Sign in Register

Rubin 2-1 Fakel – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 26

Kick-off

Sun 27 Apr 2025

17:00

Venue

Ak Bars Arena

Competition

Premier League

Russia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours Rubin (60%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Rubin face Fakel.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Rubin and Fakel meet at Ak Bars Arena in Premier League, Regular Season - 26. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 27 April 2025 at 17:00 UTC.

Current Form

Rubin's overall Premier League record this term: 5W 2D 3L from 10 games (1.70 PPG). Last five: W L D W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Rubin, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Rubin's home record at Ak Bars Arena: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Premier League appearances (2.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Ak Bars Arena. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Fakel have collected 0.30 PPG across 10 Premier League outings this season: 0W 3D 7L. Last five: L L D L L. Their scoring rate of 0.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No. This season is still relatively young for Fakel, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Fakel have gone 1W 2D 7L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game.

The points-per-game gap of 1.40 in Rubin's favour (1.70 vs 0.30) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Rubin, 0 for Fakel and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 0.7 per game from 3 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 27 Sep 2024, ended 0–0 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 0.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading & In-Play

Rubin — key trading statistics (55 games, 27 at home): they score before half-time in 85% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (home games).

Fakel — key trading statistics (55 games, 27 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 37% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (away games); they fail to score in 56% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Rubin 49% versus Fakel 33%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Rubin 46% | Fakel 26%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Rubin 1.59 xG and Fakel 0.56 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Rubin attack 0.916 / defence 0.847 | Fakel attack 0.594 / defence 1.147. League average goals — home 1.511 / away 1.104. Data: 55 Rubin games / 55 Fakel games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Rubin 60% | Draw 29% | Fakel 10%. Fair-value odds: Rubin 1.67 | Draw 3.45 | Fakel 10.00. The model has a clear lean to Rubin (60%) — a 50pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 36% | BTTS probability 36% | Total xG 2.14. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 64% — total xG of 2.14 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 36% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Rubin as the most likely outcome at 60% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 29% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.14 combined xG gives a 36% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 0.7 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 36%. Form rates corroborate: Rubin 30% | Fakel 40% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Rubin — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 60%.
Goals H2H (0.67 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.14) both back Under 2.5 goals (64% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 0% and Poisson BTTS 36% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Form Rubin lead on PPG: 1.70 vs 0.30 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Rubin Poisson xG (1.59) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.30) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form averages (~1.6 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.14) both support Under 2.5 goals (64% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Rubin — Rubin at 60% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Rubin at 60% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 36% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Rubin vs Fakel | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 26 | Venue: Ak Bars Arena • Kick-off: Sunday 27 Apr 2025, 17:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Rubin 60% | Draw 29% | Fakel 10% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 36% | BTTS 36% | xG Rubin 1.59 / Fakel 0.56 • Poisson strength factors: Rubin attack 0.916 / def 0.847 | Fakel attack 0.594 / def 1.147 | league avg home 1.511 / away 1.104 • Poisson stance: Rubin (60%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.59

Rubin xG

Expected Goals

0.56

Fakel xG

60%
29%
Rubin Draw Fakel

36%

BTTS

66%

Over 1.5

36%

Over 2.5

17%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Rubin vs Fakel kick off?

Rubin vs Fakel kicked off at 17:00 on Sunday 27 April 2025 at Ak Bars Arena.

What was the final score in Rubin vs Fakel?

Rubin 2 - 1 Fakel.

Where is Rubin vs Fakel being played?

The match is being played at Ak Bars Arena.

What competition is Rubin vs Fakel part of?

Rubin vs Fakel is a Regular Season - 26 fixture in the Premier League (Russia).

Who is favourite to win Rubin vs Fakel?

Our statistical model gives Rubin a 60% chance of winning, Fakel a 10% chance, and a 29% chance of a draw — making Rubin the favourite.

Will both teams score in Rubin vs Fakel?

Our model estimates a 36% probability that both Rubin and Fakel will score (BTTS).

Will Rubin vs Fakel have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 36%.

What is the head-to-head record between Rubin and Fakel?

Record (3 meetings): Rubin 2W | Draws 1 | Fakel 0W.

What form are Rubin and Fakel in?

Rubin (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.50 | L5 W-L-D-W-L. Fakel (all comps): 0W-3D-7L in 10 | 0.30 PPG | GF 0.10 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-L-D-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates Rubin's attack at 0.92x the league average against Fakel's defence at 1.15x — combine the two and it projects 1.59 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Fakel's attack (0.59x) against Rubin's defence (0.85x) — and the away total comes out at 0.56.

These ratings are built from 55/55 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-0 carries the highest individual probability at 17.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-0 (14.8%), 0-0 (13.1%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 45% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Rubin Win

60%

Rubin

1.66

29%

Draw

3.41

10%

Fakel

9.68

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

18.6%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 0

14.8%

Home win

0 – 0

11.7%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.59

Rubin xG

Total xG

2.14

0.56

Fakel xG

60%
29%
RubinDrawFakel

1.66

60%

Home win

3.41

29%

Draw

9.68

10%

Away win

Goals Markets

63%

Over 1.5

1.59

37%

Under 1.5

2.70

36%

Over 2.5

2.78

64%

Under 2.5

1.56

17%

Over 3.5

5.88

83%

Under 3.5

1.20

7%

Over 4.5

14.29

93%

Under 4.5

1.08

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

36%

BTTS Yes

2.75

64%

BTTS No

1.57

Clean Sheet

57%

Rubin

1.74

20%

Fakel

4.90

Win to Nil

35%

Rubin

2.89

2%

Fakel

47.42

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 11.7 6.5 1.8 0.3
1 18.6 10.3 2.9 0.5 0.1
2 14.8 8.2 2.3 0.4 0.1
3 7.8 4.3 1.2 0.2
4 3.1 1.7 0.5 0.1
5 1.0 0.5 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.589
λ Away (xG) 0.555
Total xG 2.144
League avg home goals 1.511
League avg away goals 1.104
Rubin attack strength 0.916
Rubin defence strength 0.847
Fakel attack strength 0.594
Fakel defence strength 1.147
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 55 / 55

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Rubin vs Fakel?

Our Poisson model rates 1-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 17.3%.

How many goals are Rubin and Fakel expected to score?

The model projects 1.59 expected goals for Rubin and 0.56 for Fakel, a combined total of 2.14.

How confident is the prediction model for Rubin vs Fakel?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 60%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 55 outings, Rubin have picked up 1.42 PPG on a 21W 15D 19L record — W-L-D-W-L across the most recent five. The sample for Rubin is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Fakel's form line: 9W 20D 26L from 55 games, 0.85 PPG, last five L-L-D-L-L. The sample for Fakel is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Rubin are the form team by 0.57 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Fakel.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Rubin have posted 1.52 PPG from 27 outings (11W 8D 8L).

On the road, Fakel have gone 4W 6D 17L from 27 away games — 0.67 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Rubin come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Rubin are averaging 1.15 goals scored and 1.36 conceded per game recently; Fakel are on 0.60 scored and 1.24 conceded.

Last 55 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Rubin

Rubin

Blended
W L D W L
Fakel

Fakel

Blended
L L D L L
55 Played 55
21/15/19 W / D / L 9/20/26
1.42 Points Per Game 0.85
1.15 Avg Goals Scored 0.60
1.36 Avg Goals Conceded 1.24
2.51 Avg Goals / Game 1.84
15 Clean Sheets 19
27 BTTS 18
25 Over 2.5 Games 14
Rubin

Rubin

L
A Dynamo
1–3 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
H Lokomotiv
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Apr
D
A Krylia Sovetov
1–1 HT 0–1
05 Apr
L
A Zenit
0–4 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
H Nizhny Novgorod
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Mar
W
H Spartak Moscow
2–1 HT 2–1
09 Mar
L
A Akhmat
1–2 HT 1–1
01 Mar
W
A Dinamo Makhachkala
3–2 HT 1–2
07 Dec
D
A CSKA Moscow
2–2 HT 1–0
30 Nov
W
H Akron
3–0 HT 2–0
22 Nov
D
H FC Krasnodar
1–1 HT 1–0
10 Nov
L
A Lokomotiv
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Nov
W
A FC Orenburg
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
H Dynamo
0–4 HT 0–2
20 Oct
W
H Akhmat
2–0 HT 1–0
05 Oct
D
A Fakel
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Sep
D
H CSKA Moscow
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Sep
L
H Krylia Sovetov
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Sep
L
A Spartak Moscow
0–1 HT 0–0
31 Aug
W
H Dinamo Makhachkala
2–0 HT 1–0
23 Aug
W
A Akron
2–1 HT 0–1
19 Aug
D
A FC Rostov
1–1 HT 0–1
09 Aug
L
H Khimki
2–3 HT 1–0
03 Aug
L
H Zenit
0–4 HT 0–2
27 Jul
W
A Nizhny Novgorod
4–2 HT 3–1
22 Jul
D
H FC Sochi
1–1 HT 1–0
25 May
L
A Spartak Moscow
1–3 HT 0–2
19 May
W
H FC Rostov
3–1 HT 2–0
11 May
D
A CSKA Moscow
2–2 HT 1–1
06 May
D
H Ural
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Apr
W
A Zenit
2–0 HT 0–0
24 Apr
D
H Lokomotiv
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
L
A Krylia Sovetov
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
A FC Orenburg
0–3 HT 0–0
08 Apr
W
H Akhmat
2–1 HT 2–0
31 Mar
L
H Nizhny Novgorod
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Mar
D
A FC Krasnodar
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Mar
W
A Baltika
1–0 HT 1–0
10 Dec
L
A Dynamo
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Dec
W
H Fakel
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
A FC Sochi
2–0 HT 1–0
12 Nov
W
A Ural
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Nov
W
H Baltika
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
D
H CSKA Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Oct
W
A Akhmat
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
L
H FC Krasnodar
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Sep
W
A Fakel
1–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
L
H Zenit
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Sep
L
A Nizhny Novgorod
1–2 HT 0–2
02 Sep
D
H Dynamo
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
H Krylia Sovetov
2–1 HT 2–1
18 Aug
L
A FC Rostov
0–3 HT 0–0
12 Aug
L
H Spartak Moscow
1–4 HT 1–1
05 Aug
D
H FC Orenburg
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Jul
D
A Lokomotiv
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Jul
Fakel

Fakel

L
H FC Rostov
0–2 HT 0–1
20 Apr
L
A Akron
0–1 HT 0–0
13 Apr
D
H Akhmat
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A FC Krasnodar
0–5 HT 0–0
30 Mar
L
A FC Orenburg
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H Zenit
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Mar
L
A Khimki
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Mar
L
H CSKA Moscow
0–1 HT 0–1
08 Dec
D
A Dinamo Makhachkala
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Dec
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Nov
L
A Lokomotiv
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Nov
D
H Khimki
1–1 HT 1–1
03 Nov
D
A CSKA Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Oct
W
A Akhmat
3–2 HT 1–2
18 Oct
D
H Dinamo Makhachkala
1–1 HT 0–1
06 Oct
D
H Rubin
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Sep
L
A Zenit
1–3 HT 1–0
21 Sep
D
H Nizhny Novgorod
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
L
A FC Rostov
1–4 HT 0–2
01 Sep
W
H FC Orenburg
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
A Spartak Moscow
0–3 HT 0–2
18 Aug
L
A Krylia Sovetov
0–2 HT 0–0
11 Aug
D
H FC Krasnodar
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Aug
L
H Akron
0–2 HT 0–0
27 Jul
L
A Dynamo
1–3 HT 0–3
20 Jul
W
H Akhmat
2–0 HT 1–0
25 May
L
A Lokomotiv
0–2 HT 0–1
18 May
D
H Ural
0–0 HT 0–0
12 May
D
H Zenit
1–1 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A FC Sochi
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Apr
L
H Krylia Sovetov
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Apr
L
A FC Krasnodar
0–2 HT 0–0
19 Apr
L
H FC Rostov
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A CSKA Moscow
1–4 HT 0–1
07 Apr
D
H FC Orenburg
0–0 HT 0–0
31 Mar
W
A Spartak Moscow
2–0 HT 1–0
10 Mar
D
A Nizhny Novgorod
1–1 HT 1–0
03 Mar
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 0–1
10 Dec
D
H Baltika
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Rubin
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Nov
D
H CSKA Moscow
1–1 HT 0–1
11 Nov
W
A Akhmat
2–1 HT 0–1
04 Nov
W
H Spartak Moscow
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Oct
W
A FC Orenburg
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Oct
D
A Dynamo
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
W
H FC Sochi
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
L
H Rubin
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Sep
D
A Ural
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Sep
L
A Krylia Sovetov
0–3 HT 0–1
02 Sep
D
H FC Krasnodar
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
W
H Nizhny Novgorod
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A Zenit
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Aug
L
A Baltika
1–2 HT 1–1
06 Aug
L
H Lokomotiv
1–4 HT 1–1
30 Jul
L
A FC Rostov
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Jul

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Rubin and Fakel in coming into this match?

Rubin have gone 21W 15D 19L in their last 55 games (1.42 PPG), while Fakel have gone 9W 20D 26L in their last 55 (0.85 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Rubin at home or Fakel away?

Rubin's home record (1.52 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Rubin at home: 1.52 PPG; Fakel away: 0.67 PPG.

Have Rubin or Fakel been keeping clean sheets recently?

Rubin have kept a clean sheet in 27% of their recent games, Fakel in 35%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 4 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2023 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 27 April 2025, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Notable Numbers

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Rubin have gone 2W 0D 0L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Fakel — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Rubin

3

Rubin

1

Draws

Fakel

0

Fakel

Recent Meetings

Rubin
2–1
27 Apr 25
Fakel
Fakel
0–0
27 Sep 24
Rubin
Rubin
1–0
26 Nov 23
Fakel
Fakel
0–1
25 Sep 23
Rubin

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Rubin and Fakel?

From 4 meetings on record, Rubin have won 3, Fakel have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Rubin and Fakel last play each other?

They last met on 27 April 2025, when Rubin 2-1 Fakel.

Who has won more matches between Rubin and Fakel?

Rubin have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Rubin are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 85% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 52% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 22% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Fakel are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 63% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Rubin 48%, Fakel 37% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 41% (Rubin) and 44% (Fakel).

On the defensive side: Rubin have failed to score in 26% of games; Fakel in 59%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Rubin home games / Fakel away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Rubin Rubin Blended
Metric All
(55 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/55
(76.4%)
23/27
(85.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/55
(32.7%)
10/27
(37%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/13
(84.6%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/13
(30.8%)
0/4
(0%)
Winning at HT 19/55
(34.5%)
14/27
(51.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/55
(12.7%)
6/27
(22.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/55
(12.7%)
1/27
(3.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 27/55
(49.1%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 25/55
(45.5%)
11/27
(40.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/55
(25.5%)
6/27
(22.2%)
Clean Sheet 15/55
(27.3%)
8/27
(29.6%)
Failed to Score 15/55
(27.3%)
7/27
(25.9%)
Fakel Fakel Blended
Metric All
(55 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 30/55
(54.5%)
17/27
(63%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/55
(14.5%)
5/27
(18.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/25
(48%)
5/10
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/25
(24%)
3/10
(30%)
Winning at HT 6/55
(10.9%)
4/27
(14.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/55
(3.6%)
2/27
(7.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/55
(12.7%)
2/27
(7.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 18/55
(32.7%)
10/27
(37%)
Over 2.5 Goals 14/55
(25.5%)
12/27
(44.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/55
(12.7%)
6/27
(22.2%)
Clean Sheet 19/55
(34.5%)
6/27
(22.2%)
Failed to Score 31/55
(56.4%)
16/27
(59.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Rubin play Fakel?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 48% of Rubin's recent matches and 37% of Fakel's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Rubin vs Fakel usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 41% of Rubin's recent games and 44% of Fakel's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Rubin and Fakel tend to score early?

Rubin have had a goal before half-time in 85% of their recent matches, Fakel in 63% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Rubin edge out Fakel 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Rubin beat Fakel 2-1 at Ak Bars Arena, Regular Season - 26, in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Rubin 1.59 xG and Fakel 0.56 xG, a combined 2.14. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Rubin attack 0.92 / defence 0.85 against Fakel attack 0.59 / defence 1.15, drawn from 55/55 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Rubin 60% | Draw 29% | Fakel 10%, with Rubin to win its most likely call at 60%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 36%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 66% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 36% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 36% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Rubin 46%, Fakel 26%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 41%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Rubin's trading profile (55 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did.

Fakel's trading profile (55 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 33% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Rubin arrived the stronger side — 1.42 PPG against 0.85. That form edge translated into the three points. Rubin (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.15 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 36% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 36% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 36% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.