Al Shabab 3-2 NEOM – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates NEOM at 39% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Al Shabab vs NEOM encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Fixture Analysis
It is a Pro League clash, Regular Season - 15 as Al Shabab welcome NEOM to Al-Shabab Club Stadium. Kick-off is set for Wednesday 14 January 2026 at 17:30 UTC.
Form Guide
Al Shabab — All Games: 0W 4D 6L from 10 Pro League outings this season, averaging 0.40 points per game. Last five: D L L L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Al Shabab, so this record blends games from this season and last.
At home at Al-Shabab Club Stadium, Al Shabab have gone 3W 3D 4L this season (10 games, 1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Al Shabab are significantly better at Al-Shabab Club Stadium than their overall form suggests.
Across all Pro League games this season, NEOM have recorded 4W 2D 4L from 10 outings — 1.40 PPG. Last five: D W L W L. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.80. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for NEOM, so this record blends games from this season and last.
On the road, NEOM have gone 4W 1D 1L from 6 away fixtures this term (2.17 PPG). They are averaging 1.83 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 83% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 2.17 exceeds their overall 1.40 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.
Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour NEOM — 1.00 PPG ahead of the hosts (1.40 vs 0.40). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.
Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.
Trading Patterns
Al Shabab in-play and half-time data (13 games, 6 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 83% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 38% of games.
NEOM in-play and half-time data (13 games, 6 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 83% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Al Shabab 54% and NEOM 77% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al Shabab 23% | NEOM 62%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Al Shabab 1.57 xG and NEOM 1.62 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al Shabab attack 0.965 / defence 1.118 | NEOM attack 1.019 / defence 1.061. League average goals — home 1.531 / away 1.419. Data: 47 Al Shabab games / 13 NEOM games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Al Shabab 37% | Draw 23% | NEOM 39%. Fair-value odds: Al Shabab 2.70 | Draw 4.35 | NEOM 2.56. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 23% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.18. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.18 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (1.57 / 1.62) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.
Summary & Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is NEOM at 39% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 23% draw probability, Draw No Bet on NEOM offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
The Poisson model projects 3.18 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 62% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 63% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Al Shabab 70% | NEOM 83% BTTS from recent games.
The outsider holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Al Shabab vs NEOM | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 15 | Venue: Al-Shabab Club Stadium • Kick-off: Wednesday 14 Jan 2026, 17:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Al Shabab 37% | Draw 23% | NEOM 39% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 62% | BTTS 63% | xG Al Shabab 1.57 / NEOM 1.62 • Poisson strength factors: Al Shabab attack 0.965 / def 1.118 | NEOM attack 1.019 / def 1.061 | league avg home 1.531 / away 1.419 • Poisson stance: NEOM (39%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.57
Al Shabab xG
Expected Goals
1.62
NEOM xG
63%
BTTS
83%
Over 1.5
62%
Over 2.5
39%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Al Shabab vs NEOM kick off?
Al Shabab vs NEOM kicked off at 17:30 on Wednesday 14 January 2026 at Al-Shabab Club Stadium.
What was the final score in Al Shabab vs NEOM?
Al Shabab 3 - 2 NEOM.
Where is Al Shabab vs NEOM being played?
The match is being played at Al-Shabab Club Stadium.
What competition is Al Shabab vs NEOM part of?
Al Shabab vs NEOM is a Regular Season - 15 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).
Who is favourite to win Al Shabab vs NEOM?
Our statistical model gives Al Shabab a 37% chance of winning, NEOM a 39% chance, and a 23% chance of a draw — making NEOM the favourite.
Will both teams score in Al Shabab vs NEOM?
Our model estimates a 63% probability that both Al Shabab and NEOM will score (BTTS).
Will Al Shabab vs NEOM have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 62%.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and NEOM?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are Al Shabab and NEOM in?
Al Shabab (all comps): 0W-4D-6L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.60 | L5 D-L-L-L-L. NEOM (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.80 | L5 D-W-L-W-L.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
Working from Al Shabab's attack rating (0.96) and NEOM's defence rating (1.06), the model arrives at 1.57 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, NEOM's attack versus Al Shabab's defence, projects 1.62 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 47/13 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.9%. Close behind: 1-2 (8.5%), 2-1 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
NEOM Win
37%
2.69
23%
4.26
39%
2.54
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
10.5%
Draw
Most likely
1 – 2
8.5%
Away win
2 – 1
8.2%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.57
Al Shabab xG
Total xG
3.18
1.62
NEOM xG
2.69
37%
Home win
4.26
23%
Draw
2.54
39%
Away win
Goals Markets
83%
Over 1.5
1.20
17%
Under 1.5
5.88
62%
Over 2.5
1.61
38%
Under 2.5
2.63
39%
Over 3.5
2.56
61%
Under 3.5
1.64
22%
Over 4.5
4.55
78%
Under 4.5
1.28
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
63%
BTTS Yes
1.58
37%
BTTS No
2.73
Clean Sheet
20%
5.03
21%
4.79
Win to Nil
7%
13.53
8%
12.19
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.1 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 | 6.5 | 10.5 | 8.5 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 2 | 5.1 | 8.2 | 6.6 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Al Shabab vs NEOM?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.9%.
How many goals are Al Shabab and NEOM expected to score?
The model projects 1.57 expected goals for Al Shabab and 1.62 for NEOM, a combined total of 3.18.
How confident is the prediction model for Al Shabab vs NEOM?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Al Shabab's recent record stands at 1W 5D 7L from 13 games, a 0.62 PPG return, with D-L-L-L-L in the last five. The sample for Al Shabab is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
NEOM, meanwhile, have gone 6W 2D 5L across 13 games — 1.54 PPG, with D-W-L-W-L in their last five. The sample for NEOM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
The points-per-game comparison favours NEOM by 0.92 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Al Shabab heading into this one.
Home Ground vs the Road
At home specifically, Al Shabab have managed 1W 2D 3L from 6 games — 0.83 PPG in front of their own supporters.
NEOM's away record stands at 4W 1D 1L across 6 trips, a 2.17 PPG haul. That's actually stronger than their 1.54 PPG overall record — NEOM travel well.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, NEOM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
The Goals Picture
Al Shabab are averaging 0.69 goals scored and 1.54 conceded per game recently; NEOM are on 1.38 scored and 1.54 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: NEOM in 77%.
Last 13 Results — Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Al Shabab
Blended
NEOM
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Al Shabab and NEOM in coming into this match?
Al Shabab have gone 1W 5D 7L in their last 13 games (0.62 PPG), while NEOM have gone 6W 2D 5L in their last 13 (1.54 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Al Shabab at home or NEOM away?
NEOM's away record (2.17 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Al Shabab at home: 0.83 PPG; NEOM away: 2.17 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The fixture history between Al Shabab and NEOM runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to January 2026. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. They last met on 11 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.
Last 2 Meetings
1
Al Shabab
0
Draws
1
NEOM
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and NEOM?
From 2 meetings on record, Al Shabab have won 1, NEOM have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Al Shabab and NEOM last play each other?
They last met on 11 May 2026, when NEOM 2-1 Al Shabab.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
Al Shabab are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches.
NEOM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time.
The Numbers That Matter
Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — Al Shabab at 83%, NEOM at 83%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (Al Shabab) and 67% (NEOM). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 33% and 33% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Al Shabab home games / NEOM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Al Shabab play NEOM?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 83% of Al Shabab's games and 83% of NEOM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Al Shabab vs NEOM usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of Al Shabab's matches and 67% of NEOM's.
Do Al Shabab and NEOM tend to score early?
Al Shabab have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, NEOM in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Shock result as Al Shabab defy the odds to beat NEOM 3-2.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Al Shabab beat NEOM 3-2 at Al-Shabab Club Stadium, Regular Season - 15, in the Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Al Shabab 1.57 xG and NEOM 1.62 xG, a combined 3.18. The scoreboard read 3-2 for 5 actual goals. Al Shabab beat their projection by 1.4 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al Shabab attack 0.96 / defence 1.12 against NEOM attack 1.02 / defence 1.06, drawn from 47/13 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Al Shabab 37% | Draw 23% | NEOM 39%, with NEOM to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual Al Shabab win had been the model's second-ranked read at 37%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 83% and landed. Over 3.5 was 39% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 42% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al Shabab 23%, NEOM 62%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 65%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Al Shabab's trading profile (13 games, 6 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did.
NEOM's trading profile (13 games, 6 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 77% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
On form, NEOM arrived the stronger side — 1.54 PPG against 0.62. Form was overturned, with Al Shabab winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Al Shabab (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.17 average — above their attacking norm. NEOM (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.33 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.