Sign in Register

AS Eupen 4-1 KRC Genk II – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 1

Kick-off

Sat 15 Aug 2026

14:00

Venue

Kehrwegstadion

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates AS Eupen at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Kehrwegstadion plays host to AS Eupen versus KRC Genk II in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 1. Kick-off: Saturday 15 August 2026 at 14:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

AS Eupen have collected 1.60 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 4W 4D 2L. Last five: W D W D L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 0.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. AS Eupen haven't played a Challenger Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

In front of their own supporters this season, AS Eupen have posted 3W 5D 2L at Kehrwegstadion — 1.40 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

KRC Genk II (all games): 2W 5D 3L across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this term — 1.10 points per game. Last five: D W D D D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. KRC Genk II haven't played a Challenger Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

KRC Genk II's form when playing away from home: 1W 5D 4L across 10 road games this term (0.80 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The points-per-game gap of 0.50 in AS Eupen's favour (1.60 vs 1.10) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — AS Eupen have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, KRC Genk II in 80%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 4 meetings: AS Eupen 2W, KRC Genk II 1W, 1D.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Jan 2026, ended 0–2 with KRC Genk II winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

AS Eupen goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

KRC Genk II goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — AS Eupen 53% versus KRC Genk II 66%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (AS Eupen 47% | KRC Genk II 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects AS Eupen 1.59 xG and KRC Genk II 1.31 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AS Eupen attack 1.028 / defence 0.965 | KRC Genk II attack 1.033 / defence 1.092. League average goals — home 1.416 / away 1.311. Data: 32 AS Eupen games / 32 KRC Genk II games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: AS Eupen 44% | Draw 25% | KRC Genk II 31%. Fair-value odds: AS Eupen 2.27 | Draw 4.00 | KRC Genk II 3.23. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.89. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.89 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates AS Eupen as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on AS Eupen if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.89 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 55% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 58% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: AS Eupen 60% | KRC Genk II 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (32 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Form AS Eupen lead on PPG: 1.60 vs 1.10 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (AS Eupen 6/10, KRC Genk II 8/10) and Poisson model (58%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour AS Eupen — AS Eupen at 44% win probability.
Market Poisson model is using prior-season data only (32/32 games) — current-season form data is limited; weight form and market signals more heavily for this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Kehrwegstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 15 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: AS Eupen 44% | Draw 25% | KRC Genk II 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 55% | BTTS 58% | xG AS Eupen 1.59 / KRC Genk II 1.31 • Poisson strength factors: AS Eupen attack 1.028 / def 0.965 | KRC Genk II attack 1.033 / def 1.092 | league avg home 1.416 / away 1.311 • Poisson stance: AS Eupen (44%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.59

AS Eupen xG

Expected Goals

1.31

KRC Genk II xG

44%
25%
31%
AS Eupen Draw KRC Genk II

58%

BTTS

78%

Over 1.5

55%

Over 2.5

33%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II kick off?

AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II kicked off at 14:00 on Saturday 15 August 2026 at Kehrwegstadion.

What was the final score in AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II?

AS Eupen 4 - 1 KRC Genk II.

Where is AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II being played?

The match is being played at Kehrwegstadion.

What competition is AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II part of?

AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II?

Our statistical model gives AS Eupen a 44% chance of winning, KRC Genk II a 31% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making AS Eupen the favourite.

Will both teams score in AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II?

Our model estimates a 58% probability that both AS Eupen and KRC Genk II will score (BTTS).

Will AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 55%.

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and KRC Genk II?

Record (4 meetings): AS Eupen 2W | Draws 1 | KRC Genk II 1W.

What form are AS Eupen and KRC Genk II in?

No current-season fixtures available — form shown from previous season data. AS Eupen (all comps): 4W-4D-2L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 0.90 | L5 W-D-W-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

AS Eupen's attacking strength (1.03x league average) is weighed against KRC Genk II's defensive record (1.09x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.59. Flip it around — KRC Genk II's attack (1.03x) against AS Eupen's defence (0.96x) — and the away total comes out at 1.31.

These ratings are built from 32/32 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 13.0%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 1-2 (7.5%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

AS Eupen Win

44%

AS Eupen

2.27

25%

Draw

4.08

31%

KRC Genk II

3.18

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.5%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.1%

Home win

1 – 0

8.8%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.59

AS Eupen xG

Total xG

2.89

1.31

KRC Genk II xG

44%
25%
31%
AS EupenDrawKRC Genk II

2.27

44%

Home win

4.08

25%

Draw

3.18

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

55%

Over 2.5

1.82

45%

Under 2.5

2.22

33%

Over 3.5

3.03

67%

Under 3.5

1.49

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

58%

BTTS Yes

1.72

42%

BTTS No

2.38

Clean Sheet

27%

AS Eupen

3.69

20%

KRC Genk II

4.89

Win to Nil

12%

AS Eupen

8.39

6%

KRC Genk II

15.56

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.5 7.2 4.7 2.1 0.7 0.2
1 8.8 11.5 7.5 3.3 1.1 0.3
2 7.0 9.1 6.0 2.6 0.8 0.2
3 3.7 4.8 3.2 1.4 0.4 0.1
4 1.5 1.9 1.3 0.5 0.2
5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.588
λ Away (xG) 1.306
Total xG 2.894
League avg home goals 1.416
League avg away goals 1.311
AS Eupen attack strength 1.028
AS Eupen defence strength 0.965
KRC Genk II attack strength 1.033
KRC Genk II defence strength 1.092
Data phase PrevSeason
Games used (H/A) 32 / 32

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.0%.

How many goals are AS Eupen and KRC Genk II expected to score?

The model projects 1.59 expected goals for AS Eupen and 1.31 for KRC Genk II, a combined total of 2.89.

How confident is the prediction model for AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 44%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

AS Eupen's recent record stands at 12W 11D 9L from 32 games, a 1.47 PPG return, with W-D-W-D-L in the last five. AS Eupen haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.

KRC Genk II, meanwhile, have gone 7W 10D 15L across 32 games — 0.97 PPG, with D-W-D-D-D in their last five. KRC Genk II haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.

The points-per-game comparison favours AS Eupen by 0.50 — a real, if not enormous, edge over KRC Genk II heading into this one.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, AS Eupen have managed 6W 7D 3L from 16 games — 1.56 PPG in front of their own supporters.

KRC Genk II's away record stands at 3W 6D 7L across 16 trips, a 0.94 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, AS Eupen come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

AS Eupen are averaging 1.38 goals scored and 1.12 conceded per game recently; KRC Genk II are on 1.31 scored and 1.84 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: KRC Genk II in 66%.

Defensively: AS Eupen have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 32 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

AS Eupen

AS Eupen

Pre-Season
W D W D L
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

Pre-Season
D W D D D
32 Played 32
12/11/9 W / D / L 7/10/15
1.47 Points Per Game 0.97
1.38 Avg Goals Scored 1.31
1.12 Avg Goals Conceded 1.84
2.50 Avg Goals / Game 3.16
12 Clean Sheets 5
17 BTTS 21
15 Over 2.5 Games 20
AS Eupen

AS Eupen

L
A Liège
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Apr
D
H Beerschot VA
3–3 HT 2–1
10 Apr
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 1–0
04 Apr
D
H Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Mar
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Mar
L
H K. Lierse S.K.
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Mar
W
H KAA Gent II
4–0 HT 2–0
06 Mar
D
A RWDM
2–2 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
H Francs Borains
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Feb
W
H Kortrijk
1–0 HT 1–0
07 Feb
L
A KRC Genk II
0–2 HT 0–0
30 Jan
D
H Lokeren-Temse
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Jan
L
A Lommel United
2–3 HT 2–0
24 Jan
L
H SK Beveren
1–2 HT 0–2
17 Jan
D
H Olympic Charleroi
2–2 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
A Patro Eisden
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
H Club Brugge II
2–1 HT 1–1
14 Dec
W
A Seraing United
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
L
H Lommel United
1–2 HT 1–1
28 Nov
D
A SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Nov
L
A KAA Gent II
1–2 HT 0–1
01 Nov
W
H KRC Genk II
2–1 HT 1–0
25 Oct
W
A Olympic Charleroi
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Oct
D
H RWDM
2–2 HT 2–0
04 Oct
L
A Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Sep
D
A Lokeren-Temse
3–3 HT 2–2
24 Sep
D
H Patro Eisden
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Sep
W
A Francs Borains
3–0 HT 3–0
13 Sep
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Aug
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–3 HT 0–3
23 Aug
D
A Beerschot VA
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Aug
W
H Liège
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Aug
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

D
H KAA Gent II
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
D
A Francs Borains
2–2 HT 1–1
11 Apr
D
H Lokeren-Temse
2–2 HT 1–1
03 Apr
W
A Olympic Charleroi
2–1 HT 0–0
20 Mar
D
A Seraing United
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Mar
D
H Club Brugge II
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Mar
L
A Beerschot VA
0–1 HT 0–1
06 Mar
L
H K. Lierse S.K.
2–3 HT 1–2
28 Feb
L
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–2 HT 0–2
20 Feb
W
H Liège
2–0 HT 2–0
14 Feb
D
A Patro Eisden
4–4 HT 1–2
06 Feb
W
H AS Eupen
2–0 HT 0–0
30 Jan
L
H RWDM
0–2 HT 0–0
27 Jan
L
A Kortrijk
1–4 HT 1–1
23 Jan
L
H Lommel United
0–2 HT 0–2
16 Jan
L
H SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Dec
D
A Lokeren-Temse
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Dec
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
3–2 HT 3–1
09 Dec
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
1–2 HT 0–1
06 Dec
L
H Olympic Charleroi
3–4 HT 2–1
30 Nov
D
A KAA Gent II
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Nov
D
A RWDM
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Nov
L
A AS Eupen
1–2 HT 0–1
25 Oct
W
H Francs Borains
3–1 HT 1–1
18 Oct
L
A Liège
0–5 HT 0–2
05 Oct
L
H Patro Eisden
1–4 HT 1–4
26 Sep
L
H Beerschot VA
0–2 HT 0–1
23 Sep
W
A Lommel United
2–1 HT 1–0
19 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
1–3 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
A Club Brugge II
2–1 HT 2–0
31 Aug
D
H Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Aug
L
A SK Beveren
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are AS Eupen and KRC Genk II in coming into this match?

AS Eupen have gone 12W 11D 9L in their last 32 games (1.47 PPG), while KRC Genk II have gone 7W 10D 15L in their last 32 (0.97 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — AS Eupen at home or KRC Genk II away?

AS Eupen's home record (1.56 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — AS Eupen at home: 1.56 PPG; KRC Genk II away: 0.94 PPG.

Have AS Eupen or KRC Genk II been keeping clean sheets recently?

AS Eupen have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their recent games, KRC Genk II in 16%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 5 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2024 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. The two were last together as recently as 15 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: AS Eupen won 4-1 on 15 Aug 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, AS Eupen have gone 3W 0D 0L from 3 meetings on their own ground against KRC Genk II — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 5 Meetings

AS Eupen

3

AS Eupen

1

Draws

KRC Genk II

1

KRC Genk II

Recent Meetings

AS Eupen
4–1
15 Aug 26
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
2–0
30 Jan 26
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–1
25 Oct 25
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
0–0
16 Feb 25
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
3–1
27 Sep 24
KRC Genk II

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and KRC Genk II?

From 5 meetings on record, AS Eupen have won 3, KRC Genk II have won 1, and 1 have been drawn.

When did AS Eupen and KRC Genk II last play each other?

They last met on 15 August 2026, when AS Eupen 4-1 KRC Genk II.

Who has won more matches between AS Eupen and KRC Genk II?

AS Eupen have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 5 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 19% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

KRC Genk II are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 81% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 56% for AS Eupen, 75% for KRC Genk II — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 50% for AS Eupen and 75% for KRC Genk II. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 25% and 38% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: AS Eupen keep a clean sheet in 38% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = AS Eupen home games / KRC Genk II away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

AS Eupen AS Eupen Pre-Season
Metric All
(32 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 24/32
(75%)
12/16
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 11/32
(34.4%)
6/16
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/8
(75%)
2/4
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/8
(37.5%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 12/32
(37.5%)
6/16
(37.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/32
(15.6%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/32
(9.4%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/32
(53.1%)
9/16
(56.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 15/32
(46.9%)
8/16
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/32
(25%)
4/16
(25%)
Clean Sheet 12/32
(37.5%)
6/16
(37.5%)
Failed to Score 5/32
(15.6%)
3/16
(18.8%)
KRC Genk II KRC Genk II Pre-Season
Metric All
(32 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 24/32
(75%)
13/16
(81.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/32
(50%)
7/16
(43.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/8
(62.5%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/8
(50%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 7/32
(21.9%)
4/16
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/32
(9.4%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/32
(6.2%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 21/32
(65.6%)
12/16
(75%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/32
(62.5%)
12/16
(75%)
Over 3.5 Goals 13/32
(40.6%)
6/16
(37.5%)
Clean Sheet 5/32
(15.6%)
1/16
(6.2%)
Failed to Score 9/32
(28.1%)
4/16
(25%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when AS Eupen play KRC Genk II?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of AS Eupen's games and 75% of KRC Genk II's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is AS Eupen vs KRC Genk II usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of AS Eupen's matches and 75% of KRC Genk II's.

Do AS Eupen and KRC Genk II tend to score early?

AS Eupen have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, KRC Genk II in 81% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant AS Eupen run riot with a 4-1 hammering of KRC Genk II.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

AS Eupen beat KRC Genk II 4-1 at Kehrwegstadion, Regular Season - 1, in the Challenger Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AS Eupen 1.59 xG and KRC Genk II 1.31 xG, a combined 2.89. The scoreboard read 4-1 for 5 actual goals. AS Eupen beat their projection by 2.4 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AS Eupen attack 1.03 / defence 0.96 against KRC Genk II attack 1.03 / defence 1.09, drawn from 32/32 games (PrevSeason).

On the result, the model split it AS Eupen 44% | Draw 25% | KRC Genk II 31%, with AS Eupen to win its most likely call at 44%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 55%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. Over 3.5 was 33% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 55% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AS Eupen 47%, KRC Genk II 62%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AS Eupen's trading profile (32 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (32 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 66% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, AS Eupen arrived the stronger side — 1.47 PPG against 0.97. That form edge translated into the three points. AS Eupen (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.44 average — above their attacking norm. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) shipped 4 against a 1.94 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The numbers read this fixture well — the outcome largely followed the script the data laid out beforehand.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 55% Over 2.5 probability, 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 58% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 55% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.