Sign in Register

SHANGHAI SIPG 2-0 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 13

Kick-off

Wed 22 May 2024

13:00

Venue

SAIC Motor Pudong Arena

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates SHANGHAI SIPG at 47%, yet in-form Chengdu Better City provide a compelling counter-argument — this SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Chengdu Better City make the trip to SAIC Motor Pudong Arena to face SHANGHAI SIPG in Super League, Regular Season - 13. The match kicks off on Wednesday 22 May 2024 at 13:00 UTC.

Form

SHANGHAI SIPG (all games): 4W 2D 4L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 1.40 PPG. Last five: L W L D W. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, SHANGHAI SIPG have posted 5W 3D 2L at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena — 1.80 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Chengdu Better City's overall Super League record this term: 6W 2D 2L from 10 games (2.00 PPG). Last five: W D W W W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 0.80. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

Chengdu Better City's away record: 4W 2D 4L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.40 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Chengdu Better City arrive in superior form — a 0.60 PPG advantage (2.00 vs 1.40) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — SHANGHAI SIPG have seen both teams score in 80% of their games, Chengdu Better City in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — SHANGHAI SIPG lead 1W to 2W over the last 4 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 1.8 per game from 4 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 23 Sep 2023, ended 1–2 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.8 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading & In-Play

SHANGHAI SIPG — key trading statistics (64 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time.

Chengdu Better City — key trading statistics (64 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 56% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — SHANGHAI SIPG 50% versus Chengdu Better City 48%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (SHANGHAI SIPG 52% | Chengdu Better City 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects SHANGHAI SIPG 2.36 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.96 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.537 / defence 1.039 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.239 / defence 0.995. League average goals — home 1.540 / away 1.523. SHANGHAI SIPG carry an above-average attack strength of 1.537 — their λ of 2.36 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Chengdu Better City have an above-average attack strength of 1.239 — the away xG of 1.96 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 41 SHANGHAI SIPG games / 42 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 47% | Draw 21% | Chengdu Better City 32%. Fair-value odds: SHANGHAI SIPG 2.13 | Draw 4.76 | Chengdu Better City 3.12. SHANGHAI SIPG hold a narrow Poisson edge at 47% — the draw (21%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 80% | BTTS probability 79% | Total xG 4.32. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 80% — a total xG of 4.32 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 79% reflects that both xG figures (2.36 / 1.96) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates SHANGHAI SIPG as the most likely outcome at 47% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Chengdu Better City (2.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 4.32 combined xG gives a 80% probability to Over 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 79%. Form rates corroborate: SHANGHAI SIPG 80% | Chengdu Better City 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–1D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.75 goals/game but Poisson xG is 4.32 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 1.40 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG Poisson xG (2.36) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.96) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.60) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (SHANGHAI SIPG 8/10, Chengdu Better City 6/10) and Poisson model (79%).
Form Form (PPG) favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson leans SHANGHAI SIPG (47%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 80% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 79% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 13 | Venue: SAIC Motor Pudong Arena • Kick-off: Wednesday 22 May 2024, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 47% | Draw 21% | Chengdu Better City 32% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 80% | BTTS 79% | xG SHANGHAI SIPG 2.36 / Chengdu Better City 1.96 • Poisson strength factors: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.537 / def 1.039 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.239 / def 0.995 | league avg home 1.540 / away 1.523 • Poisson stance: SHANGHAI SIPG (47%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.36

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Expected Goals

1.96

Chengdu Better City xG

47%
21%
32%
SHANGHAI SIPG Draw Chengdu Better City

79%

BTTS

94%

Over 1.5

80%

Over 2.5

63%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 13:00 on Wednesday 22 May 2024 at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena.

What was the final score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City?

SHANGHAI SIPG 2 - 0 Chengdu Better City.

Where is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena.

What competition is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City part of?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 13 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives SHANGHAI SIPG a 47% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 32% chance, and a 21% chance of a draw — making SHANGHAI SIPG the favourite.

Will both teams score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 79% probability that both SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 80%.

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City?

Record (4 meetings): SHANGHAI SIPG 1W | Draws 1 | Chengdu Better City 2W.

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City in?

SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.50 | L5 L-W-L-D-W. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 0.80 | L5 W-D-W-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

SHANGHAI SIPG's attacking strength (1.54x league average) is weighed against Chengdu Better City's defensive record (0.99x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.36. Flip it around — Chengdu Better City's attack (1.24x) against SHANGHAI SIPG's defence (1.04x) — and the away total comes out at 1.96.

These ratings are built from 41/42 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-1, at 7.3%. Close behind: 2-2 (7.1%), 1-1 (7.0%). Together the top three scorelines make up 21% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

SHANGHAI SIPG Win

47%

SHANGHAI SIPG

2.14

21%

Draw

4.73

32%

Chengdu Better City

3.12

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

7.3%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 2

7.1%

Draw

1 – 1

6.2%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.36

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Total xG

4.32

1.96

Chengdu Better City xG

47%
21%
32%
SHANGHAI SIPGDrawChengdu Better City

2.14

47%

Home win

4.73

21%

Draw

3.12

32%

Away win

Goals Markets

93%

Over 1.5

1.08

7%

Under 1.5

14.29

80%

Over 2.5

1.25

20%

Under 2.5

5.00

63%

Over 3.5

1.59

37%

Under 3.5

2.70

43%

Over 4.5

2.33

57%

Under 4.5

1.75

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

79%

BTTS Yes

1.27

21%

BTTS No

4.67

Clean Sheet

14%

SHANGHAI SIPG

7.10

9%

Chengdu Better City

10.55

Win to Nil

7%

SHANGHAI SIPG

15.19

3%

Chengdu Better City

32.86

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1.3 2.6 2.6 1.7 0.8 0.3
1 3.1 6.2 6.0 3.9 1.9 0.8
2 3.7 7.3 7.1 4.7 2.3 0.9
3 2.9 5.7 5.6 3.7 1.8 0.7
4 1.7 3.4 3.3 2.2 1.1 0.4
5 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.356
λ Away (xG) 1.960
Total xG 4.316
League avg home goals 1.540
League avg away goals 1.523
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 1.537
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 1.039
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.239
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.995
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 41 / 42

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 7.3%.

How many goals are SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 2.36 expected goals for SHANGHAI SIPG and 1.96 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 4.32.

How confident is the prediction model for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 47%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

SHANGHAI SIPG's recent record stands at 39W 11D 14L from 64 games, a 2.00 PPG return, with L-W-L-D-W in the last five.

Chengdu Better City, meanwhile, have gone 33W 19D 12L across 64 games — 1.84 PPG, with W-D-W-W-W in their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 2.00 PPG for SHANGHAI SIPG against 1.84 for Chengdu Better City. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, SHANGHAI SIPG have managed 19W 6D 7L from 32 games — 1.97 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Chengdu Better City's away record stands at 15W 9D 8L across 32 trips, a 1.69 PPG haul.

Attack vs Defence

SHANGHAI SIPG are averaging 1.81 goals scored and 0.86 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.56 scored and 0.94 conceded. SHANGHAI SIPG's scoring rate against Chengdu Better City's tighter defensive record is one of the more interesting match-ups in the goals markets here.

Defensively: SHANGHAI SIPG have kept a clean sheet in 41% of their games; Chengdu Better City in 42% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 64 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Current Season
L W L D W
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
W D W W W
64 Played 64
39/11/14 W / D / L 33/19/12
2.00 Points Per Game 1.84
1.81 Avg Goals Scored 1.56
0.86 Avg Goals Conceded 0.94
2.67 Avg Goals / Game 2.50
26 Clean Sheets 27
32 BTTS 31
33 Over 2.5 Games 32
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

W
A Dalian Aerbin
3–2 HT 0–1
04 Nov
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Oct
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–1
20 Oct
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 0–1
23 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Aug
D
H Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–4 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 1–0
08 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
03 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
5–0 HT 2–0
29 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–0 HT 1–0
21 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–1 HT 1–1
16 Jul
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 0–0
12 Jul
D
H Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 1–1
08 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
29 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
09 Jun
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
A Changchun Yatai
3–0 HT 3–0
29 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
24 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
20 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 0–0
14 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–1 HT 0–0
10 May
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
06 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–2 HT 1–0
22 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Apr
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 4–0
31 Dec
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–0
27 Dec
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
W
A Meizhou Kejia
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Dec
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 2–1
04 Dec
L
H Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–1
30 Nov
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Nov
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
22 Nov
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 3–0
13 Nov
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Nov
W
H Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Nov
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–0
30 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
7–0 HT 3–0
24 Oct
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–1 HT 2–1
09 Oct
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Oct
W
H Chengdu Better City
3–0 HT 2–0
29 Sep
W
H Guangzhou R&F
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Sep
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 2–0
20 Sep
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Sep
W
H Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Aug
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–1
20 Aug
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 1–0
06 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Jul
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Jul
W
H Hebei Zhongji
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Jun
W
A Wuhan Zall
2–1 HT 1–0
25 Jun
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 0–2
19 Jun
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Jun
W
A Hebei Zhongji
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
08 Jun
L
H Wuhan Zall
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Jun
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
04 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
29 Oct
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 2–0
23 Oct
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
19 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–3 HT 0–3
04 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–1
29 Jul
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–1 HT 2–1
22 Jul
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Jul
W
H Henan Jianye
2–0 HT 0–0
11 Jul
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 0–1
07 Jul
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
27 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–1
23 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
14 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Dec
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 0–1
27 Dec
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Nov
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–2
07 Nov
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 39W 11D 14L in their last 64 games (2.00 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 33W 19D 12L in their last 64 (1.84 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — SHANGHAI SIPG at home or Chengdu Better City away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's home record (1.97 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — SHANGHAI SIPG at home: 1.97 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.69 PPG.

Have SHANGHAI SIPG or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

SHANGHAI SIPG have kept a clean sheet in 41% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 42%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 9 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 19 May 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: SHANGHAI SIPG won 3-0 on 29 Sep 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 2W 0D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Chengdu Better City — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 9 Meetings

SHANGHAI SIPG

3

SHANGHAI SIPG

1

Draws

Chengdu Better City

5

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 May 26
SHANGHAI SIPG
Chengdu Better City
4–1
30 Aug 25
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3
20 Apr 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–1
18 Oct 24
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
2–0
22 May 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–1
23 Sep 23
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1
03 Jun 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–0
10 Dec 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
3–0
29 Sep 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City?

From 9 meetings on record, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 3, Chengdu Better City have won 5, and 1 have been drawn.

When did SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 19 May 2026, when Chengdu Better City 0-1 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Who has won more matches between SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 9 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 72% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 44% of the time.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 31% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — SHANGHAI SIPG 53%, Chengdu Better City 44% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 47% (SHANGHAI SIPG) and 38% (Chengdu Better City).

On the defensive side: SHANGHAI SIPG keep a clean sheet in 34% of their matches; Chengdu Better City in 44%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = SHANGHAI SIPG home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Current Season
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/63
(68.3%)
23/32
(71.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/63
(28.6%)
10/32
(31.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 17/20
(85%)
9/9
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/20
(50%)
5/9
(55.6%)
Winning at HT 28/63
(44.4%)
14/32
(43.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/63
(6.3%)
3/32
(9.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/63
(6.3%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/64
(50%)
17/32
(53.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/64
(51.6%)
15/32
(46.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/64
(21.9%)
7/32
(21.9%)
Clean Sheet 26/64
(40.6%)
11/32
(34.4%)
Failed to Score 9/64
(14.1%)
4/32
(12.5%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/64
(75%)
25/32
(78.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/64
(34.4%)
7/32
(21.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/16
(56.2%)
4/7
(57.1%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/16
(18.8%)
0/7
(0%)
Winning at HT 24/64
(37.5%)
10/32
(31.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/64
(7.8%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/64
(9.4%)
3/32
(9.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/64
(48.4%)
14/32
(43.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/64
(50%)
12/32
(37.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/64
(25%)
5/32
(15.6%)
Clean Sheet 27/64
(42.2%)
14/32
(43.8%)
Failed to Score 13/64
(20.3%)
7/32
(21.9%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when SHANGHAI SIPG play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 53% of SHANGHAI SIPG's recent matches and 44% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 47% of SHANGHAI SIPG's recent games and 38% of Chengdu Better City's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do SHANGHAI SIPG and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

SHANGHAI SIPG have had a goal before half-time in 72% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 78% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

SHANGHAI SIPG cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over Chengdu Better City.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Chengdu Better City 2-0 at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena, Regular Season - 13, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting SHANGHAI SIPG 2.36 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.96 xG, a combined 4.32. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. Chengdu Better City landed 2.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.54 / defence 1.04 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.24 / defence 0.99, drawn from 41/42 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it SHANGHAI SIPG 47% | Draw 21% | Chengdu Better City 32%, with SHANGHAI SIPG to win its most likely call at 47%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 80%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 94% and landed. Over 3.5 was 63% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 79% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (SHANGHAI SIPG 52%, Chengdu Better City 50%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time, and duly kept one.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — SHANGHAI SIPG 2.00 PPG, Chengdu Better City 1.84 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the SHANGHAI SIPG win broke the near-deadlock. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.91 average — tighter than their form line. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.22 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 1.00 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 80% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 79% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 51% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.