SSV Ulm 1846 1-2 1. FC Nürnberg – Result & Analysis

📋

Poisson model rates 1. FC Nürnberg at 40%, yet other data sources diverge — this SSV Ulm 1846 vs 1. FC Nürnberg fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

SSV Ulm 1846 host 1. FC Nürnberg at Donaustadion in 2. Bundesliga, Regular Season - 5. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 14 September 2024 at 12:00 UTC.

Form Guide

SSV Ulm 1846 — All Games: 0W 1D 3L from 4 2. Bundesliga outings this season, averaging 0.25 points per game. Last five: L L L D. They are averaging 0.50 goals per game and conceding 1.25 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 4 outings provides some defensive foundation. SSV Ulm 1846 have played only a handful of 2. Bundesliga games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Looking at all fixtures this season, 1. FC Nürnberg stand at 2W 1D 7L from 10 2. Bundesliga matches — 0.70 PPG. Last five: L L W D L. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. 1. FC Nürnberg have played only a handful of 2. Bundesliga games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

On the road, 1. FC Nürnberg have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — SSV Ulm 1846 at 0.25 PPG versus 1. FC Nürnberg's 0.70. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Trading Patterns

SSV Ulm 1846 in-play and half-time data (4 games): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures; when winning at HT they fail to see it out 25% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games; they fail to score in 50% of games.

1. FC Nürnberg in-play and half-time data (4 games): they score before half-time in 100% of fixtures; when winning at HT they fail to see it out 25% of the time; when trailing at the break they recover to draw or win in 50% of cases; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games; Over 3.5 in 75%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — SSV Ulm 1846 50% and 1. FC Nürnberg 75% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (SSV Ulm 1846 50% | 1. FC Nürnberg 75%). There is an in-play dynamic worth noting: SSV Ulm 1846 surrender their half-time lead 25% of the time, while 1. FC Nürnberg have come from behind at the break to draw or win in 50% of cases — a combination that makes laying the hosts at HT a potential angle.

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects SSV Ulm 1846 1.49 xG and 1. FC Nürnberg 1.63 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: SSV Ulm 1846 attack 0.837 / defence 1.213 | 1. FC Nürnberg attack 0.988 / defence 1.154. League average goals — home 1.543 / away 1.361. Data: 4 SSV Ulm 1846 games / 38 1. FC Nürnberg games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: SSV Ulm 1846 33% | Draw 27% | 1. FC Nürnberg 40%. Fair-value odds: SSV Ulm 1846 3.03 | Draw 3.70 | 1. FC Nürnberg 2.50. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 3.12. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.12 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (1.49 / 1.63) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

Form averages suggest only ~1.7 goals/game but Poisson projects Over 2.5 at 60% — underlying attack/defence strengths imply more goals than surface form shows.

The Poisson model's primary lean is 1. FC Nürnberg at 40% — marginal model lean. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on 1. FC Nürnberg offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.12 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 60% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 64% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: SSV Ulm 1846 50% | 1. FC Nürnberg 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights