Jong AZ 0-1 FC Eindhoven – Result & Analysis

Poisson model rates Jong AZ at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this Jong AZ vs FC Eindhoven fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Jong AZ and FC Eindhoven meet at AFAS Trainingscomplex in Eerste Divisie, Regular Season - 1. This fixture gets under way on Monday 10 August 2026 at 18:00 UTC.

Current Form

Jong AZ's overall Eerste Divisie record this term: 3W 1D 6L from 10 games (1.00 PPG). Last five: W L L L W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Jong AZ haven't played a Eerste Divisie game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

Jong AZ's home record at AFAS Trainingscomplex: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Eerste Divisie appearances (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

FC Eindhoven have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 Eerste Divisie outings this season: 4W 1D 5L. Last five: D L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. FC Eindhoven haven't played a Eerste Divisie game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

When travelling in Eerste Divisie this season, FC Eindhoven have posted 2W 1D 7L from 10 away outings — 0.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.70 is notably below their overall 1.30 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 1.00 vs 1.30 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — Jong AZ register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant games, FC Eindhoven in 70%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

Head-to-Head

The head-to-head ledger leans to FC Eindhoven, who have claimed 5 wins from 9 meetings compared to 1 for the hosts, with 3 draws.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 9 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 19 Dec 2025, ended 2–3 with FC Eindhoven winning.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. FC Eindhoven have won 5 of 9 previous encounters, and at 3.0 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

Trading Data

Jong AZ goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (38 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 95% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 55%.

FC Eindhoven goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (38 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 45%; they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Jong AZ 58% versus FC Eindhoven 47%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Jong AZ 68% | FC Eindhoven 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Jong AZ 1.70 xG and FC Eindhoven 1.34 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Jong AZ attack 0.959 / defence 1.058 | FC Eindhoven attack 0.887 / defence 1.093. League average goals — home 1.623 / away 1.433. Data: 38 Jong AZ games / 38 FC Eindhoven games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Jong AZ 46% | Draw 24% | FC Eindhoven 30%. Fair-value odds: Jong AZ 2.17 | Draw 4.17 | FC Eindhoven 3.33. Jong AZ hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 59% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.05. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 59% — the 3.05 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.70 / 1.34) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Jong AZ at 46% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Jong AZ if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.05 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 59% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 61% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Jong AZ 70% | FC Eindhoven 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (38 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights