Nancy 1-0 Clermont Foot – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates Clermont Foot at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Nancy vs Clermont Foot fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Fixture Analysis
It is a Ligue 2 clash, Regular Season - 17 as Nancy welcome Clermont Foot to Stade Marcel Picot. Kick-off is set for Friday 12 December 2025 at 19:00 UTC.
Recent Form
Across all Ligue 2 games this season, Nancy have gone 2W 1D 7L from 10 outings — a 0.70 PPG return. Last five: W L L L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Nancy, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Nancy's form when playing at home: 2W 1D 4L across 7 games at Stade Marcel Picot this term (1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.71 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. At home, both teams have scored in only 14% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.
Looking at all fixtures this season, Clermont Foot stand at 2W 4D 4L from 10 Ligue 2 matches — 1.00 PPG. Last five: D L W D D. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Clermont Foot, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Clermont Foot away from home this season: 3W 4D 3L from 10 away games — 1.30 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
The form comparison is too close to call — 0.70 PPG (Nancy) versus 1.00 (Clermont Foot). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.
In-Play Profile
Nancy in-play tendencies (16 games, 7 at home): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 14% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 14% of games (home games); they fail to score in 50% of games.
Clermont Foot in-play tendencies (16 games, 7 at away): they score before half-time in 43% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; when winning at HT they fail to see it out 25% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Nancy 38% versus Clermont Foot 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Nancy 44% | Clermont Foot 44%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Nancy 0.96 xG and Clermont Foot 1.11 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Nancy attack 0.680 / defence 1.069 | Clermont Foot attack 0.885 / defence 1.120. League average goals — home 1.260 / away 1.178. Nancy's attack strength of 0.680 is below the league average — the 0.96 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 16 Nancy games / 50 Clermont Foot games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Nancy 31% | Draw 30% | Clermont Foot 39%. Fair-value odds: Nancy 3.23 | Draw 3.33 | Clermont Foot 2.56. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 34% | BTTS probability 41% | Total xG 2.08. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 66% probability — total xG of 2.08 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 41% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Our Verdict
Poisson rates Clermont Foot as the most likely outcome at 39% — marginal model lean. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Clermont Foot offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
On the goals line, Poisson's 2.08 combined xG gives a 34% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.2 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 41% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Nancy 14% | Clermont Foot 60% BTTS from recent games.
The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Nancy vs Clermont Foot | Competition: Ligue 2, Regular Season - 17 | Venue: Stade Marcel Picot • Kick-off: Friday 12 Dec 2025, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Nancy 31% | Draw 30% | Clermont Foot 39% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 34% | BTTS 41% | xG Nancy 0.96 / Clermont Foot 1.11 • Poisson strength factors: Nancy attack 0.680 / def 1.069 | Clermont Foot attack 0.885 / def 1.120 | league avg home 1.260 / away 1.178 • Poisson stance: Clermont Foot (39%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
0.96
Nancy xG
Expected Goals
1.11
Clermont Foot xG
41%
BTTS
61%
Over 1.5
34%
Over 2.5
16%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Nancy vs Clermont Foot kick off?
Nancy vs Clermont Foot kicked off at 19:00 on Friday 12 December 2025 at Stade Marcel Picot.
What was the final score in Nancy vs Clermont Foot?
Nancy 1 - 0 Clermont Foot.
Where is Nancy vs Clermont Foot being played?
The match is being played at Stade Marcel Picot.
What competition is Nancy vs Clermont Foot part of?
Nancy vs Clermont Foot is a Regular Season - 17 fixture in the Ligue 2 (France).
Who is favourite to win Nancy vs Clermont Foot?
Our statistical model gives Nancy a 31% chance of winning, Clermont Foot a 39% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making Clermont Foot the favourite.
Will both teams score in Nancy vs Clermont Foot?
Our model estimates a 41% probability that both Nancy and Clermont Foot will score (BTTS).
Will Nancy vs Clermont Foot have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 34%.
What is the head-to-head record between Nancy and Clermont Foot?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are Nancy and Clermont Foot in?
Nancy (all comps): 2W-1D-7L in 10 | 0.70 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.50 | L5 W-L-L-L-L. Clermont Foot (all comps): 2W-4D-4L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.50 | L5 D-L-W-D-D.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
Working from Nancy's attack rating (0.68) and Clermont Foot's defence rating (1.12), the model arrives at 0.96 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Clermont Foot's attack versus Nancy's defence, projects 1.11 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 16/50 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 15.2%. Close behind: 0-0 (14.3%), 0-1 (12.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 42% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Clermont Foot Win
31%
3.23
30%
3.33
39%
2.57
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
0 – 1
14.0%
Away win
Most likely
1 – 1
13.4%
Draw
0 – 0
12.6%
Draw
Expected Goals & Win Odds
0.96
Nancy xG
Total xG
2.08
1.11
Clermont Foot xG
3.23
31%
Home win
3.33
30%
Draw
2.57
39%
Away win
Goals Markets
61%
Over 1.5
1.64
39%
Under 1.5
2.56
34%
Over 2.5
2.94
66%
Under 2.5
1.52
16%
Over 3.5
6.25
84%
Under 3.5
1.19
6%
Over 4.5
16.67
94%
Under 4.5
1.06
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
41%
BTTS Yes
2.41
59%
BTTS No
1.71
Clean Sheet
33%
3.05
38%
2.61
Win to Nil
10%
9.84
15%
6.70
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12.6 | 14.0 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 1 | 12.1 | 13.4 | 7.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Nancy vs Clermont Foot?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.2%.
How many goals are Nancy and Clermont Foot expected to score?
The model projects 0.96 expected goals for Nancy and 1.11 for Clermont Foot, a combined total of 2.08.
How confident is the prediction model for Nancy vs Clermont Foot?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Nancy's recent record stands at 4W 3D 9L from 16 games, a 0.94 PPG return, with W-L-L-L-L in the last five. The sample for Nancy is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Clermont Foot, meanwhile, have gone 4W 7D 5L across 16 games — 1.19 PPG, with D-L-W-D-D in their last five. The sample for Clermont Foot is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Form-wise this is close to level: Nancy on 0.94 PPG, Clermont Foot on 1.19. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.
Home Ground vs the Road
At home specifically, Nancy have managed 2W 1D 4L from 7 games — 1.00 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Clermont Foot's away record stands at 2W 2D 3L across 7 trips, a 1.14 PPG haul.
The Goals Picture
Nancy are averaging 0.88 goals scored and 1.38 conceded per game recently; Clermont Foot are on 1.00 scored and 1.25 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: Clermont Foot in 62%.
Last 16 Results — Ligue 2
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Nancy
Blended
Clermont Foot
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Nancy and Clermont Foot in coming into this match?
Nancy have gone 4W 3D 9L in their last 16 games (0.94 PPG), while Clermont Foot have gone 4W 7D 5L in their last 16 (1.19 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Nancy at home or Clermont Foot away?
Clermont Foot's away record (1.14 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Nancy at home: 1.00 PPG; Clermont Foot away: 1.14 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The fixture history between Nancy and Clermont Foot runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to December 2025. Every recorded meeting has come in Ligue 2. They last met on 10 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.
Last 2 Meetings
1
Nancy
1
Draws
0
Clermont Foot
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Nancy and Clermont Foot?
From 2 meetings on record, Nancy have won 1, Clermont Foot have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.
When did Nancy and Clermont Foot last play each other?
They last met on 10 April 2026, when Clermont Foot 2-2 Nancy.
Who has won more matches between Nancy and Clermont Foot?
Nancy have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 2 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
Nancy are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 43% of the time.
Clermont Foot see a goal before the break in 43% of their matches.
The Numbers That Matter
Clean sheets have been more common than shared scoring for these two — Nancy 14% BTTS, Clermont Foot 43%. That points toward BTTS No as the trading lean.
Low-scoring games have been more typical here — Over 2.5 sits at just 14% for Nancy and 43% for Clermont Foot.
On the defensive side: Clermont Foot in 43%; Nancy have failed to score in 57% of games; Clermont Foot in 29%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Nancy home games / Clermont Foot away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Nancy play Clermont Foot?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 14% of Nancy's recent matches and 43% of Clermont Foot's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is Nancy vs Clermont Foot usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 14% of Nancy's recent games and 43% of Clermont Foot's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Nancy and Clermont Foot tend to score early?
Nancy have had a goal before half-time in 71% of their recent matches, Clermont Foot in 43% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Shock result as Nancy defy the odds to beat Clermont Foot 1-0.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Nancy beat Clermont Foot 1-0 at Stade Marcel Picot, Regular Season - 17, in the Ligue 2. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Nancy 0.96 xG and Clermont Foot 1.11 xG, a combined 2.08. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Clermont Foot landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Nancy attack 0.68 / defence 1.07 against Clermont Foot attack 0.89 / defence 1.12, drawn from 16/50 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Nancy 31% | Draw 30% | Clermont Foot 39%, with Clermont Foot to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual Nancy win had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 61% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 41% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 44% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Nancy 44%, Clermont Foot 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Nancy's trading profile (16 games, 7 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 38% of their matches — today it did not.
Clermont Foot's trading profile (16 games, 7 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Nancy 0.94 PPG, Clermont Foot 1.19 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Nancy win broke the near-deadlock. Nancy (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line. Clermont Foot (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.86 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.