Wuhan Zall 1-2 Chongqing Lifan – Result & Analysis

Poisson model rates Wuhan Zall at 40% — neither recent form nor the head-to-head data gives a clear steer either way as Wuhan Zall face Chongqing Lifan.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Wuhan Zall host Chongqing Lifan at Jiangyin Sports Park Stadium in Super League (Relegation Round - 8). Kick-off is Monday 3 January 2022 at 07:30 UK time.

Recent Form

Across their last 10 games, Wuhan Zall have gone 3W 4D 3L — a 1.30 PPG return. Last five: D D L D L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Wuhan Zall's home record over their last 10 home games: 2W 6D 2L (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Chongqing Lifan — last 10 games: 2W 3D 5L — 0.90 PPG. Last five: L D L W D. Their scoring rate of 0.60 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

Chongqing Lifan's away record over their last 10 away games: 1W 2D 7L (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.30 PPG (Wuhan Zall) versus 0.90 (Chongqing Lifan). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

Both teams have scored in at least 70% of each side's games (from Wuhan Zall's last 10 home games and Chongqing Lifan's last 10 away games). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H

There is little to separate the sides in our head-to-head data. From 1 H2H match, Wuhan Zall have won 0, Chongqing Lifan 0, with 1 draw — a balanced record that offers no clear steer on its own. With only 1 H2H match to go on, treat this as a light input.

Scoring has been limited in the 1 H2H match in our data, averaging 0.0 goals per game, which makes Under 2.5 the head-to-head-backed angle in the goals market. The most recent of those, on 21 Dec 2021, ended Wuhan Zall 0–0 Chongqing Lifan — a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 0.0 goals per game, the H2H data points toward a tight, low-scoring contest — Under 2.5 is the stronger head-to-head angle regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

Wuhan Zall in-play and half-time data (last 21 games, 10 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 70% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 43% of the time; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (home games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

Chongqing Lifan in-play and half-time data (last 21 games, 10 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 60% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%; they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Zall 62% versus Chongqing Lifan 48%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Zall 38% | Chongqing Lifan 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Zall 1.34 xG and Chongqing Lifan 1.13 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Zall attack 0.917 / defence 1.150 | Chongqing Lifan attack 0.763 / defence 1.266. League average goals — home 1.158 / away 1.286. Chongqing Lifan's defence rating of 1.266 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing Wuhan Zall's projected output up. Chongqing Lifan's attack rating of 0.763 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 1.13. Data: built from Wuhan Zall's last 14 games and Chongqing Lifan's last 14.

Result probabilities: Wuhan Zall 40% | Draw 31% | Chongqing Lifan 29%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Zall 2.53 | Draw 3.19 | Chongqing Lifan 3.43. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 45% | BTTS Yes probability 52% | Total xG 2.47. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 55% — total xG of 2.47 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS Yes at 52% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Zall at 40% — marginal model lean. With a 31% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Wuhan Zall offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.47 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 55% — a Poisson-only call with no corroboration from form or H2H.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 52% on Yes. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Wuhan Zall 80% (last 10 home games) | Chongqing Lifan 70% (last 10 away games).

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights