Clermont Foot 0-1 Dunkerque – Result & Analysis

Poisson model rates Dunkerque at 43% — neither recent form nor the head-to-head data gives a clear steer either way as Clermont Foot face Dunkerque.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

Clermont Foot welcome Dunkerque to Stade Gabriel-Montpied in Ligue 2 (matchday 4). Kick-off is Friday 13 September 2024 at 20:00 UK time.

Recent Form

Across their last 10 games, Clermont Foot have gone 2W 3D 5L — a 0.90 PPG return. Last five: L L D W L. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%).

Clermont Foot's home record over their last 10 home games: 2W 4D 4L (1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Looking at their last 10 matches, Dunkerque stand at 3W 2D 5L — 1.10 PPG. Last five: D D L L W. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%).

Dunkerque's away record over their last 10 away games: 5W 3D 2L (1.80 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.80 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The form comparison is too close to call — 0.90 PPG (Clermont Foot) versus 1.10 (Dunkerque). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Both teams have scored in 70% of Clermont Foot's games and 60% of Dunkerque's (from Clermont Foot's last 10 home games and Dunkerque's last 10 away games) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Trading Patterns

Clermont Foot in-play and half-time data (last 37 games, 18 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 56% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 60% of the time; of the 8 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 50%; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 39% of games (home games); they fail to score in 46% of games.

Dunkerque in-play and half-time data (last 37 games, 18 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 67% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 77% of the time; of the 8 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 50%; of the 13 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 38%; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Clermont Foot 49% versus Dunkerque 43%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Clermont Foot 49% | Dunkerque 40%). There is an in-play dynamic worth noting: Clermont Foot surrender their half-time lead 50% of the time, while Dunkerque have come from behind at the break to draw or win in 38% of cases — a combination that makes laying the hosts at HT a potential angle.

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Clermont Foot 1.14 xG and Dunkerque 1.42 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Clermont Foot attack 0.852 / defence 1.161 | Dunkerque attack 1.068 / defence 1.086. League average goals — home 1.237 / away 1.145. Data: built from Clermont Foot's last 3 games and Dunkerque's last 41. Some of those games are older results, so treat these probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Clermont Foot 30% | Draw 26% | Dunkerque 43%. Fair-value odds: Clermont Foot 3.29 | Draw 3.80 | Dunkerque 2.31. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS Yes probability 52% | Total xG 2.56. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.56 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 52% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Dunkerque are the pick at 43% — marginal model lean. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Dunkerque offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.56 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 53% probability — a Poisson-only call with no corroboration from form or H2H.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 52%. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Clermont Foot 70% (last 10 home games) | Dunkerque 60% (last 10 away games).

The Poisson model's sample (Clermont Foot 3 games, Dunkerque 41) includes some older results, so its projections carry extra uncertainty — weight recent form and the odds accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights