Chengdu Better City 3-0 Guangzhou R&F – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 59% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Mission Hills Football Base Stadium plays host to Chengdu Better City versus Guangzhou R&F in Super League, Regular Season - 27. Kick-off: Friday 25 November 2022 at 11:00 UTC.
Current Form
Chengdu Better City's overall Super League record this term: 5W 3D 2L from 10 games (1.80 PPG). Last five: W W D W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Chengdu Better City at Mission Hills Football Base Stadium this season: 4W 6D 0L from 10 home games — 1.80 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.
Guangzhou R&F (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Super League outings this term — 0.90 points per game. Last five: W L L L L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Guangzhou R&F, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Guangzhou R&F's form when playing away from home: 1W 2D 7L across 10 road games this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.
Form favours the hosts. Chengdu Better City's 1.80 PPG return is 0.90 points per game ahead of Guangzhou R&F's 0.90 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.
Head-to-Head
Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Chengdu Better City 1W, Guangzhou R&F 0W, 0D.
Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 27 Aug 2022, ended 2–1 with Chengdu Better City winning.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.
Trading Data
Chengdu Better City goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (28 games, 12 at home): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 43% of the time; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games).
Guangzhou R&F goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (28 games, 12 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (away games); they fail to score in 43% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 50% versus Guangzhou R&F 46%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 43% | Guangzhou R&F 54%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 1.97 xG and Guangzhou R&F 1.01 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.212 / defence 0.929 | Guangzhou R&F attack 0.806 / defence 1.077. League average goals — home 1.506 / away 1.353. Data: 26 Chengdu Better City games / 40 Guangzhou R&F games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 59% | Draw 23% | Guangzhou R&F 18%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.69 | Draw 4.35 | Guangzhou R&F 5.56. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (59%) — a 41pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.98. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.98 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates Chengdu Better City as the most likely outcome at 59% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
The Poisson model projects 2.98 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 57% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.7 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 56% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 70% | Guangzhou R&F 50% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 27 | Venue: Mission Hills Football Base Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 25 Nov 2022, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 59% | Draw 23% | Guangzhou R&F 18% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 57% | BTTS 56% | xG Chengdu Better City 1.97 / Guangzhou R&F 1.01 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.212 / def 0.929 | Guangzhou R&F attack 0.806 / def 1.077 | league avg home 1.506 / away 1.353 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (59%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.97
Chengdu Better City xG
Expected Goals
1.01
Guangzhou R&F xG
56%
BTTS
81%
Over 1.5
57%
Over 2.5
35%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F kick off?
Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F kicked off at 11:00 on Friday 25 November 2022 at Mission Hills Football Base Stadium.
What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F?
Chengdu Better City 3 - 0 Guangzhou R&F.
Where is Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F being played?
The match is being played at Mission Hills Football Base Stadium.
What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F part of?
Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F is a Regular Season - 27 fixture in the Super League (China).
Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F?
Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 59% chance of winning, Guangzhou R&F a 18% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.
Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F?
Our model estimates a 56% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F will score (BTTS).
Will Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 57%.
What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F?
Record (1 meetings): Chengdu Better City 1W | Draws 0 | Guangzhou R&F 0W.
What form are Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F in?
Chengdu Better City (all comps): 5W-3D-2L in 10 | 1.80 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-W-D-W-W. Guangzhou R&F (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.30 | L5 W-L-L-L-L.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
The model rates Chengdu Better City's attack at 1.21x the league average against Guangzhou R&F's defence at 1.08x — combine the two and it projects 1.97 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Guangzhou R&F's attack (0.81x) against Chengdu Better City's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 1.01.
These ratings are built from 26/40 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 11.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (10.0%), 2-0 (9.8%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Chengdu Better City Win
59%
1.70
23%
4.34
18%
5.50
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
10.1%
Draw
Most likely
1 – 0
10.0%
Home win
2 – 1
10.0%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.97
Chengdu Better City xG
Total xG
2.98
1.01
Guangzhou R&F xG
1.70
59%
Home win
4.34
23%
Draw
5.50
18%
Away win
Goals Markets
80%
Over 1.5
1.25
20%
Under 1.5
5.00
57%
Over 2.5
1.75
43%
Under 2.5
2.33
35%
Over 3.5
2.86
65%
Under 3.5
1.54
18%
Over 4.5
5.56
82%
Under 4.5
1.22
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
56%
BTTS Yes
1.80
44%
BTTS No
2.25
Clean Sheet
36%
2.75
14%
7.14
Win to Nil
21%
4.69
3%
39.29
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | – |
| 1 | 10.0 | 10.1 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.4%.
How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F expected to score?
The model projects 1.97 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.01 for Guangzhou R&F, a combined total of 2.98.
How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 59%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Across their last 28 outings, Chengdu Better City have picked up 1.75 PPG on a 13W 10D 5L record — W-W-D-W-W across the most recent five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Guangzhou R&F's form line: 4W 4D 20L from 28 games, 0.57 PPG, last five W-L-L-L-L. The sample for Guangzhou R&F is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Put side by side, Chengdu Better City are the form team by 1.18 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Guangzhou R&F.
Home & Away Splits
On home soil, Chengdu Better City have posted 1.58 PPG from 12 outings (4W 7D 1L).
On the road, Guangzhou R&F have gone 1W 2D 9L from 12 away games — 0.42 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Chengdu Better City are averaging 1.32 goals scored and 0.96 conceded per game recently; Guangzhou R&F are on 0.79 scored and 1.93 conceded.
Defensively: Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 39% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 28 Results — Super League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Chengdu Better City
Blended
Guangzhou R&F
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F in coming into this match?
Chengdu Better City have gone 13W 10D 5L in their last 28 games (1.75 PPG), while Guangzhou R&F have gone 4W 4D 20L in their last 28 (0.57 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Guangzhou R&F away?
Chengdu Better City's home record (1.58 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 1.58 PPG; Guangzhou R&F away: 0.42 PPG.
Have Chengdu Better City or Guangzhou R&F been keeping clean sheets recently?
Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 39% of their recent games, Guangzhou R&F in 14%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 2 times since August 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 25 November 2022, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Last 2 Meetings
2
Chengdu Better City
0
Draws
0
Guangzhou R&F
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F?
From 2 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 2, Guangzhou R&F have won 0, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F last play each other?
They last met on 25 November 2022, when Chengdu Better City 3-0 Guangzhou R&F.
Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F?
Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 42% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 25% of those situations.
Guangzhou R&F are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 75%, Guangzhou R&F 42% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 58% (Chengdu Better City) and 42% (Guangzhou R&F).
On the defensive side: Guangzhou R&F in 50%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Guangzhou R&F away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Guangzhou R&F?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 75% of Chengdu Better City's games and 42% of Guangzhou R&F's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Chengdu Better City vs Guangzhou R&F usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 58% of Chengdu Better City's recent games and 42% of Guangzhou R&F's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Chengdu Better City and Guangzhou R&F tend to score early?
Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 83% of their recent matches, Guangzhou R&F in 83% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Chengdu Better City run riot with a 3-0 hammering of Guangzhou R&F.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Chengdu Better City beat Guangzhou R&F 3-0 at Mission Hills Football Base Stadium, Regular Season - 27, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 1.97 xG and Guangzhou R&F 1.01 xG, a combined 2.98. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Chengdu Better City beat their projection by 1.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Guangzhou R&F landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.21 / defence 0.93 against Guangzhou R&F attack 0.81 / defence 1.08, drawn from 26/40 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 59% | Draw 23% | Guangzhou R&F 18%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 59%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 81% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 43%, Guangzhou R&F 54%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Chengdu Better City's trading profile (28 games, 12 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 39% of the time, and duly kept one.
Guangzhou R&F's trading profile (28 games, 12 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 43% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.75 PPG against 0.57. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.83 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.17 average — tighter than their form line. Guangzhou R&F (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.67 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.