Clermont Foot 0-3 Lens – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 40% as Clermont Foot take on Lens.
✍️ Match Preview
Match Analysis
Clermont Foot host Lens at Stade Gabriel-Montpied in Ligue 1, Regular Season - 13. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 25 November 2023 at 16:00 UTC.
Recent Form
Across all Ligue 1 games this season, Clermont Foot have gone 2W 3D 5L from 10 outings — a 0.90 PPG return. Last five: D W L D W. They are averaging 0.60 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Clermont Foot, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Clermont Foot at Stade Gabriel-Montpied this season: 5W 1D 4L from 10 home games — 1.60 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 1.60 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.90 — Clermont Foot are significantly better at Stade Gabriel-Montpied than their overall form suggests.
Looking at all fixtures this season, Lens stand at 4W 3D 3L from 10 Ligue 1 matches — 1.50 PPG. Last five: D D W D W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 0.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Lens, so this record blends games from this season and last.
On the road, Lens have gone 4W 2D 4L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.
Form points away from home here. Lens's 1.50 PPG return is 0.60 points per game ahead of Clermont Foot's 0.90 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.
Head to Head
Lens have tended to come out on top in this fixture, winning 3 of the last 4 encounters against Clermont Foot's 0 victories.
Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 4 meetings have averaged 3.8 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 12 Mar 2023, ended 0–4 with Lens winning.
The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Lens have won 3 of 4 previous encounters, and at 3.8 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.
Trading Patterns
Clermont Foot in-play and half-time data (49 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 40% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.
Lens in-play and half-time data (49 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Clermont Foot 51% versus Lens 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Clermont Foot 45% | Lens 51%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Clermont Foot 0.80 xG and Lens 0.82 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Clermont Foot attack 0.671 / defence 0.929 | Lens attack 0.864 / defence 0.866. League average goals — home 1.379 / away 1.021. Clermont Foot's attack strength of 0.671 is below the league average — the 0.80 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 49 Clermont Foot games / 50 Lens games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Clermont Foot 30% | Draw 40% | Lens 31%. Fair-value odds: Clermont Foot 3.33 | Draw 2.50 | Lens 3.23. The draw (40%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 22% | BTTS probability 33% | Total xG 1.62. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 78% probability — total xG of 1.62 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS No has firm model support at 67% — Clermont Foot's lower xG of 0.80 creates a meaningful probability of a scoring blank, which suppresses the BTTS Yes probability to 33%.
Summary & Verdict
The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 40% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 30% and away win at 31% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.
The Poisson model projects 1.62 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 22% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though H2H averaging only 3.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 33% on No. Form rates corroborate: Clermont Foot 30% | Lens 50% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Clermont Foot vs Lens | Competition: Ligue 1, Regular Season - 13 | Venue: Stade Gabriel-Montpied • Kick-off: Saturday 25 Nov 2023, 16:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Clermont Foot 30% | Draw 40% | Lens 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 22% | BTTS 33% | xG Clermont Foot 0.80 / Lens 0.82 • Poisson strength factors: Clermont Foot attack 0.671 / def 0.929 | Lens attack 0.864 / def 0.866 | league avg home 1.379 / away 1.021 • Poisson stance: Draw (40%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
0.80
Clermont Foot xG
Expected Goals
0.82
Lens xG
33%
BTTS
50%
Over 1.5
22%
Over 2.5
8%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Clermont Foot vs Lens kick off?
Clermont Foot vs Lens kicked off at 16:00 on Saturday 25 November 2023 at Stade Gabriel-Montpied.
What was the final score in Clermont Foot vs Lens?
Clermont Foot 0 - 3 Lens.
Where is Clermont Foot vs Lens being played?
The match is being played at Stade Gabriel-Montpied.
What competition is Clermont Foot vs Lens part of?
Clermont Foot vs Lens is a Regular Season - 13 fixture in the Ligue 1 (France).
Who is favourite to win Clermont Foot vs Lens?
Our statistical model gives Clermont Foot a 30% chance of winning, Lens a 31% chance, and a 40% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.
Will both teams score in Clermont Foot vs Lens?
Our model estimates a 33% probability that both Clermont Foot and Lens will score (BTTS).
Will Clermont Foot vs Lens have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 22%.
What is the head-to-head record between Clermont Foot and Lens?
Record (4 meetings): Clermont Foot 0W | Draws 1 | Lens 3W.
What form are Clermont Foot and Lens in?
Clermont Foot (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 0.60 / GA 1.00 | L5 D-W-L-D-W. Lens (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-D-W-D-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
The model rates Clermont Foot's attack at 0.67x the league average against Lens's defence at 0.87x — combine the two and it projects 0.80 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Lens's attack versus Clermont Foot's defence, projects 0.82 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 49/50 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 0-0 carries the highest individual probability at 21.5% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (14.7%), 0-1 (14.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 51% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Draw
30%
3.36
40%
2.53
31%
3.26
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
0 – 0
19.8%
Draw
Most likely
0 – 1
16.2%
Away win
1 – 0
15.9%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
0.80
Clermont Foot xG
Total xG
1.62
0.82
Lens xG
3.36
30%
Home win
2.53
40%
Draw
3.26
31%
Away win
Goals Markets
48%
Over 1.5
2.08
52%
Under 1.5
1.92
22%
Over 2.5
4.55
78%
Under 2.5
1.28
8%
Over 3.5
12.50
92%
Under 3.5
1.09
2%
Over 4.5
50.00
98%
Under 4.5
1.02
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
33%
BTTS Yes
3.02
67%
BTTS No
1.50
Clean Sheet
44%
2.27
45%
2.23
Win to Nil
13%
7.63
14%
7.27
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 19.8 | 16.2 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 15.9 | 13.0 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | – |
| 2 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | – |
| 3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | – | – |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
| 5 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Clermont Foot vs Lens?
Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 21.5%.
How many goals are Clermont Foot and Lens expected to score?
The model projects 0.80 expected goals for Clermont Foot and 0.82 for Lens, a combined total of 1.62.
How confident is the prediction model for Clermont Foot vs Lens?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 40%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Clermont Foot's recent record stands at 19W 11D 19L from 49 games, a 1.39 PPG return, with D-W-L-D-W in the last five. The sample for Clermont Foot is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Lens, meanwhile, have gone 28W 13D 8L across 49 games — 1.98 PPG, with D-D-W-D-W in their last five. The sample for Lens is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
The points-per-game comparison favours Lens by 0.59 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Clermont Foot heading into this one.
Home Ground vs the Road
At home specifically, Clermont Foot have managed 10W 4D 11L from 25 games — 1.36 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Lens's away record stands at 9W 10D 6L across 25 trips, a 1.48 PPG haul. That's a step down from their 1.98 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Lens's season.
The Goals Picture
Clermont Foot are averaging 1.08 goals scored and 1.29 conceded per game recently; Lens are on 1.59 scored and 0.82 conceded.
Defensively: Lens in 41% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 49 Results — Ligue 1
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Clermont Foot
Blended
Lens
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Clermont Foot and Lens in coming into this match?
Clermont Foot have gone 19W 11D 19L in their last 49 games (1.39 PPG), while Lens have gone 28W 13D 8L in their last 49 (1.98 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Clermont Foot at home or Lens away?
Lens's away record (1.48 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Clermont Foot at home: 1.36 PPG; Lens away: 1.48 PPG.
Have Clermont Foot or Lens been keeping clean sheets recently?
Clermont Foot have kept a clean sheet in 27% of their recent games, Lens in 41%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The fixture history between Clermont Foot and Lens runs to 6 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to December 2021. Every recorded meeting has come in Ligue 1. It has been a while since the last meeting — 20 April 2024, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Digging Into the Numbers
Lens go into this on the back of 5 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.
The biggest gap between the sides came on 12 Mar 2023, when Lens won 0-4 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.
Clermont Foot's record when hosting Lens specifically: 0W 1D 2L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 6 Meetings
0
Clermont Foot
1
Draws
5
Lens
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Clermont Foot and Lens?
From 6 meetings on record, Clermont Foot have won 0, Lens have won 5, and 1 have been drawn.
When did Clermont Foot and Lens last play each other?
They last met on 20 April 2024, when Lens 1-0 Clermont Foot.
Who has won more matches between Clermont Foot and Lens?
Lens have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 6 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
Clermont Foot are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.
Lens are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 40% of the time.
The Numbers That Matter
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Clermont Foot 40%, Lens 52% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 40% (Clermont Foot) and 44% (Lens).
On the defensive side: Lens in 40%; Clermont Foot have failed to score in 40% of games; Lens in 28%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Clermont Foot home games / Lens away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Clermont Foot play Lens?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 40% of Clermont Foot's recent matches and 52% of Lens's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is Clermont Foot vs Lens usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 40% of Clermont Foot's recent games and 44% of Lens's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Clermont Foot and Lens tend to score early?
Clermont Foot have had a goal before half-time in 64% of their recent matches, Lens in 64% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Lens run riot with a 0-3 hammering of Clermont Foot.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Lens beat Clermont Foot 0-3 at Stade Gabriel-Montpied, Regular Season - 13, in the Ligue 1. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Clermont Foot 0.80 xG and Lens 0.82 xG, a combined 1.62. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. Clermont Foot fell 0.8 short of their projected output. Lens outscored their 0.82 projection by 2.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Clermont Foot attack 0.67 / defence 0.93 against Lens attack 0.86 / defence 0.87, drawn from 49/50 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Clermont Foot 30% | Draw 40% | Lens 31%, with the draw its most likely call at 40%. The actual Lens win had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 22%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 50% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 33% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Clermont Foot 45%, Lens 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Clermont Foot's trading profile (49 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Lens's trading profile (49 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time, and duly kept one.
Form vs Result
On form, Lens arrived the stronger side — 1.98 PPG against 1.39. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Clermont Foot (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.92 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.40 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Lens (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.24 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.