Sign in Register

Reading 1-1 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Championship · Regular Season - 18

Kick-off

Sat 20 Nov 2021

15:00

Venue

Select Car Leasing Stadium

Competition

Championship

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Nottingham Forest at 52% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Reading vs Nottingham Forest encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Nottingham Forest make the trip to Select Car Leasing Stadium to face Reading in Championship, Regular Season - 18. The match kicks off on Saturday 20 November 2021 at 15:00 UTC.

Current Form

Reading's overall Championship record this term: 5W 0D 5L from 10 games (1.50 PPG). Last five: L L L L W. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Reading, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Select Car Leasing Stadium, Reading have gone 4W 1D 3L this season (8 games, 1.62 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.75 goals scored and 1.62 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 62% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Nottingham Forest (all games): 6W 3D 1L across 10 Championship outings this term — 2.10 points per game. Last five: W L D D W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.00. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Nottingham Forest, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Nottingham Forest have gone 4W 2D 2L from 8 away fixtures this term (1.75 PPG). Away from home they average 1.62 goals scored and 0.88 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 62% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Nottingham Forest arrive in superior form — a 0.60 PPG advantage (2.10 vs 1.50) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Reading have seen both teams score in 62% of their games, Nottingham Forest in 62%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Trading

Reading half-time and goal-timing data (17 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 35%.

Nottingham Forest half-time and goal-timing data (17 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; when trailing at the break they recover to draw or win in 29% of cases; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Reading 53% versus Nottingham Forest 65%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Reading 59% | Nottingham Forest 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Reading 1.11 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.78 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Reading attack 1.060 / defence 1.421 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.120 / defence 0.980. League average goals — home 1.066 / away 1.118. Data: 17 Reading games / 17 Nottingham Forest games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Reading 23% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 52%. Fair-value odds: Reading 4.35 | Draw 4.00 | Nottingham Forest 1.92. Nottingham Forest hold a narrow Poisson edge at 52% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.89. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.89 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Nottingham Forest at 52% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Nottingham Forest if the outright odds are short.

Poisson projects 2.89 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 55% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 56% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Reading 62% | Nottingham Forest 62% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form Nottingham Forest lead on PPG: 2.10 vs 1.50 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Reading Poisson xG (1.11) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.75) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Reading 5/8, Nottingham Forest 5/8) and Poisson model (56%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Nottingham Forest — Nottingham Forest at 52% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Reading vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Championship, Regular Season - 18 | Venue: Select Car Leasing Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 20 Nov 2021, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Reading 23% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 52% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 55% | BTTS 56% | xG Reading 1.11 / Nottingham Forest 1.78 • Poisson strength factors: Reading attack 1.060 / def 1.421 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.120 / def 0.980 | league avg home 1.066 / away 1.118 • Poisson stance: Nottingham Forest (52%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.11

Reading xG

Expected Goals

1.78

Nottingham Forest xG

23%
25%
52%
Reading Draw Nottingham Forest

56%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

55%

Over 2.5

33%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Reading vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Reading vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 20 November 2021 at Select Car Leasing Stadium.

What was the final score in Reading vs Nottingham Forest?

Reading 1 - 1 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Reading vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Select Car Leasing Stadium.

What competition is Reading vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Reading vs Nottingham Forest is a Regular Season - 18 fixture in the Championship (England).

Who is favourite to win Reading vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Reading a 23% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 52% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Nottingham Forest the favourite.

Will both teams score in Reading vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 56% probability that both Reading and Nottingham Forest will score (BTTS).

Will Reading vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 55%.

What is the head-to-head record between Reading and Nottingham Forest?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are Reading and Nottingham Forest in?

Reading (all comps): 5W-0D-5L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.10 | L5 L-L-L-L-W. Nottingham Forest (all comps): 6W-3D-1L in 10 | 2.10 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 1.00 | L5 W-L-D-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Reading's attack at 1.06x the league average against Nottingham Forest's defence at 0.98x — combine the two and it projects 1.11 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Nottingham Forest's attack (1.12x) against Reading's defence (1.42x) — and the away total comes out at 1.78.

These ratings are built from 17/17 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (9.8%), 0-2 (8.8%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Nottingham Forest Win

23%

Reading

4.38

25%

Draw

4.04

52%

Nottingham Forest

1.91

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.0%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

9.9%

Away win

1 – 2

9.8%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.11

Reading xG

Total xG

2.89

1.78

Nottingham Forest xG

23%
25%
52%
ReadingDrawNottingham Forest

4.38

23%

Home win

4.04

25%

Draw

1.91

52%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

55%

Over 2.5

1.82

45%

Under 2.5

2.22

33%

Over 3.5

3.03

67%

Under 3.5

1.49

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

56%

BTTS Yes

1.77

44%

BTTS No

2.29

Clean Sheet

17%

Reading

5.94

33%

Nottingham Forest

3.02

Win to Nil

4%

Reading

26.01

17%

Nottingham Forest

5.76

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.6 9.9 8.8 5.2 2.3 0.8
1 6.2 11.0 9.8 5.8 2.6 0.9
2 3.4 6.1 5.4 3.2 1.4 0.5
3 1.3 2.2 2.0 1.2 0.5 0.2
4 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.106
λ Away (xG) 1.781
Total xG 2.887
League avg home goals 1.066
League avg away goals 1.118
Reading attack strength 1.060
Reading defence strength 1.421
Nottingham Forest attack strength 1.120
Nottingham Forest defence strength 0.980
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 17 / 17

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Reading vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.4%.

How many goals are Reading and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.11 expected goals for Reading and 1.78 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 2.89.

How confident is the prediction model for Reading vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 52%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 17 outings, Reading have picked up 1.29 PPG on a 7W 1D 9L record — L-L-L-L-W across the most recent five. The sample for Reading is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Nottingham Forest's form line: 6W 4D 7L from 17 games, 1.29 PPG, last five W-L-D-D-W. The sample for Nottingham Forest is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.29 PPG for Reading against 1.29 for Nottingham Forest. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Reading have posted 1.62 PPG from 8 outings (4W 1D 3L).

On the road, Nottingham Forest have gone 4W 2D 2L from 8 away games — 1.75 PPG when travelling. That's actually stronger than their 1.29 PPG overall record — Nottingham Forest travel well.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Reading are averaging 1.29 goals scored and 1.65 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.35 scored and 1.29 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Nottingham Forest in 65%.

Last 17 Results — Championship

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Reading

Reading

Blended
L L L L W
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Blended
W L D D W
17 Played 17
7/1/9 W / D / L 6/4/7
1.29 Points Per Game 1.29
1.29 Avg Goals Scored 1.35
1.65 Avg Goals Conceded 1.29
2.94 Avg Goals / Game 2.65
3 Clean Sheets 3
9 BTTS 11
10 Over 2.5 Games 10
Reading

Reading

W
A Birmingham
2–1 HT 0–1
06 Nov
L
A Millwall
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Nov
L
H Bournemouth
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Oct
L
A Blackburn
0–2 HT 0–0
23 Oct
L
H Blackpool
2–3 HT 2–0
20 Oct
W
H Barnsley
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Oct
W
A Cardiff
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Oct
L
A Derby
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
W
H Middlesbrough
1–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Fulham
2–1 HT 1–0
18 Sep
W
H Peterborough
3–1 HT 0–0
14 Sep
D
H QPR
3–3 HT 1–1
11 Sep
L
A Huddersfield
0–4 HT 0–1
28 Aug
L
A Coventry
1–2 HT 1–0
21 Aug
L
H Bristol City
2–3 HT 1–2
17 Aug
W
H Preston
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Aug
L
A Stoke City
2–3 HT 1–2
07 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

W
H Preston
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Nov
D
H Sheffield Utd
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Nov
D
A QPR
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–4 HT 0–1
24 Oct
W
A Bristol City
2–1 HT 0–1
19 Oct
W
H Blackpool
2–1 HT 1–0
16 Oct
W
A Birmingham
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Oct
W
A Barnsley
3–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
D
H Millwall
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Sep
W
A Huddersfield
2–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
L
H Middlesbrough
0–2 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
H Cardiff
1–2 HT 1–0
12 Sep
D
A Derby
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug
L
A Stoke City
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Aug
L
H Blackburn
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Aug
L
H Bournemouth
1–2 HT 0–1
14 Aug
L
A Coventry
1–2 HT 1–0
08 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Reading and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Reading have gone 7W 1D 9L in their last 17 games (1.29 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 6W 4D 7L in their last 17 (1.29 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Reading at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Nottingham Forest's away record (1.75 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Reading at home: 1.62 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 1.75 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 2 times since November 2021 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Championship. It has been a while since the last meeting — 12 March 2022, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Reading

0

Reading

1

Draws

Nottingham Forest

1

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Nottingham Forest
4–0
12 Mar 22
Reading
Reading
1–1
20 Nov 21
Nottingham Forest

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Reading and Nottingham Forest?

From 2 meetings on record, Reading have won 0, Nottingham Forest have won 1, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Reading and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

They last met on 12 March 2022, when Nottingham Forest 4-0 Reading.

Who has won more matches between Reading and Nottingham Forest?

Nottingham Forest have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Reading are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 62% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

Nottingham Forest are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 88% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 50% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Reading 62%, Nottingham Forest 62% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 62% (Reading) and 50% (Nottingham Forest). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 50% and 12% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Reading home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Reading Reading Blended
Metric All
(17 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 12/17
(70.6%)
5/8
(62.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/17
(23.5%)
3/8
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/5
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/5
(40%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 5/17
(29.4%)
2/8
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/17
(5.9%)
0/8
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 9/17
(52.9%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 10/17
(58.8%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 6/17
(35.3%)
4/8
(50%)
Clean Sheet 3/17
(17.6%)
2/8
(25%)
Failed to Score 5/17
(29.4%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Blended
Metric All
(17 games)
Venue
(8 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 14/17
(82.4%)
7/8
(87.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/3
(100%)
1/1
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
0/1
(0%)
Winning at HT 6/17
(35.3%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/17
(29.4%)
4/8
(50%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 11/17
(64.7%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 10/17
(58.8%)
4/8
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 2/17
(11.8%)
1/8
(12.5%)
Clean Sheet 3/17
(17.6%)
2/8
(25%)
Failed to Score 3/17
(17.6%)
1/8
(12.5%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Reading play Nottingham Forest?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 62% of Reading's games and 62% of Nottingham Forest's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Reading vs Nottingham Forest usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 62% of Reading's matches and 50% of Nottingham Forest's.

Do Reading and Nottingham Forest tend to score early?

Reading have had a goal before half-time in 62% of their recent matches, Nottingham Forest in 88% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Reading and Nottingham Forest share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Select Car Leasing Stadium, Regular Season - 18, as Reading and Nottingham Forest drew 1-1 in the Championship. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Reading 1.11 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.78 xG, a combined 2.89. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Reading attack 1.06 / defence 1.42 against Nottingham Forest attack 1.12 / defence 0.98, drawn from 17/17 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Reading 23% | Draw 25% | Nottingham Forest 52%, with Nottingham Forest to win its most likely call at 52%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Reading 59%, Nottingham Forest 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Reading's trading profile (17 games, 8 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (17 games, 8 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Reading 1.29 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.29 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 55% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 56% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 59% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.