Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 20

Kick-off

Sat 29 Oct 2022

12:30

Venue

Wuhan Sports Center Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Wuhan Three Towns at 68%, yet other data sources diverge — this Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns host Chengdu Better City at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 20. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 29 October 2022 at 12:30 UTC.

Form Guide

Wuhan Three Towns — All Games: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 2.20 points per game. Last five: W L L W W. They are averaging 2.70 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Wuhan Three Towns, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 8W 0D 1L this season (9 games, 2.67 PPG). They are averaging 4.33 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 9 games (44%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 56% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 5W 2D 3L from 10 outings — 1.70 PPG. Last five: D L W L D. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Super League this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 7W 0D 3L from 10 away outings — 2.10 PPG. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

Wuhan Three Towns are in the better shape of the two on current Super League data — 0.50 PPG ahead (2.20 vs 1.70). That form margin is the baseline of a sensible selection even before other signals are layered in.

In-Play Data

Wuhan Three Towns trading profile (21 games, 9 at home): they score before half-time in 100% of fixtures in home games; they lead at the break 76% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 100% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 48%; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time.

Chengdu Better City trading profile (21 games, 9 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 33% of the time; BTTS occurs in 33% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (away games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 57% versus Chengdu Better City 48%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 81% | Chengdu Better City 38%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 2.36 xG and Chengdu Better City 0.98 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.872 / defence 1.040 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.728 / defence 0.924. League average goals — home 1.365 / away 1.295. Wuhan Three Towns carry an above-average attack strength of 1.872 — their λ of 2.36 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 21 Wuhan Three Towns games / 21 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 68% | Draw 18% | Chengdu Better City 14%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 1.47 | Draw 5.56 | Chengdu Better City 7.14. The model has a clear lean to Wuhan Three Towns (68%) — a 54pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 57% | Total xG 3.34. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.34 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS probability of 57% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Three Towns at 68% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 18% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 3.34 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 65% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.8 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 57%. Form rates are neutral: Wuhan Three Towns 56% | Chengdu Better City 40%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form Wuhan Three Towns lead on PPG: 2.20 vs 1.70 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (2.36) is below their recent form scoring rate (4.33) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~3.3 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.34) both support Over 2.5 goals at 65%.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Wuhan Three Towns — Wuhan Three Towns at 68% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Wuhan Three Towns at 68% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 65% — the model favours goals in this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 20 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 29 Oct 2022, 12:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 68% | Draw 18% | Chengdu Better City 14% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 65% | BTTS 57% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 2.36 / Chengdu Better City 0.98 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.872 / def 1.040 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.728 / def 0.924 | league avg home 1.365 / away 1.295 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (68%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.36

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

0.98

Chengdu Better City xG

68%
18%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Chengdu Better City

57%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

65%

Over 2.5

43%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 12:30 on Saturday 29 October 2022 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 1 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 20 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 68% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 14% chance, and a 18% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 57% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 65%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 7W-1D-2L in 10 | 2.20 PPG | GF 2.70 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-L-L-W-W. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.00 | L5 D-L-W-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Wuhan Three Towns's attack rating (1.87) and Chengdu Better City's defence rating (0.92), the model arrives at 2.36 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Wuhan Three Towns's defence, projects 0.98 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 21/21 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 9.9%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.7%), 1-1 (9.3%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

68%

Wuhan Three Towns

1.47

18%

Draw

5.52

14%

Chengdu Better City

7.19

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 0

9.9%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

1 – 0

8.4%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.36

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

3.34

0.98

Chengdu Better City xG

68%
18%
14%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawChengdu Better City

1.47

68%

Home win

5.52

18%

Draw

7.19

14%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

65%

Over 2.5

1.54

35%

Under 2.5

2.86

43%

Over 3.5

2.33

57%

Under 3.5

1.75

25%

Over 4.5

4.00

75%

Under 4.5

1.33

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

57%

BTTS Yes

1.76

43%

BTTS No

2.31

Clean Sheet

38%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.66

9%

Chengdu Better City

10.61

Win to Nil

26%

Wuhan Three Towns

3.92

1%

Chengdu Better City

76.29

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.5 3.5 1.7 0.6 0.1
1 8.4 8.2 4.0 1.3 0.3 0.1
2 9.9 9.7 4.7 1.5 0.4 0.1
3 7.8 7.6 3.7 1.2 0.3 0.1
4 4.6 4.5 2.2 0.7 0.2
5 2.2 2.1 1.0 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.362
λ Away (xG) 0.980
Total xG 3.342
League avg home goals 1.365
League avg away goals 1.295
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.872
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 1.040
Chengdu Better City attack strength 0.728
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.924
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 21 / 21

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.9%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 2.36 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 0.98 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 3.34.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 68%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 21 outings, Wuhan Three Towns have picked up 2.52 PPG on a 17W 2D 2L record — W-L-L-W-W across the most recent five. The sample for Wuhan Three Towns is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City's form line: 8W 8D 5L from 21 games, 1.52 PPG, last five D-L-W-L-D. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Wuhan Three Towns are the form team by 1.00 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Chengdu Better City.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Wuhan Three Towns have posted 2.67 PPG from 9 outings (8W 0D 1L).

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 6W 0D 3L from 9 away games — 2.00 PPG when travelling. That's actually stronger than their 1.52 PPG overall record — Chengdu Better City travel well.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 3.00 goals scored and 0.81 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.00 scored and 1.00 conceded. Wuhan Three Towns's scoring rate against Chengdu Better City's tighter defensive record is one of the more interesting match-ups in the goals markets here.

Defensively: Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 43% of their games; Chengdu Better City in 38% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 21 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Blended
W L L W W
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
D L W L D
21 Played 21
17/2/2 W / D / L 8/8/5
2.52 Points Per Game 1.52
3.00 Avg Goals Scored 1.00
0.81 Avg Goals Conceded 1.00
3.81 Avg Goals / Game 2.00
9 Clean Sheets 8
12 BTTS 10
17 Over 2.5 Games 8
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–0 HT 2–0
25 Oct
W
A Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–4 HT 1–2
24 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
28 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–1
22 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
06 Aug
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jul
W
H Wuhan Zall
5–0 HT 2–0
08 Jul
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Jul
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
5–0 HT 3–0
26 Jun
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 2–0
19 Jun
W
A Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 2–0
15 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Jun
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
6–0 HT 2–0
07 Jun
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 2–0
03 Jun
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 17W 2D 2L in their last 21 games (2.52 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 8W 8D 5L in their last 21 (1.52 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Wuhan Three Towns's home record (2.67 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 2.67 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 2.00 PPG.

Have Wuhan Three Towns or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 43% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 38%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City runs to 10 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

Wuhan Three Towns's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 0W 3D 2L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Draws

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

From 10 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 4, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 89% of the time.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 11% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 56%, Chengdu Better City 33% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 100% for Wuhan Three Towns and 44% for Chengdu Better City. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 89% and 0% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns keep a clean sheet in 44% of their matches; Chengdu Better City in 44%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Blended
Metric All
(21 games)
Venue
(9 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 19/21
(90.5%)
9/9
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 13/21
(61.9%)
8/9
(88.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/2
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/2
(50%)
β€”
Winning at HT 16/21
(76.2%)
8/9
(88.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/21
(9.5%)
0/9
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/21
(0%)
0/9
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 12/21
(57.1%)
5/9
(55.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/21
(81%)
9/9
(100%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/21
(47.6%)
8/9
(88.9%)
Clean Sheet 9/21
(42.9%)
4/9
(44.4%)
Failed to Score 0/21
(0%)
0/9
(0%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(21 games)
Venue
(9 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 15/21
(71.4%)
7/9
(77.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 3/21
(14.3%)
1/9
(11.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/6
(33.3%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/6
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
Winning at HT 7/21
(33.3%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/21
(14.3%)
0/9
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/21
(9.5%)
1/9
(11.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 10/21
(47.6%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 8/21
(38.1%)
4/9
(44.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 2/21
(9.5%)
0/9
(0%)
Clean Sheet 8/21
(38.1%)
4/9
(44.4%)
Failed to Score 7/21
(33.3%)
2/9
(22.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 56% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 33% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 100% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 44% of Chengdu Better City's.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 100% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 78% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Chengdu Better City defy the odds to beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Regular Season - 20, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 2.36 xG and Chengdu Better City 0.98 xG, a combined 3.34. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Wuhan Three Towns fell 2.4 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.87 / defence 1.04 against Chengdu Better City attack 0.73 / defence 0.92, drawn from 21/21 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 68% | Draw 18% | Chengdu Better City 14%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 68%. Instead the game produced a Chengdu Better City win, an outcome the model had rated at just 14% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 65%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 85% and missed. Over 3.5 was 43% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 81%, Chengdu Better City 38%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (21 games, 9 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time, and conceded here.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (21 games, 9 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 2.52 PPG against 1.52. Form was overturned, with Chengdu Better City winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 4.33 scoring average — below par going forward. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 65% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 57% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 60% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.