Sign in Register

Stockport County 3-0 AFC Wimbledon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League One · Regular Season - 40

Kick-off

Sat 28 Mar 2026

15:00

Venue

Edgeley Park

Competition

League One

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Stockport County at 57% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a League One clash, Regular Season - 40 as Stockport County welcome AFC Wimbledon to Edgeley Park. Kick-off is set for Saturday 28 March 2026 at 15:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all League One games this season, Stockport County have gone 4W 2D 4L from 10 outings — a 1.40 PPG return. Last five: L L L W D. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, Stockport County have posted 6W 2D 2L at Edgeley Park — 2.00 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.40 — Stockport County are significantly better at Edgeley Park than their overall form suggests.

AFC Wimbledon — All Games: 4W 3D 3L from 10 League One fixtures this season — 1.50 PPG. Last five: W W L L D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

AFC Wimbledon's away record: 2W 3D 5L from 10 road trips in League One this season (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 0.90 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.40 PPG (Stockport County) versus 1.50 (AFC Wimbledon). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Stockport County register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant matches, AFC Wimbledon in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 3 wins apiece for Stockport County, 1 for AFC Wimbledon and 0 shared spoils from 4 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.5 per contest from 4 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 1 Apr 2024, ended 1–0 with Stockport County winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.5 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Stockport County in-play tendencies (85 games, 42 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 55% of games (home games).

AFC Wimbledon in-play tendencies (85 games, 42 at away): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 81% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Stockport County 58% versus AFC Wimbledon 40%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Stockport County 48% | AFC Wimbledon 39%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Stockport County 2.09 xG and AFC Wimbledon 1.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Stockport County attack 1.107 / defence 1.083 | AFC Wimbledon attack 1.005 / defence 1.329. League average goals — home 1.420 / away 1.151. AFC Wimbledon bring a strong defensive rating of 1.329 — this is suppressing Stockport County's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 83 Stockport County games / 38 AFC Wimbledon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Stockport County 57% | Draw 21% | AFC Wimbledon 22%. Fair-value odds: Stockport County 1.75 | Draw 4.76 | AFC Wimbledon 4.55. The model has a clear lean to Stockport County (57%) — a 35pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.34. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.34 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (2.09 / 1.25) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Stockport County at 57% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.34 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 65% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.5 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 63% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Stockport County 80% | AFC Wimbledon 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (3W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Stockport County — H2H win rate 75% vs Poisson 57%.
Goals H2H only shows 1.50 goals/game but Poisson xG is 3.34 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Stockport County 8/10, AFC Wimbledon 6/10) and Poisson model (63%).
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Stockport County at 57% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 65% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 63% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon | Competition: League One, Regular Season - 40 | Venue: Edgeley Park • Kick-off: Saturday 28 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Stockport County 57% | Draw 21% | AFC Wimbledon 22% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 65% | BTTS 63% | xG Stockport County 2.09 / AFC Wimbledon 1.25 • Poisson strength factors: Stockport County attack 1.107 / def 1.083 | AFC Wimbledon attack 1.005 / def 1.329 | league avg home 1.420 / away 1.151 • Poisson stance: Stockport County (57%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.09

Stockport County xG

Expected Goals

1.25

AFC Wimbledon xG

57%
21%
22%
Stockport County Draw AFC Wimbledon

63%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

65%

Over 2.5

43%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon kick off?

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 28 March 2026 at Edgeley Park.

What was the final score in Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Stockport County 3 - 0 AFC Wimbledon.

Where is Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon being played?

The match is being played at Edgeley Park.

What competition is Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon part of?

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon is a Regular Season - 40 fixture in the League One (England).

Who is favourite to win Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our statistical model gives Stockport County a 57% chance of winning, AFC Wimbledon a 22% chance, and a 21% chance of a draw — making Stockport County the favourite.

Will both teams score in Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our model estimates a 63% probability that both Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon will score (BTTS).

Will Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 65%.

What is the head-to-head record between Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon?

Record (4 meetings): Stockport County 3W | Draws 0 | AFC Wimbledon 1W.

What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in?

Stockport County (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.50 | L5 L-L-L-W-D. AFC Wimbledon (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 1.90 | L5 W-W-L-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from Stockport County's attack rating (1.11) and AFC Wimbledon's defence rating (1.33), the model arrives at 2.09 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, AFC Wimbledon's attack versus Stockport County's defence, projects 1.25 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 83/38 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 10.4%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.7%), 2-0 (7.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Stockport County Win

57%

Stockport County

1.77

21%

Draw

4.78

22%

AFC Wimbledon

4.46

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

9.2%

Draw

2 – 0

7.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.09

Stockport County xG

Total xG

3.34

1.25

AFC Wimbledon xG

57%
21%
22%
Stockport CountyDrawAFC Wimbledon

1.77

57%

Home win

4.78

21%

Draw

4.46

22%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

65%

Over 2.5

1.54

35%

Under 2.5

2.86

43%

Over 3.5

2.33

57%

Under 3.5

1.75

25%

Over 4.5

4.00

75%

Under 4.5

1.33

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

63%

BTTS Yes

1.60

37%

BTTS No

2.67

Clean Sheet

29%

Stockport County

3.50

12%

AFC Wimbledon

8.09

Win to Nil

16%

Stockport County

6.18

3%

AFC Wimbledon

36.08

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.5 4.4 2.8 1.2 0.4 0.1
1 7.4 9.2 5.8 2.4 0.8 0.2
2 7.7 9.7 6.1 2.5 0.8 0.2
3 5.4 6.7 4.2 1.8 0.6 0.1
4 2.8 3.5 2.2 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 1.2 1.5 0.9 0.4 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.091
λ Away (xG) 1.253
Total xG 3.344
League avg home goals 1.420
League avg away goals 1.151
Stockport County attack strength 1.107
Stockport County defence strength 1.083
AFC Wimbledon attack strength 1.005
AFC Wimbledon defence strength 1.329
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 83 / 38

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.4%.

How many goals are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon expected to score?

The model projects 2.09 expected goals for Stockport County and 1.25 for AFC Wimbledon, a combined total of 3.34.

How confident is the prediction model for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 57%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Stockport County's recent record stands at 42W 23D 20L from 85 games, a 1.75 PPG return, with L-L-L-W-D in the last five.

AFC Wimbledon, meanwhile, have gone 36W 21D 28L across 85 games — 1.52 PPG, with W-W-L-L-D in their last five.

Form-wise this is close to level: Stockport County on 1.75 PPG, AFC Wimbledon on 1.52. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Venue Form

At home specifically, Stockport County have managed 26W 9D 7L from 42 games — 2.07 PPG in front of their own supporters.

AFC Wimbledon's away record stands at 14W 12D 16L across 42 trips, a 1.29 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Stockport County come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Stockport County are averaging 1.48 goals scored and 1.09 conceded per game recently; AFC Wimbledon are on 1.22 scored and 1.01 conceded.

Defensively: AFC Wimbledon in 36% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 85 Results — League One

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Stockport County

Stockport County

Current Season
L L L W D
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

Current Season
W W L L D
85 Played 85
42/23/20 W / D / L 36/21/28
1.75 Points Per Game 1.52
1.48 Avg Goals Scored 1.22
1.09 Avg Goals Conceded 1.01
2.58 Avg Goals / Game 2.24
26 Clean Sheets 31
49 BTTS 34
41 Over 2.5 Games 33
Stockport County

Stockport County

D
A Luton
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Mar
W
H Northampton
2–1 HT 1–1
17 Mar
L
A Lincoln
1–3 HT 0–1
14 Mar
L
A Stevenage
1–2 HT 1–1
28 Feb
L
A Burton Albion
0–3 HT 0–0
24 Feb
W
H Wigan
4–2 HT 2–2
21 Feb
L
A Bradford
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
D
H Leyton Orient
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Feb
W
H Plymouth
2–1 HT 0–1
31 Jan
W
A Blackpool
2–1 HT 2–0
27 Jan
D
A Cardiff
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Jan
W
H Rotherham
3–2 HT 1–1
17 Jan
W
H Huddersfield
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Jan
L
A Reading
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Jan
D
A Northampton
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
W
H Doncaster
4–2 HT 1–1
29 Dec
L
H Lincoln
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
A Mansfield Town
2–1 HT 1–1
20 Dec
L
H Stevenage
1–3 HT 0–1
13 Dec
W
A Doncaster
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Dec
D
H Barnsley
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Nov
L
A Peterborough
0–3 HT 0–2
20 Nov
L
H Luton
0–3 HT 0–2
08 Nov
W
A Port Vale
3–0 HT 3–0
27 Oct
W
H Exeter City
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Oct
W
H Blackpool
1–0 HT 0–0
11 Oct
W
A Huddersfield
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Oct
D
H Reading
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Sep
W
A Rotherham
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
H Cardiff
1–1 HT 1–0
13 Sep
L
A Plymouth
2–4 HT 1–2
06 Sep
D
A Wigan
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Aug
W
H Burton Albion
2–1 HT 0–1
23 Aug
L
H Bradford
1–2 HT 1–0
19 Aug
D
A Leyton Orient
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Aug
W
A Wycombe
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
H Bolton
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Aug
D
H Leyton Orient
1–1 HT 0–1
14 May
D
A Leyton Orient
2–2 HT 0–1
10 May
W
A Wycombe
3–1 HT 0–1
03 May
W
H Lincoln
3–2 HT 0–2
26 Apr
W
H Huddersfield
2–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
D
A Peterborough
1–1 HT 0–1
18 Apr
W
H Rotherham
3–1 HT 1–1
12 Apr
W
A Exeter City
2–0 HT 2–0
05 Apr
W
H Stevenage
3–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
W
H Burton Albion
2–1 HT 1–0
29 Mar
L
A Wrexham
0–1 HT 0–1
22 Mar
W
A Bolton
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
D
H Charlton
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Mar
D
A Northampton
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Mar
W
H Blackpool
2–1 HT 0–1
01 Mar
L
A Cambridge United
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Feb
W
A Wigan
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
D
A Bristol Rovers
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Feb
W
H Barnsley
2–1 HT 2–0
08 Feb
W
A Leyton Orient
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
W
H Shrewsbury
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Jan
W
H Crawley Town
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jan
W
A Reading
3–1 HT 2–0
18 Jan
L
H Mansfield Town
1–2 HT 1–2
04 Jan
D
H Birmingham
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Jan
D
A Rotherham
1–1 HT 1–1
29 Dec
L
A Huddersfield
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
H Peterborough
2–1 HT 1–1
20 Dec
L
A Stevenage
1–2 HT 1–1
14 Dec
W
H Exeter City
2–0 HT 0–0
07 Dec
L
A Birmingham
0–2 HT 0–2
04 Dec
W
A Burton Albion
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Nov
W
H Wrexham
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Nov
W
H Bolton
5–0 HT 1–0
09 Nov
L
H Wycombe
0–5 HT 0–3
05 Nov
W
H Reading
4–1 HT 3–1
29 Oct
L
A Lincoln
1–2 HT 1–1
26 Oct
D
H Northampton
1–1 HT 0–0
22 Oct
D
A Charlton
1–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
D
H Wigan
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
W
A Shrewsbury
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
D
A Barnsley
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
H Leyton Orient
1–4 HT 0–2
21 Sep
D
A Crawley Town
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
D
A Mansfield Town
1–1 HT 1–1
31 Aug
W
H Bristol Rovers
2–0 HT 1–0
24 Aug
W
A Blackpool
3–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
H Cambridge United
2–0 HT 1–0
10 Aug
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

D
H Peterborough
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Mar
L
H Leyton Orient
2–4 HT 2–1
17 Mar
L
A Stevenage
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Mar
W
H Blackpool
4–1 HT 1–0
11 Mar
W
H Northampton
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Mar
D
A Mansfield Town
2–2 HT 1–2
28 Feb
W
H Bradford
3–1 HT 2–0
21 Feb
L
A Cardiff
1–4 HT 1–1
17 Feb
D
A Barnsley
3–3 HT 2–2
14 Feb
W
H Reading
3–2 HT 1–1
07 Feb
W
A Port Vale
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
L
H Bolton
0–1 HT 0–1
31 Jan
D
A Rotherham
1–1 HT 0–0
24 Jan
L
H Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Jan
L
A Wycombe
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jan
W
A Leyton Orient
3–1 HT 1–1
01 Jan
L
H Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Dec
D
H Stevenage
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Dec
L
A Northampton
1–3 HT 1–1
19 Dec
D
H Mansfield Town
0–0 HT 0–0
13 Dec
L
A Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–0
09 Dec
D
A Huddersfield
3–3 HT 1–0
29 Nov
L
H Wigan
1–2 HT 0–0
22 Nov
L
A Peterborough
0–5 HT 0–3
08 Nov
L
H Burton Albion
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Oct
W
A Plymouth
2–1 HT 1–1
18 Oct
D
H Port Vale
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Oct
W
A Blackpool
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Oct
W
H Wycombe
2–1 HT 2–0
27 Sep
W
A Doncaster
2–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
W
H Rotherham
2–1 HT 0–1
13 Sep
L
A Bolton
0–3 HT 0–1
06 Sep
L
A Bradford
2–3 HT 1–1
30 Aug
W
H Barnsley
2–0 HT 1–0
23 Aug
L
H Cardiff
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Aug
W
A Reading
2–1 HT 1–0
16 Aug
W
H Lincoln
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Luton
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Aug
W
H Walsall
1–0 HT 1–0
26 May
W
H Notts County
1–0 HT 1–0
17 May
W
A Notts County
1–0 HT 0–0
10 May
W
A Grimsby
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
L
H Port Vale
0–2 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
D
H Chesterfield
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
D
A Doncaster
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Mar
D
H Barrow
2–2 HT 0–0
22 Mar
W
A Carlisle
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Mar
L
H Cheltenham
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Mar
W
H Notts County
2–0 HT 2–0
08 Mar
L
A Morecambe
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
H Bromley
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
A Colchester
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Feb
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Feb
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
W
H Crewe
3–0 HT 2–0
11 Feb
D
A Accrington ST
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
28 Jan
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
H Tranmere
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Jan
W
A Newport County
2–1 HT 0–0
02 Jan
W
H Gillingham
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Dec
D
H Swindon Town
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
A Chesterfield
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
H Doncaster
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
W
A Harrogate Town
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Dec
D
H Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
03 Dec
W
A Tranmere
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
L
H Walsall
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
H Accrington ST
2–2 HT 0–0
19 Nov
W
A Barrow
3–1 HT 1–1
16 Nov
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Nov
L
A Port Vale
2–3 HT 0–2
26 Oct
W
H Morecambe
3–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
L
A Notts County
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H Carlisle
4–0 HT 3–0
12 Oct
L
A Salford City
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Oct
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
3–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Fleetwood Town
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
W
A Cheltenham
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in coming into this match?

Stockport County have gone 42W 23D 20L in their last 85 games (1.75 PPG), while AFC Wimbledon have gone 36W 21D 28L in their last 85 (1.52 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Stockport County at home or AFC Wimbledon away?

Stockport County's home record (2.07 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Stockport County at home: 2.07 PPG; AFC Wimbledon away: 1.29 PPG.

Have Stockport County or AFC Wimbledon been keeping clean sheets recently?

Stockport County have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their recent games, AFC Wimbledon in 36%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to September 2022. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League Two, League One all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 15 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Streaks & Records

There's a clear current trend here: Stockport County have taken the last 4 head-to-head results.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 28 Mar 2026, when Stockport County won 3-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Stockport County's record when hosting AFC Wimbledon specifically: 3W 0D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Stockport County

5

Stockport County

0

Draws

AFC Wimbledon

1

AFC Wimbledon

Recent Meetings

AFC Wimbledon
0–2
15 Apr 26
Stockport County
Stockport County
3–0
28 Mar 26
AFC Wimbledon
Stockport County
1–0
01 Apr 24
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
1–2
09 Sep 23
Stockport County
AFC Wimbledon
1–0
28 Jan 23
Stockport County
Stockport County
1–0
03 Sep 22
AFC Wimbledon

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon?

From 6 meetings on record, Stockport County have won 5, AFC Wimbledon have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon last play each other?

They last met on 15 April 2026, when AFC Wimbledon 0-2 Stockport County.

Who has won more matches between Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon?

Stockport County have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Stockport County are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 81% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 36% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.

AFC Wimbledon see a goal before the break in 57% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Stockport County 60%, AFC Wimbledon 48% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 55% (Stockport County) and 43% (AFC Wimbledon).

On the defensive side: Stockport County keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches; AFC Wimbledon in 36%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Stockport County home games / AFC Wimbledon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Stockport County Stockport County Current Season
Metric All
(85 games)
Venue
(42 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 67/85
(78.8%)
34/42
(81%)
2+ Goals Before HT 31/85
(36.5%)
14/42
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 14/18
(77.8%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/18
(44.4%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Winning at HT 28/85
(32.9%)
15/42
(35.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/85
(8.2%)
3/42
(7.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 13/85
(15.3%)
7/42
(16.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 49/85
(57.6%)
25/42
(59.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 41/85
(48.2%)
23/42
(54.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/85
(18.8%)
10/42
(23.8%)
Clean Sheet 26/85
(30.6%)
15/42
(35.7%)
Failed to Score 14/85
(16.5%)
5/42
(11.9%)
AFC Wimbledon AFC Wimbledon Current Season
Metric All
(85 games)
Venue
(42 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 49/85
(57.6%)
24/42
(57.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/85
(24.7%)
12/42
(28.6%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 29/36
(80.6%)
14/18
(77.8%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 12/36
(33.3%)
5/18
(27.8%)
Winning at HT 26/85
(30.6%)
8/42
(19%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/85
(7.1%)
3/42
(7.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/85
(3.5%)
1/42
(2.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/85
(40%)
20/42
(47.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/85
(38.8%)
18/42
(42.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/85
(21.2%)
10/42
(23.8%)
Clean Sheet 31/85
(36.5%)
11/42
(26.2%)
Failed to Score 27/85
(31.8%)
15/42
(35.7%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Stockport County play AFC Wimbledon?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 60% of Stockport County's recent matches and 48% of AFC Wimbledon's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 55% of Stockport County's recent games and 43% of AFC Wimbledon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon tend to score early?

Stockport County have had a goal before half-time in 81% of their recent matches, AFC Wimbledon in 57% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Stockport County run riot with a 3-0 hammering of AFC Wimbledon.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Stockport County beat AFC Wimbledon 3-0 at Edgeley Park, Regular Season - 40, in the League One. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Stockport County 2.09 xG and AFC Wimbledon 1.25 xG, a combined 3.34. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Stockport County beat their projection by 0.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. AFC Wimbledon landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Stockport County attack 1.11 / defence 1.08 against AFC Wimbledon attack 1.00 / defence 1.33, drawn from 83/38 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Stockport County 57% | Draw 21% | AFC Wimbledon 22%, with Stockport County to win its most likely call at 57%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 65%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 43% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 44% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Stockport County 48%, AFC Wimbledon 39%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Stockport County's trading profile (85 games, 42 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and duly kept one.

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (85 games, 42 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Stockport County 1.75 PPG, AFC Wimbledon 1.52 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Stockport County win broke the near-deadlock. Stockport County (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.69 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.07 average — tighter than their form line. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.26 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 65% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 63% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 44% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.