Sign in Register

KuPS 1-0 Gnistan – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Veikkausliiga · Regular Season - 2

Kick-off

Sat 11 Apr 2026

11:00

Venue

Vare Areena

Competition

Veikkausliiga

Finland

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours KuPS (36%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as KuPS face Gnistan.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Veikkausliiga encounter, Regular Season - 2 sees Gnistan travel to Vare Areena to take on KuPS. The game is scheduled for Saturday 11 April 2026, 11:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, KuPS stand at 7W 2D 1L from 10 Veikkausliiga matches — 2.30 PPG. Last five: W W D W W. They are averaging 2.30 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

KuPS's home record at Vare Areena: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Veikkausliiga appearances (2.20 PPG). They are averaging 2.60 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Gnistan — All Games: 1W 2D 7L from 10 Veikkausliiga fixtures this season — 0.50 PPG. Last five: L L D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 2.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.60 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Gnistan's form when playing away from home: 2W 3D 5L across 10 road games this term (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

KuPS carry the stronger recent momentum — 1.80 PPG ahead of their opponents on 2.30 vs 0.50. The form data is a point in their favour, and where the price allows, it is the cleaner directional bet.

Both teams score in over 80% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H

The historical ledger comes down firmly in favour of KuPS: 4 wins from 6 previous clashes against 0 for Gnistan, with 2 draws across those contests.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 6 meetings have averaged 3.5 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 30 Oct 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both KuPS and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 6 meetings, combined with an average of 3.5 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading Patterns

KuPS in-play and half-time data (59 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (home games).

Gnistan in-play and half-time data (59 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — KuPS 56% versus Gnistan 63%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (KuPS 56% | Gnistan 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects KuPS 1.48 xG and Gnistan 1.41 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: KuPS attack 1.074 / defence 0.989 | Gnistan attack 1.024 / defence 1.042. League average goals — home 1.323 / away 1.392. Data: 23 KuPS games / 23 Gnistan games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: KuPS 36% | Draw 32% | Gnistan 33%. Fair-value odds: KuPS 2.78 | Draw 3.12 | Gnistan 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 2.89. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.89 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.48 / 1.41) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, KuPS are the pick at 36% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 32% draw probability, Draw No Bet on KuPS offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.89 combined xG gives a 55% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 4.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.5 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 62% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: KuPS 80% | Gnistan 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (23 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H KuPS hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 6 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to KuPS — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 36%.
Goals H2H (3.50 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.89) both back Over 2.5 goals (55% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 62% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form KuPS lead on PPG: 2.30 vs 0.50 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form KuPS Poisson xG (1.48) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.60) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Gnistan Poisson xG (1.41) is below their form scoring rate (1.70) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Form averages (~3.2 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.89) both support Over 2.5 goals at 55%.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (KuPS 8/10, Gnistan 8/10) and Poisson model (62%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour KuPS — KuPS at 36% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 32% — tight contest expected.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: KuPS vs Gnistan | Competition: Veikkausliiga, Regular Season - 2 | Venue: Vare Areena • Kick-off: Saturday 11 Apr 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: KuPS 36% | Draw 32% | Gnistan 33% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 55% | BTTS 62% | xG KuPS 1.48 / Gnistan 1.41 • Poisson strength factors: KuPS attack 1.074 / def 0.989 | Gnistan attack 1.024 / def 1.042 | league avg home 1.323 / away 1.392 • Poisson stance: KuPS (36%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.48

KuPS xG

Expected Goals

1.41

Gnistan xG

36%
32%
33%
KuPS Draw Gnistan

62%

BTTS

82%

Over 1.5

55%

Over 2.5

33%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does KuPS vs Gnistan kick off?

KuPS vs Gnistan kicked off at 11:00 on Saturday 11 April 2026 at Vare Areena.

What was the final score in KuPS vs Gnistan?

KuPS 1 - 0 Gnistan.

Where is KuPS vs Gnistan being played?

The match is being played at Vare Areena.

What competition is KuPS vs Gnistan part of?

KuPS vs Gnistan is a Regular Season - 2 fixture in the Veikkausliiga (Finland).

Who is favourite to win KuPS vs Gnistan?

Our statistical model gives KuPS a 36% chance of winning, Gnistan a 33% chance, and a 32% chance of a draw — making KuPS the favourite.

Will both teams score in KuPS vs Gnistan?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both KuPS and Gnistan will score (BTTS).

Will KuPS vs Gnistan have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 55%.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and Gnistan?

Record (6 meetings): KuPS 4W | Draws 2 | Gnistan 0W.

What form are KuPS and Gnistan in?

KuPS (all comps): 7W-2D-1L in 10 | 2.30 PPG | GF 2.30 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-W-D-W-W. Gnistan (all comps): 1W-2D-7L in 10 | 0.50 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 2.60 | L5 L-L-D-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from KuPS's attack rating (1.07) and Gnistan's defence rating (1.04), the model arrives at 1.48 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Gnistan's attack versus KuPS's defence, projects 1.41 expected goals for the visitors.

The sample (23/23 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.1%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.6%), 1-2 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

KuPS Win

36%

KuPS

2.79

32%

Draw

3.17

33%

Gnistan

3.06

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.6%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.6%

Home win

1 – 0

8.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.48

KuPS xG

Total xG

2.89

1.41

Gnistan xG

36%
32%
33%
KuPSDrawGnistan

2.79

36%

Home win

3.17

32%

Draw

3.06

33%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

55%

Over 2.5

1.82

45%

Under 2.5

2.22

33%

Over 3.5

3.03

67%

Under 3.5

1.49

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.62

38%

BTTS No

2.61

Clean Sheet

24%

KuPS

4.10

23%

Gnistan

4.39

Win to Nil

9%

KuPS

11.44

7%

Gnistan

13.45

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.6 7.8 5.5 2.6 0.9 0.3
1 8.2 11.6 8.2 3.8 1.4 0.4
2 6.1 8.6 6.1 2.8 1.0 0.3
3 3.0 4.2 3.0 1.4 0.5 0.1
4 1.1 1.6 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.480
λ Away (xG) 1.410
Total xG 2.890
League avg home goals 1.323
League avg away goals 1.392
KuPS attack strength 1.074
KuPS defence strength 0.989
Gnistan attack strength 1.024
Gnistan defence strength 1.042
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 23 / 23

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for KuPS vs Gnistan?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.1%.

How many goals are KuPS and Gnistan expected to score?

The model projects 1.48 expected goals for KuPS and 1.41 for Gnistan, a combined total of 2.89.

How confident is the prediction model for KuPS vs Gnistan?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 36%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

KuPS come into this having played 59 games, going 37W 12D 10L for 2.08 points per game. Their last five reads W-W-D-W-W.

On the other side, Gnistan sit at 1.15 PPG from 59 outings (17W 17D 25L), a run that reads L-L-D-D-L across their last five.

KuPS carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.93 PPG clear of Gnistan — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home Ground vs the Road

KuPS's home form reads 24W 1D 5L across 30 games on their own ground, a 2.43 PPG return.

Away from home, Gnistan have taken 1.03 points per game from 30 outings (7W 10D 13L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, KuPS come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

KuPS are averaging 1.83 goals scored and 0.98 conceded per game recently; Gnistan are on 1.41 scored and 1.80 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Gnistan in 63%.

Last 59 Results — Veikkausliiga

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

KuPS

KuPS

Current Season
W W D W W
Gnistan

Gnistan

Current Season
L L D D L
59 Played 59
37/12/10 W / D / L 17/17/25
2.08 Points Per Game 1.15
1.83 Avg Goals Scored 1.41
0.98 Avg Goals Conceded 1.80
2.81 Avg Goals / Game 3.20
19 Clean Sheets 12
33 BTTS 37
33 Over 2.5 Games 38
KuPS

KuPS

W
A HJK Helsinki
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Nov
W
H Inter Turku
3–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
H Gnistan
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
A SJK
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
W
H HJK Helsinki
3–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
D
A Ilves
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Oct
W
A Inter Turku
3–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
W
A Gnistan
4–0 HT 2–0
27 Sep
W
H SJK
3–2 HT 2–0
23 Sep
L
H Ilves
2–4 HT 0–4
14 Sep
D
A SJK
1–1 HT 1–1
31 Aug
W
A FF Jaro
3–1 HT 1–1
24 Aug
W
H Inter Turku
2–1 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
A Kooteepee
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
H Haka
3–2 HT 2–0
02 Aug
D
A VPS
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Jul
D
A AC Oulu
2–2 HT 0–1
04 Jul
W
H Gnistan
6–2 HT 3–1
01 Jul
W
H HJK Helsinki
3–0 HT 2–0
27 Jun
L
A Mariehamn
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
L
H Ilves
0–3 HT 0–2
14 Jun
D
A HJK Helsinki
0–0 HT 0–0
31 May
L
H VPS
0–2 HT 0–1
25 May
L
A Ilves
0–3 HT 0–0
21 May
W
A Haka
3–1 HT 1–0
16 May
W
H Kooteepee
3–0 HT 2–0
10 May
W
H SJK
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Gnistan
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
H Mariehamn
4–1 HT 2–0
23 Apr
W
H FF Jaro
1–0 HT 0–0
19 Apr
W
H AC Oulu
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
D
A Inter Turku
1–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
W
H HJK Helsinki
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Oct
W
A SJK
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
W
H Haka
2–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
L
A Ilves
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Sep
W
H VPS
3–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
H Inter Turku
1–2 HT 1–2
01 Sep
W
H Mariehamn
3–0 HT 1–0
25 Aug
W
H Ilves
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
D
A Haka
2–2 HT 2–0
11 Aug
W
H SJK
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Aug
W
A EIF
2–1 HT 0–1
28 Jul
W
H Lahti
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Gnistan
3–1 HT 3–1
07 Jul
L
A AC Oulu
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Jun
L
A HJK Helsinki
1–3 HT 1–0
19 Jun
L
H Haka
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Jun
W
H AC Oulu
4–1 HT 1–0
08 Jun
W
A Ilves
2–1 HT 1–1
31 May
W
H EIF
4–1 HT 2–1
26 May
W
A VPS
3–1 HT 1–0
22 May
D
A Gnistan
0–0 HT 0–0
19 May
W
H VPS
2–1 HT 0–0
10 May
D
A SJK
1–1 HT 0–1
04 May
W
A Lahti
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Apr
D
A Inter Turku
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Apr
D
A Mariehamn
2–2 HT 1–1
13 Apr
W
H HJK Helsinki
3–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
Gnistan

Gnistan

L
A SJK
0–3 HT 0–1
09 Nov
D
H HJK Helsinki
2–2 HT 1–2
03 Nov
D
A KuPS
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Oct
L
H Ilves
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Oct
L
A Inter Turku
1–2 HT 1–1
22 Oct
L
H SJK
3–4 HT 1–1
19 Oct
W
A HJK Helsinki
3–2 HT 1–2
03 Oct
L
H KuPS
0–4 HT 0–2
27 Sep
L
A Ilves
2–3 HT 0–1
23 Sep
L
H Inter Turku
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Sep
L
H FF Jaro
1–2 HT 0–1
31 Aug
W
H AC Oulu
3–2 HT 1–1
25 Aug
D
H VPS
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
W
A Mariehamn
5–2 HT 2–0
09 Aug
D
A Ilves
2–2 HT 1–1
04 Aug
L
H HJK Helsinki
2–4 HT 0–1
28 Jul
L
A SJK
1–3 HT 1–0
20 Jul
W
H Haka
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Jul
D
A Kooteepee
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
L
A KuPS
2–6 HT 1–3
01 Jul
D
H Inter Turku
2–2 HT 2–1
27 Jun
D
A VPS
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
H Kooteepee
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Jun
L
H Ilves
0–2 HT 0–0
01 Jun
D
A FF Jaro
1–1 HT 1–1
24 May
D
H SJK
2–2 HT 1–1
16 May
W
A AC Oulu
3–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Mariehamn
2–0 HT 2–0
03 May
L
H KuPS
1–2 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
A HJK Helsinki
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Apr
L
A Inter Turku
0–3 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Haka
2–3 HT 0–1
05 Apr
D
A Haka
3–3 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
A VPS
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Oct
L
A Inter Turku
2–3 HT 0–2
19 Oct
D
H Lahti
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Oct
W
H AC Oulu
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Sep
L
A EIF
1–3 HT 1–2
22 Sep
W
H Mariehamn
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Sep
D
H Ilves
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Sep
W
A SJK
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
H Mariehamn
2–1 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
H AC Oulu
2–0 HT 2–0
18 Aug
W
H VPS
3–0 HT 2–0
04 Aug
W
A Haka
2–1 HT 1–0
28 Jul
D
A Inter Turku
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Jul
L
A KuPS
1–3 HT 1–3
07 Jul
L
H EIF
1–2 HT 0–1
30 Jun
D
A Lahti
3–3 HT 2–1
19 Jun
L
H HJK Helsinki
0–4 HT 0–2
12 Jun
L
A EIF
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
H Lahti
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Jun
D
A Mariehamn
1–1 HT 1–1
26 May
L
A HJK Helsinki
0–1 HT 0–1
22 May
D
H KuPS
0–0 HT 0–0
19 May
D
A AC Oulu
1–1 HT 1–1
11 May
L
H Haka
0–3 HT 0–2
05 May
L
H SJK
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Apr
L
A VPS
2–3 HT 1–2
20 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are KuPS and Gnistan in coming into this match?

KuPS have gone 37W 12D 10L in their last 59 games (2.08 PPG), while Gnistan have gone 17W 17D 25L in their last 59 (1.15 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — KuPS at home or Gnistan away?

KuPS's home record (2.43 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — KuPS at home: 2.43 PPG; Gnistan away: 1.03 PPG.

Have KuPS or Gnistan been keeping clean sheets recently?

KuPS have kept a clean sheet in 32% of their recent games, Gnistan in 20%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between KuPS and Gnistan runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to May 2024. Every recorded meeting has come in Veikkausliiga. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

KuPS have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 1 Jul 2025, when KuPS won 6-2 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

KuPS's record when hosting Gnistan specifically: 3W 1D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

KuPS

6

KuPS

2

Draws

Gnistan

0

Gnistan

Recent Meetings

Gnistan
0–1
01 Aug 26
KuPS
KuPS
1–0
11 Apr 26
Gnistan
KuPS
1–1
30 Oct 25
Gnistan
Gnistan
0–4
27 Sep 25
KuPS
KuPS
6–2
01 Jul 25
Gnistan
Gnistan
1–2
27 Apr 25
KuPS
KuPS
3–1
07 Jul 24
Gnistan
Gnistan
0–0
19 May 24
KuPS

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and Gnistan?

From 8 meetings on record, KuPS have won 6, Gnistan have won 0, and 2 have been drawn.

When did KuPS and Gnistan last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Gnistan 0-1 KuPS.

Who has won more matches between KuPS and Gnistan?

KuPS have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

KuPS are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 60% of the time.

Gnistan are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — KuPS 57%, Gnistan 70% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 67% for KuPS and 63% for Gnistan. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 40% and 50% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: KuPS keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = KuPS home games / Gnistan away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

KuPS KuPS Current Season
Metric All
(59 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/59
(71.2%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/59
(30.5%)
12/30
(40%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 15/17
(88.2%)
6/6
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/17
(47.1%)
3/6
(50%)
Winning at HT 26/59
(44.1%)
18/30
(60%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/59
(5.1%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/59
(8.5%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/59
(55.9%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/59
(55.9%)
20/30
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/59
(33.9%)
12/30
(40%)
Clean Sheet 19/59
(32.2%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 9/59
(15.3%)
3/30
(10%)
Gnistan Gnistan Current Season
Metric All
(59 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 45/59
(76.3%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 27/59
(45.8%)
14/30
(46.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/14
(71.4%)
4/6
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/14
(35.7%)
1/6
(16.7%)
Winning at HT 11/59
(18.6%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/59
(6.8%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/59
(10.2%)
3/30
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 37/59
(62.7%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 2.5 Goals 38/59
(64.4%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 25/59
(42.4%)
15/30
(50%)
Clean Sheet 12/59
(20.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Failed to Score 14/59
(23.7%)
6/30
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when KuPS play Gnistan?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of KuPS's games and 70% of Gnistan's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is KuPS vs Gnistan usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 67% of KuPS's matches and 63% of Gnistan's.

Do KuPS and Gnistan tend to score early?

KuPS have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, Gnistan in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as KuPS edge out Gnistan 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

KuPS beat Gnistan 1-0 at Vare Areena, Regular Season - 2, in the Veikkausliiga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting KuPS 1.48 xG and Gnistan 1.41 xG, a combined 2.89. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Gnistan landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of KuPS attack 1.07 / defence 0.99 against Gnistan attack 1.02 / defence 1.04, drawn from 23/23 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it KuPS 36% | Draw 32% | Gnistan 33%, with KuPS to win its most likely call at 36%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 82% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (KuPS 56%, Gnistan 64%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

KuPS's trading profile (59 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one.

Gnistan's trading profile (59 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, KuPS arrived the stronger side — 2.08 PPG against 1.15. Form held, and they took the win. KuPS (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.20 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line. Gnistan (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.93 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 55% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 62% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 60% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.