Sign in Register

Chelsea 0-1 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 4

Kick-off

Sat 2 Sep 2023

15:00

Venue

Stamford Bridge

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Chelsea at 52%, yet other data sources diverge — this Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chelsea and Nottingham Forest meet at Stamford Bridge in Premier League, Regular Season - 4. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 2 September 2023 at 15:00 UTC.

Current Form

Chelsea's overall Premier League record this term: 2W 3D 5L from 10 games (0.90 PPG). Last five: L D D L W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Chelsea have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Chelsea's form when playing at home: 2W 5D 3L across 10 games at Stamford Bridge this term (1.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

Nottingham Forest (all games): 4W 2D 4L across 10 Premier League outings this term — 1.40 points per game. Last five: W D L W L. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.80. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Nottingham Forest have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Nottingham Forest's away record: 0W 2D 8L from 10 road trips in Premier League this season (0.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.20 is notably below their overall 1.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.90 for Chelsea, 1.40 for Nottingham Forest — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 2 meetings: Chelsea 0W, Nottingham Forest 0W, 2D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 2 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 13 May 2023, ended 2–2 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Chelsea half-time and goal-timing data (41 games, 21 at home): BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (home games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

Nottingham Forest half-time and goal-timing data (41 games, 21 at away): BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chelsea 49% versus Nottingham Forest 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chelsea 44% | Nottingham Forest 49%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chelsea 1.73 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.10 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chelsea attack 0.938 / defence 0.815 | Nottingham Forest attack 0.987 / defence 1.186. League average goals — home 1.550 / away 1.372. Data: 41 Chelsea games / 41 Nottingham Forest games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chelsea 52% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 24%. Fair-value odds: Chelsea 1.92 | Draw 4.17 | Nottingham Forest 4.17. Chelsea hold a narrow Poisson edge at 52% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.83. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.83 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chelsea at 52% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Chelsea if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.83 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 54% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 55% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chelsea 50% | Nottingham Forest 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–2D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.83) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 55% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Chelsea Poisson xG (1.73) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.10) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form only shows ~2.0 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.83 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 4 | Venue: Stamford Bridge • Kick-off: Saturday 2 Sep 2023, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chelsea 52% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 24% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 55% | xG Chelsea 1.73 / Nottingham Forest 1.10 • Poisson strength factors: Chelsea attack 0.938 / def 0.815 | Nottingham Forest attack 0.987 / def 1.186 | league avg home 1.550 / away 1.372 • Poisson stance: Chelsea (52%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.73

Chelsea xG

Expected Goals

1.10

Nottingham Forest xG

52%
24%
24%
Chelsea Draw Nottingham Forest

55%

BTTS

77%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

31%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 2 September 2023 at Stamford Bridge.

What was the final score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea 0 - 1 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Stamford Bridge.

What competition is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest is a Regular Season - 4 fixture in the Premier League (England).

Who is favourite to win Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Chelsea a 52% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 24% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Chelsea the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 55% probability that both Chelsea and Nottingham Forest will score (BTTS).

Will Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Record (2 meetings): Chelsea 0W | Draws 2 | Nottingham Forest 0W.

What form are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest in?

Chelsea (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.80 | L5 L-D-D-L-W. Nottingham Forest (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.80 | L5 W-D-L-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Chelsea's attack at 0.94x the league average against Nottingham Forest's defence at 1.19x — combine the two and it projects 1.73 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Nottingham Forest's attack (0.99x) against Chelsea's defence (0.81x) — and the away total comes out at 1.10.

These ratings are built from 41/41 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.7% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.7%), 2-0 (8.8%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chelsea Win

52%

Chelsea

1.93

24%

Draw

4.21

24%

Nottingham Forest

4.12

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.2%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

10.2%

Home win

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.73

Chelsea xG

Total xG

2.83

1.10

Nottingham Forest xG

52%
24%
24%
ChelseaDrawNottingham Forest

1.93

52%

Home win

4.21

24%

Draw

4.12

24%

Away win

Goals Markets

77%

Over 1.5

1.30

23%

Under 1.5

4.35

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

31%

Over 3.5

3.23

69%

Under 3.5

1.45

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

55%

BTTS Yes

1.82

45%

BTTS No

2.22

Clean Sheet

33%

Chelsea

3.02

18%

Nottingham Forest

5.62

Win to Nil

17%

Chelsea

5.81

4%

Nottingham Forest

23.14

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.9 6.5 3.6 1.3 0.4 0.1
1 10.2 11.2 6.2 2.3 0.6 0.1
2 8.8 9.7 5.4 2.0 0.5 0.1
3 5.1 5.6 3.1 1.1 0.3 0.1
4 2.2 2.4 1.3 0.5 0.1
5 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.726
λ Away (xG) 1.104
Total xG 2.830
League avg home goals 1.550
League avg away goals 1.372
Chelsea attack strength 0.938
Chelsea defence strength 0.815
Nottingham Forest attack strength 0.987
Nottingham Forest defence strength 1.186
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 41 / 41

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.7%.

How many goals are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.73 expected goals for Chelsea and 1.10 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 2.83.

How confident is the prediction model for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 52%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Chelsea come into this having played 41 games, going 12W 12D 17L for 1.17 points per game. Their last five reads L-D-D-L-W. It's still early in the season for Chelsea, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

On the other side, Nottingham Forest sit at 1.00 PPG from 41 outings (10W 11D 20L), a run that reads W-D-L-W-L across their last five. It's still early in the season for Nottingham Forest, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.17 PPG for Chelsea against 1.00 for Nottingham Forest. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

Chelsea's home form reads 7W 8D 6L across 21 games on their own ground, a 1.38 PPG return.

Away from home, Nottingham Forest have taken 0.38 points per game from 21 outings (1W 5D 15L). That's a step down from their 1.00 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Nottingham Forest's season.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chelsea come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chelsea are averaging 1.05 goals scored and 1.24 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.05 scored and 1.80 conceded.

Last 41 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chelsea

Chelsea

Early Season
L D D L W
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Early Season
W D L W L
41 Played 41
12/12/17 W / D / L 10/11/20
1.17 Points Per Game 1.00
1.05 Avg Goals Scored 1.05
1.24 Avg Goals Conceded 1.80
2.29 Avg Goals / Game 2.85
11 Clean Sheets 8
20 BTTS 22
18 Over 2.5 Games 20
Chelsea

Chelsea

W
H Luton
3–0
25 Aug
L
A West Ham
1–3
20 Aug
D
H Liverpool
1–1
13 Aug
D
H Newcastle
1–1
28 May
L
A Manchester United
1–4
25 May
L
A Manchester City
0–1
21 May
D
H Nottingham Forest
2–2
13 May
W
A Bournemouth
3–1
06 May
L
A Arsenal
1–3
02 May
L
H Brentford
0–2
26 Apr
L
H Brighton
1–2
15 Apr
L
A Wolves
0–1
08 Apr
D
H Liverpool
0–0
04 Apr
L
H Aston Villa
0–2
01 Apr
D
H Everton
2–2
18 Mar
W
A Leicester
3–1
11 Mar
W
H Leeds
1–0
04 Mar
L
A Tottenham
0–2
26 Feb
L
H Southampton
0–1
18 Feb
D
A West Ham
1–1
11 Feb
D
H Fulham
0–0
03 Feb
D
A Liverpool
0–0
21 Jan
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
15 Jan
L
A Fulham
1–2
12 Jan
L
H Manchester City
0–1
05 Jan
D
A Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Jan
W
H Bournemouth
2–0
27 Dec
L
A Newcastle
0–1
12 Nov
L
H Arsenal
0–1
06 Nov
L
A Brighton
1–4
29 Oct
D
H Manchester United
1–1
22 Oct
D
A Brentford
0–0
19 Oct
W
A Aston Villa
2–0
16 Oct
W
H Wolves
3–0
08 Oct
W
A Crystal Palace
2–1
01 Oct
W
H West Ham
2–1
03 Sep
L
A Southampton
1–2
30 Aug
W
H Leicester
2–1
27 Aug
L
A Leeds
0–3
21 Aug
D
H Tottenham
2–2
14 Aug
W
A Everton
1–0
06 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

L
A Manchester United
2–3
26 Aug
W
H Sheffield Utd
2–1
18 Aug
L
A Arsenal
1–2
12 Aug
D
A Crystal Palace
1–1
28 May
W
H Arsenal
1–0
20 May
D
A Chelsea
2–2
13 May
W
H Southampton
4–3
08 May
L
A Brentford
1–2
29 Apr
W
H Brighton
3–1
26 Apr
L
A Liverpool
2–3
22 Apr
L
H Manchester United
0–2
16 Apr
L
A Aston Villa
0–2
08 Apr
L
A Leeds
1–2
04 Apr
D
H Wolves
1–1
01 Apr
L
H Newcastle
1–2
17 Mar
L
A Tottenham
1–3
11 Mar
D
H Everton
2–2
05 Mar
L
A West Ham
0–4
25 Feb
D
H Manchester City
1–1
18 Feb
L
A Fulham
0–2
11 Feb
W
H Leeds
1–0
05 Feb
D
A Bournemouth
1–1
21 Jan
W
H Leicester
2–0
14 Jan
W
A Southampton
1–0
04 Jan
D
H Chelsea
1–1
01 Jan
L
A Manchester United
0–3
27 Dec
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
12 Nov
D
H Brentford
2–2
05 Nov
L
A Arsenal
0–5
30 Oct
W
H Liverpool
1–0
22 Oct
D
A Brighton
0–0
18 Oct
L
A Wolves
0–1
15 Oct
D
H Aston Villa
1–1
10 Oct
L
A Leicester
0–4
03 Oct
L
H Fulham
2–3
16 Sep
L
H Bournemouth
2–3
03 Sep
L
A Manchester City
0–6
31 Aug
L
H Tottenham
0–2
28 Aug
D
A Everton
1–1
20 Aug
W
H West Ham
1–0
14 Aug
L
A Newcastle
0–2
06 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Chelsea have gone 12W 12D 17L in their last 41 games (1.17 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 10W 11D 20L in their last 41 (1.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chelsea at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Chelsea's home record (1.38 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chelsea at home: 1.38 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 0.38 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since January 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. They last met on 4 May 2026, roughly 3 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Chelsea won 0-3 on 18 Oct 2025, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chelsea have gone 0W 2D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Nottingham Forest — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Chelsea

3

Chelsea

3

Draws

Nottingham Forest

2

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Chelsea
1–3
04 May 26
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
0–3
18 Oct 25
Chelsea
Nottingham Forest
0–1
25 May 25
Chelsea
Chelsea
1–1
06 Oct 24
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
2–3
11 May 24
Chelsea
Chelsea
0–1
02 Sep 23
Nottingham Forest
Chelsea
2–2
13 May 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Jan 23
Chelsea

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

From 8 meetings on record, Chelsea have won 3, Nottingham Forest have won 2, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Chelsea and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

They last met on 4 May 2026, when Chelsea 1-3 Nottingham Forest.

Who has won more matches between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chelsea 43%, Nottingham Forest 48% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 38% (Chelsea) and 57% (Nottingham Forest).

On the defensive side: Chelsea keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches; Chelsea have failed to score in 33% of games; Nottingham Forest in 48%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chelsea home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chelsea Chelsea Early Season
Metric All
(41 games)
Venue
(21 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT β€” β€”
2+ Goals Before HT β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT β€” β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) β€” β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) β€” β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 20/41
(48.8%)
9/21
(42.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 18/41
(43.9%)
8/21
(38.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 9/41
(22%)
3/21
(14.3%)
Clean Sheet 11/41
(26.8%)
7/21
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 14/41
(34.1%)
7/21
(33.3%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Early Season
Metric All
(41 games)
Venue
(21 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT β€” β€”
2+ Goals Before HT β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT β€” β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) β€” β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) β€” β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/41
(53.7%)
10/21
(47.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/41
(48.8%)
12/21
(57.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/41
(34.1%)
8/21
(38.1%)
Clean Sheet 8/41
(19.5%)
2/21
(9.5%)
Failed to Score 12/41
(29.3%)
10/21
(47.6%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chelsea play Nottingham Forest?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 43% of Chelsea's recent matches and 48% of Nottingham Forest's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 38% of Chelsea's recent games and 57% of Nottingham Forest's, pointing to a tighter contest.

📰

Shock result as Nottingham Forest defy the odds to beat Chelsea 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Nottingham Forest beat Chelsea 0-1 at Stamford Bridge, Regular Season - 4, in the Premier League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chelsea 1.73 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.10 xG, a combined 2.83. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Chelsea fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chelsea attack 0.94 / defence 0.81 against Nottingham Forest attack 0.99 / defence 1.19, drawn from 41/41 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chelsea 52% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 24%, with Chelsea to win its most likely call at 52%. Instead the game produced a Nottingham Forest win, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chelsea 44%, Nottingham Forest 49%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chelsea's trading profile (41 games, 21 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 34% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (41 games, 21 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chelsea 1.17 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.00 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Nottingham Forest win broke the near-deadlock. Chelsea (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.14 scoring average — below par going forward. Nottingham Forest (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 2.33 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 55% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 46% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.