Sign in Register

NEOM 0-1 Al-Ettifaq – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Pro League · Regular Season - 9

Kick-off

Sat 17 Oct 2026

15:40

Venue

King Khalid Sport City Stadium

Competition

Pro League

Saudi-Arabia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates NEOM at 40%, yet other data sources diverge — this NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

NEOM host Al-Ettifaq at King Khalid Sport City Stadium in Pro League, Regular Season - 9. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 17 October 2026 at 15:40 UTC.

Form Guide

NEOM — All Games: 5W 2D 3L from 10 Pro League outings this season, averaging 1.70 points per game. Last five: L W W W D. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.00 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for NEOM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NEOM's home record at King Khalid Sport City Stadium: 5W 3D 2L from 10 Pro League appearances (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Pro League games this season, Al-Ettifaq have recorded 3W 4D 3L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: L W D D D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Al-Ettifaq, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Pro League this season, Al-Ettifaq have posted 4W 2D 4L from 10 away outings — 1.40 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — NEOM at 1.70 PPG versus Al-Ettifaq's 1.30. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 2 previous meetings, NEOM have won 0, Al-Ettifaq 0, with 2 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The last 2 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 21 May 2026, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

NEOM in-play and half-time data (42 games, 20 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (home games).

Al-Ettifaq in-play and half-time data (42 games, 20 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 55% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 45%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NEOM 60% versus Al-Ettifaq 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEOM 50% | Al-Ettifaq 57%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEOM 1.66 xG and Al-Ettifaq 1.43 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEOM attack 1.238 / defence 0.964 | Al-Ettifaq attack 1.066 / defence 0.942. League average goals — home 1.419 / away 1.394. Data: 42 NEOM games / 42 Al-Ettifaq games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEOM 40% | Draw 30% | Al-Ettifaq 30%. Fair-value odds: NEOM 2.50 | Draw 3.33 | Al-Ettifaq 3.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.09. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.09 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.66 / 1.43) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, NEOM are the pick at 40% — marginal model lean. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on NEOM offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.09 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 60% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 65%. Form rates corroborate: NEOM 70% | Al-Ettifaq 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–2D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is 3.09 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 60% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 9 | Venue: King Khalid Sport City Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 17 Oct 2026, 15:40 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: NEOM 40% | Draw 30% | Al-Ettifaq 30% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 60% | BTTS 65% | xG NEOM 1.66 / Al-Ettifaq 1.43 • Poisson strength factors: NEOM attack 1.238 / def 0.964 | Al-Ettifaq attack 1.066 / def 0.942 | league avg home 1.419 / away 1.394 • Poisson stance: NEOM (40%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.66

NEOM xG

Expected Goals

1.43

Al-Ettifaq xG

40%
30%
30%
NEOM Draw Al-Ettifaq

65%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

60%

Over 2.5

37%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq kick off?

NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq kicked off at 15:40 on Saturday 17 October 2026 at King Khalid Sport City Stadium.

What was the final score in NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

NEOM 0 - 1 Al-Ettifaq.

Where is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq being played?

The match is being played at King Khalid Sport City Stadium.

What competition is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq part of?

NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq is a Regular Season - 9 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).

Who is favourite to win NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our statistical model gives NEOM a 40% chance of winning, Al-Ettifaq a 30% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making NEOM the favourite.

Will both teams score in NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both NEOM and Al-Ettifaq will score (BTTS).

Will NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 60%.

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq?

Record (2 meetings): NEOM 0W | Draws 2 | Al-Ettifaq 0W.

What form are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq in?

NEOM (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.00 | L5 L-W-W-W-D. Al-Ettifaq (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-W-D-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

NEOM's attacking strength (1.24x league average) is weighed against Al-Ettifaq's defensive record (0.94x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.66. The same calculation in reverse, Al-Ettifaq's attack versus NEOM's defence, projects 1.43 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 42/42 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 12.2%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.0%), 1-2 (7.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

NEOM Win

40%

NEOM

2.52

30%

Draw

3.31

30%

Al-Ettifaq

3.33

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.8%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.0%

Home win

1 – 2

7.7%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.66

NEOM xG

Total xG

3.09

1.43

Al-Ettifaq xG

40%
30%
30%
NEOMDrawAl-Ettifaq

2.52

40%

Home win

3.31

30%

Draw

3.33

30%

Away win

Goals Markets

81%

Over 1.5

1.23

19%

Under 1.5

5.26

60%

Over 2.5

1.67

40%

Under 2.5

2.50

37%

Over 3.5

2.70

63%

Under 3.5

1.59

20%

Over 4.5

5.00

80%

Under 4.5

1.25

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.54

35%

BTTS No

2.84

Clean Sheet

24%

NEOM

4.19

19%

Al-Ettifaq

5.23

Win to Nil

9%

NEOM

10.55

6%

Al-Ettifaq

17.41

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.6 6.5 4.7 2.2 0.8 0.2
1 7.6 10.8 7.7 3.7 1.3 0.4
2 6.3 9.0 6.4 3.1 1.1 0.3
3 3.4 4.9 3.5 1.7 0.6 0.2
4 1.4 2.0 1.5 0.7 0.2 0.1
5 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.655
λ Away (xG) 1.432
Total xG 3.087
League avg home goals 1.419
League avg away goals 1.394
NEOM attack strength 1.238
NEOM defence strength 0.964
Al-Ettifaq attack strength 1.066
Al-Ettifaq defence strength 0.942
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 42

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.2%.

How many goals are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq expected to score?

The model projects 1.66 expected goals for NEOM and 1.43 for Al-Ettifaq, a combined total of 3.09.

How confident is the prediction model for NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 40%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 42 outings, NEOM have picked up 1.45 PPG on a 17W 10D 15L record — L-W-W-W-D across the most recent five. The sample for NEOM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Al-Ettifaq's form line: 17W 11D 14L from 42 games, 1.48 PPG, last five L-W-D-D-D. The sample for Al-Ettifaq is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Form-wise this is close to level: NEOM on 1.45 PPG, Al-Ettifaq on 1.48. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, NEOM have posted 1.40 PPG from 20 outings (8W 4D 8L).

On the road, Al-Ettifaq have gone 9W 3D 8L from 20 away games — 1.50 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

NEOM are averaging 1.36 goals scored and 1.31 conceded per game recently; Al-Ettifaq are on 1.50 scored and 1.60 conceded.

Last 42 Results — Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

NEOM

NEOM

Blended
L W W W D
Al-Ettifaq

Al-Ettifaq

Blended
L W D D D
42 Played 42
17/10/15 W / D / L 17/11/14
1.45 Points Per Game 1.48
1.36 Avg Goals Scored 1.50
1.31 Avg Goals Conceded 1.60
2.67 Avg Goals / Game 3.10
9 Clean Sheets 12
25 BTTS 23
21 Over 2.5 Games 24
NEOM

NEOM

D
A Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 0–1
10 Oct
W
H Al-Fateh
4–2 HT 1–1
13 Sep
W
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
2–0 HT 2–0
07 Sep
W
H Al Khaleej Saihat
3–0 HT 3–0
03 Sep
L
A Al Riyadh
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Aug
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–2 HT 0–1
24 Aug
W
A Al-Faisaly FC
2–0 HT 0–0
21 Aug
W
H Al-Fayha
2–1 HT 2–0
14 Aug
D
H Al-Ettifaq
1–1 HT 0–1
21 May
L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–1
16 May
W
H Al Shabab
2–1 HT 2–0
11 May
D
A Al-Fateh
2–2 HT 1–0
02 May
D
H Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Apr
L
A Al Najma
1–2 HT 0–1
11 Apr
W
A Al-Ittihad FC
4–3 HT 2–2
08 Apr
W
H Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
H Al Taawon
2–2 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Al Kholood
1–2 HT 1–2
28 Feb
D
A Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Feb
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Al Riyadh
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
D
A Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Feb
W
H Damac
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Jan
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–3 HT 0–0
24 Jan
D
A Al-Ettifaq
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–2 HT 1–0
18 Jan
L
A Al Shabab
2–3 HT 1–1
14 Jan
L
H Al-Fateh
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Jan
W
A Al-Hazm
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Jan
L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–1
31 Dec
W
H Al Najma
2–1 HT 0–0
25 Dec
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Al-Nassr
1–3 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Al Kholood
3–2 HT 2–1
30 Oct
D
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–3 HT 0–2
19 Oct
W
A Al Riyadh
3–2 HT 2–1
27 Sep
W
H Al Okhdood
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
W
A Damac
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug
Al-Ettifaq

Al-Ettifaq

D
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Oct
D
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
3–3 HT 1–2
11 Sep
D
H Al-Faisaly FC
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Sep
W
A Abha
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Sep
L
H Al Diriyah
0–3 HT 0–1
29 Aug
L
H Al-Nassr
2–3 HT 2–0
25 Aug
W
A Al-Fateh
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Aug
W
H Al Riyadh
4–2 HT 1–1
14 Aug
D
A NEOM
1–1 HT 1–0
21 May
L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–2
14 May
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
5–0 HT 1–0
09 May
D
H Al Najma
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
W
A Al Okhdood
3–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
L
H Al Riyadh
2–3 HT 2–1
09 Apr
W
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
3–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
L
A Al-Fayha
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Mar
D
H Al Shabab
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
A Al-Hazm
1–3 HT 1–2
27 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–4 HT 0–2
23 Feb
W
H Al-Fateh
4–3 HT 3–2
19 Feb
L
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Feb
W
H Damac
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Feb
W
H Al Taawon
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–4 HT 0–2
28 Jan
W
A Al Kholood
2–1 HT 0–1
24 Jan
D
H NEOM
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
W
A Al-Ittihad FC
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Jan
L
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–2 HT 1–1
12 Jan
W
A Al Najma
4–3 HT 3–0
08 Jan
W
H Al Okhdood
2–0 HT 0–0
02 Jan
D
H Al-Nassr
2–2 HT 1–0
30 Dec
W
A Al Riyadh
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Dec
W
H Al-Fayha
3–2 HT 2–0
22 Nov
D
A Al Shabab
1–1 HT 0–1
08 Nov
D
H Al-Hazm
2–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
L
A Al-Fateh
1–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–5 HT 0–2
18 Oct
W
A Damac
3–1 HT 1–1
26 Sep
L
A Al Taawon
1–4 HT 0–1
18 Sep
D
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Sep
W
H Al Kholood
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are NEOM and Al-Ettifaq in coming into this match?

NEOM have gone 17W 10D 15L in their last 42 games (1.45 PPG), while Al-Ettifaq have gone 17W 11D 14L in their last 42 (1.48 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — NEOM at home or Al-Ettifaq away?

Al-Ettifaq's away record (1.50 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — NEOM at home: 1.40 PPG; Al-Ettifaq away: 1.50 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq runs to 3 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to January 2026. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. The two were last together as recently as 17 October 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

NEOM's record when hosting Al-Ettifaq specifically: 0W 1D 1L from 2 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 3 Meetings

NEOM

0

NEOM

2

Draws

Al-Ettifaq

1

Al-Ettifaq

Recent Meetings

NEOM
0–1
17 Oct 26
Al-Ettifaq
NEOM
1–1
21 May 26
Al-Ettifaq
Al-Ettifaq
0–0
21 Jan 26
NEOM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq?

From 3 meetings on record, NEOM have won 0, Al-Ettifaq have won 1, and 2 have been drawn.

When did NEOM and Al-Ettifaq last play each other?

They last met on 17 October 2026, when NEOM 0-1 Al-Ettifaq.

Who has won more matches between NEOM and Al-Ettifaq?

Al-Ettifaq have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 3 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

NEOM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 35% of the time.

Al-Ettifaq are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 15% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — NEOM 65%, Al-Ettifaq 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 65% for NEOM and 55% for Al-Ettifaq. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 25% and 45% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = NEOM home games / Al-Ettifaq away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

NEOM NEOM Blended
Metric All
(42 games)
Venue
(20 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/42
(69%)
15/20
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/42
(33.3%)
9/20
(45%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/13
(92.3%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/13
(46.2%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 14/42
(33.3%)
7/20
(35%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/42
(11.9%)
3/20
(15%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/42
(7.1%)
1/20
(5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 25/42
(59.5%)
13/20
(65%)
Over 2.5 Goals 21/42
(50%)
13/20
(65%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/42
(23.8%)
5/20
(25%)
Clean Sheet 9/42
(21.4%)
4/20
(20%)
Failed to Score 9/42
(21.4%)
3/20
(15%)
Al-Ettifaq Al-Ettifaq Blended
Metric All
(42 games)
Venue
(20 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 30/42
(71.4%)
16/20
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/42
(40.5%)
7/20
(35%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/12
(66.7%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/12
(33.3%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 11/42
(26.2%)
4/20
(20%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/42
(11.9%)
1/20
(5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/42
(7.1%)
3/20
(15%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 23/42
(54.8%)
10/20
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 24/42
(57.1%)
11/20
(55%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/42
(45.2%)
9/20
(45%)
Clean Sheet 12/42
(28.6%)
5/20
(25%)
Failed to Score 11/42
(26.2%)
5/20
(25%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when NEOM play Al-Ettifaq?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 65% of NEOM's games and 50% of Al-Ettifaq's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is NEOM vs Al-Ettifaq usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 65% of NEOM's matches and 55% of Al-Ettifaq's.

Do NEOM and Al-Ettifaq tend to score early?

NEOM have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, Al-Ettifaq in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Al-Ettifaq defy the odds to beat NEOM 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Al-Ettifaq beat NEOM 0-1 at King Khalid Sport City Stadium, Regular Season - 9, in the Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting NEOM 1.66 xG and Al-Ettifaq 1.43 xG, a combined 3.09. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. NEOM fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of NEOM attack 1.24 / defence 0.96 against Al-Ettifaq attack 1.07 / defence 0.94, drawn from 42/42 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it NEOM 40% | Draw 30% | Al-Ettifaq 30%, with NEOM to win its most likely call at 40%. The actual Al-Ettifaq win had been the model's second-ranked read at 30%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 85% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 54% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (NEOM 50%, Al-Ettifaq 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

NEOM's trading profile (42 games, 20 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not.

Al-Ettifaq's trading profile (42 games, 20 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — NEOM 1.45 PPG, Al-Ettifaq 1.48 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Al-Ettifaq win broke the near-deadlock. NEOM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.40 scoring average — below par going forward. Al-Ettifaq (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.60 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 60% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 65% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 54% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.