Sign in Register

RWDM 1-1 KRC Genk II – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 6

Kick-off

Sat 17 Sep 2022

19:00

Venue

Edmond Machtens-Stadion

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates RWDM at 53%, yet other data sources diverge — this RWDM vs KRC Genk II fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Challenger Pro League clash, Regular Season - 6 as RWDM welcome KRC Genk II to Edmond Machtens-Stadion. Kick-off is set for Saturday 17 September 2022 at 19:00 UTC.

Form Guide

RWDM — All Games: 3W 4D 3L from 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season, averaging 1.30 points per game. Last five: D W L D W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. RWDM have played only a handful of Challenger Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

RWDM's form when playing at home: 7W 1D 2L across 10 games at Edmond Machtens-Stadion this term (2.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Edmond Machtens-Stadion. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.30 — RWDM are significantly better at Edmond Machtens-Stadion than their overall form suggests.

Across all Challenger Pro League games this season, KRC Genk II have recorded 1W 1D 3L from 5 outings — 0.80 PPG. Last five: W L L D L. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 2.00. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. KRC Genk II have played only a handful of Challenger Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

On current form, RWDM have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (1.30 vs 0.80) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

In-Play Profile

RWDM in-play tendencies (5 games): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures; when trailing at the break they recover to draw or win in 40% of cases; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games.

KRC Genk II in-play tendencies (5 games): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 80% of games; Over 3.5 in 60%; they fail to score in 40% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — RWDM 80% and KRC Genk II 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (RWDM 60% | KRC Genk II 80%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.97 xG and KRC Genk II 1.27 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 1.133 / defence 0.857 | KRC Genk II attack 0.935 / defence 1.381. League average goals — home 1.256 / away 1.584. KRC Genk II bring a strong defensive rating of 1.381 — this is suppressing RWDM's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 33 RWDM games / 5 KRC Genk II games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RWDM 53% | Draw 22% | KRC Genk II 24%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 1.89 | Draw 4.55 | KRC Genk II 4.17. RWDM hold a narrow Poisson edge at 53% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.23. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.23 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.97 / 1.27) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, RWDM are the pick at 53% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 22% draw probability, Draw No Bet on RWDM offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 3.23 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 62%. Form rates are neutral: RWDM 30% | KRC Genk II 60%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form RWDM lead on PPG: 1.30 vs 0.80 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form RWDM Poisson xG (1.97) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.60) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form KRC Genk II Poisson xG (1.27) is below their form scoring rate (1.60) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour RWDM — RWDM at 53% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RWDM vs KRC Genk II | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 6 | Venue: Edmond Machtens-Stadion • Kick-off: Saturday 17 Sep 2022, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 53% | Draw 22% | KRC Genk II 24% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 62% | xG RWDM 1.97 / KRC Genk II 1.27 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 1.133 / def 0.857 | KRC Genk II attack 0.935 / def 1.381 | league avg home 1.256 / away 1.584 • Poisson stance: RWDM (53%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.97

RWDM xG

Expected Goals

1.27

KRC Genk II xG

53%
22%
24%
RWDM Draw KRC Genk II

62%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

40%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RWDM vs KRC Genk II kick off?

RWDM vs KRC Genk II kicked off at 19:00 on Saturday 17 September 2022 at Edmond Machtens-Stadion.

What was the final score in RWDM vs KRC Genk II?

RWDM 1 - 1 KRC Genk II.

Where is RWDM vs KRC Genk II being played?

The match is being played at Edmond Machtens-Stadion.

What competition is RWDM vs KRC Genk II part of?

RWDM vs KRC Genk II is a Regular Season - 6 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win RWDM vs KRC Genk II?

Our statistical model gives RWDM a 53% chance of winning, KRC Genk II a 24% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.

Will both teams score in RWDM vs KRC Genk II?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both RWDM and KRC Genk II will score (BTTS).

Will RWDM vs KRC Genk II have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and KRC Genk II?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are RWDM and KRC Genk II in?

RWDM (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-D-W. KRC Genk II (all comps): 1W-1D-3L in 5 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 2.00 | L5 W-L-L-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from RWDM's attack rating (1.13) and KRC Genk II's defence rating (1.38), the model arrives at 1.97 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, KRC Genk II's attack versus RWDM's defence, projects 1.27 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 33/5 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.1%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.7%), 2-0 (7.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

RWDM Win

53%

RWDM

1.87

22%

Draw

4.47

24%

KRC Genk II

4.12

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

9.8%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

1 – 0

7.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.97

RWDM xG

Total xG

3.23

1.27

KRC Genk II xG

53%
22%
24%
RWDMDrawKRC Genk II

1.87

53%

Home win

4.47

22%

Draw

4.12

24%

Away win

Goals Markets

83%

Over 1.5

1.20

17%

Under 1.5

5.88

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.61

38%

BTTS No

2.64

Clean Sheet

28%

RWDM

3.56

14%

KRC Genk II

7.13

Win to Nil

15%

RWDM

6.67

3%

KRC Genk II

29.40

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 5.0 3.2 1.3 0.4 0.1
1 7.7 9.8 6.2 2.6 0.8 0.2
2 7.6 9.7 6.1 2.6 0.8 0.2
3 5.0 6.3 4.0 1.7 0.5 0.1
4 2.4 3.1 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.1
5 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.965
λ Away (xG) 1.269
Total xG 3.234
League avg home goals 1.256
League avg away goals 1.584
RWDM attack strength 1.133
RWDM defence strength 0.857
KRC Genk II attack strength 0.935
KRC Genk II defence strength 1.381
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 33 / 5

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs KRC Genk II?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.1%.

How many goals are RWDM and KRC Genk II expected to score?

The model projects 1.97 expected goals for RWDM and 1.27 for KRC Genk II, a combined total of 3.23.

How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs KRC Genk II?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 53%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

RWDM come into this having played 5 games, going 2W 2D 1L for 1.60 points per game. Their last five reads D-W-L-D-W. It's still early in the season for RWDM, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

On the other side, KRC Genk II sit at 0.80 PPG from 5 outings (1W 1D 3L), a run that reads W-L-L-D-L across their last five. It's still early in the season for KRC Genk II, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

RWDM carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.80 PPG clear of KRC Genk II — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

The Goals Picture

RWDM are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game recently; KRC Genk II are on 1.60 scored and 2.00 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: RWDM have seen both teams score in 80% of their recent games; KRC Genk II in 60%.

Last 5 Results — Challenger Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

RWDM

RWDM

Early Season
D W L D W
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

Early Season
W L L D L
5 Played 5
2/2/1 W / D / L 1/1/3
1.60 Points Per Game 0.80
1.40 Avg Goals Scored 1.60
1.20 Avg Goals Conceded 2.00
2.60 Avg Goals / Game 3.60
1 Clean Sheets 0
4 BTTS 3
3 Over 2.5 Games 4
RWDM

RWDM

W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Sep
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Aug
W
H Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
A Excelsior Virton
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug
KRC Genk II

KRC Genk II

L
H Excelsior Virton
0–1 HT 0–0
11 Sep
D
A Standard Liège II
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Sep
L
H Lommel United
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Aug
L
A Deinze
2–3 HT 1–1
19 Aug
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
4–1 HT 1–1
14 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are RWDM and KRC Genk II in coming into this match?

RWDM have gone 2W 2D 1L in their last 5 games (1.60 PPG), while KRC Genk II have gone 1W 1D 3L in their last 5 (0.80 PPG).

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between RWDM and KRC Genk II runs to 6 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to September 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. They last met on 27 January 2026, roughly 6 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The biggest gap between the sides came on 21 Sep 2024, when RWDM won 0-3 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

RWDM's record when hosting KRC Genk II specifically: 1W 2D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

RWDM

3

RWDM

2

Draws

KRC Genk II

1

KRC Genk II

Recent Meetings

KRC Genk II
0–2
27 Jan 26
RWDM
RWDM
1–1
01 Nov 25
KRC Genk II
RWDM
1–0
24 Jan 25
KRC Genk II
KRC Genk II
0–3
21 Sep 24
RWDM
KRC Genk II
2–0
25 Nov 22
RWDM
RWDM
1–1
17 Sep 22
KRC Genk II

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and KRC Genk II?

From 6 meetings on record, RWDM have won 3, KRC Genk II have won 1, and 2 have been drawn.

When did RWDM and KRC Genk II last play each other?

They last met on 27 January 2026, when KRC Genk II 0-2 RWDM.

Who has won more matches between RWDM and KRC Genk II?

RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 40% of those situations.

KRC Genk II are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — RWDM at 80%, KRC Genk II at 60%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 60% for RWDM and 80% for KRC Genk II. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 20% and 60% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: KRC Genk II in 40%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = RWDM home games / KRC Genk II away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

RWDM RWDM Early Season
Metric All
(5 games)
Venue
(2 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 4/5
(80%)
2/2
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 1/1
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/1
(100%)
β€”
Winning at HT 1/5
(20%)
1/2
(50%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/5
(40%)
1/2
(50%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 4/5
(80%)
1/2
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 3/5
(60%)
1/2
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 1/5
(20%)
1/2
(50%)
Clean Sheet 1/5
(20%)
1/2
(50%)
Failed to Score 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
KRC Genk II KRC Genk II Early Season
Metric All
(5 games)
Venue
(2 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 4/5
(80%)
2/2
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 3/5
(60%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 1/1
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Winning at HT 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/5
(20%)
1/2
(50%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 3/5
(60%)
2/2
(100%)
Over 2.5 Goals 4/5
(80%)
2/2
(100%)
Over 3.5 Goals 3/5
(60%)
2/2
(100%)
Clean Sheet 0/5
(0%)
0/2
(0%)
Failed to Score 2/5
(40%)
0/2
(0%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when RWDM play KRC Genk II?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 80% of RWDM's games and 60% of KRC Genk II's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is RWDM vs KRC Genk II usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% of RWDM's matches and 80% of KRC Genk II's.

Do RWDM and KRC Genk II tend to score early?

RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, KRC Genk II in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

RWDM and KRC Genk II share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RWDM and KRC Genk II finished level at 1-1 at Edmond Machtens-Stadion, Regular Season - 6, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.97 xG and KRC Genk II 1.27 xG, a combined 3.23. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. RWDM fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 1.13 / defence 0.86 against KRC Genk II attack 0.94 / defence 1.38, drawn from 33/5 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RWDM 53% | Draw 22% | KRC Genk II 24%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 53%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 40% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 70% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 60%, KRC Genk II 80%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 70%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RWDM's trading profile (5 games) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 80% of their matches — today it did.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (5 games) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.60 PPG against 0.80. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. KRC Genk II conceded 1 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 63% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 62% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 70% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.