Sign in Register

Clermont Foot 0-4 Lens – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Ligue 1 · Regular Season - 27

Kick-off

Sun 12 Mar 2023

12:00

Venue

Stade Gabriel Montpied

Competition

Ligue 1

France

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Lens at 42% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Clermont Foot vs Lens encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Clermont Foot host Lens at Stade Gabriel Montpied in Ligue 1, Regular Season - 27. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 12 March 2023 at 12:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Ligue 1 games this season, Clermont Foot have gone 4W 3D 3L from 10 outings — a 1.50 PPG return. Last five: L L L D W. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 0.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Clermont Foot, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Clermont Foot at Stade Gabriel Montpied this season: 2W 3D 5L from 10 home games — 0.90 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.80 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.90 lags behind their overall 1.50 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Stade Gabriel Montpied this season.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Lens stand at 3W 5D 2L from 10 Ligue 1 matches — 1.40 PPG. Last five: D L W D D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Lens, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Lens have gone 2W 6D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.50 PPG (Clermont Foot) versus 1.40 (Lens). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Clermont Foot register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Lens in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 3 previous meetings, Clermont Foot have won 0, Lens 2, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 3 meetings have averaged 3.7 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 12 Nov 2022, ended 1–2 with Lens winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.7 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

Clermont Foot in-play and half-time data (64 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 81% of the time; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Lens in-play and half-time data (64 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 84% of the time; BTTS occurs in 66% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Clermont Foot 50% versus Lens 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Clermont Foot 45% | Lens 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Clermont Foot 0.84 xG and Lens 1.19 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Clermont Foot attack 0.681 / defence 1.064 | Lens attack 0.899 / defence 0.855. League average goals — home 1.439 / away 1.242. Clermont Foot's attack strength of 0.681 is below the league average — the 0.84 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 64 Clermont Foot games / 64 Lens games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Clermont Foot 24% | Draw 33% | Lens 42%. Fair-value odds: Clermont Foot 4.17 | Draw 3.03 | Lens 2.38. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 33% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 33% | BTTS probability 41% | Total xG 2.03. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 67% probability — total xG of 2.03 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 41% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Lens at 42% — marginal model lean. With a 33% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Lens offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

The Poisson model projects 2.03 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 33% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 2.1 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 3.7 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 41% on No. This conflicts with form data: Clermont Foot 60% | Lens 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Lens — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 42%.
Goals H2H suggests 3.67 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 2.03 — current-season defences are outperforming historical norms.
BTTS H2H BTTS history (100%) is contradicted by Poisson (41%) — recent defensive form has changed the dynamic.
Form Lens Poisson xG (1.19) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.90) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~1.5 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.03) both support Under 2.5 goals (67% probability).
BTTS Form backs BTTS Yes (Clermont Foot 6/10, Lens 6/10) but Poisson only rates it at 41% — proceed with caution.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 33% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 33% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Clermont Foot vs Lens | Competition: Ligue 1, Regular Season - 27 | Venue: Stade Gabriel Montpied • Kick-off: Sunday 12 Mar 2023, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Clermont Foot 24% | Draw 33% | Lens 42% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 33% | BTTS 41% | xG Clermont Foot 0.84 / Lens 1.19 • Poisson strength factors: Clermont Foot attack 0.681 / def 1.064 | Lens attack 0.899 / def 0.855 | league avg home 1.439 / away 1.242 • Poisson stance: Lens (42%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

0.84

Clermont Foot xG

Expected Goals

1.19

Lens xG

24%
33%
42%
Clermont Foot Draw Lens

41%

BTTS

62%

Over 1.5

33%

Over 2.5

15%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Clermont Foot vs Lens kick off?

Clermont Foot vs Lens kicked off at 12:00 on Sunday 12 March 2023 at Stade Gabriel Montpied.

What was the final score in Clermont Foot vs Lens?

Clermont Foot 0 - 4 Lens.

Where is Clermont Foot vs Lens being played?

The match is being played at Stade Gabriel Montpied.

What competition is Clermont Foot vs Lens part of?

Clermont Foot vs Lens is a Regular Season - 27 fixture in the Ligue 1 (France).

Who is favourite to win Clermont Foot vs Lens?

Our statistical model gives Clermont Foot a 24% chance of winning, Lens a 42% chance, and a 33% chance of a draw — making Lens the favourite.

Will both teams score in Clermont Foot vs Lens?

Our model estimates a 41% probability that both Clermont Foot and Lens will score (BTTS).

Will Clermont Foot vs Lens have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 33%.

What is the head-to-head record between Clermont Foot and Lens?

Record (3 meetings): Clermont Foot 0W | Draws 1 | Lens 2W.

What form are Clermont Foot and Lens in?

Clermont Foot (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 0.90 | L5 L-L-L-D-W. Lens (all comps): 3W-5D-2L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.10 | L5 D-L-W-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates Clermont Foot's attack at 0.68x the league average against Lens's defence at 0.85x — combine the two and it projects 0.84 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Lens's attack versus Clermont Foot's defence, projects 1.19 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 64/64 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 0-0 carries the highest individual probability at 14.9% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (14.8%), 0-1 (14.0%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 44% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Lens Win

24%

Clermont Foot

4.12

33%

Draw

3.00

42%

Lens

2.36

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

15.7%

Away win

Most likely

0 – 0

13.2%

Draw

1 – 1

13.1%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.84

Clermont Foot xG

Total xG

2.03

1.19

Lens xG

24%
33%
42%
Clermont FootDrawLens

4.12

24%

Home win

3.00

33%

Draw

2.36

42%

Away win

Goals Markets

60%

Over 1.5

1.67

40%

Under 1.5

2.50

33%

Over 2.5

3.03

67%

Under 2.5

1.49

15%

Over 3.5

6.67

85%

Under 3.5

1.18

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

41%

BTTS Yes

2.43

59%

BTTS No

1.70

Clean Sheet

30%

Clermont Foot

3.28

43%

Lens

2.31

Win to Nil

7%

Clermont Foot

13.53

18%

Lens

5.46

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 13.2 15.7 9.3 3.7 1.1 0.3
1 11.1 13.1 7.8 3.1 0.9 0.2
2 4.6 5.5 3.3 1.3 0.4 0.1
3 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.4 0.1
4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1
5 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.838
λ Away (xG) 1.188
Total xG 2.026
League avg home goals 1.439
League avg away goals 1.242
Clermont Foot attack strength 0.681
Clermont Foot defence strength 1.064
Lens attack strength 0.899
Lens defence strength 0.855
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 64 / 64

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Clermont Foot vs Lens?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.9%.

How many goals are Clermont Foot and Lens expected to score?

The model projects 0.84 expected goals for Clermont Foot and 1.19 for Lens, a combined total of 2.03.

How confident is the prediction model for Clermont Foot vs Lens?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 42%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Clermont Foot's recent record stands at 18W 16D 30L from 64 games, a 1.09 PPG return, with L-L-L-D-W in the last five. The sample for Clermont Foot is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Lens, meanwhile, have gone 31W 20D 13L across 64 games — 1.77 PPG, with D-L-W-D-D in their last five. The sample for Lens is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours Lens by 0.68 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Clermont Foot heading into this one.

Home Ground vs the Road

At home specifically, Clermont Foot have managed 8W 9D 15L from 32 games — 1.03 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Lens's away record stands at 11W 12D 9L across 32 trips, a 1.41 PPG haul.

The Goals Picture

Clermont Foot are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.61 conceded per game recently; Lens are on 1.59 scored and 1.08 conceded.

Last 64 Results — Ligue 1

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Clermont Foot

Clermont Foot

Blended
L L L D W
Lens

Lens

Blended
D L W D D
64 Played 64
18/16/30 W / D / L 31/20/13
1.09 Points Per Game 1.77
1.00 Avg Goals Scored 1.59
1.61 Avg Goals Conceded 1.08
2.61 Avg Goals / Game 2.67
15 Clean Sheets 17
32 BTTS 38
29 Over 2.5 Games 33
Clermont Foot

Clermont Foot

W
A Toulouse
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
D
H Strasbourg
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Feb
L
A Rennes
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Feb
L
H Marseille
0–2 HT 0–1
11 Feb
L
H Monaco
0–2 HT 0–2
05 Feb
D
A Lille
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
H Nantes
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Jan
W
A Angers
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Jan
W
H Rennes
2–1 HT 1–0
11 Jan
W
A Lyon
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
L
H Lille
0–2 HT 0–0
28 Dec
L
A Lens
1–2 HT 1–0
12 Nov
D
H Montpellier
1–1 HT 0–1
06 Nov
D
A Nantes
1–1 HT 0–0
30 Oct
L
H Stade Brestois 29
1–3 HT 0–1
23 Oct
D
A Monaco
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Oct
W
H Auxerre
2–1 HT 0–0
09 Oct
W
A Ajaccio
3–1 HT 1–0
02 Oct
L
H Estac Troyes
1–3 HT 1–1
18 Sep
D
A Strasbourg
0–0 HT 0–0
11 Sep
W
H Toulouse
2–0 HT 0–0
04 Sep
L
A Marseille
0–1 HT 0–0
31 Aug
L
A Lorient
1–2 HT 0–2
28 Aug
W
H Nice
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Aug
W
A Reims
4–2 HT 0–2
14 Aug
L
H Paris Saint Germain
0–5 HT 0–3
06 Aug
L
H Lyon
1–2 HT 0–1
21 May
L
A Strasbourg
0–1 HT 0–1
14 May
W
H Montpellier
2–1 HT 1–1
08 May
L
A Stade Brestois 29
0–2 HT 0–0
01 May
D
H Angers
2–2 HT 0–2
24 Apr
W
A Estac Troyes
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Metz
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Apr
L
H Paris Saint Germain
1–6 HT 1–2
09 Apr
L
H Nantes
2–3 HT 0–1
03 Apr
L
A Lens
1–3 HT 1–2
19 Mar
L
H Lorient
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Mar
L
A Lille
0–4 HT 0–1
06 Mar
D
H Bordeaux
1–1 HT 1–1
27 Feb
W
A Marseille
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Feb
L
H Saint Etienne
1–2 HT 1–0
13 Feb
W
A Nice
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
W
H Rennes
2–1 HT 0–1
23 Jan
L
H Strasbourg
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Jan
L
A Monaco
0–4 HT 0–1
16 Jan
D
H Reims
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Jan
W
A Angers
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Dec
L
A Montpellier
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Dec
D
H Lens
2–2 HT 1–1
01 Dec
L
A Reims
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Nov
L
H Nice
1–2 HT 1–0
21 Nov
L
A Saint Etienne
2–3 HT 0–0
07 Nov
L
H Marseille
0–1 HT 0–1
31 Oct
L
A Nantes
1–2 HT 0–1
23 Oct
W
H Lille
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Oct
D
A Lorient
1–1 HT 1–0
03 Oct
L
H Monaco
1–3 HT 1–1
26 Sep
L
A Rennes
0–6 HT 0–2
22 Sep
D
H Stade Brestois 29
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Sep
L
A Paris Saint Germain
0–4 HT 0–2
11 Sep
D
H Metz
2–2 HT 1–2
29 Aug
D
A Lyon
3–3 HT 1–3
22 Aug
W
H Estac Troyes
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
W
A Bordeaux
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
Lens

Lens

D
H Lille
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Mar
D
A Montpellier
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Feb
W
H Nantes
3–1 HT 2–1
19 Feb
L
A Lyon
1–2 HT 1–1
12 Feb
D
A Stade Brestois 29
1–1 HT 0–0
05 Feb
L
H Nice
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
A Estac Troyes
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Jan
W
H Auxerre
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Jan
D
A Strasbourg
2–2 HT 2–2
11 Jan
W
H Paris Saint Germain
3–1 HT 2–1
01 Jan
D
A Nice
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Dec
W
H Clermont Foot
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Nov
W
A Angers
2–1 HT 1–0
05 Nov
W
H Toulouse
3–0 HT 0–0
28 Oct
W
A Marseille
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
W
H Montpellier
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Oct
L
A Lille
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
H Lyon
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Oct
D
A Nantes
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Sep
W
H Estac Troyes
1–0 HT 1–0
09 Sep
D
A Reims
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Sep
W
H Lorient
5–2 HT 2–1
31 Aug
W
H Rennes
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Aug
W
A Monaco
4–1 HT 2–1
20 Aug
D
A Ajaccio
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Aug
W
H Stade Brestois 29
3–2 HT 1–0
07 Aug
D
H Monaco
2–2 HT 1–1
21 May
W
A Estac Troyes
3–1 HT 2–1
14 May
W
A Reims
2–1 HT 0–1
08 May
D
H Nantes
2–2 HT 0–2
30 Apr
D
A Paris Saint Germain
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Apr
W
H Montpellier
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Apr
W
A Lille
2–1 HT 2–1
16 Apr
W
H Nice
3–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
A Strasbourg
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Apr
W
H Clermont Foot
3–1 HT 2–1
19 Mar
D
A Metz
0–0 HT 0–0
13 Mar
L
H Stade Brestois 29
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Mar
W
A Angers
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Feb
D
H Lyon
1–1 HT 1–1
19 Feb
W
H Bordeaux
3–2 HT 3–1
13 Feb
L
A Lorient
0–2 HT 0–1
06 Feb
L
H Marseille
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Jan
W
A Saint Etienne
2–1 HT 0–1
15 Jan
W
H Rennes
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Jan
L
A Nice
1–2 HT 1–0
22 Dec
L
A Nantes
2–3 HT 2–0
10 Dec
D
H Paris Saint Germain
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Dec
D
A Clermont Foot
2–2 HT 1–1
01 Dec
D
H Angers
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Nov
L
A Stade Brestois 29
0–4 HT 0–3
21 Nov
W
H Estac Troyes
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Nov
L
A Lyon
1–2 HT 0–2
30 Oct
W
H Metz
4–1 HT 2–1
24 Oct
L
A Montpellier
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Oct
W
H Reims
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
A Marseille
3–2 HT 2–2
26 Sep
L
H Strasbourg
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Sep
W
H Lille
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Sep
W
A Bordeaux
3–2 HT 2–0
12 Sep
D
H Lorient
2–2 HT 1–2
29 Aug
W
A Monaco
2–0 HT 0–0
21 Aug
D
H Saint Etienne
2–2 HT 1–1
15 Aug
D
A Rennes
1–1 HT 1–1
08 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Clermont Foot and Lens in coming into this match?

Clermont Foot have gone 18W 16D 30L in their last 64 games (1.09 PPG), while Lens have gone 31W 20D 13L in their last 64 (1.77 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Clermont Foot at home or Lens away?

Lens's away record (1.41 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Clermont Foot at home: 1.03 PPG; Lens away: 1.41 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Clermont Foot and Lens runs to 6 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to December 2021. Every recorded meeting has come in Ligue 1. It has been a while since the last meeting — 20 April 2024, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Digging Into the Numbers

Lens go into this on the back of 5 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 12 Mar 2023, when Lens won 0-4 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Clermont Foot's record when hosting Lens specifically: 0W 1D 2L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Clermont Foot

0

Clermont Foot

1

Draws

Lens

5

Lens

Recent Meetings

Lens
1–0
20 Apr 24
Clermont Foot
Clermont Foot
0–3
25 Nov 23
Lens
Clermont Foot
0–4
12 Mar 23
Lens
Lens
2–1
12 Nov 22
Clermont Foot
Lens
3–1
19 Mar 22
Clermont Foot
Clermont Foot
2–2
01 Dec 21
Lens

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Clermont Foot and Lens?

From 6 meetings on record, Clermont Foot have won 0, Lens have won 5, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Clermont Foot and Lens last play each other?

They last met on 20 April 2024, when Lens 1-0 Clermont Foot.

Who has won more matches between Clermont Foot and Lens?

Lens have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Clermont Foot are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 16% of those situations.

Lens see a goal before the break in 59% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Clermont Foot 59%, Lens 66% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (Clermont Foot) and 50% (Lens).

On the defensive side: Clermont Foot have failed to score in 28% of games; Lens in 28%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Clermont Foot home games / Lens away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Clermont Foot Clermont Foot Blended
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/64
(67.2%)
24/32
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/64
(26.6%)
10/32
(31.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 17/21
(81%)
6/8
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/21
(47.6%)
6/8
(75%)
Winning at HT 10/64
(15.6%)
5/32
(15.6%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/64
(6.2%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/64
(12.5%)
5/32
(15.6%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/64
(50%)
19/32
(59.4%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/64
(45.3%)
16/32
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/64
(28.1%)
9/32
(28.1%)
Clean Sheet 15/64
(23.4%)
6/32
(18.8%)
Failed to Score 21/64
(32.8%)
9/32
(28.1%)
Lens Lens Blended
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 39/64
(60.9%)
19/32
(59.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/64
(37.5%)
12/32
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 21/25
(84%)
9/13
(69.2%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/25
(40%)
6/13
(46.2%)
Winning at HT 20/64
(31.2%)
8/32
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/64
(6.2%)
3/32
(9.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/64
(9.4%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 38/64
(59.4%)
21/32
(65.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/64
(51.6%)
16/32
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 21/64
(32.8%)
8/32
(25%)
Clean Sheet 17/64
(26.6%)
6/32
(18.8%)
Failed to Score 13/64
(20.3%)
9/32
(28.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Clermont Foot play Lens?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 59% of Clermont Foot's games and 66% of Lens's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Clermont Foot vs Lens usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 50% of Clermont Foot's recent games and 50% of Lens's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Clermont Foot and Lens tend to score early?

Clermont Foot have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, Lens in 59% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Lens run riot with a 0-4 hammering of Clermont Foot.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Lens beat Clermont Foot 0-4 at Stade Gabriel Montpied, Regular Season - 27, in the Ligue 1. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Clermont Foot 0.84 xG and Lens 1.19 xG, a combined 2.03. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. Clermont Foot fell 0.8 short of their projected output. Lens outscored their 1.19 projection by 2.8. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Clermont Foot attack 0.68 / defence 1.06 against Lens attack 0.90 / defence 0.85, drawn from 64/64 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Clermont Foot 24% | Draw 33% | Lens 42%, with Lens to win its most likely call at 42%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 33%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 62% and landed. Over 3.5 was 15% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 41% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Clermont Foot 45%, Lens 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Clermont Foot's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Lens's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Lens arrived the stronger side — 1.77 PPG against 1.09. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Clermont Foot (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.03 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 1.69 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Lens (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.28 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.22 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 33% Over 2.5 probability, but 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 41% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 48% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.