Sign in Register

RWDM 2-4 Patro Eisden – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Sat 24 Jan 2026

19:00

Venue

Edmond Machtens Stadium

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Patro Eisden at 48% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this RWDM vs Patro Eisden encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Patro Eisden make the trip to Edmond Machtens Stadium to face RWDM in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 21. The match kicks off on Saturday 24 January 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

RWDM have collected 0.60 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 1W 3D 6L. Last five: D D W L L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

RWDM's home record at Edmond Machtens Stadium: 2W 3D 5L from 10 Challenger Pro League appearances (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Patro Eisden's overall Challenger Pro League record this term: 4W 3D 3L from 10 games (1.50 PPG). Last five: D W L D W. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 0.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.70 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Patro Eisden, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Patro Eisden away from home this season: 3W 3D 4L from 10 away games — 1.20 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Patro Eisden are 0.90 PPG clear of RWDM in recent Challenger Pro League fixtures (1.50 vs 0.60). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for RWDM, 1 for Patro Eisden and 2 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 3 previous contests averaged 1.7 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 23 Nov 2025, ended 0–1 with Patro Eisden winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

RWDM goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (50 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games).

Patro Eisden goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (50 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 72% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 50% versus Patro Eisden 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 52% | Patro Eisden 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.07 xG and Patro Eisden 1.54 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.998 / defence 1.306 | Patro Eisden attack 0.873 / defence 0.795. League average goals — home 1.352 / away 1.352. Patro Eisden's defence strength of 0.795 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 48 RWDM games / 48 Patro Eisden games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RWDM 26% | Draw 25% | Patro Eisden 48%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 3.85 | Draw 4.00 | Patro Eisden 2.08. Patro Eisden hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 2.62. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.62 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Patro Eisden as the most likely outcome at 48% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Patro Eisden if the outright odds are short.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.62 combined xG gives a 49% probability to Under 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting — though form averaging only 2.9 goals per game points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 52%. Form rates are neutral: RWDM 60% | Patro Eisden 40%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–2D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.67 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.62 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 52% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Patro Eisden lead on PPG: 1.50 vs 0.60 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form RWDM Poisson xG (1.07) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Patro Eisden Poisson xG (1.54) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.10) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Patro Eisden — Patro Eisden at 48% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RWDM vs Patro Eisden | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Edmond Machtens Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 24 Jan 2026, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 26% | Draw 25% | Patro Eisden 48% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 49% | BTTS 52% | xG RWDM 1.07 / Patro Eisden 1.54 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.998 / def 1.306 | Patro Eisden attack 0.873 / def 0.795 | league avg home 1.352 / away 1.352 • Poisson stance: Patro Eisden (48%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.07

RWDM xG

Expected Goals

1.54

Patro Eisden xG

26%
25%
48%
RWDM Draw Patro Eisden

52%

BTTS

74%

Over 1.5

49%

Over 2.5

27%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RWDM vs Patro Eisden kick off?

RWDM vs Patro Eisden kicked off at 19:00 on Saturday 24 January 2026 at Edmond Machtens Stadium.

What was the final score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

RWDM 2 - 4 Patro Eisden.

Where is RWDM vs Patro Eisden being played?

The match is being played at Edmond Machtens Stadium.

What competition is RWDM vs Patro Eisden part of?

RWDM vs Patro Eisden is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Our statistical model gives RWDM a 26% chance of winning, Patro Eisden a 48% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Patro Eisden the favourite.

Will both teams score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Our model estimates a 52% probability that both RWDM and Patro Eisden will score (BTTS).

Will RWDM vs Patro Eisden have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 49%.

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Patro Eisden?

Record (3 meetings): RWDM 0W | Draws 2 | Patro Eisden 1W.

What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?

RWDM (all comps): 1W-3D-6L in 10 | 0.60 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 2.10 | L5 D-D-W-L-L. Patro Eisden (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 0.70 | L5 D-W-L-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from RWDM's attack rating (1.00) and Patro Eisden's defence rating (0.80), the model arrives at 1.07 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Patro Eisden's attack (0.87x) against RWDM's defence (1.31x) — and the away total comes out at 1.54.

These ratings are built from 48/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.7%. Close behind: 0-1 (9.7%), 1-2 (9.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 33% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Patro Eisden Win

26%

RWDM

3.79

25%

Draw

3.93

48%

Patro Eisden

2.08

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.1%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

11.3%

Away win

1 – 2

9.3%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.07

RWDM xG

Total xG

2.62

1.54

Patro Eisden xG

26%
25%
48%
RWDMDrawPatro Eisden

3.79

26%

Home win

3.93

25%

Draw

2.08

48%

Away win

Goals Markets

74%

Over 1.5

1.35

26%

Under 1.5

3.85

49%

Over 2.5

2.04

51%

Under 2.5

1.96

27%

Over 3.5

3.70

73%

Under 3.5

1.37

12%

Over 4.5

8.33

88%

Under 4.5

1.14

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

52%

BTTS Yes

1.93

48%

BTTS No

2.07

Clean Sheet

21%

RWDM

4.67

34%

Patro Eisden

2.92

Win to Nil

6%

RWDM

17.70

16%

Patro Eisden

6.07

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.3 11.3 8.7 4.5 1.7 0.5
1 7.9 12.1 9.3 4.8 1.8 0.6
2 4.2 6.5 5.0 2.6 1.0 0.3
3 1.5 2.3 1.8 0.9 0.4 0.1
4 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.073
λ Away (xG) 1.542
Total xG 2.615
League avg home goals 1.352
League avg away goals 1.352
RWDM attack strength 0.998
RWDM defence strength 1.306
Patro Eisden attack strength 0.873
Patro Eisden defence strength 0.795
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 48 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.7%.

How many goals are RWDM and Patro Eisden expected to score?

The model projects 1.07 expected goals for RWDM and 1.54 for Patro Eisden, a combined total of 2.62.

How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 48%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

RWDM come into this having played 50 games, going 24W 11D 15L for 1.66 points per game. Their last five reads D-D-W-L-L. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, Patro Eisden sit at 1.76 PPG from 50 outings (25W 13D 12L), a run that reads D-W-L-D-W across their last five. The sample for Patro Eisden is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.66 PPG for RWDM against 1.76 for Patro Eisden. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

RWDM's home form reads 13W 4D 7L across 24 games on their own ground, a 1.79 PPG return.

Away from home, Patro Eisden have taken 1.67 points per game from 24 outings (11W 7D 6L).

Scoring & Defensive Trends

RWDM are averaging 1.58 goals scored and 1.22 conceded per game recently; Patro Eisden are on 1.56 scored and 1.06 conceded.

Last 50 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

RWDM

RWDM

Blended
D D W L L
Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

Blended
D W L D W
50 Played 50
24/11/15 W / D / L 25/13/12
1.66 Points Per Game 1.76
1.58 Avg Goals Scored 1.56
1.22 Avg Goals Conceded 1.06
2.80 Avg Goals / Game 2.62
17 Clean Sheets 17
25 BTTS 27
26 Over 2.5 Games 24
RWDM

RWDM

L
A Seraing United
1–3 HT 1–1
16 Jan
L
H Liège
0–3 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Dec
D
H Olympic Charleroi
3–3 HT 1–1
13 Dec
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 1–1
06 Dec
L
H Francs Borains
1–3 HT 1–0
29 Nov
L
A Patro Eisden
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Beerschot VA
0–1 HT 0–0
09 Nov
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Nov
L
A Liège
3–4 HT 2–3
25 Oct
W
H Club Brugge II
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Oct
D
A AS Eupen
2–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
W
A KAA Gent II
2–0 HT 2–0
28 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
1–2 HT 0–2
24 Sep
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–2 HT 0–0
19 Sep
W
H Seraing United
5–0 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
H SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–0
23 Aug
W
A Lokeren-Temse
3–1 HT 2–0
16 Aug
D
H Lommel United
3–3 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
H Lokeren-Temse
3–2 HT 1–0
27 Apr
L
A Lokeren-Temse
0–2 HT 0–2
24 Apr
L
A Zulte Waregem
1–2 HT 0–1
18 Apr
L
H Lommel United
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Apr
D
A Patro Eisden
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Apr
W
H Seraing United
3–0 HT 2–0
28 Mar
W
A SK Beveren
2–0 HT 2–0
14 Mar
W
H Lokeren-Temse
1–0 HT 1–0
09 Mar
W
H Francs Borains
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Feb
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Feb
D
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
W
H KRC Genk II
1–0 HT 1–0
24 Jan
W
A AS Eupen
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Jan
W
H Liège
2–1 HT 0–0
11 Jan
D
A RAAL La Louvière
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Dec
W
H Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 1–0
15 Dec
W
A Lokeren-Temse
4–1 HT 1–1
08 Dec
D
A Seraing United
4–4 HT 1–1
01 Dec
L
H SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–2
23 Nov
L
A Liège
1–2 HT 1–1
08 Nov
W
H Zulte Waregem
2–1 HT 1–1
01 Nov
W
H Deinze
3–2 HT 2–1
26 Oct
L
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–2 HT 1–0
20 Oct
D
H RAAL La Louvière
1–1 HT 1–0
05 Oct
W
A Francs Borains
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Sep
W
A KRC Genk II
3–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H AS Eupen
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Aug
W
A Lommel United
2–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
D
H Patro Eisden
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Aug
Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden

W
H Kortrijk
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Jan
D
A Lokeren-Temse
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Dec
L
H AS Eupen
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
A Beerschot VA
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Dec
D
A Olympic Charleroi
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H KAA Gent II
2–1 HT 0–0
29 Nov
W
H RWDM
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
A Kortrijk
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Nov
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Nov
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Oct
D
H Seraing United
2–2 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 0–1
04 Oct
W
A KRC Genk II
4–1 HT 4–1
26 Sep
D
A AS Eupen
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Sep
L
H Lommel United
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
A Liège
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Aug
W
H Club Brugge II
2–1 HT 1–0
22 Aug
L
A Francs Borains
0–2 HT 0–1
15 Aug
W
H Lokeren-Temse
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Cercle Brugge
1–3 HT 0–2
23 May
L
H Cercle Brugge
1–5 HT 0–2
18 May
D
H Lokeren-Temse
1–1 HT 1–1
11 May
W
A Lokeren-Temse
2–1 HT 1–0
03 May
W
A SK Beveren
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
H SK Beveren
3–2 HT 2–1
24 Apr
W
H AS Eupen
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
L
A K. Lierse S.K.
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Apr
D
H RWDM
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
A Liège
2–2 HT 1–1
30 Mar
W
A Lommel United
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H SK Beveren
1–2 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
A Club Brugge II
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
H RAAL La Louvière
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Feb
W
H KRC Genk II
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
A Francs Borains
3–1 HT 2–1
02 Feb
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Jan
W
H Lokeren-Temse
4–1 HT 3–1
17 Jan
L
A Zulte Waregem
2–3 HT 1–0
11 Jan
L
H Seraing United
2–3 HT 1–1
22 Dec
W
A KRC Genk II
3–1 HT 1–1
15 Dec
W
H Lommel United
4–0 HT 1–0
08 Dec
D
A SK Beveren
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Nov
W
H Liège
2–0 HT 1–0
24 Nov
W
A AS Eupen
4–0 HT 1–0
10 Nov
D
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
D
A Seraing United
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Oct
L
H Zulte Waregem
0–1 HT 0–1
20 Oct
W
H Deinze
3–1 HT 2–0
04 Oct
W
A RAAL La Louvière
2–0 HT 2–0
29 Sep
W
H Francs Borains
4–1 HT 2–0
21 Sep

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in coming into this match?

RWDM have gone 24W 11D 15L in their last 50 games (1.66 PPG), while Patro Eisden have gone 25W 13D 12L in their last 50 (1.76 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or Patro Eisden away?

RWDM's home record (1.79 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 1.79 PPG; Patro Eisden away: 1.67 PPG.

Have RWDM or Patro Eisden been keeping clean sheets recently?

RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 34% of their recent games, Patro Eisden in 34%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 4 times since August 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 24 January 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

There's a clear current trend here: Patro Eisden have taken the last 2 head-to-head results.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, RWDM have gone 0W 1D 1L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Patro Eisden — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

RWDM

0

RWDM

2

Draws

Patro Eisden

2

Patro Eisden

Recent Meetings

RWDM
2–4
24 Jan 26
Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden
1–0
23 Nov 25
RWDM
Patro Eisden
1–1
04 Apr 25
RWDM
RWDM
1–1
17 Aug 24
Patro Eisden

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Patro Eisden?

From 4 meetings on record, RWDM have won 0, Patro Eisden have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.

When did RWDM and Patro Eisden last play each other?

They last met on 24 January 2026, when RWDM 2-4 Patro Eisden.

Who has won more matches between RWDM and Patro Eisden?

Patro Eisden have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 79% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 54% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Patro Eisden are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 42% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 46%, Patro Eisden 46% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 54% (RWDM) and 42% (Patro Eisden).

On the defensive side: RWDM keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches; Patro Eisden in 42%; Patro Eisden in 29%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = RWDM home games / Patro Eisden away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

RWDM RWDM Blended
Metric All
(50 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/50
(72%)
19/24
(79.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/50
(42%)
7/24
(29.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/14
(85.7%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/14
(42.9%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 18/50
(36%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/50
(10%)
4/24
(16.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/50
(2%)
0/24
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 25/50
(50%)
11/24
(45.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 26/50
(52%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/50
(28%)
7/24
(29.2%)
Clean Sheet 17/50
(34%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 10/50
(20%)
5/24
(20.8%)
Patro Eisden Patro Eisden Blended
Metric All
(50 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 32/50
(64%)
17/24
(70.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 15/50
(30%)
7/24
(29.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/18
(72.2%)
3/7
(42.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/18
(33.3%)
1/7
(14.3%)
Winning at HT 19/50
(38%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/50
(8%)
3/24
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/50
(2%)
0/24
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 27/50
(54%)
11/24
(45.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 24/50
(48%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/50
(32%)
7/24
(29.2%)
Clean Sheet 17/50
(34%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Failed to Score 11/50
(22%)
7/24
(29.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when RWDM play Patro Eisden?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 46% of RWDM's recent matches and 46% of Patro Eisden's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is RWDM vs Patro Eisden usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 54% of RWDM's recent games and 42% of Patro Eisden's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do RWDM and Patro Eisden tend to score early?

RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 79% of their recent matches, Patro Eisden in 71% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Patro Eisden cruise to a comfortable 2-4 victory over RWDM.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat RWDM 2-4 at Edmond Machtens Stadium, Regular Season - 21, in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.07 xG and Patro Eisden 1.54 xG, a combined 2.62. The scoreboard read 2-4 for 6 actual goals. RWDM beat their projection by 0.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Patro Eisden outscored their 1.54 projection by 2.5. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 1.00 / defence 1.31 against Patro Eisden attack 0.87 / defence 0.80, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RWDM 26% | Draw 25% | Patro Eisden 48%, with Patro Eisden to win its most likely call at 48%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 6, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 74% and landed. Over 3.5 was 27% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 52% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 52%, Patro Eisden 48%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RWDM's trading profile (50 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Patro Eisden's trading profile (50 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — RWDM 1.66 PPG, Patro Eisden 1.76 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Patro Eisden win broke the near-deadlock. RWDM (home/away splits) shipped 4 against a 1.21 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.42 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 2 against a 0.92 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 49% Over 2.5 probability, but 6 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 52% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 50% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.