Meizhou Kejia 1-2 Wuhan Three Towns – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns at 54% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium plays host to Meizhou Kejia versus Wuhan Three Towns in Super League, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off: Monday 22 August 2022 at 12:30 UTC.
Current Form
Meizhou Kejia's overall Super League record this term: 5W 3D 2L from 10 games (1.80 PPG). Last five: D L W W W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 0.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Defensively, conceding just 0.80 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.
In front of their own supporters this season, Meizhou Kejia have posted 4W 2D 1L at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium — 2.00 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.86 goals scored and 1.14 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 86% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.
Wuhan Three Towns (all games): 10W 0D 0L across 10 Super League outings this term — 3.00 points per game. Last five: W W W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 3.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Defensively, 0.60 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. This season is still relatively young for Wuhan Three Towns, so this record blends games from this season and last.
On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 6W 1D 0L from 7 away fixtures this term (2.71 PPG). They are averaging 2.43 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 4 away clean sheets from 7 games (57%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home.
On a straight form reading, Wuhan Three Towns are the stronger side — 1.20 PPG clear of the hosts (3.00 vs 1.80). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.
Trading
Meizhou Kejia half-time and goal-timing data (13 games, 7 at home): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 33% of the time; BTTS occurs in 86% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (home games).
Wuhan Three Towns half-time and goal-timing data (13 games, 7 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; they lead at the break 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 54%; they keep a clean sheet 54% of the time.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Meizhou Kejia 62% versus Wuhan Three Towns 46%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Meizhou Kejia 46% | Wuhan Three Towns 85%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 0.97 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.72 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.037 / defence 1.039 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.256 / defence 0.674. League average goals — home 1.386 / away 1.317. Wuhan Three Towns's defence strength of 0.674 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Wuhan Three Towns have an above-average attack strength of 1.256 — the away xG of 1.72 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 13 Meizhou Kejia games / 13 Wuhan Three Towns games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 25% | Wuhan Three Towns 54%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 4.76 | Draw 4.00 | Wuhan Three Towns 1.85. Wuhan Three Towns hold a narrow Poisson edge at 54% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.69. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.69 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Three Towns at 54% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short.
The Poisson model projects 2.69 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 50% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 51% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Meizhou Kejia 86% | Wuhan Three Towns 43% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium • Kick-off: Monday 22 Aug 2022, 12:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 25% | Wuhan Three Towns 54% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 50% | BTTS 51% | xG Meizhou Kejia 0.97 / Wuhan Three Towns 1.72 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 1.037 / def 1.039 | Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.256 / def 0.674 | league avg home 1.386 / away 1.317 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (54%) — moderate lean
🧮 Prediction Model
0.97
Meizhou Kejia xG
Expected Goals
1.72
Wuhan Three Towns xG
51%
BTTS
75%
Over 1.5
50%
Over 2.5
28%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kick off?
Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns kicked off at 12:30 on Monday 22 August 2022 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.
What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Meizhou Kejia 1 - 2 Wuhan Three Towns.
Where is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns being played?
The match is being played at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium.
What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns part of?
Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Super League (China).
Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 21% chance of winning, Wuhan Three Towns a 54% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.
Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Our model estimates a 51% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns will score (BTTS).
Will Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 50%.
What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns in?
Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 5W-3D-2L in 10 | 1.80 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 0.80 | L5 D-L-W-W-W. Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 10W-0D-0L in 10 | 3.00 PPG | GF 3.30 / GA 0.60 | L5 W-W-W-W-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
The model rates Meizhou Kejia's attack at 1.04x the league average against Wuhan Three Towns's defence at 0.67x — combine the two and it projects 0.97 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Wuhan Three Towns's attack (1.26x) against Meizhou Kejia's defence (1.04x) — and the away total comes out at 1.72.
These ratings are built from 13/13 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.8% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-1 (10.2%), 0-2 (10.0%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 33% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Wuhan Three Towns Win
21%
4.85
25%
4.01
54%
1.84
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
0 β 1
11.7%
Away win
Most likely
1 β 1
11.3%
Draw
0 β 2
10.0%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
0.97
Meizhou Kejia xG
Total xG
2.69
1.72
Wuhan Three Towns xG
4.85
21%
Home win
4.01
25%
Draw
1.84
54%
Away win
Goals Markets
75%
Over 1.5
1.33
25%
Under 1.5
4.00
50%
Over 2.5
2.00
50%
Under 2.5
2.00
28%
Over 3.5
3.57
72%
Under 3.5
1.39
14%
Over 4.5
7.14
86%
Under 4.5
1.16
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
51%
BTTS Yes
1.94
49%
BTTS No
2.06
Clean Sheet
18%
5.58
38%
2.64
Win to Nil
4%
27.08
21%
4.84
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.8 | 11.7 | 10.0 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 0.9 |
| 1 | 6.6 | 11.3 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 2 | 3.2 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | – | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.8%.
How many goals are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns expected to score?
The model projects 0.97 expected goals for Meizhou Kejia and 1.72 for Wuhan Three Towns, a combined total of 2.69.
How confident is the prediction model for Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 54%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Across their last 13 outings, Meizhou Kejia have picked up 1.77 PPG on a 6W 5D 2L record — D-L-W-W-W across the most recent five. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Wuhan Three Towns's form line: 12W 1D 0L from 13 games, 2.85 PPG, last five W-W-W-W-W. The sample for Wuhan Three Towns is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Put side by side, Wuhan Three Towns are the form team by 1.08 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Meizhou Kejia.
Home & Away Splits
On home soil, Meizhou Kejia have posted 2.00 PPG from 7 outings (4W 2D 1L).
On the road, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 6W 1D 0L from 7 away games — 2.71 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Meizhou Kejia are averaging 1.31 goals scored and 0.85 conceded per game recently; Wuhan Three Towns are on 3.38 scored and 0.54 conceded. Wuhan Three Towns's attacking output running into Meizhou Kejia's solid defensive record is the key goals-market tension in this fixture.
On BTTS specifically: Meizhou Kejia have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.
Defensively: Wuhan Three Towns in 54% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 13 Results — Super League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Meizhou Kejia
Blended
Wuhan Three Towns
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns in coming into this match?
Meizhou Kejia have gone 6W 5D 2L in their last 13 games (1.77 PPG), while Wuhan Three Towns have gone 12W 1D 0L in their last 13 (2.85 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Meizhou Kejia at home or Wuhan Three Towns away?
Wuhan Three Towns's away record (2.71 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Meizhou Kejia at home: 2.00 PPG; Wuhan Three Towns away: 2.71 PPG.
Have Meizhou Kejia or Wuhan Three Towns been keeping clean sheets recently?
Meizhou Kejia have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their recent games, Wuhan Three Towns in 54%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 8 times since August 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 10 August 2025, roughly 12 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
Meizhou Kejia go into this on the back of 4 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Wuhan Three Towns won 3-0 on 21 Nov 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Meizhou Kejia have gone 2W 0D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Wuhan Three Towns — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 8 Meetings
4
Meizhou Kejia
0
Draws
4
Wuhan Three Towns
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns?
From 8 meetings on record, Meizhou Kejia have won 4, Wuhan Three Towns have won 4, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns last play each other?
They last met on 10 August 2025, when Wuhan Three Towns 1-2 Meizhou Kejia.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 43% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 29% of those situations.
Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 71% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Meizhou Kejia 86%, Wuhan Three Towns 43% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 71% for Meizhou Kejia and 71% for Wuhan Three Towns. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 29% and 29% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns in 57%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Meizhou Kejia home games / Wuhan Three Towns away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Meizhou Kejia play Wuhan Three Towns?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 86% of Meizhou Kejia's games and 43% of Wuhan Three Towns's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Meizhou Kejia vs Wuhan Three Towns usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 71% of Meizhou Kejia's matches and 71% of Wuhan Three Towns's.
Do Meizhou Kejia and Wuhan Three Towns tend to score early?
Meizhou Kejia have had a goal before half-time in 86% of their recent matches, Wuhan Three Towns in 86% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Prediction vindicated as Wuhan Three Towns edge out Meizhou Kejia 1-2.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Wuhan Three Towns beat Meizhou Kejia 1-2 at Wuhua Olympic Sports Center Huitang Stadium, Regular Season - 14, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Meizhou Kejia 0.97 xG and Wuhan Three Towns 1.72 xG, a combined 2.69. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Meizhou Kejia attack 1.04 / defence 1.04 against Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.26 / defence 0.67, drawn from 13/13 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Meizhou Kejia 21% | Draw 25% | Wuhan Three Towns 54%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 54%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 75% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 65% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Meizhou Kejia 46%, Wuhan Three Towns 85%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (13 games, 7 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (13 games, 7 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 54% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 2.85 PPG against 1.77. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.86 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 1.14 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The data earned its keep here, calling the bulk of the fixture correctly.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.