RWDM 1-1 Patro Eisden – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates Patro Eisden at 45%, yet other data sources diverge — this RWDM vs Patro Eisden fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis
Patro Eisden make the trip to Edmond Machtensstadion to face RWDM in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 1. The match kicks off on Saturday 17 August 2024 at 19:00 UTC.
Form & Momentum
RWDM have collected 0.80 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 2W 2D 6L. Last five: W W L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. RWDM haven't played a Challenger Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.
RWDM's home record at Edmond Machtensstadion: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Challenger Pro League appearances (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game.
Patro Eisden's overall Challenger Pro League record this term: 4W 2D 4L from 10 games (1.40 PPG). Last five: D L W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. Patro Eisden haven't played a Challenger Pro League game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.
Patro Eisden away from home this season: 4W 3D 3L from 10 away games — 1.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 6 away clean sheets from 10 games (60%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.
The travelling side arrive in better shape. Patro Eisden are 0.60 PPG clear of RWDM in recent Challenger Pro League fixtures (1.40 vs 0.80). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.
Trading Data
RWDM goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 44%; they fail to score in 34% of games.
Patro Eisden goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 31% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time; they fail to score in 38% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 62% versus Patro Eisden 41%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 66% | Patro Eisden 56%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.11 xG and Patro Eisden 1.44 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.850 / defence 1.150 | Patro Eisden attack 0.869 / defence 0.849. League average goals — home 1.532 / away 1.437. Data: 0 RWDM games / 30 Patro Eisden games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.
Result probabilities: RWDM 29% | Draw 26% | Patro Eisden 45%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 3.45 | Draw 3.85 | Patro Eisden 2.22. Patro Eisden hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (26%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.54. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.54 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates Patro Eisden as the most likely outcome at 45% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Patro Eisden if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
On the goals line, Poisson's 2.54 combined xG gives a 47% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 51%. This conflicts with form data: RWDM 50% | Patro Eisden 20% from recent games — a notable divergence.
The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (0 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: RWDM vs Patro Eisden | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Edmond Machtensstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 17 Aug 2024, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 29% | Draw 26% | Patro Eisden 45% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 47% | BTTS 51% | xG RWDM 1.11 / Patro Eisden 1.44 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.850 / def 1.150 | Patro Eisden attack 0.869 / def 0.849 | league avg home 1.532 / away 1.437 • Poisson stance: Patro Eisden (45%) — moderate lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.11
RWDM xG
Expected Goals
1.44
Patro Eisden xG
51%
BTTS
72%
Over 1.5
47%
Over 2.5
25%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does RWDM vs Patro Eisden kick off?
RWDM vs Patro Eisden kicked off at 19:00 on Saturday 17 August 2024 at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What was the final score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
RWDM 1 - 1 Patro Eisden.
Where is RWDM vs Patro Eisden being played?
The match is being played at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What competition is RWDM vs Patro Eisden part of?
RWDM vs Patro Eisden is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
Our statistical model gives RWDM a 29% chance of winning, Patro Eisden a 45% chance, and a 26% chance of a draw — making Patro Eisden the favourite.
Will both teams score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
Our model estimates a 51% probability that both RWDM and Patro Eisden will score (BTTS).
Will RWDM vs Patro Eisden have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 47%.
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Patro Eisden?
No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.
What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?
No current-season fixtures available — form shown from previous season data. RWDM (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 2.00 | L5 W-W-L-L-L.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from RWDM's attack rating (0.85) and Patro Eisden's defence rating (0.85), the model arrives at 1.11 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Patro Eisden's attack (0.87x) against RWDM's defence (1.15x) — and the away total comes out at 1.44.
These ratings are built from 0/30 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 14.1%. Close behind: 0-1 (9.7%), 0-0 (9.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 33% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Patro Eisden Win
29%
3.44
26%
3.80
45%
2.24
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
12.5%
Draw
Most likely
0 – 1
11.3%
Away win
1 – 2
9.0%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.11
RWDM xG
Total xG
2.54
1.44
Patro Eisden xG
3.44
29%
Home win
3.80
26%
Draw
2.24
45%
Away win
Goals Markets
72%
Over 1.5
1.39
28%
Under 1.5
3.57
47%
Over 2.5
2.13
53%
Under 2.5
1.89
25%
Over 3.5
4.00
75%
Under 3.5
1.33
11%
Over 4.5
9.09
89%
Under 4.5
1.12
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
51%
BTTS Yes
1.96
49%
BTTS No
2.04
Clean Sheet
24%
4.20
33%
3.02
Win to Nil
7%
14.47
15%
6.77
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7.9 | 11.3 | 8.1 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 | 8.7 | 12.5 | 9.0 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| 2 | 4.8 | 6.9 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · White ring = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.1%.
How many goals are RWDM and Patro Eisden expected to score?
The model projects 1.11 expected goals for RWDM and 1.44 for Patro Eisden, a combined total of 2.54.
How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
RWDM come into this having played 32 games, going 5W 9D 18L for 0.75 points per game. Their last five reads W-W-L-L-L. RWDM haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.
On the other side, Patro Eisden sit at 1.59 PPG from 32 outings (14W 9D 9L), a run that reads D-L-W-L-L across their last five. Patro Eisden haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.
Patro Eisden carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.84 PPG clear of RWDM — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.
Home & Away Splits
RWDM's home form reads 3W 6D 7L across 16 games on their own ground, a 0.94 PPG return.
Away from home, Patro Eisden have taken 1.50 points per game from 16 outings (6W 6D 4L).
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Patro Eisden come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
RWDM are averaging 1.09 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game recently; Patro Eisden are on 1.28 scored and 1.06 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: RWDM have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.
Defensively: Patro Eisden in 41% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 32 Results — Challenger Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
RWDM
Pre-Season
Patro Eisden
Pre-Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in coming into this match?
RWDM have gone 5W 9D 18L in their last 32 games (0.75 PPG), while Patro Eisden have gone 14W 9D 9L in their last 32 (1.59 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or Patro Eisden away?
Patro Eisden's away record (1.50 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 0.94 PPG; Patro Eisden away: 1.50 PPG.
Have RWDM or Patro Eisden been keeping clean sheets recently?
RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 12% of their recent games, Patro Eisden in 41%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 4 times since August 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 24 January 2026, roughly 6 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
There's a clear current trend here: Patro Eisden have taken the last 2 head-to-head results.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, RWDM have gone 0W 1D 1L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Patro Eisden — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 4 Meetings
0
RWDM
2
Draws
2
Patro Eisden
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Patro Eisden?
From 4 meetings on record, RWDM have won 0, Patro Eisden have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.
When did RWDM and Patro Eisden last play each other?
They last met on 24 January 2026, when RWDM 2-4 Patro Eisden.
Who has won more matches between RWDM and Patro Eisden?
Patro Eisden have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 4 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 81% of their matches.
Patro Eisden see a goal before the break in 50% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 31% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 62%, Patro Eisden 31% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 56% (RWDM) and 38% (Patro Eisden).
On the defensive side: Patro Eisden in 56%; RWDM have failed to score in 31% of games; Patro Eisden in 44%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = RWDM home games / Patro Eisden away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when RWDM play Patro Eisden?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 62% of RWDM's recent matches and 31% of Patro Eisden's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is RWDM vs Patro Eisden usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 56% of RWDM's recent games and 38% of Patro Eisden's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do RWDM and Patro Eisden tend to score early?
RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 81% of their recent matches, Patro Eisden in 50% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
RWDM and Patro Eisden share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
RWDM and Patro Eisden finished level at 1-1 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Regular Season - 1, in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.11 xG and Patro Eisden 1.44 xG, a combined 2.54. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 0.85 / defence 1.15 against Patro Eisden attack 0.87 / defence 0.85, drawn from 0/30 games (PrevSeason).
On the result, the model split it RWDM 29% | Draw 26% | Patro Eisden 45%, with Patro Eisden to win its most likely call at 45%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 47%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 72% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 61% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 66%, Patro Eisden 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
RWDM's trading profile (32 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.
Patro Eisden's trading profile (32 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
On form, Patro Eisden arrived the stronger side — 1.59 PPG against 0.75. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. RWDM (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.81 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.