Sign in Register

NEOM 1-1 Al-Ettifaq – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Pro League · Regular Season - 34

Kick-off

Thu 21 May 2026

19:00

Venue

King Khalid Sports City

Competition

Pro League

Saudi-Arabia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Al-Ettifaq at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

NEOM host Al-Ettifaq at King Khalid Sports City in Pro League, Regular Season - 34. Kick-off is scheduled for Thursday 21 May 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form Guide

NEOM — All Games: 3W 3D 4L from 10 Pro League outings this season, averaging 1.20 points per game. Last five: L D D W L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

NEOM's home record at King Khalid Sports City: 4W 2D 4L from 10 Pro League appearances (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

Across all Pro League games this season, Al-Ettifaq have recorded 3W 2D 5L from 10 outings — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L W D W L. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.50. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Pro League this season, Al-Ettifaq have posted 4W 0D 6L from 10 away outings — 1.20 PPG. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — NEOM at 1.20 PPG versus Al-Ettifaq's 1.10. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 1 previous meetings, NEOM have won 0, Al-Ettifaq 0, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The last 1 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 0.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 21 Jan 2026, ended 0–0 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 0.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

NEOM in-play and half-time data (33 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games).

Al-Ettifaq in-play and half-time data (33 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 48%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NEOM 64% versus Al-Ettifaq 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEOM 54% | Al-Ettifaq 61%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEOM 1.22 xG and Al-Ettifaq 1.64 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEOM attack 0.826 / defence 1.047 | Al-Ettifaq attack 1.118 / defence 0.967. League average goals — home 1.526 / away 1.399. Data: 33 NEOM games / 67 Al-Ettifaq games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEOM 28% | Draw 26% | Al-Ettifaq 46%. Fair-value odds: NEOM 3.57 | Draw 3.85 | Al-Ettifaq 2.17. Al-Ettifaq hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (26%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.86. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.86 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Al-Ettifaq are the pick at 46% — moderate model lean. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Al-Ettifaq offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.86 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 58%. This conflicts with form data: NEOM 50% | Al-Ettifaq 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 0.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.86 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Al-Ettifaq Poisson xG (1.64) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.20) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.86 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 34 | Venue: King Khalid Sports City • Kick-off: Thursday 21 May 2026, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: NEOM 28% | Draw 26% | Al-Ettifaq 46% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 58% | xG NEOM 1.22 / Al-Ettifaq 1.64 • Poisson strength factors: NEOM attack 0.826 / def 1.047 | Al-Ettifaq attack 1.118 / def 0.967 | league avg home 1.526 / away 1.399 • Poisson stance: Al-Ettifaq (46%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.22

NEOM xG

Expected Goals

1.64

Al-Ettifaq xG

28%
26%
46%
NEOM Draw Al-Ettifaq

58%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq kick off?

NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq kicked off at 19:00 on Thursday 21 May 2026 at King Khalid Sports City.

What was the final score in NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

NEOM 1 - 1 Al-Ettifaq.

Where is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq being played?

The match is being played at King Khalid Sports City.

What competition is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq part of?

NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq is a Regular Season - 34 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).

Who is favourite to win NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our statistical model gives NEOM a 28% chance of winning, Al-Ettifaq a 46% chance, and a 26% chance of a draw — making Al-Ettifaq the favourite.

Will both teams score in NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our model estimates a 58% probability that both NEOM and Al-Ettifaq will score (BTTS).

Will NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq?

Record (1 meetings): NEOM 0W | Draws 1 | Al-Ettifaq 0W.

What form are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq in?

NEOM (all comps): 3W-3D-4L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-D-D-W-L. Al-Ettifaq (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 1.50 | L5 L-W-D-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

NEOM's attacking strength (0.83x league average) is weighed against Al-Ettifaq's defensive record (0.97x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.22. The same calculation in reverse, Al-Ettifaq's attack versus NEOM's defence, projects 1.64 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 33/67 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 13.0%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.4%), 0-1 (7.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Al-Ettifaq Win

28%

NEOM

3.63

26%

Draw

3.81

46%

Al-Ettifaq

2.16

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.5%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

9.4%

Away win

1 – 2

9.4%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.22

NEOM xG

Total xG

2.86

1.64

Al-Ettifaq xG

28%
26%
46%
NEOMDrawAl-Ettifaq

3.63

28%

Home win

3.81

26%

Draw

2.16

46%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

32%

Over 3.5

3.12

68%

Under 3.5

1.47

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

58%

BTTS Yes

1.73

42%

BTTS No

2.36

Clean Sheet

19%

NEOM

5.14

30%

Al-Ettifaq

3.39

Win to Nil

5%

NEOM

18.64

14%

Al-Ettifaq

7.33

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.7 9.4 7.7 4.2 1.7 0.6
1 7.0 11.5 9.4 5.1 2.1 0.7
2 4.3 7.0 5.7 3.1 1.3 0.4
3 1.7 2.8 2.3 1.3 0.5 0.2
4 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.220
λ Away (xG) 1.637
Total xG 2.857
League avg home goals 1.526
League avg away goals 1.399
NEOM attack strength 0.826
NEOM defence strength 1.047
Al-Ettifaq attack strength 1.118
Al-Ettifaq defence strength 0.967
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 33 / 67

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.0%.

How many goals are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq expected to score?

The model projects 1.22 expected goals for NEOM and 1.64 for Al-Ettifaq, a combined total of 2.86.

How confident is the prediction model for NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 46%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 33 outings, NEOM have picked up 1.33 PPG on a 12W 8D 13L record — L-D-D-W-L across the most recent five.

Al-Ettifaq's form line: 14W 7D 12L from 33 games, 1.48 PPG, last five L-W-D-W-L.

Form-wise this is close to level: NEOM on 1.33 PPG, Al-Ettifaq on 1.48. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, NEOM have posted 1.31 PPG from 16 outings (6W 3D 7L).

On the road, Al-Ettifaq have gone 7W 1D 8L from 16 away games — 1.38 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

NEOM are averaging 1.27 goals scored and 1.42 conceded per game recently; Al-Ettifaq are on 1.52 scored and 1.64 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: NEOM have seen both teams score in 64% of their recent games.

Last 33 Results — Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

NEOM

NEOM

Current Season
L D D W L
Al-Ettifaq

Al-Ettifaq

Current Season
L W D W L
33 Played 33
12/8/13 W / D / L 14/7/12
1.33 Points Per Game 1.48
1.27 Avg Goals Scored 1.52
1.42 Avg Goals Conceded 1.64
2.70 Avg Goals / Game 3.15
6 Clean Sheets 9
21 BTTS 18
18 Over 2.5 Games 20
NEOM

NEOM

L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–1
16 May
W
H Al Shabab
2–1 HT 2–0
11 May
D
A Al-Fateh
2–2 HT 1–0
02 May
D
H Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Apr
L
A Al Najma
1–2 HT 0–1
11 Apr
W
A Al-Ittihad FC
4–3 HT 2–2
08 Apr
W
H Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
H Al Taawon
2–2 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Al Kholood
1–2 HT 1–2
28 Feb
D
A Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Feb
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Al Riyadh
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
D
A Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Feb
W
H Damac
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Jan
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–3 HT 0–0
24 Jan
D
A Al-Ettifaq
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–2 HT 1–0
18 Jan
L
A Al Shabab
2–3 HT 1–1
14 Jan
L
H Al-Fateh
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Jan
W
A Al-Hazm
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Jan
L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–1
31 Dec
W
H Al Najma
2–1 HT 0–0
25 Dec
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Al-Nassr
1–3 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Al Kholood
3–2 HT 2–1
30 Oct
D
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–3 HT 0–2
19 Oct
W
A Al Riyadh
3–2 HT 2–1
27 Sep
W
H Al Okhdood
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
W
A Damac
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug
Al-Ettifaq

Al-Ettifaq

L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–2
14 May
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
5–0 HT 1–0
09 May
D
H Al Najma
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
W
A Al Okhdood
3–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
L
H Al Riyadh
2–3 HT 2–1
09 Apr
W
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
3–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
L
A Al-Fayha
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Mar
D
H Al Shabab
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
A Al-Hazm
1–3 HT 1–2
27 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–4 HT 0–2
23 Feb
W
H Al-Fateh
4–3 HT 3–2
19 Feb
L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Feb
W
H Damac
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Feb
W
H Al Taawon
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–4 HT 0–2
28 Jan
W
A Al Kholood
2–1 HT 0–1
24 Jan
D
H NEOM
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
W
A Al-Ittihad FC
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Jan
L
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–2 HT 1–1
12 Jan
W
A Al Najma
4–3 HT 3–0
08 Jan
W
H Al Okhdood
2–0 HT 0–0
02 Jan
D
H Al-Nassr
2–2 HT 1–0
30 Dec
W
A Al Riyadh
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Dec
W
H Al-Fayha
3–2 HT 2–0
22 Nov
D
A Al Shabab
1–1 HT 0–1
08 Nov
D
H Al-Hazm
2–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
L
A Al-Fateh
1–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–5 HT 0–2
18 Oct
W
A Damac
3–1 HT 1–1
26 Sep
L
A Al Taawon
1–4 HT 0–1
18 Sep
D
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Sep
W
H Al Kholood
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq in coming into this match?

NEOM have gone 12W 8D 13L in their last 33 games (1.33 PPG), while Al-Ettifaq have gone 14W 7D 12L in their last 33 (1.48 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — NEOM at home or Al-Ettifaq away?

Al-Ettifaq's away record (1.38 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — NEOM at home: 1.31 PPG; Al-Ettifaq away: 1.38 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to January 2026. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. They last met on 21 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Last 2 Meetings

NEOM

0

NEOM

2

Draws

Al-Ettifaq

0

Al-Ettifaq

Recent Meetings

NEOM
1–1
21 May 26
Al-Ettifaq
Al-Ettifaq
0–0
21 Jan 26
NEOM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq?

From 2 meetings on record, NEOM have won 0, Al-Ettifaq have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.

When did NEOM and Al-Ettifaq last play each other?

They last met on 21 May 2026, when NEOM 1-1 Al-Ettifaq.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

NEOM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 69% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 19% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Al-Ettifaq are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 88% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — NEOM 62%, Al-Ettifaq 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 62% for NEOM and 62% for Al-Ettifaq. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 25% and 50% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Al-Ettifaq in 31%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = NEOM home games / Al-Ettifaq away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

NEOM NEOM Current Season
Metric All
(33 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 22/33
(66.7%)
11/16
(68.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/33
(30.3%)
6/16
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/11
(90.9%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 11/33
(33.3%)
6/16
(37.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/33
(15.2%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/33
(3%)
0/16
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 21/33
(63.6%)
10/16
(62.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 18/33
(54.5%)
10/16
(62.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 9/33
(27.3%)
4/16
(25%)
Clean Sheet 6/33
(18.2%)
4/16
(25%)
Failed to Score 7/33
(21.2%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Al-Ettifaq Al-Ettifaq Current Season
Metric All
(33 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 25/33
(75.8%)
14/16
(87.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/33
(42.4%)
6/16
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/8
(62.5%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/8
(37.5%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 9/33
(27.3%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/33
(9.1%)
0/16
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/33
(6.1%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 18/33
(54.5%)
8/16
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/33
(60.6%)
10/16
(62.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/33
(48.5%)
8/16
(50%)
Clean Sheet 9/33
(27.3%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Failed to Score 9/33
(27.3%)
5/16
(31.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when NEOM play Al-Ettifaq?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 62% of NEOM's games and 50% of Al-Ettifaq's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 62% of NEOM's matches and 62% of Al-Ettifaq's.

Do NEOM and Al-Ettifaq tend to score early?

NEOM have had a goal before half-time in 69% of their recent matches, Al-Ettifaq in 88% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

NEOM and Al-Ettifaq share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at King Khalid Sports City, Regular Season - 34, as NEOM and Al-Ettifaq drew 1-1 in the Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting NEOM 1.22 xG and Al-Ettifaq 1.64 xG, a combined 2.86. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of NEOM attack 0.83 / defence 1.05 against Al-Ettifaq attack 1.12 / defence 0.97, drawn from 33/67 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it NEOM 28% | Draw 26% | Al-Ettifaq 46%, with Al-Ettifaq to win its most likely call at 46%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (NEOM 54%, Al-Ettifaq 61%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

NEOM's trading profile (33 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did.

Al-Ettifaq's trading profile (33 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — NEOM 1.33 PPG, Al-Ettifaq 1.48 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 58% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 58% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.