RWDM 0-4 Genk – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates Genk at 42%, yet in-form RWDM provide a compelling counter-argument — this RWDM vs Genk fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Edmond Machtensstadion plays host to RWDM versus Genk in Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 1. Kick-off: Saturday 29 July 2023 at 19:45 UTC.
Current Form
RWDM's overall Jupiler Pro League record this term: 7W 2D 1L from 10 games (2.30 PPG). Last five: W D W W W. They are averaging 2.40 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. Defensively, conceding just 0.80 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. RWDM haven't played a Jupiler Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.
RWDM's form when playing at home: 8W 1D 1L across 10 games at Edmond Machtensstadion this term (2.50 PPG). They are averaging 2.50 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
Genk (all games): 4W 3D 3L across 10 Jupiler Pro League outings this term — 1.50 points per game. Last five: L L D W D. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.70. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Genk haven't played a Jupiler Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.
When travelling in Jupiler Pro League this season, Genk have posted 2W 5D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.10 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.
Form favours the hosts. RWDM's 2.30 PPG return is 0.80 points per game ahead of Genk's 1.50 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.
In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — RWDM have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Genk in 80%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.
Trading & In-Play
RWDM — key trading statistics (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 78% of those occasions; they lead at the break 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games).
Genk — key trading statistics (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 94% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; they lead at the break 47% of the time; BTTS occurs in 69% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 47%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — RWDM 62% and Genk 69% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (RWDM 62% | Genk 69%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.41 xG and Genk 1.64 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.850 / defence 1.150 | Genk attack 1.062 / defence 0.978. League average goals — home 1.700 / away 1.343. Data: 0 RWDM games / 34 Genk games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.
Result probabilities: RWDM 32% | Draw 27% | Genk 42%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 3.12 | Draw 3.70 | Genk 2.38. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 59% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.05. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 59% — the 3.05 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.41 / 1.64) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Genk at 42% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form RWDM (2.30 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Genk if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
Poisson projects 3.05 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 59% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.3 goals per game.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: RWDM 60% | Genk 80% BTTS from recent games.
The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (0 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: RWDM vs Genk | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Edmond Machtensstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 29 Jul 2023, 19:45 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 32% | Draw 27% | Genk 42% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 59% | BTTS 62% | xG RWDM 1.41 / Genk 1.64 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.850 / def 1.150 | Genk attack 1.062 / def 0.978 | league avg home 1.700 / away 1.343 • Poisson stance: Genk (42%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.41
RWDM xG
Expected Goals
1.64
Genk xG
62%
BTTS
82%
Over 1.5
59%
Over 2.5
36%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does RWDM vs Genk kick off?
RWDM vs Genk kicked off at 19:45 on Saturday 29 July 2023 at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What was the final score in RWDM vs Genk?
RWDM 0 - 4 Genk.
Where is RWDM vs Genk being played?
The match is being played at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What competition is RWDM vs Genk part of?
RWDM vs Genk is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Genk?
Our statistical model gives RWDM a 32% chance of winning, Genk a 42% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Genk the favourite.
Will both teams score in RWDM vs Genk?
Our model estimates a 62% probability that both RWDM and Genk will score (BTTS).
Will RWDM vs Genk have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 59%.
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Genk?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are RWDM and Genk in?
No current-season fixtures available — form shown from previous season data. RWDM (all comps): 7W-2D-1L in 10 | 2.30 PPG | GF 2.40 / GA 0.80 | L5 W-D-W-W-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
The model rates RWDM's attack at 0.85x the league average against Genk's defence at 0.98x — combine the two and it projects 1.41 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Genk's attack (1.06x) against RWDM's defence (1.15x) — and the away total comes out at 1.64.
These ratings are built from 0/34 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (9.0%), 2-1 (7.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Genk Win
32%
3.16
27%
3.74
42%
2.41
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
10.9%
Draw
Most likely
1 – 2
9.0%
Away win
0 – 1
7.7%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.41
RWDM xG
Total xG
3.05
1.64
Genk xG
3.16
32%
Home win
3.74
27%
Draw
2.41
42%
Away win
Goals Markets
81%
Over 1.5
1.23
19%
Under 1.5
5.26
59%
Over 2.5
1.69
41%
Under 2.5
2.44
36%
Over 3.5
2.78
64%
Under 3.5
1.56
19%
Over 4.5
5.26
81%
Under 4.5
1.23
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
62%
BTTS Yes
1.60
38%
BTTS No
2.66
Clean Sheet
19%
5.16
24%
4.11
Win to Nil
6%
16.28
10%
9.88
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.7 | 7.7 | 6.4 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 1 | 6.7 | 10.9 | 9.0 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.7 |
| 2 | 4.7 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs Genk?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.4%.
How many goals are RWDM and Genk expected to score?
The model projects 1.41 expected goals for RWDM and 1.64 for Genk, a combined total of 3.05.
How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs Genk?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 42%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
RWDM's recent record stands at 21W 6D 5L from 32 games, a 2.16 PPG return, with W-D-W-W-W in the last five. RWDM haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.
Genk, meanwhile, have gone 19W 7D 6L across 32 games — 2.00 PPG, with L-L-D-W-D in their last five. Genk haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 2.16 PPG for RWDM against 2.00 for Genk. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
Home & Away Splits
At home specifically, RWDM have managed 12W 3D 1L from 16 games — 2.44 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Genk's away record stands at 7W 5D 4L across 16 trips, a 1.62 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
RWDM are averaging 2.03 goals scored and 0.91 conceded per game recently; Genk are on 2.09 scored and 1.19 conceded. Genk's attacking output running into RWDM's solid defensive record is the key goals-market tension in this fixture.
On BTTS specifically: RWDM have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games; Genk in 69%.
Last 32 Results — Jupiler Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
RWDM
Pre-Season
Genk
Pre-Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are RWDM and Genk in coming into this match?
RWDM have gone 21W 6D 5L in their last 32 games (2.16 PPG), while Genk have gone 19W 7D 6L in their last 32 (2.00 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or Genk away?
RWDM's home record (2.44 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 2.44 PPG; Genk away: 1.62 PPG.
Have RWDM or Genk been keeping clean sheets recently?
RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their recent games, Genk in 19%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 2 times since July 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Jupiler Pro League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 17 February 2024, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Last 2 Meetings
0
RWDM
0
Draws
2
Genk
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Genk?
From 2 meetings on record, RWDM have won 0, Genk have won 2, and 0 have been drawn.
When did RWDM and Genk last play each other?
They last met on 17 February 2024, when Genk 3-1 RWDM.
Who has won more matches between RWDM and Genk?
Genk have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 81% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 62% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.
Genk are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 94% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 56%, Genk 69% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 62% for RWDM and 62% for Genk. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 50% and 44% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: RWDM keep a clean sheet in 38% of their matches.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = RWDM home games / Genk away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when RWDM play Genk?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of RWDM's games and 69% of Genk's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is RWDM vs Genk usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 62% of RWDM's matches and 62% of Genk's.
Do RWDM and Genk tend to score early?
RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 81% of their recent matches, Genk in 94% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Genk run riot with a 0-4 hammering of RWDM.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Genk beat RWDM 0-4 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Regular Season - 1, in the Jupiler Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.41 xG and Genk 1.64 xG, a combined 3.05. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. RWDM fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Genk outscored their 1.64 projection by 2.4. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 0.85 / defence 1.15 against Genk attack 1.06 / defence 0.98, drawn from 0/34 games (PrevSeason).
On the result, the model split it RWDM 32% | Draw 27% | Genk 42%, with Genk to win its most likely call at 42%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 59%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. Over 3.5 was 36% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 66% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 62%, Genk 69%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 66%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
RWDM's trading profile (32 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Genk's trading profile (32 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 69% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — RWDM 2.16 PPG, Genk 2.00 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Genk win broke the near-deadlock. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.31 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 0.81 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Genk (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.62 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.44 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.