Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 1-0 Wuhan Three Towns – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 32

Kick-off

Fri 23 Dec 2022

12:00

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Wuhan Three Towns at 45%, yet other data sources diverge — this Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 32 sees Wuhan Three Towns travel to Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park to take on Chengdu Better City. The game is scheduled for Friday 23 December 2022, 12:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Chengdu Better City stand at 7W 3D 0L from 10 Super League matches — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W W W D D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. Defensively, conceding just 0.60 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 6 clean sheets from 10 games (60%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches.

In front of their own supporters this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 6W 4D 0L at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park — 2.20 PPG. They are averaging 2.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

Across all Super League games this season, Wuhan Three Towns have recorded 6W 1D 3L from 10 outings — 1.90 PPG. Last five: W L W D W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 8W 1D 1L from 10 away fixtures this term (2.50 PPG). They are averaging 2.20 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Their away PPG of 2.50 exceeds their overall 1.90 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

On current form, Chengdu Better City have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (2.40 vs 1.90) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 1 previous meetings, Chengdu Better City have won 1, Wuhan Three Towns 0, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.0 per contest from 1 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 29 Oct 2022, ended 1–0 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

Chengdu Better City in-play and half-time data (31 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 44% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time.

Wuhan Three Towns in-play and half-time data (31 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; they lead at the break 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 48%; they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 45% versus Wuhan Three Towns 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 42% | Wuhan Three Towns 77%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 1.12 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.51 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.189 / defence 0.780 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.420 / defence 0.655. League average goals — home 1.441 / away 1.368. Wuhan Three Towns's defence strength of 0.655 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Wuhan Three Towns have an above-average attack strength of 1.420 — the away xG of 1.51 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Chengdu Better City's defence rating of 0.780 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 31 Chengdu Better City games / 31 Wuhan Three Towns games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 27% | Draw 28% | Wuhan Three Towns 45%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 3.70 | Draw 3.57 | Wuhan Three Towns 2.22. Wuhan Three Towns hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (28%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 54% | Total xG 2.64. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.64 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 54% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns as the most likely outcome at 45% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Chengdu Better City (2.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 28% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.64 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 49% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 54%. Form rates are neutral: Chengdu Better City 50% | Wuhan Three Towns 50%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.64 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.40 vs 1.90 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.12) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.10) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.51) is below their form scoring rate (2.20) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Form Form (PPG) favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson leans Wuhan Three Towns (45%) — divergence worth monitoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 32 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park • Kick-off: Friday 23 Dec 2022, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 27% | Draw 28% | Wuhan Three Towns 45% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 49% | BTTS 54% | xG Chengdu Better City 1.12 / Wuhan Three Towns 1.51 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.189 / def 0.780 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.420 / def 0.655 | league avg home 1.441 / away 1.368 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (45%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.12

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

1.51

Wuhan Three Towns xG

27%
28%
45%
Chengdu Better City Draw Wuhan Three Towns

54%

BTTS

75%

Over 1.5

49%

Over 2.5

27%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns kicked off at 12:00 on Friday 23 December 2022 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Chengdu Better City 1 - 0 Wuhan Three Towns.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns is a Regular Season - 32 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 27% chance of winning, Wuhan Three Towns a 45% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our model estimates a 54% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 49%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

Record (1 meetings): Chengdu Better City 1W | Draws 0 | Wuhan Three Towns 0W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 7W-3D-0L in 10 | 2.40 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 0.60 | L5 W-W-W-D-D. Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 6W-1D-3L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 2.30 / GA 1.00 | L5 W-L-W-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from Chengdu Better City's attack rating (1.19) and Wuhan Three Towns's defence rating (0.66), the model arrives at 1.12 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Wuhan Three Towns's attack versus Chengdu Better City's defence, projects 1.51 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 31/31 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.7%. Close behind: 0-1 (9.3%), 1-2 (9.2%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

27%

Chengdu Better City

3.72

28%

Draw

3.55

45%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.22

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.2%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

10.8%

Away win

1 – 2

9.2%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.12

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

2.64

1.51

Wuhan Three Towns xG

27%
28%
45%
Chengdu Better CityDrawWuhan Three Towns

3.72

27%

Home win

3.55

28%

Draw

2.22

45%

Away win

Goals Markets

74%

Over 1.5

1.35

26%

Under 1.5

3.85

49%

Over 2.5

2.04

51%

Under 2.5

1.96

27%

Over 3.5

3.70

73%

Under 3.5

1.37

13%

Over 4.5

7.69

87%

Under 4.5

1.15

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

54%

BTTS Yes

1.85

46%

BTTS No

2.17

Clean Sheet

22%

Chengdu Better City

4.55

33%

Wuhan Three Towns

3.07

Win to Nil

6%

Chengdu Better City

16.93

15%

Wuhan Three Towns

6.83

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.2 10.8 8.2 4.1 1.6 0.5
1 8.0 12.2 9.2 4.7 1.8 0.5
2 4.5 6.8 5.2 2.6 1.0 0.3
3 1.7 2.6 1.9 1.0 0.4 0.1
4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1
5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.123
λ Away (xG) 1.515
Total xG 2.638
League avg home goals 1.441
League avg away goals 1.368
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.189
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.780
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.420
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 0.655
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 31 / 31

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.7%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns expected to score?

The model projects 1.12 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.51 for Wuhan Three Towns, a combined total of 2.64.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Chengdu Better City come into this having played 31 games, going 15W 11D 5L for 1.81 points per game. Their last five reads W-W-W-D-D.

On the other side, Wuhan Three Towns sit at 2.32 PPG from 31 outings (23W 3D 5L), a run that reads W-L-W-D-W across their last five.

Wuhan Three Towns carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.51 PPG clear of Chengdu Better City — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Venue Form

Chengdu Better City's home form reads 6W 7D 1L across 14 games on their own ground, a 1.79 PPG return.

Away from home, Wuhan Three Towns have taken 2.64 points per game from 14 outings (12W 1D 1L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Chengdu Better City are averaging 1.35 goals scored and 0.87 conceded per game recently; Wuhan Three Towns are on 2.77 scored and 0.87 conceded. Wuhan Three Towns's attacking output running into Chengdu Better City's solid defensive record is the key goals-market tension in this fixture.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 45% of their games; Wuhan Three Towns in 42% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 31 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
W W W D D
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
W L W D W
31 Played 31
15/11/5 W / D / L 23/3/5
1.81 Points Per Game 2.32
1.35 Avg Goals Scored 2.77
0.87 Avg Goals Conceded 0.87
2.23 Avg Goals / Game 3.65
14 Clean Sheets 13
14 BTTS 17
13 Over 2.5 Games 24
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Nov
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–2
07 Nov
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

W
A Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 0–0
14 Dec
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Dec
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
04 Dec
L
H Changchun Yatai
2–3 HT 0–1
30 Nov
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
21 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–0
13 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Nov
W
H Guangzhou R&F
4–1 HT 2–1
03 Nov
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–0 HT 2–0
25 Oct
W
A Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–4 HT 1–2
24 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
28 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–1
22 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
06 Aug
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jul
W
H Wuhan Zall
5–0 HT 2–0
08 Jul
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Jul
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
5–0 HT 3–0
26 Jun
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 2–0
19 Jun
W
A Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 2–0
15 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Jun
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
6–0 HT 2–0
07 Jun
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 2–0
03 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 15W 11D 5L in their last 31 games (1.81 PPG), while Wuhan Three Towns have gone 23W 3D 5L in their last 31 (2.32 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Wuhan Three Towns away?

Wuhan Three Towns's away record (2.64 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 1.79 PPG; Wuhan Three Towns away: 2.64 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Wuhan Three Towns been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 45% of their recent games, Wuhan Three Towns in 42%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

10 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Streaks & Records

Chengdu Better City's record when hosting Wuhan Three Towns specifically: 2W 2D 1L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

5

Draws

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

From 10 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 4, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 43% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 14% of those situations.

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 79% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 64% of the time.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 57%, Wuhan Three Towns 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 57% for Chengdu Better City and 71% for Wuhan Three Towns. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 36% and 21% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 43% of their matches; Wuhan Three Towns in 50%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Wuhan Three Towns away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(31 games)
Venue
(14 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 22/31
(71%)
10/14
(71.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/31
(25.8%)
7/14
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/9
(44.4%)
1/4
(25%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/9
(11.1%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 11/31
(35.5%)
6/14
(42.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/31
(9.7%)
2/14
(14.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/31
(16.1%)
2/14
(14.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/31
(45.2%)
8/14
(57.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 13/31
(41.9%)
8/14
(57.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 5/31
(16.1%)
5/14
(35.7%)
Clean Sheet 14/31
(45.2%)
6/14
(42.9%)
Failed to Score 8/31
(25.8%)
3/14
(21.4%)
Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(31 games)
Venue
(14 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 28/31
(90.3%)
11/14
(78.6%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/31
(54.8%)
5/14
(35.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/3
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 22/31
(71%)
9/14
(64.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/31
(9.7%)
1/14
(7.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/31
(0%)
0/14
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/31
(54.8%)
7/14
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 24/31
(77.4%)
10/14
(71.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/31
(48.4%)
3/14
(21.4%)
Clean Sheet 13/31
(41.9%)
7/14
(50%)
Failed to Score 1/31
(3.2%)
0/14
(0%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Wuhan Three Towns?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 57% of Chengdu Better City's recent matches and 50% of Wuhan Three Towns's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Wuhan Three Towns usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 57% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 71% of Wuhan Three Towns's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Wuhan Three Towns tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 71% of their recent matches, Wuhan Three Towns in 79% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Chengdu Better City defy the odds to beat Wuhan Three Towns 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Wuhan Three Towns 1-0 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park, Regular Season - 32, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 1.12 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.51 xG, a combined 2.64. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Wuhan Three Towns landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.19 / defence 0.78 against Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.42 / defence 0.66, drawn from 31/31 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 27% | Draw 28% | Wuhan Three Towns 45%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 45%. The actual Chengdu Better City win had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 42%, Wuhan Three Towns 77%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (31 games, 14 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 45% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and duly kept one.

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (31 games, 14 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 2.32 PPG against 1.81. Form was overturned, with Chengdu Better City winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.86 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.93 average — tighter than their form line. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.21 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 49% Over 2.5 probability, 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 54% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 60% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.