Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 0-1 Beijing Guoan – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Mon 3 Jul 2023

12:35

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 49% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park plays host to Chengdu Better City versus Beijing Guoan in Super League, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off: Monday 3 July 2023 at 12:35 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Chengdu Better City have collected 2.20 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 6W 4D 0L. Last five: W W W D W. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.00 conceded. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park, Chengdu Better City have gone 7W 3D 0L this season (10 games, 2.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Beijing Guoan's overall Super League record this term: 4W 4D 2L from 10 games (1.60 PPG). Last five: W L W D L. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.40. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Beijing Guoan, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Beijing Guoan's form when playing away from home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form ledger tips toward Chengdu Better City. A 0.60 PPG lead over Beijing Guoan (2.20 vs 1.60) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Chengdu Better City have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Beijing Guoan in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Chengdu Better City lead 0W to 1W over the last 2 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Jun 2022, ended 0–0 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Chengdu Better City — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 53% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 47% of the time.

Beijing Guoan — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 70% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 47% versus Beijing Guoan 64%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 47% | Beijing Guoan 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 1.84 xG and Beijing Guoan 1.28 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.148 / defence 0.882 | Beijing Guoan attack 1.117 / defence 1.154. League average goals — home 1.386 / away 1.297. Data: 47 Chengdu Better City games / 47 Beijing Guoan games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 49% | Draw 25% | Beijing Guoan 25%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 2.04 | Draw 4.00 | Beijing Guoan 4.00. Chengdu Better City hold a narrow Poisson edge at 49% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.11. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.11 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.84 / 1.28) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 49% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Chengdu Better City if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 3.11 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 60% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 62% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 60% | Beijing Guoan 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.20 vs 1.60 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Chengdu Better City 6/10, Beijing Guoan 6/10) and Poisson model (62%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 49% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 60% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park • Kick-off: Monday 3 Jul 2023, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 49% | Draw 25% | Beijing Guoan 25% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 60% | BTTS 62% | xG Chengdu Better City 1.84 / Beijing Guoan 1.28 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.148 / def 0.882 | Beijing Guoan attack 1.117 / def 1.154 | league avg home 1.386 / away 1.297 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (49%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.84

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

1.28

Beijing Guoan xG

49%
25%
25%
Chengdu Better City Draw Beijing Guoan

62%

BTTS

83%

Over 1.5

60%

Over 2.5

38%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan kicked off at 12:35 on Monday 3 July 2023 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan?

Chengdu Better City 0 - 1 Beijing Guoan.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 49% chance of winning, Beijing Guoan a 25% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 60%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan?

Record (2 meetings): Chengdu Better City 0W | Draws 1 | Beijing Guoan 1W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 6W-4D-0L in 10 | 2.20 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.00 | L5 W-W-W-D-W. Beijing Guoan (all comps): 4W-4D-2L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-L-W-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from Chengdu Better City's attack rating (1.15) and Beijing Guoan's defence rating (1.15), the model arrives at 1.84 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Beijing Guoan's attack (1.12x) against Chengdu Better City's defence (0.88x) — and the away total comes out at 1.28.

These ratings are built from 47/47 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.8%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.6%), 2-0 (7.5%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

49%

Chengdu Better City

2.03

25%

Draw

3.93

25%

Beijing Guoan

3.95

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.4%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.6%

Home win

1 – 0

8.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.84

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

3.11

1.28

Beijing Guoan xG

49%
25%
25%
Chengdu Better CityDrawBeijing Guoan

2.03

49%

Home win

3.93

25%

Draw

3.95

25%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

60%

Over 2.5

1.67

40%

Under 2.5

2.50

38%

Over 3.5

2.63

62%

Under 3.5

1.61

20%

Over 4.5

5.00

80%

Under 4.5

1.25

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.61

38%

BTTS No

2.63

Clean Sheet

28%

Chengdu Better City

3.59

16%

Beijing Guoan

6.27

Win to Nil

14%

Chengdu Better City

7.29

4%

Beijing Guoan

24.75

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.4 5.7 3.6 1.5 0.5 0.1
1 8.2 10.4 6.7 2.8 0.9 0.2
2 7.5 9.6 6.1 2.6 0.8 0.2
3 4.6 5.9 3.7 1.6 0.5 0.1
4 2.1 2.7 1.7 0.7 0.2 0.1
5 0.8 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.836
λ Away (xG) 1.277
Total xG 3.113
League avg home goals 1.386
League avg away goals 1.297
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.148
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.882
Beijing Guoan attack strength 1.117
Beijing Guoan defence strength 1.154
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 47 / 47

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.8%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan expected to score?

The model projects 1.84 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.28 for Beijing Guoan, a combined total of 3.11.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 49%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Chengdu Better City come into this having played 47 games, going 25W 17D 5L for 1.96 points per game. Their last five reads W-W-W-D-W. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, Beijing Guoan sit at 1.62 PPG from 47 outings (21W 13D 13L), a run that reads W-L-W-D-L across their last five. The sample for Beijing Guoan is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.96 PPG for Chengdu Better City against 1.62 for Beijing Guoan. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

Chengdu Better City's home form reads 13W 10D 0L across 23 games on their own ground, a 2.13 PPG return.

Away from home, Beijing Guoan have taken 1.57 points per game from 23 outings (10W 6D 7L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chengdu Better City are averaging 1.51 goals scored and 0.85 conceded per game recently; Beijing Guoan are on 1.68 scored and 1.45 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Beijing Guoan in 64%.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 47% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 47 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W W W D W
Beijing Guoan

Beijing Guoan

Blended
W L W D L
47 Played 47
25/17/5 W / D / L 21/13/13
1.96 Points Per Game 1.62
1.51 Avg Goals Scored 1.68
0.85 Avg Goals Conceded 1.45
2.36 Avg Goals / Game 3.13
22 Clean Sheets 11
22 BTTS 30
22 Over 2.5 Games 30
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
27 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–1
23 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
14 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Dec
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 0–1
27 Dec
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Nov
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–2
07 Nov
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun
Beijing Guoan

Beijing Guoan

L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Jun
D
A Dalian Aerbin
2–2 HT 0–2
09 Jun
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 2–1
02 Jun
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–1
28 May
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
6–2 HT 3–2
23 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–1
19 May
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
15 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 0–0
10 May
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Apr
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 0–2
25 Apr
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3
31 Dec
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3
27 Dec
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–1 HT 3–1
23 Dec
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–0 HT 1–0
15 Dec
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 2–0
10 Dec
L
H Dalian Aerbin
1–3 HT 0–0
05 Dec
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Nov
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 0–1
25 Nov
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Nov
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 0–0
13 Nov
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Nov
W
H Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Nov
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
4–1 HT 4–0
29 Oct
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
24 Oct
D
H Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 1–1
09 Oct
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Oct
D
A Dalian Aerbin
2–2 HT 1–1
24 Sep
W
H Hebei Zhongji
3–1 HT 2–1
14 Sep
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–1
06 Sep
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–2
26 Aug
W
H Guangzhou R&F
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Aug
W
A Wuhan Zall
4–1 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–5 HT 1–2
12 Aug
L
A Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–2
07 Aug
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–2 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–0
03 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–1 HT 1–0
21 Jun
D
A Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–1
17 Jun
W
H Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
13 Jun
W
A Chengdu Better City
3–2 HT 3–2
08 Jun
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–1
05 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 25W 17D 5L in their last 47 games (1.96 PPG), while Beijing Guoan have gone 21W 13D 13L in their last 47 (1.62 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Beijing Guoan away?

Chengdu Better City's home record (2.13 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.13 PPG; Beijing Guoan away: 1.57 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Beijing Guoan been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 47% of their recent games, Beijing Guoan in 23%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 10 times since June 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 26 July 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chengdu Better City have gone 1W 2D 2L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Beijing Guoan — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

3

Chengdu Better City

4

Draws

Beijing Guoan

3

Beijing Guoan

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
2–2
26 Jul 26
Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan
1–2
12 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–0
26 Jul 25
Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan
1–1
29 Mar 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
14 Sep 24
Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan
2–1
05 May 24
Chengdu Better City
Beijing Guoan
2–3
29 Oct 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–1
03 Jul 23
Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan
0–0
30 Jun 22
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–3
08 Jun 22
Beijing Guoan

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan?

From 10 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 3, Beijing Guoan have won 3, and 4 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan last play each other?

They last met on 26 July 2026, when Chengdu Better City 2-2 Beijing Guoan.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 44% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

Beijing Guoan are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 41% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 18% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 56%, Beijing Guoan 70% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 61% for Chengdu Better City and 70% for Beijing Guoan. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 35% and 44% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 44% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Beijing Guoan away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(47 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 32/47
(68.1%)
15/23
(65.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 13/47
(27.7%)
10/23
(43.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/15
(53.3%)
4/8
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/15
(13.3%)
2/8
(25%)
Winning at HT 18/47
(38.3%)
10/23
(43.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/47
(10.6%)
3/23
(13%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/47
(12.8%)
3/23
(13%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/47
(46.8%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 22/47
(46.8%)
14/23
(60.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/47
(21.3%)
8/23
(34.8%)
Clean Sheet 22/47
(46.8%)
10/23
(43.5%)
Failed to Score 10/47
(21.3%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Beijing Guoan Beijing Guoan Blended
Metric All
(47 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 35/45
(77.8%)
19/22
(86.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/45
(40%)
11/22
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/10
(70%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/10
(50%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 18/45
(40%)
9/22
(40.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/45
(4.4%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/45
(11.1%)
4/22
(18.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/47
(63.8%)
16/23
(69.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/47
(63.8%)
16/23
(69.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/47
(40.4%)
10/23
(43.5%)
Clean Sheet 11/47
(23.4%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Failed to Score 9/47
(19.1%)
3/23
(13%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Beijing Guoan?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of Chengdu Better City's games and 70% of Beijing Guoan's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Beijing Guoan usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 61% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 70% of Beijing Guoan's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Beijing Guoan tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, Beijing Guoan in 86% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Beijing Guoan defy the odds to beat Chengdu Better City 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Beijing Guoan beat Chengdu Better City 0-1 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park, Regular Season - 14, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 1.84 xG and Beijing Guoan 1.28 xG, a combined 3.11. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Chengdu Better City fell 1.8 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.15 / defence 0.88 against Beijing Guoan attack 1.12 / defence 1.15, drawn from 47/47 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 49% | Draw 25% | Beijing Guoan 25%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 49%. Instead the game produced a Beijing Guoan win, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 83% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 55% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 47%, Beijing Guoan 64%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (47 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 47% of the time, and conceded here.

Beijing Guoan's trading profile (47 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chengdu Better City 1.96 PPG, Beijing Guoan 1.62 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Beijing Guoan win broke the near-deadlock. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.87 scoring average — below par going forward. Beijing Guoan (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.61 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 60% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 62% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 55% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.