Sign in Register

Ham-Kam 2-1 Viking – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eliteserien · Regular Season - 1

Kick-off

Sat 14 Mar 2026

15:00

Venue

Briskeby Arena

Competition

Eliteserien

Norway

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Ham-Kam at 47%, yet in-form Viking provide a compelling counter-argument — this Ham-Kam vs Viking fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Briskeby Arena plays host to Ham-Kam versus Viking in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 1. Kick-off: Saturday 14 March 2026 at 15:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Ham-Kam have collected 1.60 PPG across 10 Eliteserien outings this season: 5W 1D 4L. Last five: W W L W L. They are averaging 2.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Ham-Kam's home record at Briskeby Arena: 5W 2D 3L from 10 Eliteserien appearances (1.70 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Viking's overall Eliteserien record this term: 8W 2D 0L from 10 games (2.60 PPG). Last five: W W W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.80 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

On the road, Viking have gone 6W 3D 1L from 10 away fixtures this term (2.10 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 2.10 is notably below their overall 2.60 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

On a straight form reading, Viking are the stronger side — 1.00 PPG clear of the hosts (2.60 vs 1.60). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — Ham-Kam register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant games, Viking in 80%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

Head-to-Head

Viking hold the superior head-to-head record in this fixture, claiming 5 wins from 8 meetings. The hosts have won just 1 times in that span.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 4.6 goals per game across 8 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 8 Nov 2025, ended 0–3 with Viking winning.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Viking have won 5 of 8 previous encounters, and at 4.6 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

Trading

Ham-Kam half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

Viking half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; BTTS occurs in 73% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 48%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ham-Kam 48% versus Viking 68%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ham-Kam 50% | Viking 68%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.86 xG and Viking 1.47 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 1.057 / defence 0.960 | Viking attack 1.115 / defence 0.906. League average goals — home 1.945 / away 1.371. Data: 30 Ham-Kam games / 30 Viking games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 47% | Draw 22% | Viking 31%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 2.13 | Draw 4.55 | Viking 3.23. Ham-Kam hold a narrow Poisson edge at 47% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.33. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.33 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.86 / 1.47) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Ham-Kam as the most likely outcome at 47% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Viking (2.60 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 22% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Ham-Kam if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.33 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 65% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.6 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 65% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Ham-Kam 70% | Viking 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (30 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Viking have been the dominant side historically, winning 5 of 8 meetings.
H2H H2H history favours Viking but Poisson model leans Ham-Kam — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H (4.62 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.33) both back Over 2.5 goals (65% Poisson probability).
Form Viking lead on PPG: 2.60 vs 1.60 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Viking Poisson xG (1.47) is below their form scoring rate (1.90) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Ham-Kam 7/10, Viking 8/10) and Poisson model (65%).
Form Form (PPG) favours Viking but Poisson leans Ham-Kam (47%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 65% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.
Market Poisson model is using prior-season data only (30/30 games) — current-season form data is limited; weight form and market signals more heavily for this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Ham-Kam vs Viking | Competition: Eliteserien, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Briskeby Arena • Kick-off: Saturday 14 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Ham-Kam 47% | Draw 22% | Viking 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 65% | BTTS 65% | xG Ham-Kam 1.86 / Viking 1.47 • Poisson strength factors: Ham-Kam attack 1.057 / def 0.960 | Viking attack 1.115 / def 0.906 | league avg home 1.945 / away 1.371 • Poisson stance: Ham-Kam (47%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.86

Ham-Kam xG

Expected Goals

1.47

Viking xG

47%
22%
31%
Ham-Kam Draw Viking

65%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

65%

Over 2.5

43%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Ham-Kam vs Viking kick off?

Ham-Kam vs Viking kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 14 March 2026 at Briskeby Arena.

What was the final score in Ham-Kam vs Viking?

Ham-Kam 2 - 1 Viking.

Where is Ham-Kam vs Viking being played?

The match is being played at Briskeby Arena.

What competition is Ham-Kam vs Viking part of?

Ham-Kam vs Viking is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the Eliteserien (Norway).

Who is favourite to win Ham-Kam vs Viking?

Our statistical model gives Ham-Kam a 47% chance of winning, Viking a 31% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Ham-Kam the favourite.

Will both teams score in Ham-Kam vs Viking?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Ham-Kam and Viking will score (BTTS).

Will Ham-Kam vs Viking have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 65%.

What is the head-to-head record between Ham-Kam and Viking?

Record (8 meetings): Ham-Kam 1W | Draws 2 | Viking 5W.

What form are Ham-Kam and Viking in?

Ham-Kam (all comps): 5W-1D-4L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 1.30 | L5 W-W-L-W-L. Viking (all comps): 8W-2D-0L in 10 | 2.60 PPG | GF 2.80 / GA 0.90 | L5 W-W-W-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Ham-Kam's attacking strength (1.06x league average) is weighed against Viking's defensive record (0.91x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.86. Flip it around — Viking's attack (1.11x) against Ham-Kam's defence (0.96x) — and the away total comes out at 1.47.

These ratings are built from 30/30 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.1%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 1-2 (7.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 27% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Ham-Kam Win

47%

Ham-Kam

2.13

22%

Draw

4.45

31%

Viking

3.27

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.8%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.1%

Home win

1 – 2

7.2%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.86

Ham-Kam xG

Total xG

3.33

1.47

Viking xG

47%
22%
31%
Ham-KamDrawViking

2.13

47%

Home win

4.45

22%

Draw

3.27

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

65%

Over 2.5

1.54

35%

Under 2.5

2.86

43%

Over 3.5

2.33

57%

Under 3.5

1.75

24%

Over 4.5

4.17

76%

Under 4.5

1.32

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.54

35%

BTTS No

2.86

Clean Sheet

23%

Ham-Kam

4.34

16%

Viking

6.44

Win to Nil

11%

Ham-Kam

9.24

5%

Viking

21.07

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.6 5.3 3.9 1.9 0.7 0.2
1 6.7 9.8 7.2 3.5 1.3 0.4
2 6.2 9.1 6.7 3.3 1.2 0.4
3 3.9 5.7 4.1 2.0 0.7 0.2
4 1.8 2.6 1.9 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.862
λ Away (xG) 1.468
Total xG 3.330
League avg home goals 1.945
League avg away goals 1.371
Ham-Kam attack strength 1.057
Ham-Kam defence strength 0.960
Viking attack strength 1.115
Viking defence strength 0.906
Data phase PrevSeason
Games used (H/A) 30 / 30

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Ham-Kam vs Viking?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.1%.

How many goals are Ham-Kam and Viking expected to score?

The model projects 1.86 expected goals for Ham-Kam and 1.47 for Viking, a combined total of 3.33.

How confident is the prediction model for Ham-Kam vs Viking?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 47%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 60 outings, Ham-Kam have picked up 1.17 PPG on a 18W 16D 26L record — W-W-L-W-L across the most recent five.

Viking's form line: 38W 14D 8L from 60 games, 2.13 PPG, last five W-W-W-W-W.

Put side by side, Viking are the form team by 0.96 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Ham-Kam.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Ham-Kam have posted 1.33 PPG from 30 outings (11W 7D 12L).

On the road, Viking have gone 16W 8D 6L from 30 away games — 1.87 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Viking come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Ham-Kam are averaging 1.27 goals scored and 1.43 conceded per game recently; Viking are on 2.30 scored and 1.25 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Viking in 68%.

Last 60 Results — Eliteserien

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

Current Season
W W L W L
Viking

Viking

Current Season
W W W W W
60 Played 60
18/16/26 W / D / L 38/14/8
1.17 Points Per Game 2.13
1.27 Avg Goals Scored 2.30
1.43 Avg Goals Conceded 1.25
2.70 Avg Goals / Game 3.55
12 Clean Sheets 17
29 BTTS 41
30 Over 2.5 Games 41
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

L
A Brann
1–3 HT 1–2
30 Nov
W
H Haugesund
5–0 HT 5–0
23 Nov
L
A Viking
0–3 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
H Sandefjord
3–1 HT 2–0
02 Nov
W
A Kristiansund BK
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Oct
W
H Valerenga
2–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
D
A Fredrikstad
1–1 HT 1–0
05 Oct
W
H Rosenborg
4–0 HT 3–0
28 Sep
L
A Tromso
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
H Stromsgodset
1–2 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
1–3 HT 0–1
31 Aug
D
A KFUM Oslo
2–2 HT 1–0
22 Aug
W
H Bryne
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
L
A Molde
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Aug
L
H Bodo/Glimt
1–3 HT 0–2
03 Aug
W
A Haugesund
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Jul
D
H Fredrikstad
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Jul
L
A Rosenborg
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Jul
D
H Brann
1–1 HT 1–0
05 Jul
D
A Bryne
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Jun
L
H Tromso
1–3 HT 0–2
22 Jun
W
A Stromsgodset
3–0 HT 1–0
31 May
W
H Molde
2–1 HT 1–1
25 May
D
A Valerenga
1–1 HT 1–1
16 May
L
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
0–4 HT 0–1
11 May
D
H KFUM Oslo
0–0 HT 0–0
02 May
L
A Sandefjord
0–2 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
H Viking
2–5 HT 0–4
21 Apr
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–1
05 Apr
W
H Kristiansund BK
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Mar
L
H KFUM Oslo
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Fredrikstad
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Rosenborg
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Nov
D
A Tromso
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
W
H Kristiansund BK
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
L
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
0–2 HT 0–2
20 Oct
D
A Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
W
H Lillestrom
5–0 HT 4–0
21 Sep
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
H Sandefjord
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Sep
L
A Molde
0–3 HT 0–1
25 Aug
W
H ODD Ballklubb
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
A Haugesund
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
D
H Viking
3–3 HT 0–1
04 Aug
L
H Fredrikstad
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
D
H Tromso
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Jun
L
H Brann
1–2 HT 0–1
01 Jun
L
A Viking
0–3 HT 0–2
26 May
W
H Bodo/Glimt
1–0 HT 1–0
20 May
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
7–1 HT 5–0
16 May
D
H Haugesund
2–2 HT 1–0
12 May
D
A Kristiansund BK
1–1 HT 1–1
05 May
D
A Lillestrom
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Apr
L
H Stromsgodset
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
L
A Brann
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
A Rosenborg
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
H Molde
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Apr
D
A KFUM Oslo
1–1 HT 1–0
02 Apr
Viking

Viking

W
H Valerenga
5–1 HT 3–0
30 Nov
W
A Fredrikstad
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Stromsgodset
2–1 HT 2–1
02 Nov
W
H Bryne
5–1 HT 2–0
25 Oct
W
A Tromso
3–1 HT 1–1
19 Oct
W
H Brann
3–0 HT 2–0
05 Oct
D
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–3 HT 3–1
27 Sep
W
H Molde
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A KFUM Oslo
2–2 HT 1–2
14 Sep
W
H Rosenborg
2–1 HT 1–0
31 Aug
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 0–1
10 Aug
W
A Bryne
3–1 HT 1–0
27 Jul
L
H Bodo/Glimt
2–4 HT 2–3
19 Jul
L
A Brann
1–3 HT 0–2
13 Jul
W
H Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Jul
D
A Rosenborg
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Jun
W
H Fredrikstad
3–0 HT 1–0
22 Jun
W
A Molde
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Jun
W
A Bodo/Glimt
4–2 HT 1–2
28 May
W
A Kristiansund BK
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
W
H Sandefjord
3–1 HT 0–0
16 May
W
A Haugesund
4–1 HT 2–0
11 May
D
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
W
H Haugesund
5–1 HT 2–1
30 Apr
D
H Tromso
4–4 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
A Ham-Kam
5–2 HT 4–0
21 Apr
W
H Kristiansund BK
3–1 HT 0–1
10 Apr
W
H KFUM Oslo
3–1 HT 1–1
06 Apr
L
A Valerenga
1–3 HT 0–1
30 Mar
D
A Brann
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Dec
W
H Haugesund
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Nov
W
A Kristiansund BK
1–0 HT 1–0
10 Nov
W
H Sandefjord
3–2 HT 2–2
02 Nov
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Oct
D
H ODD Ballklubb
3–3 HT 1–2
20 Oct
W
A Lillestrom
4–1 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Fredrikstad
2–3 HT 0–2
22 Sep
W
H KFUM Oslo
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
D
A Tromso
2–2 HT 0–2
01 Sep
W
H Stromsgodset
5–2 HT 2–1
25 Aug
L
A Rosenborg
1–2 HT 0–2
18 Aug
D
H Bodo/Glimt
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Aug
D
A Ham-Kam
3–3 HT 1–0
04 Aug
W
H Molde
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Jul
L
A Haugesund
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Kristiansund BK
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Jul
W
A KFUM Oslo
2–1 HT 0–1
07 Jul
W
H Rosenborg
4–2 HT 1–0
30 Jun
D
A Molde
2–2 HT 1–1
02 Jun
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 2–0
26 May
W
A Sandefjord
3–0 HT 1–0
20 May
L
H Lillestrom
1–4 HT 0–3
16 May
W
A Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
12 May
W
H Tromso
2–1 HT 0–0
05 May
D
A ODD Ballklubb
3–3 HT 1–2
28 Apr
D
H Fredrikstad
1–1 HT 1–1
21 Apr
D
H Brann
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Apr
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Ham-Kam and Viking in coming into this match?

Ham-Kam have gone 18W 16D 26L in their last 60 games (1.17 PPG), while Viking have gone 38W 14D 8L in their last 60 (2.13 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Ham-Kam at home or Viking away?

Viking's away record (1.87 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Ham-Kam at home: 1.33 PPG; Viking away: 1.87 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 9 times since May 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Eliteserien. They last met on 14 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Viking won 7-3 on 30 Apr 2023, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Ham-Kam have gone 2W 1D 2L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Viking — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 9 Meetings

Ham-Kam

2

Ham-Kam

2

Draws

Viking

5

Viking

Recent Meetings

Ham-Kam
2–1
14 Mar 26
Viking
Viking
3–0
08 Nov 25
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
2–5
21 Apr 25
Viking
Ham-Kam
3–3
04 Aug 24
Viking
Viking
3–0
26 May 24
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
3–0
04 Nov 23
Viking
Viking
7–3
30 Apr 23
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
1–2
11 Sep 22
Viking
Viking
1–1
25 May 22
Ham-Kam

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Ham-Kam and Viking?

From 9 meetings on record, Ham-Kam have won 2, Viking have won 5, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Ham-Kam and Viking last play each other?

They last met on 14 March 2026, when Ham-Kam 2-1 Viking.

Who has won more matches between Ham-Kam and Viking?

Viking have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 9 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Ham-Kam are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time.

Viking are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 37% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Ham-Kam 50%, Viking 73% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 50% for Ham-Kam and 70% for Viking. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 33% and 50% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Ham-Kam have failed to score in 27% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Ham-Kam home games / Viking away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Ham-Kam Ham-Kam Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/60
(35%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/14
(85.7%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/14
(28.6%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Winning at HT 18/60
(30%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 9/60
(15%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/60
(48.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/60
(50%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/60
(26.7%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 12/60
(20%)
9/30
(30%)
Failed to Score 21/60
(35%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Viking Viking Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 46/60
(76.7%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 27/60
(45%)
14/30
(46.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/14
(92.9%)
6/6
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/14
(42.9%)
1/6
(16.7%)
Winning at HT 24/60
(40%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 9/60
(15%)
6/30
(20%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 41/60
(68.3%)
22/30
(73.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 41/60
(68.3%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 3.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Clean Sheet 17/60
(28.3%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 3/60
(5%)
2/30
(6.7%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Ham-Kam play Viking?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 50% of Ham-Kam's games and 73% of Viking's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Ham-Kam vs Viking usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of Ham-Kam's matches and 70% of Viking's.

Do Ham-Kam and Viking tend to score early?

Ham-Kam have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, Viking in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Ham-Kam edge out Viking 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Ham-Kam beat Viking 2-1 at Briskeby Arena, Regular Season - 1, in the Eliteserien. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Ham-Kam 1.86 xG and Viking 1.47 xG, a combined 3.33. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Ham-Kam attack 1.06 / defence 0.96 against Viking attack 1.11 / defence 0.91, drawn from 30/30 games (PrevSeason).

On the result, the model split it Ham-Kam 47% | Draw 22% | Viking 31%, with Ham-Kam to win its most likely call at 47%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 65%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 43% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Ham-Kam 50%, Viking 68%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Ham-Kam's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did.

Viking's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 68% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Viking arrived the stronger side — 2.13 PPG against 1.17. Form was overturned, with Ham-Kam winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Viking (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.03 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 65% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 59% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.