Sign in Register

Gais 0-0 Mjallby AIF – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Allsvenskan · Regular Season - 4

Kick-off

Thu 23 Apr 2026

17:00

Venue

Gamla Ullevi

Competition

Allsvenskan

Sweden

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Gais at 38%, yet in-form Mjallby AIF provide a compelling counter-argument — this Gais vs Mjallby AIF fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Mjallby AIF make the trip to Gamla Ullevi to face Gais in Allsvenskan, Regular Season - 4. The match kicks off on Thursday 23 April 2026 at 17:00 UTC.

Form

Gais (all games): 5W 2D 3L across 10 Allsvenskan fixtures this term — 1.70 PPG. Last five: W W W D L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

At home at Gamla Ullevi, Gais have gone 6W 2D 2L this season (10 games, 2.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game.

Mjallby AIF have collected 2.80 PPG across 10 Allsvenskan outings this season: 9W 1D 0L. Last five: W W W W W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 0.20. Defensively, 0.20 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 8 clean sheets from 10 games (80%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No.

Mjallby AIF away from home this season: 9W 1D 0L from 10 away games — 2.80 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.00 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 6 away clean sheets from 10 games (60%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Mjallby AIF are 1.10 PPG clear of Gais in recent Allsvenskan fixtures (2.80 vs 1.70). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Gais lead 1W to 1W over the last 4 encounters, with 2 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 25 Aug 2025, ended 0–2 with Mjallby AIF winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Gais goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

Mjallby AIF goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 94% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Gais 50% versus Mjallby AIF 60%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Gais 48% | Mjallby AIF 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Gais 1.28 xG and Mjallby AIF 1.21 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Gais attack 0.864 / defence 0.932 | Mjallby AIF attack 0.952 / defence 0.963. League average goals — home 1.535 / away 1.361. Data: 33 Gais games / 33 Mjallby AIF games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Gais 38% | Draw 27% | Mjallby AIF 35%. Fair-value odds: Gais 2.63 | Draw 3.70 | Mjallby AIF 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 45% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.48. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 55% — total xG of 2.48 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Gais are the pick at 38% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Mjallby AIF (2.80 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Gais if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.48 combined xG gives a 45% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 51%. Form rates are neutral: Gais 50% | Mjallby AIF 40%.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–2D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
BTTS H2H BTTS 75% and Poisson BTTS 51% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Mjallby AIF lead on PPG: 2.80 vs 1.70 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Gais Poisson xG (1.28) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.60) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Mjallby AIF Poisson xG (1.21) is below their form scoring rate (2.00) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Form Form (PPG) favours Mjallby AIF but Poisson leans Gais (38%) — divergence worth monitoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Gais vs Mjallby AIF | Competition: Allsvenskan, Regular Season - 4 | Venue: Gamla Ullevi • Kick-off: Thursday 23 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Gais 38% | Draw 27% | Mjallby AIF 35% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 45% | BTTS 51% | xG Gais 1.28 / Mjallby AIF 1.21 • Poisson strength factors: Gais attack 0.864 / def 0.932 | Mjallby AIF attack 0.952 / def 0.963 | league avg home 1.535 / away 1.361 • Poisson stance: Gais (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.28

Gais xG

Expected Goals

1.21

Mjallby AIF xG

38%
27%
35%
Gais Draw Mjallby AIF

51%

BTTS

71%

Over 1.5

45%

Over 2.5

24%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Gais vs Mjallby AIF kick off?

Gais vs Mjallby AIF kicked off at 17:00 on Thursday 23 April 2026 at Gamla Ullevi.

What was the final score in Gais vs Mjallby AIF?

Gais 0 - 0 Mjallby AIF.

Where is Gais vs Mjallby AIF being played?

The match is being played at Gamla Ullevi.

What competition is Gais vs Mjallby AIF part of?

Gais vs Mjallby AIF is a Regular Season - 4 fixture in the Allsvenskan (Sweden).

Who is favourite to win Gais vs Mjallby AIF?

Our statistical model gives Gais a 38% chance of winning, Mjallby AIF a 35% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Gais the favourite.

Will both teams score in Gais vs Mjallby AIF?

Our model estimates a 51% probability that both Gais and Mjallby AIF will score (BTTS).

Will Gais vs Mjallby AIF have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 45%.

What is the head-to-head record between Gais and Mjallby AIF?

Record (4 meetings): Gais 1W | Draws 2 | Mjallby AIF 1W.

What form are Gais and Mjallby AIF in?

Gais (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.30 | L5 W-W-W-D-L. Mjallby AIF (all comps): 9W-1D-0L in 10 | 2.80 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 0.20 | L5 W-W-W-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from Gais's attack rating (0.86) and Mjallby AIF's defence rating (0.96), the model arrives at 1.28 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Mjallby AIF's attack (0.95x) against Gais's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 1.21.

These ratings are built from 33/33 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 14.5%. Close behind: 0-0 (10.0%), 1-0 (9.0%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 33% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Gais Win

38%

Gais

2.62

27%

Draw

3.69

35%

Mjallby AIF

2.87

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.9%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

10.6%

Home win

0 – 1

10.1%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.28

Gais xG

Total xG

2.48

1.21

Mjallby AIF xG

38%
27%
35%
GaisDrawMjallby AIF

2.62

38%

Home win

3.69

27%

Draw

2.87

35%

Away win

Goals Markets

71%

Over 1.5

1.41

29%

Under 1.5

3.45

45%

Over 2.5

2.22

55%

Under 2.5

1.82

24%

Over 3.5

4.17

76%

Under 3.5

1.32

11%

Over 4.5

9.09

89%

Under 4.5

1.12

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

51%

BTTS Yes

1.98

49%

BTTS No

2.02

Clean Sheet

30%

Gais

3.35

28%

Mjallby AIF

3.59

Win to Nil

11%

Gais

8.78

10%

Mjallby AIF

10.30

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 8.3 10.1 6.1 2.4 0.7 0.2
1 10.6 12.9 7.8 3.1 0.9 0.2
2 6.8 8.2 5.0 2.0 0.6 0.1
3 2.9 3.5 2.1 0.8 0.3 0.1
4 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1
5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.277
λ Away (xG) 1.208
Total xG 2.485
League avg home goals 1.535
League avg away goals 1.361
Gais attack strength 0.864
Gais defence strength 0.932
Mjallby AIF attack strength 0.952
Mjallby AIF defence strength 0.963
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 33 / 33

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Gais vs Mjallby AIF?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.5%.

How many goals are Gais and Mjallby AIF expected to score?

The model projects 1.28 expected goals for Gais and 1.21 for Mjallby AIF, a combined total of 2.48.

How confident is the prediction model for Gais vs Mjallby AIF?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Gais's recent record stands at 28W 16D 16L from 60 games, a 1.67 PPG return, with W-W-W-D-L in the last five.

Mjallby AIF, meanwhile, have gone 37W 14D 9L across 60 games — 2.08 PPG, with W-W-W-W-W in their last five.

The points-per-game comparison favours Mjallby AIF by 0.41 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Gais heading into this one.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Gais have managed 17W 8D 5L from 30 games — 1.97 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Mjallby AIF's away record stands at 17W 5D 8L across 30 trips, a 1.87 PPG haul.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Gais are averaging 1.35 goals scored and 1.07 conceded per game recently; Mjallby AIF are on 1.68 scored and 0.88 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Mjallby AIF in 60%.

Last 60 Results — Allsvenskan

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Gais

Gais

Current Season
W W W D L
Mjallby AIF

Mjallby AIF

Current Season
W W W W W
60 Played 60
28/16/16 W / D / L 37/14/9
1.67 Points Per Game 2.08
1.35 Avg Goals Scored 1.68
1.07 Avg Goals Conceded 0.88
2.42 Avg Goals / Game 2.57
17 Clean Sheets 20
30 BTTS 36
29 Over 2.5 Games 30
Gais

Gais

L
A Malmo FF
1–2 HT 1–0
09 Nov
D
H Osters IF
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Nov
W
A IF Brommapojkarna
2–0 HT 2–0
27 Oct
W
H Djurgardens IF
3–2 HT 2–1
19 Oct
W
H IFK Norrkoping
2–1 HT 2–0
04 Oct
D
A AIK Stockholm
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
H IF Elfsborg
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Sep
L
A Sirius
0–3 HT 0–1
14 Sep
W
H BK Hacken
2–1 HT 1–0
31 Aug
L
H Mjallby AIF
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Aug
W
A Hammarby FF
2–1 HT 1–1
17 Aug
L
H IFK Goteborg
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Aug
D
A IFK Varnamo
2–2 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Halmstad
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Jul
W
A Degerfors IF
3–0 HT 1–0
19 Jul
W
H Hammarby FF
3–2 HT 1–0
13 Jul
D
H Malmo FF
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Jul
W
A BK Hacken
3–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
W
A IFK Norrkoping
3–0 HT 1–0
31 May
W
H Sirius
2–1 HT 0–0
24 May
D
A Osters IF
1–1 HT 0–0
18 May
W
A Halmstad
3–1 HT 1–1
14 May
D
H IFK Varnamo
1–1 HT 1–0
10 May
L
A IF Elfsborg
0–2 HT 0–1
05 May
D
A IFK Goteborg
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Apr
D
H IF Brommapojkarna
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Apr
D
A Djurgardens IF
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Apr
W
H Degerfors IF
2–0 HT 2–0
13 Apr
D
A Mjallby AIF
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
L
H AIK Stockholm
0–1 HT 0–0
31 Mar
W
H Sirius
2–1 HT 1–0
10 Nov
W
A BK Hacken
2–1 HT 1–1
03 Nov
D
A Mjallby AIF
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Oct
D
H IFK Varnamo
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Oct
L
A IF Brommapojkarna
0–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A IFK Goteborg
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Sep
W
H Djurgardens IF
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Sep
D
H Malmo FF
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Sep
W
A Vasteras SK FK
3–2 HT 3–0
14 Sep
D
H Kalmar FF
1–1 HT 1–1
31 Aug
D
A Hammarby FF
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Aug
W
H Halmstad
3–1 HT 2–0
18 Aug
L
A IF Elfsborg
1–2 HT 1–2
11 Aug
L
H IFK Norrkoping
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
A AIK Stockholm
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Jul
W
H AIK Stockholm
2–0 HT 1–0
22 Jul
L
A Sirius
1–3 HT 0–1
13 Jul
D
H Hammarby FF
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
L
A Halmstad
0–4 HT 0–2
01 Jun
W
H BK Hacken
3–0 HT 2–0
25 May
W
H IF Elfsborg
2–1 HT 2–1
19 May
L
A Malmo FF
0–1 HT 0–0
16 May
W
H Vasteras SK FK
2–0 HT 2–0
11 May
W
H IFK Goteborg
2–1 HT 1–0
06 May
L
A Djurgardens IF
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Apr
W
A Kalmar FF
3–2 HT 1–1
25 Apr
W
H Mjallby AIF
2–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
L
A IFK Norrkoping
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
W
A IFK Varnamo
2–1 HT 2–1
08 Apr
L
H IF Brommapojkarna
0–4 HT 0–2
31 Mar
Mjallby AIF

Mjallby AIF

W
H BK Hacken
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Nov
W
A IFK Varnamo
5–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
H IFK Norrkoping
2–1 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
A IFK Goteborg
2–0 HT 2–0
20 Oct
W
H IF Elfsborg
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Oct
W
A IF Brommapojkarna
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Sep
D
H Osters IF
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Sep
W
A Degerfors IF
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
W
H Halmstad
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Aug
W
A Gais
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
D
H Djurgardens IF
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Malmo FF
3–1 HT 0–0
09 Aug
W
H Sirius
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H AIK Stockholm
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
A Sirius
2–1 HT 2–0
14 Jul
W
A Osters IF
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Jul
D
H Malmo FF
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
H IFK Varnamo
2–0 HT 0–0
01 Jun
D
A IFK Norrkoping
1–1 HT 1–0
26 May
W
A Hammarby FF
2–1 HT 1–1
22 May
W
H IF Brommapojkarna
1–0 HT 1–0
19 May
W
A Djurgardens IF
3–1 HT 1–1
15 May
L
A AIK Stockholm
1–2 HT 1–1
11 May
W
H IFK Goteborg
1–0 HT 1–0
04 May
W
H Degerfors IF
4–1 HT 3–0
27 Apr
W
A Halmstad
3–1 HT 1–1
23 Apr
W
H Hammarby FF
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Apr
W
A BK Hacken
3–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
D
H Gais
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
D
A IF Elfsborg
2–2 HT 2–0
30 Mar
W
H IFK Goteborg
1–0 HT 1–0
10 Nov
D
A Sirius
1–1 HT 1–1
03 Nov
D
H Gais
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Oct
W
A Kalmar FF
3–0 HT 2–0
20 Oct
W
H Vasteras SK FK
2–1 HT 1–1
05 Oct
L
A Malmo FF
0–2 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H IFK Varnamo
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Sep
D
A IF Brommapojkarna
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A Djurgardens IF
1–1 HT 1–1
15 Sep
W
H Halmstad
3–1 HT 3–1
31 Aug
W
A IFK Norrkoping
2–1 HT 2–0
26 Aug
D
H IF Elfsborg
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Aug
L
A AIK Stockholm
0–1 HT 0–0
11 Aug
L
A Hammarby FF
0–3 HT 0–0
28 Jul
L
A IF Elfsborg
1–3 HT 1–2
21 Jul
W
H Malmo FF
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jul
W
H Sirius
3–2 HT 0–0
06 Jul
W
A IFK Varnamo
2–1 HT 1–0
02 Jun
W
H BK Hacken
2–1 HT 1–0
29 May
L
H Djurgardens IF
1–3 HT 0–2
25 May
L
A IFK Goteborg
0–1 HT 0–0
21 May
W
H Hammarby FF
3–0 HT 3–0
15 May
W
A Halmstad
3–1 HT 3–0
11 May
D
H IF Brommapojkarna
1–1 HT 1–0
04 May
W
H Kalmar FF
3–2 HT 2–2
29 Apr
L
A Vasteras SK FK
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Apr
L
A Gais
1–2 HT 0–0
21 Apr
D
H AIK Stockholm
1–1 HT 0–0
13 Apr
W
H IFK Norrkoping
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Apr
W
A BK Hacken
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Gais and Mjallby AIF in coming into this match?

Gais have gone 28W 16D 16L in their last 60 games (1.67 PPG), while Mjallby AIF have gone 37W 14D 9L in their last 60 (2.08 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Gais at home or Mjallby AIF away?

Gais's home record (1.97 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Gais at home: 1.97 PPG; Mjallby AIF away: 1.87 PPG.

Have Gais or Mjallby AIF been keeping clean sheets recently?

Gais have kept a clean sheet in 28% of their recent games, Mjallby AIF in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 5 times since April 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Allsvenskan. They last met on 23 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Gais have gone 1W 1D 1L from 3 meetings on their own ground against Mjallby AIF — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 5 Meetings

Gais

1

Gais

3

Draws

Mjallby AIF

1

Mjallby AIF

Recent Meetings

Gais
0–0
23 Apr 26
Mjallby AIF
Gais
0–2
25 Aug 25
Mjallby AIF
Mjallby AIF
1–1
06 Apr 25
Gais
Mjallby AIF
1–1
26 Oct 24
Gais
Gais
2–1
21 Apr 24
Mjallby AIF

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Gais and Mjallby AIF?

From 5 meetings on record, Gais have won 1, Mjallby AIF have won 1, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Gais and Mjallby AIF last play each other?

They last met on 23 April 2026, when Gais 0-0 Mjallby AIF.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Gais are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 53% of the time.

Mjallby AIF are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 37% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Gais 47%, Mjallby AIF 53% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 47% (Gais) and 57% (Mjallby AIF).

On the defensive side: Gais keep a clean sheet in 37% of their matches; Mjallby AIF in 33%; Gais have failed to score in 30% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Gais home games / Mjallby AIF away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Gais Gais Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/60
(70%)
21/30
(70%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/60
(36.7%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/18
(66.7%)
5/9
(55.6%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/18
(38.9%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 26/60
(43.3%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/60
(1.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/60
(50%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/60
(18.3%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Clean Sheet 17/60
(28.3%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Failed to Score 19/60
(31.7%)
9/30
(30%)
Mjallby AIF Mjallby AIF Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/60
(70%)
20/30
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 25/60
(41.7%)
16/30
(53.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 17/18
(94.4%)
9/10
(90%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/18
(55.6%)
4/10
(40%)
Winning at HT 24/60
(40%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/60
(8.3%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 36/60
(60%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/60
(50%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 13/60
(21.7%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Clean Sheet 20/60
(33.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 5/60
(8.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Gais play Mjallby AIF?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 47% of Gais's recent matches and 53% of Mjallby AIF's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Gais vs Mjallby AIF usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 47% of Gais's recent games and 57% of Mjallby AIF's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Gais and Mjallby AIF tend to score early?

Gais have had a goal before half-time in 70% of their recent matches, Mjallby AIF in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Gais's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gais and Mjallby AIF finished level at 0-0 at Gamla Ullevi, Regular Season - 4, in the Allsvenskan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gais 1.28 xG and Mjallby AIF 1.21 xG, a combined 2.48. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gais fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Mjallby AIF landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gais attack 0.86 / defence 0.93 against Mjallby AIF attack 0.95 / defence 0.96, drawn from 33/33 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gais 38% | Draw 27% | Mjallby AIF 35%, with Gais to win its most likely call at 38%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 45%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 71% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 49% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gais 48%, Mjallby AIF 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gais's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Mjallby AIF's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Mjallby AIF arrived the stronger side — 2.08 PPG against 1.67. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Gais (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.83 average — tighter than their form line. Mjallby AIF (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.60 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.97 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 45% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 51% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 49% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.