Sign in Register

Hangzhou Greentown 2-2 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 7

Kick-off

Wed 16 Apr 2025

12:00

Venue

Huizhou Olympic Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Hangzhou Greentown at 51% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 7 sees Meizhou Kejia travel to Huizhou Olympic Stadium to take on Hangzhou Greentown. The game is scheduled for Wednesday 16 April 2025, 12:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Hangzhou Greentown stand at 2W 4D 4L from 10 Super League matches — 1.00 PPG. Last five: D L W D D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. However, 2.30 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

At home at Huizhou Olympic Stadium, Hangzhou Greentown have gone 6W 2D 2L this season (10 games, 2.00 PPG). They are averaging 3.20 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — Hangzhou Greentown are significantly better at Huizhou Olympic Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Meizhou Kejia have recorded 3W 1D 6L from 10 outings — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L L D W L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 2.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.30 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Meizhou Kejia's form when playing away from home: 1W 2D 7L across 10 road games this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.70 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.50 is notably below their overall 1.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Hangzhou Greentown at 1.00 PPG versus Meizhou Kejia's 1.00. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

H2H Record

Hangzhou Greentown hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 4 wins from 6 previous encounters compared to 0 for Meizhou Kejia, with 2 draws in between.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 7 Jul 2024, ended 4–0 with Hangzhou Greentown winning.

The historical record gives Hangzhou Greentown a meaningful edge here — 4 wins from 6 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

In-Play Profile

Hangzhou Greentown in-play tendencies (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 77% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

Meizhou Kejia in-play tendencies (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 65% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (away games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Hangzhou Greentown 65% and Meizhou Kejia 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Hangzhou Greentown 77% | Meizhou Kejia 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Hangzhou Greentown 1.97 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.34 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.086 / defence 0.916 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.950 / defence 1.071. League average goals — home 1.697 / away 1.539. Data: 36 Hangzhou Greentown games / 36 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 51% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 24%. Fair-value odds: Hangzhou Greentown 1.96 | Draw 4.00 | Meizhou Kejia 4.17. Hangzhou Greentown hold a narrow Poisson edge at 51% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 64% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.31. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 64% — the 3.31 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.97 / 1.34) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Hangzhou Greentown are the pick at 51% — moderate model lean. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Hangzhou Greentown offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

The Poisson model projects 3.31 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 64% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 4.5 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 65% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Hangzhou Greentown 90% | Meizhou Kejia 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Hangzhou Greentown hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 6 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Hangzhou Greentown — H2H win rate 67% vs Poisson 51%.
Form Hangzhou Greentown Poisson xG (1.97) is below their recent form scoring rate (3.20) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.34) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.00) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~3.3 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.31) both support Over 2.5 goals at 64%.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 64% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 7 | Venue: Huizhou Olympic Stadium • Kick-off: Wednesday 16 Apr 2025, 12:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 51% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 24% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 64% | BTTS 65% | xG Hangzhou Greentown 1.97 / Meizhou Kejia 1.34 • Poisson strength factors: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.086 / def 0.916 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.950 / def 1.071 | league avg home 1.697 / away 1.539 • Poisson stance: Hangzhou Greentown (51%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.97

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Expected Goals

1.34

Meizhou Kejia xG

51%
25%
24%
Hangzhou Greentown Draw Meizhou Kejia

65%

BTTS

86%

Over 1.5

64%

Over 2.5

42%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 12:00 on Wednesday 16 April 2025 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What was the final score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia?

Hangzhou Greentown 2 - 2 Meizhou Kejia.

Where is Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia being played?

The match is being played at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What competition is Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia part of?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 7 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our statistical model gives Hangzhou Greentown a 51% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 24% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Hangzhou Greentown the favourite.

Will both teams score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).

Will Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 64%.

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia?

Record (6 meetings): Hangzhou Greentown 4W | Draws 2 | Meizhou Kejia 0W.

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia in?

Hangzhou Greentown (all comps): 2W-4D-4L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 2.30 | L5 D-L-W-D-D. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 2.30 | L5 L-L-D-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Hangzhou Greentown's attacking strength (1.09x league average) is weighed against Meizhou Kejia's defensive record (1.07x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.97. The same calculation in reverse, Meizhou Kejia's attack versus Hangzhou Greentown's defence, projects 1.34 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 36/36 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 10.9%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.5%), 2-0 (7.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 27% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Hangzhou Greentown Win

51%

Hangzhou Greentown

1.97

25%

Draw

4.01

24%

Meizhou Kejia

4.10

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.6%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.5%

Home win

1 – 0

7.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.97

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Total xG

3.31

1.34

Meizhou Kejia xG

51%
25%
24%
Hangzhou GreentownDrawMeizhou Kejia

1.97

51%

Home win

4.01

25%

Draw

4.10

24%

Away win

Goals Markets

84%

Over 1.5

1.19

16%

Under 1.5

6.25

64%

Over 2.5

1.56

36%

Under 2.5

2.78

42%

Over 3.5

2.38

58%

Under 3.5

1.72

24%

Over 4.5

4.17

76%

Under 4.5

1.32

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.54

35%

BTTS No

2.86

Clean Sheet

26%

Hangzhou Greentown

3.82

14%

Meizhou Kejia

7.20

Win to Nil

13%

Hangzhou Greentown

7.54

3%

Meizhou Kejia

29.51

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.6 4.9 3.3 1.5 0.5 0.1
1 7.2 9.6 6.4 2.9 1.0 0.3
2 7.1 9.5 6.4 2.8 1.0 0.3
3 4.7 6.2 4.2 1.9 0.6 0.2
4 2.3 3.1 2.1 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.974
λ Away (xG) 1.340
Total xG 3.314
League avg home goals 1.697
League avg away goals 1.539
Hangzhou Greentown attack strength 1.086
Hangzhou Greentown defence strength 0.916
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.950
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.071
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 36 / 36

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.9%.

How many goals are Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?

The model projects 1.97 expected goals for Hangzhou Greentown and 1.34 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 3.31.

How confident is the prediction model for Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 51%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Hangzhou Greentown's recent record stands at 27W 12D 21L from 60 games, a 1.55 PPG return, with D-L-W-D-D in the last five.

Meizhou Kejia, meanwhile, have gone 15W 16D 29L across 60 games — 1.02 PPG, with L-L-D-W-L in their last five.

The points-per-game comparison favours Hangzhou Greentown by 0.53 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Meizhou Kejia heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, Hangzhou Greentown have managed 17W 5D 8L from 30 games — 1.87 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Meizhou Kejia's away record stands at 4W 8D 18L across 30 trips, a 0.67 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Hangzhou Greentown come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Hangzhou Greentown are averaging 1.87 goals scored and 1.57 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.18 scored and 1.82 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Hangzhou Greentown have seen both teams score in 65% of their recent games; Meizhou Kejia in 62%.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

Current Season
D L W D D
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Current Season
L L D W L
60 Played 60
27/12/21 W / D / L 15/16/29
1.55 Points Per Game 1.02
1.87 Avg Goals Scored 1.18
1.57 Avg Goals Conceded 1.82
3.43 Avg Goals / Game 3.00
14 Clean Sheets 11
39 BTTS 37
46 Over 2.5 Games 36
Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 2–1
27 Oct
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 1–0
18 Oct
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 0–2
22 Sep
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–4 HT 2–2
13 Sep
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 0–2
11 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
4–3 HT 2–1
03 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–1
28 Jul
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–2
21 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–5 HT 2–1
13 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
07 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–3 HT 1–0
25 Jun
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 0–1
15 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–3
25 May
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 2–1
21 May
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
5–2 HT 3–1
17 May
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 0–0
12 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–4 HT 0–2
05 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–1
19 Apr
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–1
10 Apr
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Mar
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
6–1 HT 3–0
29 Oct
D
A Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
30 Sep
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–0 HT 3–0
24 Sep
W
A Beijing Guoan
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 1–0
26 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
4–3 HT 1–2
12 Aug
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 1–1
08 Aug
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–1 HT 2–1
04 Aug
W
A Chengdu Better City
2–1 HT 1–1
29 Jul
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 0–0
22 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–1
12 Jul
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Jul
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–2
02 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 1–0
28 Jun
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 1–0
09 Jun
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 0–0
02 Jun
W
H Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
28 May
W
A Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 2–0
24 May
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 0–2
19 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
14 May
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 1–0
10 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–0 HT 0–0
05 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Apr
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
25 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–2
21 Apr
L
H Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Apr
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Sep
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–3 HT 0–1
20 Sep
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 2–0
17 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–7 HT 1–4
09 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–4 HT 1–2
28 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
21 Jul
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
13 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–3
07 Jul
L
H Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–0
30 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
21 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 0–1
17 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–0
11 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
05 May
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 1–1
09 Mar
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
03 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–2
04 Nov
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
0–4 HT 0–1
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
16 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–3 HT 0–2
26 Aug
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 2–1
08 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–6 HT 0–3
04 Aug
W
H Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 2–1
29 Jul
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Jul
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
3–1 HT 3–0
12 Jul
W
H Chengdu Better City
3–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
D
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 1–0
02 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–1
28 Jun
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 1–1
09 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
03 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–3 HT 2–0
28 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
24 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–1
20 May
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–0
14 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 1–2
10 May
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Apr
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?

Hangzhou Greentown have gone 27W 12D 21L in their last 60 games (1.55 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 15W 16D 29L in their last 60 (1.02 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Hangzhou Greentown at home or Meizhou Kejia away?

Hangzhou Greentown's home record (1.87 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Hangzhou Greentown at home: 1.87 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 0.67 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

8 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to September 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 24 August 2025, roughly 12 months ago.

Streaks & Records

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 7 Jul 2024, when Hangzhou Greentown won 4-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Hangzhou Greentown's record when hosting Meizhou Kejia specifically: 3W 1D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Hangzhou Greentown

4

Hangzhou Greentown

4

Draws

Meizhou Kejia

0

Meizhou Kejia

Recent Meetings

Meizhou Kejia
2–2
24 Aug 25
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
2–2
16 Apr 25
Meizhou Kejia
Hangzhou Greentown
4–0
07 Jul 24
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
31 Mar 24
Hangzhou Greentown
Meizhou Kejia
1–1
19 Oct 23
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
3–0
28 Jun 23
Meizhou Kejia
Hangzhou Greentown
2–0
10 Dec 22
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
0–0
14 Sep 22
Hangzhou Greentown

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia?

From 8 meetings on record, Hangzhou Greentown have won 4, Meizhou Kejia have won 0, and 4 have been drawn.

When did Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?

They last met on 24 August 2025, when Meizhou Kejia 2-2 Hangzhou Greentown.

Who has won more matches between Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia?

Hangzhou Greentown have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Hangzhou Greentown are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 40% of the time.

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Hangzhou Greentown 63%, Meizhou Kejia 60% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 77% for Hangzhou Greentown and 63% for Meizhou Kejia. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 43% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Meizhou Kejia in 30%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Hangzhou Greentown home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Hangzhou Greentown Hangzhou Greentown Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/60
(80%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/60
(48.3%)
14/30
(46.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/12
(66.7%)
4/6
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/12
(50%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 19/60
(31.7%)
12/30
(40%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/60
(11.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 39/60
(65%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 46/60
(76.7%)
23/30
(76.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 25/60
(41.7%)
13/30
(43.3%)
Clean Sheet 14/60
(23.3%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Failed to Score 11/60
(18.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/60
(71.7%)
21/30
(70%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/60
(36.7%)
15/30
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/17
(64.7%)
7/9
(77.8%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/17
(41.2%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 16/60
(26.7%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/60
(11.7%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/60
(10%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 37/60
(61.7%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/60
(33.3%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 11/60
(18.3%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Failed to Score 18/60
(30%)
9/30
(30%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Hangzhou Greentown play Meizhou Kejia?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 63% of Hangzhou Greentown's games and 60% of Meizhou Kejia's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Hangzhou Greentown vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 77% of Hangzhou Greentown's matches and 63% of Meizhou Kejia's.

Do Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?

Hangzhou Greentown have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 70% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Hangzhou Greentown and Meizhou Kejia finished level at 2-2 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium, Regular Season - 7, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hangzhou Greentown 1.97 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.34 xG, a combined 3.31. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.09 / defence 0.92 against Meizhou Kejia attack 0.95 / defence 1.07, drawn from 36/36 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hangzhou Greentown 51% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 24%, with Hangzhou Greentown to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 64%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 86% and landed. Over 3.5 was 42% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 68% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Hangzhou Greentown 77%, Meizhou Kejia 60%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Hangzhou Greentown's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did.

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Hangzhou Greentown arrived the stronger side — 1.55 PPG against 1.02. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.07 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 64% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 68% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.