?

Patro Eisden have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, RWDM in 65% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Patro Eisden defy the odds to beat RWDM 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat RWDM 1-0 at Patrostadion, Regular Season - 14, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Patro Eisden 1.44 xG and RWDM 1.53 xG, a combined 2.97. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. RWDM landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Patro Eisden attack 0.96 / defence 0.93 against RWDM attack 1.18 / defence 1.17, drawn from 41/41 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Patro Eisden 34% | Draw 29% | RWDM 38%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 38%. The actual Patro Eisden win had been the model's second-ranked read at 34%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 82% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Patro Eisden 54%, RWDM 49%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Patro Eisden's trading profile (43 games, 20 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one.

RWDM's trading profile (43 games, 20 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Patro Eisden 1.72 PPG, RWDM 1.81 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Patro Eisden win broke the near-deadlock. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.35 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.65 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 57% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 62% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 51% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.